Low-carb diet deemed safe over short term

[Guest guest]

Low-carb diet deemed safe over short term

Last Updated: 2002-10-21 11:25:16 -0400 (Reuters Health)

By Alison McCook

PHILADELPHIA (Reuters Health) - People who follow a low-carbohydrate,

high-protein diet for 6 months may lose more weight than those on a standard

low-fat diet, and they appear to experience no cardiovascular problems as a

result.

However, study author Dr. Bonnie J. Brehm of the University of Cincinnati in

Ohio told Reuters Health that despite the apparent short-term benefits of

the low-carbohydrate, high-protein (LCHP) diet, this option may not be

healthy in the long run.

Following the diet for 3 or 4 months may be fine, Brehm said. " But

long-term? We don't know, " she added.

One example of a LCHP diet is the Atkins Diet, which first gained popularity

during the 1970s. Limited evidence suggests it may help people lose weight,

but many experts remain concerned about the long-term health effects of the

diet, which can contain high levels of fat and cholesterol.

The current study is based on results from 53 obese women, half of whom were

asked to follow the LCHP diet, in which less than 10% of their calories came

from carbohydrates. The rest of the women followed a standard low-fat diet,

in which fat made up only 30% of their total calories. Both groups consumed

the same number of calories each day.

After 6 months, Brehm and her colleagues found that women on the LCHP diet

lost 10 more pounds of body weight and 6 more pounds of body fat than did

those following the low-fat diet. Blood pressure and blood sugar

levels--which can indicate increased risk for cardiovascular disease--were

within normal ranges for both groups.

However, as the authors reported here on Sunday at the 85th Annual Meeting

of the American Dietetic Association (ADA), those on the LCHP diet ate less

carbohydrate and fiber and more protein, fat and cholesterol than did the

low-fat diet followers. The ADA is a professional organization representing

the nation's licensed nutritionists and dietitians.

So why did a seemingly unhealthy diet not affect indicators of

cardiovascular risk? In an interview with Reuters Health, Brehm suggested

that the benefits of losing more weight may offset the disadvantages

associated with high fat and cholesterol. " Perhaps it's weight loss that

causes the positive results (in cardiovascular risk factors)...and it isn't

dependent on the diet, " she said.

Although the LCHP diet helped dieters shed more pounds than the low-fat

regimen, Brehm cautioned that much more research is needed before consumers

can consider this program to be safe and effective. " More research does need

to be done before I think you can make any kind of recommendation as to what

you should follow, " she said.

The study was supported by funds from the American Heart Association.

In an interview with Reuters Health, Dr. Meir Stampfer of Harvard University

said that the current study was well conducted, but he agreed that 6 months

is not long enough to determine if the LCHP diet is safe over the long term.

However, he added that low-fat diets are often unsatisfying for dieters,

because many carbohydrates--a common source of low-fat foods--cause a rapid

rise and fall of blood sugar, leaving eaters hungrier sooner than after

eating protein and other foods with the same number of calories.

But the alternative does not have to be diets that are high in protein and

fats, he added. Rather, Stampfer said that he recommends that people follow

a reasonable diet, consisting of moderate levels of protein and fat.

http://www.reutershealth.com/archive/2002/10/21/eline/links/20021021elin019.

html