Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: smoking was:

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Check out www.realhealthnews.com. Dr. s is writing a book about

possible health benefits of smoking. For those not familiar with him, he

wrote The Milk Book that Sally Fallon quotes so much in her book. I did

order the book and it's supposed to be shipped as soon as it's ready.

>On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 21:29:43 -0800

> " Berg " <bberg@...> wrote:

>

> >----- Original Message -----

> >From: <slethnobotanist@...>

> >> >

> >> >First, glad to hear from you! Have missed the two of you.

> >>

> >> Nice to know I was missed by somebody!

> >

> >I second that. I don't know if you got the mail, but I pinged you

> >off-list a month or so ago to see if you were still alive.

>

>

>Hey well thanks! No I did not receive the email.

>

>

> >

> >> At any rate, to answer your question, no I am not quite done. It is

> >> actually a rewrite of an article I did a few years back where I

> >> basically said the normally stated " dogma " against smoking as being

> >> unhealthy was pure baloney. That such a stance was not nearly as cut

> >and

> >> dried as its proponents would have you believe.

> >

> >I can believe that it may not be as bad as the anti-smoking lobby would

> >have us believe, but from an intuitive perspective, at least, it seems

> >as though inhaling large quantities of smoke should cause some

> >substantial oxidative damage. Is this wrong?

>

>As I argue in my article it is dependent on a number of factors. The

>type of tobacco, how it was cured, the fertility of the soil the tobacco

>was grown in, how it was processed, the amount smoked, the type of diet

>consumed by the smoker, etc.

>

>What got me started on this was years ago when I read that certain

>cultures in the East considered smoking mildly healthful and not necessarily

>a poison in the diet.

>

>I will post some articles/studies in the near future, but is very

>difficult to get some real science on this topic. It is a lot like the

>cholesterol issue was/is, much of the mainstream is very opposed to any

>evidence that might contradict the current mantra.

>

>

>

>Stupid Vogue

><http://tinyurl.com/39juj>http://tinyurl.com/39juj

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...