Guest guest Posted January 20, 2004 Report Share Posted January 20, 2004 Upon consideration, I've come up with a slight alteration to Heidi's excellent idea of putting an " OFF-TOPIC " tag in the subject lines of off-topic messages. As points out (and as I've argued before) political subjects are not necessarily off-topic. Many of the roots of modern nutritional problems are political, and many of the solutions will likewise have to be political. I want neither an excessively cumbersome solution to the problem of post flooding nor one which requires heavily subjective and therefore argument-inspiring judgements from a diverse array of list members, and I certainly don't want to change the fundamental character of this list, which as many people have observed is all but unique and highly valuable. Therefore, since the umbrella topic by far most frequently objected to by some list members (and which sometimes does generate massive torrents of email) is politics, I'm going to ask that everyone include the capitalized word " POLITICS " in the subject headers of all messages which include political content. Unlike discriminations between off-topic and on-topic subjects, this dividing line should be pretty easy for almost everyone to see and agree upon in almost every situation, and it should do the best job of tagging posts some members would rather skip. Using the " POLITICS " tag, those members who want to avoid political discussion can do so easily using the methods of their choice (filtering, deleting before reading, selective browsing on the web, etc.) while those who want to read or participate in political discussions inside this community without having to mess around with multiple or cumbersome tagging rules can proceed almost exactly as they have been. It will also allow for the relatively clear and unimpeded flow of conversation into and out of political domains. When the need arises, people can simply add or remove the tag from subject lines without making other changes except as dictated by everyday topic drift. I ask everyone to make a special effort in the coming days and weeks to ensure that all messages which merit the " POLITICS " tag include it in their subject lines. This will have the added benefit of getting many of us used to changing subject lines as needed. As I'm among the worst offenders in that department, I'll be making an extra effort to try to lead by example. I don't expect perfection -- I'm certainly not capable of it -- but I do hope you'll all chip in with gentle reminders from time to time to people who forget (including me) and I hope those of you to whom this solution is addressed will have some patience during the early days of its implementation. Habits can't always be built (and rebuilt) overnight. As to the practical matter of where to put it in the subject line -- it probably doesn't much matter. Subjects get prefaced with " Re: " and " " and the like, filtering doesn't require specific placement and capitalization will aid visual recognition almost regardless of position. You can use forms like " POLITICS: USDA rules on grass-fed labeling " , or " USDA rules on grass-fed labeling -- POLITICS " or whatever else you like as long as placement makes the tag visibly distinct from the rest of the subject. The tag should not, for example, be adjacent to other capitalized words; " USDA POLITICS affect new rule on grass-fed labeling " would be unacceptable. The one time front placement might be preferable is if a subject line gets long enough to be truncated on some people's displays. That's an area in which member feedback will prove useful in the coming weeks. Please understand that this new guideline is _not_ a preface to more elaborate tagging and formatting requirements. Cumbersome rules would be grossly inconsistent with one of my foremost goals for this list, namely to preserve its casual, free-wheeling spirit. This is a one-off compromise solution to a long-running problem bothering a substantial number of list members, nothing more. As always, you should all feel free to email me offlist with questions or concerns if you have any. I'm sure the matter will also be subject to extensive discussion here on the list. <g> - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.