Guest guest Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 After reading the actual article, I must conclude that your statements are unfounded. There is no indication in this paper that these infections were contracted from household exposure to mold. In fact, all of the sources listed seem to be from outdoor environments. Although lots of lawyers and environmental air quality consultants make a lot of money off this mold hysteria, there is still no scientific evidence that household mold has ever been associated with any clinical infection. Please provide us with some evidence to the contrary.Danny Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 17, 2008 Report Share Posted January 17, 2008 Mold is mold. People tend to get high exposures indoors in moldy buildings because of the confined nature of indoor spaces. All species of " indoor " mold originally evolved outdoors. If there wasn't mold, we wouldn't have dirt, nothing would decay. In that sense, we need it. However, the high levels of MYCOTOXIN production by mold in idoor spaces is not seen unless youhave high humidity. Normal building conditions in well-maintained, properly insulated rarely result in that kind of humidty. Almost all of thr really sick buildings are also buildings in which maintenance has been deferred or they are in some other way being used in a way which they were not designed for. (For example, modifications were done that were badly thought out, or leaks not fixed that needed to be attended to.) Thats why many people are afraid of the truth. They are guilty of taking a calculated risk in full knowledge that they are making people ill and thinking that they could get away with it forever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.