VS: Physics of Spinal Adaptation, Structure, Function, Training

[Guest guest]

I am interested in learning about core stability and training related to

it. I think that muscle type is different and might need a different

kind of exercising program. Also control of muscles – the ability to

sense and consciously activate them might be different compared to

movement related muscles.

I know that core performance or “inside – out”- type of approaches are

very in now. I like the idea to first practice stability and the core.

It might prevent some back pain later.

I cannot judge spinalfitness – the content of it. If the is good

information somewhere, please let me know…

I hope we could discuss the stability and training of our core? Does it

differ from basic strength training?

Hannu Leinonen

Jyväskylä, Finland

-----Alkuperäinen viesti-----

Lähettäjä: Casler

Lähetetty: 2. helmikuuta 2006 1:10

Vastaanottaja: Supertraining

Aihe: Physics of Spinal Adaptation, Structure, Function,

Training

Scherger wrote:

On spinalfitness.com we have available for study our course Spinal

Core Stability Training & Treatment:

The Restoration & Preservation of Proper Structure and Function

You can open the following link

Take A Free Look At Course #2

Casler writes:

, I see you are still posting the following:

" NSCA Certification Commission Executive Council approved 2.0 CEUs for

CSCS

or NCSA-CPT certificants who successfully complete this course "

I have been told by representatives of the NSCA, that the course does

not

meet their approval, and does not provide such CEU's.

Posts such as this, would seem to be little more than SPAM with

questionable

claims.

Scherger wrote:

This course is result of think tank of health and sports medicine

individuals. These included US Olympic weight lifting strength and

conditioning,US Olympic Sports medicine and professional sports

athletic trainers.

We were interested in finding out how properly adapted spinal

posture produced the superior athlete and therefore athletic

performance. We wereinterested in how to train and treat individuals

to enhance, restoreand preserve proper spinal posture.

Casler writes:

I would challenge any of the members of this " Think Tank " to join us to

discuss their involvement in the creation of these courses, as well as

the

content.

Scherger wrote:

We use the term spinal fitness to mean training and treatment that

1st produces the proper Upright S-shaped human neutral spine

posture. Spinal fitness is possessing the proper spinal posture that

will produce the optimal musculo-leverage for human movement, which

is necessity if you truly expect to be physically healthy and

productive. We were not interested in training the muscles of the

abdominal musculo-spinal complex but the bones (vertebrae)and

therefore the posture that the musclesleveraged. We were interested

in training that would produce the optimal spinal posture for the

muscles to leverage for physical performance.

Casler writes:

While this is an admirable goal, you completely neglected several of the

systems that strongly participate in Torso and Spinal Stabilization. In

doing so, you have made the material incomplete and less than

meaningful.

Regards,

Casler

TRI-VECTOR 3-D Force Systems

Century City, CA