Guest guest Posted December 29, 2008 Report Share Posted December 29, 2008 Well said, Sharon! I believe Jim White has also reminded us in the past that if we all agreed with each other all the time, none of us would be learning (Jim said it a lot more eloquently, though). Here’s to the continued pursuit of knowledge and understanding in the coming year(s). Curtis From: iequality [mailto:iequality ] On Behalf Of snk1955@... Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 10:50 AM To: iequality Subject: Re: Digest 1C Re: THE RIGHT TO HEALTHY INDOOR AIR Tony, In response to the picture of a chilly winter day as seen out the window of my office, you wrote, " That ain't winter. " It is indeed winter. The facts show that I took that picture and posted it on December 28, 2008. That is a date known worldwide to occur in the season of winter. What a great metaphor this makes. What I see and what shapes my view when I share what the world looks like from my office is not the same thing you see and shapes your view based on what the world looks like from your office. It proves the point: Life is simply a matter of perspective. Scientifically speaking, the view from your office will never look the same as the view from mine. That is an undisputable fact (supported by much evidence over these past two years!) Looking forward in 2009, to trying to decifer why you think what you think based on your views and perspectives as I show why I think what I think based on what is seen from mine. Happy New Year To All, Sharon In a message dated 12/29/2008 8:10:11 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, aahavics@... writes: Vince: 1. You Said: Uh, no, the main thrust of " Brazil " was that everything was completely and incompetently controlled by the government, and that any private initiative to better it was labeled as " terrorism " ; Response: Good man. I call Brazil a cross between Orwell's 1984 and Monty Python's the Meaning of Life (I have several version here). Sharon: 2. You said: a. " Based on what scientific studies are you concluding that " Adding oxygen to the mix does nothing to limit or reduce the inhalation of the other crap. " ? Doesn't adding oxygen change the mix of what people are breathing and thereby reduce the relevant dose of the other " crap " ? b. (Not sure " relevant dose " is the correct term, but I think you know what I mean) Why else would they use increased oxygen in hospitals? " Response: a. There is some data on respiration rate changes based on O2 levels (J Physiol and some older Military data on humans and animals), but I think 's point is that unless you remove the other offending agents (particles, vapors, gases) adding O2 is not going to do much. It's like adding vitamin C to a fat-filled diet. An example would Carbon monoxide that forms carboxyhemoglobin (COhb) at 400 times greater affinity than O2 binding. So increasing O2 relatively slightly compared to CO does not move the transfer of O2 much. Another might be heavy metals in ultrafines whereby the increase in O2 made increase circulation and thus increase distribution of these particles. b. O2 is used in hospitals because patients at higher concentrations there is a diffusion gradient that increases O2 dissolution into the blood, thus greater O2 available at the same cardiopulmonary rate. This also relates to what barb said: " Given under increased barometric pressure is also designed to deal with specific problems like wound healing, infections " where they use Delta P (pressure) to drive the diffusion instead of increased Conc. One of the general things that occurs with excess O2 is oxidation (corrosion, free radical production, etc.) that is not necessarily good. And finally, let's presume an asthmatic gets more O2 which is good during inflammatory reactions because ones needs a certain amount to survive and function; but radioactive deposition of particles in lungs was found to be no different for non-asthmatics v asthmatics in actual radio-labeled studies, so they are still depositing the same particles. 3. You said: Winter days like today are among my very favorite Response: That ain't winter. Tony ....................................................................... " Tony " Havics, CHMM, CIH, PE pH2, LLC 5250 E US 36, Suite 830 Avon, IN 46123 www.ph2llc.com off fax cell 90% of Risk Management is knowing where to place the decimal point...any consultant can give you the other 10%(SM) This message is from pH2. This message and any attachments may contain legally privileged or confidential information, and are intended only for the individual or entity identified above as the addressee. If you are not the addressee, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, you are not authorized to read, copy, or distribute this message and any attachments, and we ask that you please delete this message and attachments (including all copies) and notify the sender by return e-mail or by phone at . Delivery of this message and any attachments to any person other than the intended recipient(s) is not intended in any way to waive confidentiality or a privilege. All personal messages express views only of the sender, which are not to be attributed to pH2 and may not be copied or distributed without this statement. Don't be the last to know - click here for the latest news that will have people talking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.