Guest guest Posted April 9, 2008 Report Share Posted April 9, 2008 Hi Owen, I had not heard/read this expression before, but I believe your interpretation is correct. Good luck, ---- Comenzando con la auscultación es fundamental la determinacion de los ruidos cardiacos normalmente auscultables (1ero y 2do. Ruido), prácticamente el origen del primer ruido cardiaco esta en relación con el cierre de las válvulas auriculoventriculares izquierda y derecha, y el segundo ruido con en cierre de las semilunares (aortica y pulmonar), como regla practica **la identificación de los ruidos cardiacos será determinado con relación a los * silencios*, *ya* que entre el 1er y 2do ruido, el silencio es pequeño y entre el 2do ruido y el primero el silencio es mayor**, esta regla fácilmente entendible me permitirá determinar el cierre de las auriculoventriculares (1er ruido) y el cierre de las semilunares (2do ruido), solo por el espacio de tiempo entre ambos. Al determinar los ruidos cardiacos, también determino la fase del ciclo cardiaco, ya que entre el 1er ruido y el 2do ruido, tengo la sístole ventricular, y entre el 2do y el 1ro la diástole ventricular, de aquí es que tenemos esa diferencia en los * silencios*: *la* fase sistólica es de menor duración en tiempo que la fase de llenado ventricular (diástole). < http://www.fcv.unlp.edu.ar/sitios-catedras/5/material/Peq-Practico-2005-Charla_e\ xamen_fisico.doc > <http://www.asovepavalle.com/monotema2003cardioneumologia.doc> ===== 2008/4/9, Owen Beith : > > Hello all > > The patient's first and second heart sounds are normal, " R1 y R2 > normofoneticos " , then comes " silencios libres " . Does " silencios libres " > mean that no intervening sounds are detected? Would " no abnormal sounds > noted " be OK as a rendering? Any advice gratefully received. > > All the best > > Owen > > Owen Beith - Translations FR/SP/PT>EN > 70 Sewardstone Road, London E2 9JG > +44 (0) 20 8981 9879 > ----------- Cedeño Berrueta Traductor Público / Certified Legal Translator Caracas, Venezuela manceber@... mcedenoberrueta@... mcedenoberrueta@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 9, 2008 Report Share Posted April 9, 2008 Owen, Though Wikipedia might not be as relaible as we would like, check this URL: http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruido_card%C3%ADaco At the bottom, alter describing the normal heart sounds (“Ruidos cardíacos”) you will see a brief description of the " silencios " . I hope it helps… Regards, Lanús Delta Translations elanus@... _____ From: medical_translation [mailto:medical_translation ] On Behalf Of Owen Beith Sent: miércoles, 09 de abril de 2008 11:29 To: medical_translation Subject: ES(AR)>EN Silencios libres Hello all The patient's first and second heart sounds are normal, " R1 y R2 normofoneticos " , then comes " silencios libres " . Does " silencios libres " mean that no intervening sounds are detected? Would " no abnormal sounds noted " be OK as a rendering? Any advice gratefully received. All the best Owen Owen Beith - Translations FR/SP/PT>EN 70 Sewardstone Road, London E2 9JG +44 (0) 20 8981 9879 Alternative e-mail address: beithowenwaitrose (DOT) <mailto:beithowen%40waitrose.com> com (but ring and tell me). ********************************************************************* Read " Fighting The Banana Wars and Other Fairtrade Battles " by Harriet Lamb Visit http://www.fairtrad <http://www.fairtrade.org.uk/> e.org.uk/ -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.10/1367 - Release Date: 09/04/2008 07:10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 10, 2008 Report Share Posted April 10, 2008 Thanks a lot, . " En circunstancias anormales, estos silencios [pequeno y grande] pueden estar ocupados, hablando entonces de la existencia de un soplo cardiaco. " I can't find any referenced source or a specific rendering into English and as you say Wikipedia isn't always a friend but since what's being referred to here is the absence of significant information " no heart murmurs " seems a legitimate interpretation. All the best Owen At 14:13 09/04/2008 -0300, you wrote: > >Owen, > > > >Though Wikipedia might not be as relaible as we would like, check this URL: >http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruido_card%C3%ADaco > > > >At the bottom, alter describing the normal heart sounds (“Ruidos cardíacos”) >you will see a brief description of the " silencios " . > > > >I hope it helps… > > > >Regards, > > Lanús > >Delta Translations > >elanus@... > > > > > > _____ > >From: medical_translation >[mailto:medical_translation ] On Behalf Of Owen Beith >Sent: miércoles, 09 de abril de 2008 11:29 >To: medical_translation >Subject: ES(AR)>EN Silencios libres > > > >Hello all > >The patient's first and second heart sounds are normal, " R1 y R2 >normofoneticos " , then comes " silencios libres " . Does " silencios libres " >mean that no intervening sounds are detected? Would " no abnormal sounds >noted " be OK as a rendering? Any advice gratefully received. > >All the best > >Owen > >Owen Beith - Translations FR/SP/PT>EN >70 Sewardstone Road, London E2 9JG >+44 (0) 20 8981 9879 >Alternative e-mail address: beithowenwaitrose (DOT) ><mailto:beithowen%40waitrose.com> com (but ring and tell me). >********************************************************************* >Read " Fighting The Banana Wars and Other Fairtrade Battles " by Harriet Lamb >Visit http://www.fairtrad <http://www.fairtrade.org.uk/> e.org.uk/ > >-- >No virus found in this outgoing message. >Checked by AVG. >Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.10/1367 - Release Date: 09/04/2008 >07:10 > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.