Guest guest Posted January 9, 2004 Report Share Posted January 9, 2004 Could someone explain exactly how this works on the WD??? I thought skipping meals makes you more likely to gain weight? I've looked at the website and still don't understand it. What about losing muscle. Is it a good diet for a middle-aged female who doesn't work out whole lot? > When I tried the WD out of curiosity, I discovered that I could skip > meals, eat a potato, and eat less fat, without the low blood sugar > symptoms returning. Over Christmas in the middle of the day, I > grabbed about five cookies (SAD-type) that I ate all of them while > listening to my great uncle gripe about the government. To my > amazement, I experienced not a single low blood sugar symptom. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 9, 2004 Report Share Posted January 9, 2004 > >Could someone explain exactly how this works on the WD??? I thought >skipping meals makes you more likely to gain weight? I've looked at >the website and still don't understand it. What about losing >muscle. Is it a good diet for a middle-aged female who doesn't work >out whole lot? This was discussed to the point that it torqued some people off a few months ago. It is absolutely true that common sports knowledge says that skipping meals makes you gain weight and lose muscle, and I was doing a 5-meal-day plan for exactly that reason. However, I'm a middle aged female, and I lose fat on this diet. Not terribly quickly, but I feel a lot better and my clothes are a lot looser and my muscles are stronger (with or without exercise). Mainly it solved the hypoglycemic problems I'd dealt with for years. As for the theory ... the short explanation is: humans until very recently did not get food regularly, and we seem to be geared for NOT eating constantly, whatever the gurus say. The " losing muscle " theory came about from people being on long term low-cal diets, which makes the body feel it is in a time of scarcity. Pigging out every night does NOT make the body feel food is scarce, rather the opposite. I'd guess Ori's new book gets into the biochemistry of it, but I'm not sure anyone really understands how or why the feast/fast thing works so well. It's a new research thing that is just now coming to light. -- Heidi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 24, 2004 Report Share Posted January 24, 2004 Heidi Schuppenhauer wrote: > This was discussed to the point that it torqued some people off > a few months ago. It is absolutely true that common > sports knowledge says that skipping meals makes you gain weight > and lose muscle, and I was doing a 5-meal-day plan for exactly > that reason. > > However, I'm a middle aged female, and I lose fat on this diet. > Not terribly quickly, but I feel a lot better and my clothes are > a lot looser and my muscles are stronger (with or without > exercise). Mainly it solved the hypoglycemic problems I'd > dealt with for years. I've attended a workshop conducted by a personal trainer who addressed this issue. He said that he'd had a client who ate once a day, in the evening, and that evening meal provided calories of the whole day. He was very overweight. So, this trainer made him change only this aspect of eating - he made him eat the same amount of food and quality during about 5 meals a day. After that, the man started to lose weight. Maybe this works differently for different individuals? Roman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 24, 2004 Report Share Posted January 24, 2004 >I've attended a workshop conducted by a personal trainer who addressed this issue. He said that he'd had a client who ate once a day, in the evening, and that evening meal provided calories of the whole day. He was very overweight. So, this trainer made him change only this aspect of eating - he made him eat the same amount of food and quality during about 5 meals a day. After that, the man started to lose weight. Maybe this works differently for different individuals? > >Roman Cliff Sheats says the same thing in his books. I'm not sure what to make of it either -- the two camps are rather polarized on that issue! I was doing the " eat most of your calories in the morning " and that worked pretty well too (it actually worked out to be the reverse of the WD). The main reason I switched was sleep quality -- I can't sleep with no carbs in the evening. I suspect that some folks would have to regulate their food intake on the WD to lose weight, though probably not by a lot. It DOES seem that some folks lose weight better on 5 meals a day. Ori basically says that if you want to lose weight on the WD, you need to cut down on carbs -- and most of the 5-meal-a day folks are also recommending pretty high-carb/low fat diets. So maybe if you eat a high-carb/low fat diet you are better off with 5 meals a day, weight wise? BUT ... the evidence for fasting goes beyond the weight loss issue. The research seems to indicate that occasional fasting regulates blood sugar and hormones, makes people more resistant to stress, and decidedly makes mice healthier and longer lived (they are just now experimenting on humans). -- Heidi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 24, 2004 Report Share Posted January 24, 2004 Roman wrote: > >I've attended a workshop conducted by a personal trainer who addressed > this issue. He said that he'd had a client who ate once a day, in the evening, > and that evening meal provided calories of the whole day. He was very > overweight. So, this trainer made him change only this aspect of eating - he made him > eat the same amount of food and quality during about 5 meals a day. After > that, the man started to lose weight. Maybe this works differently for > different individuals? Roman, What was he drinking during the day? Drinking soda or fruit juices (beyond a very small amount) all day long would entirely undermine the benefits of cyclical undereating, as would carby snacks. Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2004 Report Share Posted February 2, 2004 ChrisMasterjohn@... wrote: > Roman wrote: > >>>I've attended a workshop conducted by a personal trainer who addressed >> >>this issue. He said that he'd had a client who ate once a day, in the evening, >>and that evening meal provided calories of the whole day. He was very >>overweight. So, this trainer made him change only this aspect of eating - he made him >>eat the same amount of food and quality during about 5 meals a day. After >>that, the man started to lose weight. Maybe this works differently for >>different individuals? > > > Roman, > > What was he drinking during the day? Drinking soda or fruit juices (beyond a > very small amount) all day long would entirely undermine the benefits of > cyclical undereating, as would carby snacks. > > Chris I have no idea, Chris. What I said was I all I remember hearing that trainer say about the man. It's probably reasonable to assume that he might have been drinking some soda throughout the day as most Americans seem to do. Roman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.