Guest guest Posted January 9, 2004 Report Share Posted January 9, 2004 In a message dated 1/9/04 3:18:32 PM Eastern Standard Time, ChrisMasterjohn writes: > I'm quite sure this is a latter interpretation of Price's work. I don't > recall Price thinking there was any relevance of macronutrient ratios to > health. > > According to WAPF, the healthy cultures ranged between 15-20% protein and > 30-80% fat (I believe they are excluding the Bantu, who probably had more like > 10-15% fat in the non-milk tribes). A person eating on the low-animal side > of WAPF's ranges would be getting 15% protein, 30% fat, and 55% carbs, which > would make fat very much higher than carbs. Ack! I meant, would make carbs very much higher than fat. Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.