Re: Water Filters (Was: Want to see a picture of fluorosis?)

[Guest guest]

RAdiant Life (888-593-8333) has a filter that gets it all out but it is expensive, around $1000. Sally

[Guest guest]

Hi Daphne,

If you are interested, I could send you our water information packet, which describes what is probably the most advanced, thorough, and yet affordable water system on the market. It takes out the fluoride as well as 99.999% of the other toxins. I don't know of any other system that can do this, and if anyone knows of such I'd like to hear about it.

Cheers,

----- Original Message -----

From: Daphne Blumenthal

Sent: 8/14/2001 12:45:12 PM

Subject: Water Filters (Was: Want to see a picture of fluorosis?)

Hello,

I have a Terra Flow counter top filter but I don't believe it gets

the flouride out. I would like to invest in a better water filter.

Suggestions?

Thanks,

D

[Guest guest]

I use the large one from AMWAY (large, under-the-counter - it is the only

one they have). It came out " best " in my research of some 30-40 filter

characteristics.

I tried to find a fluoride filter too for my whole-house water filter. I

found out that there are such filters made but apparently the filters

really weren't that effective - binding the fluoride and then maybe leaking

some other (bad) things (the chemical used to " pull " out the fluoride)

together with some of the fluoride, etc. In other words, the maker thought

the filters they were selling were not working as expected and probably

have pulled them from the market by now. In my research for under-counter

and above-counter filters I did not find one that would actively filter out

the fluoride to an acceptable level. " It ain't easy " , apparently, to

filter out fluoride (or whatever actually arrives at the tap).

The only recourse I could find was to join in any community action to

reduce, limit or remove fluoride from the drinking water (remove it from

the source is the best way).

Regards,

-=mark=-

At 12:42 PM 8/14/01 -0700, you wrote:

>Hello,

>

>I have a Terra Flow counter top filter but I don't believe it gets

>the flouride out. I would like to invest in a better water filter.

>Suggestions?

>

>Thanks,

>D

>

>

[Guest guest]

The 7 stage purifier we (Radiant Life) carry costs $795. Stages 8 & 9, which take care of energetic purification through homeopathic restructuring & far-infrared reprogramming. (These stages remove the memory of toxins in the water, which homeopathic principles tell us are present even when the physical toxins are gone.) Stages 8 & 9 are optional, and can be added for $200 at any time.

Virtually all other reverse osmosis-based systems use just one purifier stage and thus get out maybe 90-95% of what's in the water when brand new, and then fall to as low as 80% after a year, because that is what happens to all RO membranes over time. We have found a way to address this problem, however. Besides carbon pre- and post- carbon filters, our 7 stage system incorporates 3 purifiers (1 reverse osmosis and 2 deionization stages) and each takes out 90% of what the one before it missed. So when brand new, it gets out 99.999% of everything in the water, and after one year it has dropped in efficiency only a tiny bit, to 99.998%. It has a lifetime warranty and uses incredible components, such as a 3-year warranteed RO membrane, a stainless steel ultraviolet light, and solid housings among others. So far we have not found another water !

system like this in all our research.

Considering the quality and power of the system, it is actually quite amazing that it is available for this price. It was developed by a water researcher whose focus has been to create the very best, most biocompatible water; not to make a killing. Others do sell it for twice our price in some parts of the country, though. With respect to water purification it has never been more true that you get what you pay for. We feel strongly that given the very toxic state of most water today, and given the importance of good water in our (80% water) bodies, a good water system is one of the best investments one can make, and will pay for itself in robust health many times over.

Forgive me for promoting here but I wanted to say a little about the value of this system compared to its cost. I am very passionate about good water (we call it "biocompatible" water) - and have found such water to be very hard to come by today. I have just scratched the surface here, and can explain much more on the phone and through our literature.

Cheers,

radiantlife@...

[Guest guest]

Hi Daphne,

If you are interested, I could send you our water information packet, which

describes what is probably the most advanced, thorough, and yet affordable water

system on the market. It takes out the fluoride as well as 99.999% of the

other toxins. I don't know of any other system that can do this, and if

anyone knows of such I'd like to hear about it.

Cheers,

----- Original Message -----

From: Daphne

Blumenthal

Sent: 8/14/2001 12:45:12 PM

Subject: Water Filters

(Was: Want to see a picture of fluorosis?)

Hello,

I have a Terra Flow counter top filter but I don't believe it gets

the flouride out. I would like to invest in a better water

filter.

Suggestions?

Thanks,

D

[Guest guest]

Hi, ,

What type/brand of water filter do you sell and what is the price

range? Is it a whole house filter or single faucet?

ine

[Guest guest]

Hi,

I would love some info on this, I was just saying to my husband tonight that

it was time for a new system. the filter we have now is just about used up.

Can you email or give me a web address for the info or do you need my

mailing address? Thanks,

-----Original Message-----

Hi Daphne,

If you are interested, I could send you our water information packet,

which

describes what is probably the most advanced, thorough, and yet affordable

water

system on the market. It takes out the fluoride as well as 99.999% of the

other toxins. I don't know of any other system that can do this, and if

anyone knows of such I'd like to hear about it.

Cheers,

[Guest guest]

,

You can send your snail mail address to me at radiantlife@... and

I'll send you our water packet; that's where we have the most complete

info.

Cheers,

> [Original Message]

> From: Baldwin <jbaldwin@...>

> < >

> Date: 10/31/2001 5:45:43 PM

> Subject: RE: Water Filters (Was: Want to see a picture

of fluorosis?)

>

> Hi,

>

> I would love some info on this, I was just saying to my husband tonight

that

> it was time for a new system. the filter we have now is just about used

up.

> Can you email or give me a web address for the info or do you need my

> mailing address? Thanks,

> -----Original Message-----

>

>

> Hi Daphne,

>

>

>

> If you are interested, I could send you our water information packet,

> which

> describes what is probably the most advanced, thorough, and yet

affordable

> water

> system on the market. It takes out the fluoride as well as 99.999% of

the

> other toxins. I don't know of any other system that can do this, and if

> anyone knows of such I'd like to hear about it.

>

>

>

> Cheers,

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Chris:

Is your water filter a Reverse Osmosis system?

Shalom!

Carol in SE Illinois

[Guest guest]

Hi Carol,

Our system is a reverse osmosis system but calling it that doesn't do it

justice. We call this system a 7-stage triple purifier, meaning that in

addition to the reverse osmosis membrane there are two more purifiers

(deionization media) which ensure that the water is always at least 99.9%

pure. (There is no other way to get all the impurities out of water except

to purify it several times in sequence and regular RO units can't do this.)

To some all this may seem excessive, but when you really understand

biocompatible water and how important it is for health and regeneration,

other water systems seem merely inadequate.

There is so much amazing info about how to create biocompatible,

super-hydrating and regenerating water, that we are working on a 60 min. CD

to explain it all....

Cheers,

> [Original Message]

> From: Carol <cdentons@...>

> < >

> Date: 11/5/2001 8:16:26 PM

> Subject: Re: Water Filters (Was: Want to see a picture

of fluorosis?)

>

> Chris:

>

> Is your water filter a Reverse Osmosis system?

>

> Shalom!

>

> Carol in SE Illinois

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

..

Just to clarify, I am not changing my views on minerals in water and there is

no difference in mineral ions in water that come from rocks or mineral ions

that have been in living things. When we talked, the inventor of this filter

could not explain any difference and agreed with the above statement. If you

are using a filter that takes them all the minerals out of water, and are

relying on water for your liquids, then you need to put them in again.

What the filtered water should be used for is making broth and

lacto-fermented beverages and this is what we should drink.

Mineral waters have been valued for ages as restorative to health. Sally

[Guest guest]

Doesn't this also take out all the good minerals in the water also?

----- Original Message -----

From: Cogswell

Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 11:21 AM

Subject: Re: Water Filters (Was: Want to see a picture of

fluorosis?)

Hi Carol,

Our system is a reverse osmosis system but calling it that doesn't do it

justice. We call this system a 7-stage triple purifier, meaning that in

addition to the reverse osmosis membrane there are two more purifiers

(deionization media) which ensure that the water is always at least 99.9%

pure. (There is no other way to get all the impurities out of water except

to purify it several times in sequence and regular RO units can't do this.)

To some all this may seem excessive, but when you really understand

biocompatible water and how important it is for health and regeneration,

other water systems seem merely inadequate.

There is so much amazing info about how to create biocompatible,

super-hydrating and regenerating water, that we are working on a 60 min. CD

to explain it all....

Cheers,

> [Original Message]

> From: Carol <cdentons@...>

> < >

> Date: 11/5/2001 8:16:26 PM

> Subject: Re: Water Filters (Was: Want to see a picture

of fluorosis?)

>

> Chris:

>

> Is your water filter a Reverse Osmosis system?

>

> Shalom!

>

> Carol in SE Illinois

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Hi Carol,

There are a lot of misconceptions about the issue of minerals in water. We

believe the evidence strongly suggests that inorganic minerals in water

(those that haven't been a part of a living thing) are not only not an aid

to health, but are actually a liability, plaquing up arteries, calcifying

joints, causing kidney and gall stones, and preventing full hydration,

which can cause lots of problems. Last time I heard, Sally was changing

her views on water expressed in NT because she has come to feel that for

optimal health, the evidence supports removing the minerals in tap and

spring waters (as well as the toxins of course).

I had a dramatic personal experience that drove home the importance of

demineralized, restructured water for me almost 2 years ago. We had moved

to a beautiful little valley in west Marin county north of San Francisco

and learned that our water was supplied by a spring on a hill, which filled

a cistern and then flowed down to the house. This water was very sweet and

we knew it was uncontaminated as there are no and have never been any

industries out here, and are no cities to our west (10 miles to the ocean).

We thought it would be great to drink clean water directly from mother

earth. We drank it for three weeks, giving up our beloved restructured RO

water. Going into our fourth week, my lips were chapped and my skin was

extremely dry - very unusual for me. My girlfriend Marie's lips were

extremely chapped as well, to the point of bleeding. I had to admit that

that water felt as if it were sitting like a rock in my stomach - I always

felt full after drinking it. After just a couple days with our regular

restructured RO water our lips and skin were back to normal, and it was a

pleasure to drink water again. It does appear that inorganic minerals

prevent water from being digested and assimilated to any degree of

efficiency, and I say this not just based on my own experience, but from

many others' experiences, and from the research I have done.

Many people report that they actually get really thirsty for a number of

months after drinking the restructured water we recommend. We believe this

is because their cells are actually hydrating and their body wants MORE!

Then an equilibrium is reached and people's thirst generally abates, at

least until they slack off on the water, then the thirst returns strongly.

A good sense of thirst is a healthy thing. We only lose our thirst when we

are seriously dehydrated, which unfortunately is the case with too many of

us.

We are not saying people should drink straight demineralized RO water

either - we recommend lowering the surface tension and adding a good source

of organic, ionic minerals which the body can easily assimilate.

Hope this helps,

[Guest guest]

Hi Sally,

It was not my intention to misrepresent you, and if I did, I apologize. I

was under the impression that while we agreed that the distinction

" organic " and " inorganic " minerals was technically inappropriate and

inaccurate, we also agreed that minerals which had once been a part of a

living thing were more assimilatable by our bodies and thus would be more

beneficial as a part of the water we drink, than other minerals. I thought

that the info I sent you about farmers and ranchers needing to feed their

animals significantly less minerals when they were in an " organic " * (having

been part of a living thing) form, was convincing, with the other info I

sent.... (*This is the term they used.)

It is my understanding that the mineral waters you are referring to have

inordinate amounts of minerals we are lacking, and/or have high

concentrations of minerals which have been part of a living thing. I agree

that we should use our purified water to make and drink as much of the

fermented drinks as possible.

Sally, I guess the main reason you have recommended that people consider

our (Dr. Higgins') RO system on this list and in other forums is because it

is extremely effective in removing the various toxins including fluoride,

and not because of the mineral issue. I did not realize that we were not

in agreement on the mineral question.

Since you are obviously someone who is moved by solid evidence and good

research, I will set to the task of assembling a compelling " smoking gun "

of proof that there -is- a difference between minerals that have been part

of a living thing, and those which have not. Will keep you posted. Anyone

else have evidence/info they would like to share on the subject?

Again, Sally, my apologies as I evidently and unknowingly misrepresented

you.

Cheers,

[Guest guest]

,

The minerals in water are in ionic form--it does not matter whether they came

from a rock or from a living thing, they look the same when they are ions.

Dennis agreed that this was true. By the way, cows will eat various mineral

powders, such as Azomite, and do very well on them. Sally

[Guest guest]

Dear Sally,

I have a growing file of references like these with respect to the

org./inorg. mineral discussion. It would appear that I am not alone in the

view that the org./inorg. distinction is valid. I think it would be very

worthwhile to settle this issue definitively because if I and the following

folks are wrong, then here is yet another fairly widespread myth to bust!

Two representative samples from my files follow. (These would not send in

their original form bec. they were in HTML format so I had to retype them -

hope there are no typos!)

#1) The following excerpt is from an article by Judith DeCava, familiar to

many, (author, researcher, and proponent of whole foods and whole food

supplements.)

Of Foods and Supplements

By Judith A. DeCava, C.C.N., L.N.C.

....From a nutritional viewpoint, mineral elements may appear in one or more

of four general forms: organic or inorganic, colloidal or crystalloidal.

An organic mineral is " in some chemical combination that is peculiar to the

reactions of a living cell " - it has been acted upon by plant or animal

life. Such a combined mineral may be either crystalloidal or colloidal.

For example, phytin in wheat bran is crystalloidal and lecithin in wheat

germ is colloidal, yet both carry organic phosphorus and magnesium.

An inorganic mineral is in a form before it has been acted upon by living

cells. Plants take inorganic mineral elements from the soil, water, and

air, and convert them into live organic elements. The most vital factors

in this conversion process are enzymes and the influence of the sun's rays

which generates chlorophyll. Inorganic mineral forms may be essential to

living cells of both of both plants and animals, but they are not live -

enzyme-active - and must be converted to organic forms.

Studies indicate that inorganic minerals can be taken into the body and

will serve a specific function. However, about 10 to 20 times more of them

are needed to get the same effect as from organic minerals. Taking large

quantities of inorganic minerals presents a " risk of overload " - of

upsetting the delicate metabolic balance and taxing the system (with

associated nutrients), utilize, or excrete the excess. Ferrous sulfate,

for example, is an inorganic source of iron most often prescribed for

iron-deficiency anemia. Black stools, nausea, heartburn, and constipation

or diarrhea are common effects since very little (about 5%) is absorbed and

it is irritating to the gastrointestinal tract. Iron in food complexes is

absorbed much easier without adverse effects, and is needed in much smaller

amounts.

A colloidal mineral is dispersed in some medium, often viscous. It may be

either organic or inorganic. The crystalloidal form is the " pure " mineral

substance, and will form crystals. To form colloidal minerals some other

substance must be present. The difference is in the molecular makeup; the

colloid molecule is composed of a group of perhaps 50,000 crystalloid

molecules. This is why it will not pass through a cell wall or other

organic membrane. When in unaltered foods, colloidal minerals can be

converted into smaller, usable components. " Colloidal mineral " supplements

are usually a mixture of clay and water - not a food.

Many colloids in living cells are proteins. In plants, mineral molecules

are attached to proteins. Raw milk contains a colloidal form of calcium

compound which is protein in nature.

Heat denatures proteins and destroys enzymes, so cooking destroys the

colloidal form of plant minerals, and pasteurization destroys the

availability of calcium from milk.

Minerals function in the body in numerous forms, so the " best " supplement

is a matter of controversy. Calcium lactate, for example, often produces

" spectacular results " in some symptoms of calcium deficiency (e.g. fever,

fever blisters, cramping) but may fail for some people or in other

situations. Associated nutrients may be needed (such as magnesium,

manganese, boron, vitamins A, C, D, or E, unsaturated fatty acids, etc.) or

another form of calcium. Food complexes always contain related,

cooperative nutrients. It is best to obtain nutrients from a variety of

food sources since individual foods differ in content....

****************************************************************************

*****

#2) The second is from a state level ag. publication.

Agricultural Publication G2081 - Revised 2/15/01

Mineral Supplements for Beef Cattle

Chad Hale and K.C. Olson

Department of Animal Sciences

(excerpted...)

Organic vs. inorganic mineral sources

.....The source of minerals in the diet can affect the performance of the

animals and the cost-effectiveness of the supplementation program. The

relative bioavailability of the mineral and the amount of the mineral in

the supplement are important factors to consider when purchasing a mineral

supplement. Organic mineral sources are characterized by the presence of

an amino acid or a carbohydrate carrier for the trace mineral that is to be

fed to cattle. In a process informally termed chelation or proteination,

the organic carrier molecule is chemically bound to the trace mineral of

interest. Inorganic sources of minerals are much more commonly encountered

in the North American feed industry. They are mined or chemically

synthesized from natural mineral sources and are not bonded to a carrier

molecule. They are fed as the naturlly occuring inorganic mineral complex.

Organic mineral sources reportedly have higher bioavailabilities than do

inorganic sources of minerals; however, chelated minerals are usually more

expensive than inorganic sources....

K.C. Olson is a State Beef Nutrition Specialist. Chad Hale is a graduate

research assistant in animal sciences.

****************************************************************************

*****

Both of these sources claim " organic " minerals are those that are

chelated/bound to an organic carrier molecule, be it protein or

carbohydrate. So according to them it would seem correct to say that there

is no difference in the actual mineral ions found in " organic " and

" inorganic " minerals, but it would be inaccurate to say that there is no

difference in their bioavailability/absorbability. To me, this

(bioavailability) is one of the main reasons for taking whole food

supplements and superfoods over synthetic or fractionated supplements....

Are these folks in disagreement with you or are we talking about a whole

different issue when it comes to minerals in water?

Finally, isn't Azomite a mineral deposit formed by crustaceans and other

once-living things, and thus would be an " organic " source?

Thanks in advance,

[Guest guest]

(This version will hopefully have spaces between paragraphs, as in the last

message they were cut out in transmission for some reason. If this comes

through again with no spaces, disregard it and I apologize on behalf of the

computer forces that be....)

Dear Sally,

I have a growing file of references like these with respect to the

org./inorg. mineral discussion. It would appear that I am not alone in the

view that the org./inorg. distinction is valid. I think it would be very

worthwhile to settle this issue definitively because if I and the following

folks are wrong, then here is yet another fairly widespread myth to bust!

Two representative samples from my files follow. (These would not send in

their original form bec. they were in HTML format so I had to retype them -

hope there are no typos!)

#1) The following excerpt is from an article by Judith DeCava, familiar to

many, (author, researcher, and proponent of whole foods and whole food

supplements.)

Of Foods and Supplements

By Judith A. DeCava, C.C.N., L.N.C.

....From a nutritional viewpoint, mineral elements may appear in one or more

of four general forms: organic or inorganic, colloidal or crystalloidal.

An organic mineral is " in some chemical combination that is peculiar to the

reactions of a living cell " - it has been acted upon by plant or animal

life. Such a combined mineral may be either crystalloidal or colloidal.

For example, phytin in wheat bran is crystalloidal and lecithin in wheat

germ is colloidal, yet both carry organic phosphorus and magnesium.

An inorganic mineral is in a form before it has been acted upon by living

cells. Plants take inorganic mineral elements from the soil, water, and

air, and convert them into live organic elements. The most vital factors

in this conversion process are enzymes and the influence of the sun's rays

which generates chlorophyll. Inorganic mineral forms may be essential to

living cells of both of both plants and animals, but they are not live -

enzyme-active - and must be converted to organic forms.

Studies indicate that inorganic minerals can be taken into the body and

will serve a specific function. However, about 10 to 20 times more of them

are needed to get the same effect as from organic minerals. Taking large

quantities of inorganic minerals presents a " risk of overload " - of

upsetting the delicate metabolic balance and taxing the system (with

associated nutrients), utilize, or excrete the excess. Ferrous sulfate,

for example, is an inorganic source of iron most often prescribed for

iron-deficiency anemia. Black stools, nausea, heartburn, and constipation

or diarrhea are common effects since very little (about 5%) is absorbed and

it is irritating to the gastrointestinal tract. Iron in food complexes is

absorbed much easier without adverse effects, and is needed in much smaller

amounts.

A colloidal mineral is dispersed in some medium, often viscous. It may be

either organic or inorganic. The crystalloidal form is the " pure " mineral

substance, and will form crystals. To form colloidal minerals some other

substance must be present. The difference is in the molecular makeup; the

colloid molecule is composed of a group of perhaps 50,000 crystalloid

molecules. This is why it will not pass through a cell wall or other

organic membrane. When in unaltered foods, colloidal minerals can be

converted into smaller, usable components. " Colloidal mineral " supplements

are usually a mixture of clay and water - not a food.

Many colloids in living cells are proteins. In plants, mineral molecules

are attached to proteins. Raw milk contains a colloidal form of calcium

compound which is protein in nature.

Heat denatures proteins and destroys enzymes, so cooking destroys the

colloidal form of plant minerals, and pasteurization destroys the

availability of calcium from milk.

Minerals function in the body in numerous forms, so the " best " supplement

is a matter of controversy. Calcium lactate, for example, often produces

" spectacular results " in some symptoms of calcium deficiency (e.g. fever,

fever blisters, cramping) but may fail for some people or in other

situations. Associated nutrients may be needed (such as magnesium,

manganese, boron, vitamins A, C, D, or E, unsaturated fatty acids, etc.) or

another form of calcium. Food complexes always contain related,

cooperative nutrients. It is best to obtain nutrients from a variety of

food sources since individual foods differ in content....

****************************************************************************

*****

#2) The second is from a state level ag. publication.

Agricultural Publication G2081 - Revised 2/15/01

Mineral Supplements for Beef Cattle

Chad Hale and K.C. Olson

Department of Animal Sciences

(excerpted...)

Organic vs. inorganic mineral sources

.....The source of minerals in the diet can affect the performance of the

animals and the cost-effectiveness of the supplementation program. The

relative bioavailability of the mineral and the amount of the mineral in

the supplement are important factors to consider when purchasing a mineral

supplement. Organic mineral sources are characterized by the presence of

an amino acid or a carbohydrate carrier for the trace mineral that is to be

fed to cattle. In a process informally termed chelation or proteination,

the organic carrier molecule is chemically bound to the trace mineral of

interest. Inorganic sources of minerals are much more commonly encountered

in the North American feed industry. They are mined or chemically

synthesized from natural mineral sources and are not bonded to a carrier

molecule. They are fed as the naturlly occuring inorganic mineral complex.

Organic mineral sources reportedly have higher bioavailabilities than do

inorganic sources of minerals; however, chelated minerals are usually more

expensive than inorganic sources....

K.C. Olson is a State Beef Nutrition Specialist. Chad Hale is a graduate

research assistant in animal sciences.

****************************************************************************

*****

Both of these sources claim " organic " minerals are those that are

chelated/bound to an organic carrier molecule, be it protein or

carbohydrate. So according to them it would seem correct to say that there

is no difference in the actual mineral ions found in " organic " and

" inorganic " minerals, but it would be inaccurate to say that there is no

difference in their bioavailability/absorbability. To me, this

(bioavailability) is one of the main reasons for taking whole food

supplements and superfoods over synthetic or fractionated supplements....

Are these folks in disagreement with you or are we talking about a whole

different issue when it comes to minerals in water?

Finally, isn't Azomite a mineral deposit formed by crustaceans and other

once-living things, and thus would be an " organic " source?

Thanks in advance,

[Guest guest]

Dear ,

First of all, read the section on minerals in NT. and I worked very

hard on this section. Also, read the section on water.

When minerals are dissolved in water, they are just that, dissolved into

mineral ions. It doesn't matter whether they were part of rock (or clay) or

of a living plant previously. Ions are ions.

Please be careful of Ms. De Cava. She makes lots of mistakes.

Please don't misunderstand me. I think Dennis' water filtration system is

wonderful. But it does take out all the minerals and if you are using water

as your main liquid, it would be wise to put some minerals back in--such as

Azomite, trace mineral drops, etc.

The minerals in plants are in chelated form. I know that the makers of

chelated mineral supplements claim that theirs work better than " inorganic "

minerals, but actually, it is difficult for the human body to get at these

minerals. they must be " unchelated " and reduced to mineral ions before the

body can absorb them. That is why it is so hard to get the minerals we need

from plant foods. Sally

[Guest guest]

Sally,

You got it! Will reread those sections and if I have questions or

continuing confusion I will contact you directly so as to not bore the

group.

Thanks,

[Guest guest]

Hi Daphne,

If you are interested, I could send you our water information packet, which

describes what is probably the most advanced, thorough, and yet affordable water

system on the market. It takes out the fluoride as well as 99.999% of the

other toxins. I don't know of any other system that can do this, and if

anyone knows of such I'd like to hear about it.

Cheers,

----- Original Message -----

From: Daphne

Blumenthal

Sent: 8/14/2001 12:45:12 PM

Subject: Water Filters

(Was: Want to see a picture of fluorosis?)

Hello,

I have a Terra Flow counter top filter but I don't believe it gets

the flouride out. I would like to invest in a better water

filter.

Suggestions?

Thanks,

D

[Guest guest]

Hi Daphne,

If you are interested, I could send you our water information packet, which

describes what is probably the most advanced, thorough, and yet affordable water

system on the market. It takes out the fluoride as well as 99.999% of the

other toxins. I don't know of any other system that can do this, and if

anyone knows of such I'd like to hear about it.

Cheers,

----- Original Message -----

From: Daphne

Blumenthal

Sent: 8/14/2001 12:45:12 PM

Subject: Water Filters

(Was: Want to see a picture of fluorosis?)

Hello,

I have a Terra Flow counter top filter but I don't believe it gets

the flouride out. I would like to invest in a better water

filter.

Suggestions?

Thanks,

D

[Guest guest]

Hi Daphne,

If you are interested, I could send you our water information packet, which

describes what is probably the most advanced, thorough, and yet affordable water

system on the market. It takes out the fluoride as well as 99.999% of the

other toxins. I don't know of any other system that can do this, and if

anyone knows of such I'd like to hear about it.

Cheers,

----- Original Message -----

From: Daphne

Blumenthal

Sent: 8/14/2001 12:45:12 PM

Subject: Water Filters

(Was: Want to see a picture of fluorosis?)

Hello,

I have a Terra Flow counter top filter but I don't believe it gets

the flouride out. I would like to invest in a better water

filter.

Suggestions?

Thanks,

D