Guest guest Posted March 25, 1999 Report Share Posted March 25, 1999 How is it that the State of Florida can come up with progressive guidelines for chronic treatment, while the same is ignored virtually everywhere else? This will give you a sense of how you should be entitled to be treated. I would even suggest making a copy for *some* doctors. And this is not brand new, it has been in place for a while. Ken _______________________________________________________________ Florida Pain Management Guidelines Courtesy Pain-L Discussion Group A Landmark message to Florida doctors from the State brings new hope to Chronic Pain Patients. If every State did this, the War Against Pain Patients, would soon be over, and tens of thousands of American lives would be saved annually. From Florida’s new guidelines with American Society for Action on Pain, Striving for Adequate Pain Medication emphasis added. FLORIDA GENERIC CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES The State of Florida recognizes that pain, including intractable pain, is often under treated. Unrelieved pain can have harsh and sometimes disastrous influence on the quality of life for patients and their families. PAIN MANAGEMENT SHOULD BE A HIGH PRIORITY IN FLORIDA Principles of quality medical practice dictate that citizens of Florida who suffer from pain should seek relief with treatment that is currently available. The appropriate application of current knowledge and treatments can greatly improve the quality of life for many Florida citizens and reduce the morbidity and costs associated with untreated pain. In addition to promoting competent patient care, these guidelines are intended to help physicians avoid investigation if controlled substances are appropriately prescribed for short or long term pain management. PRESCRIBING DANGEROUS DRUGS AND CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES FOR PAIN The proper treatment for any patient’s pain depends upon a careful diagnosis of the etiology of the pain, selection of appropriate and cost effective treatments and the ongoing evaluations of the results of treatment. Patients with chronic pain may demand more time of the practitioner because of the complexity of their problem. Opioid analgesics and other dangerous and controlled substances are useful for pain treatment. They are the cornerstone of treatment for acute pain due to trauma or surgery and of chronic pain due to progressive diseases, such as cancer. Other than that specified in the Physicians Desk Reference (PDR), large doses, if documented, may be necessary to control severe pain. Extended therapy may also be needed to alleviate chronic pain. Published formularies, relating to commercial financial incentives, should not be a deterrent to achieving optimal pain relief. Opioid analgesics may also be useful in treating patients with intractable nonmalignant pain especially when efforts to remove or treat the pain with other modalities have failed. Such intractable pain may have a number of different etiologies and might require several treatment methods. In addition, the extent to which pain is associated with physical and psychosocial impairment varies greatly. Therefore, when patients are selected for therapy trials using dangerous drugs and opioid therapy, care should be used to assess the pain as well as the patient’s disability. The duration of drug therapy should depend on the physician’s evaluation of the results of treatment, including the degree of pain relief, the changes in physical and psychological functioning and the appropriate utilization of health care resources. Addiction in relation to these substances should be placed in proper perspective. Physical dependence and tolerance are normal physiological consequences of extended opioid therapy and are not the same as addiction. Addiction is a behavioral syndrome characterized by psychological dependence and aberrant, drug-related behaviors. Addicts use drugs in a compulsive manner and not for medical purposes. An addict may also be physically dependent or tolerant. Patients with chronic pain shouldn’t be considered addicts merely because they are being treated with opioids. Physicians need to be cognizant of the fact that patients with a history of drug abuse may be particularly problematic to the management of pain. PAIN MANAGEMENT, CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES AND THE LAW Federal government laws and regulations and those of the State of Florida impose special requirements for dangerous drugs and controlled substances prescription. These regulations are aimed at preventing harm to the consumer from dangerous prescription drugs which are diverted to nonmedical uses. It is legitimate medical practice for physicians to prescribe controlled substances for the treatment of pain, including intractable pain. The Agency for Health Administration supports the examination must be based on the documented diagnosis and treatment rather than on the dosage or the number of prescriptions written. Concerns about regulatory scrutiny should not cause physicians to be reluctant to prescribe or administer dangerous and controlled substances, including Schedules II-V drugs as provided for in Florida Statutes s.893.03, for patients with legitimate medical needs. Physicians need not fear administrative action when prescribing dangerous drugs and controlled substances to patients in their care for a pathology or condition when the prescription is issued after a good faith examination and there is medical indication for the prescription. (ASAP Editor’s Note: Please keep in mind that Ankylosing Spondylitis, doesn’t show up on X-ray film for up to 14 years after the excruciating disease begins. There is no diagnostic “proof” that the patient should be having pain, when in fact, the patient is having excruciating pain. Doctors should ALWAYS suspect Ankylosing Spondylitis, when no other “cause of pain” can be found. It took me 12 years to get an exact diagnosis, and 13 years before “proof” started to show up on film!) The regulatory boards may identify a pattern of dangerous and controlled substance use which merits further examination, but private, courteous and professional inquiry can usually determine whether the physician is appropriately prescribing for patients in good faith or whether an investigation is warranted. The Florida Board of Medicine and the Florida Board of Osteopathic Medicine must judge the prescription validity relative to the physician’s documented diagnosis and treatment and if the prescribed drugs are appropriate for the patient’s condition. Predetermined limits should not be placed on dosages or length of drug therapy. It is the goal of the Agency for Health Care Administration to CHANGE practitioner perception of regulatory scrutiny and recognize the commitment of regulatory boards to improving pain management in order to enhance the quality of lives of pain-affected patients in Florida. Federal and State laws and regulatory policies should not hamper the appropriate use of dangerous drugs and controlled substances for the relief of pain. The “orders” from the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration, goes on for 3 or 4 more pages, all good news for Chronic Pain Patients, who have faced nightmares in other States such as Virginia. It appears they are recommending, that doctors treat Chronic Pain, the very way that Dr. Hurwitz has been treating it for years! It is ironic that it took the “over reaction” of the Virginia Medical Board, to bring this crisis to an end! -- Skip Baker ASAP - American Society for Action on Pain To subscribe to the ASAP list, send e-mail to: listproc@... with " subscribe asap your name " in the message. Web info at: http://www.calyx.net/~schaffer/asap/asapmain.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.