Guest guest Posted June 16, 2008 Report Share Posted June 16, 2008 > The problem I have I thought I stated pretty clearly, the substance that your trying to avoid (I believe) is much more abundant in the air outside, so it makes no sense how the reactivity could be coming from the object in question. A much more plausible hypothesis would be your friends are mistaking this object in question for much more likely sources, " outside mold " " indoor mold from one's dwelling " " any place they go, friends house, library, supermarket " etc. (many times I have found my reactivity isn't instantaneous so I am always having difficulty determining the sources and skeptical of others that insist they always know) Until they remove these variables they can't possibly know what they are claiming to know. And what further denigrates anybodies credibility is when they use testimonials from others to bolster what they claim to know. In science testimonials are never taken at face value. They are treated with a great deal of skepticism and for a very good reason, people fool themselves all the time so they may be honest in what they believe but none the less they may also be wrong. (I also briefly touched how we fool ourselves in the last post) Other examples would be the big foot legend, or ufo's, or esp, once these things are let out of the bag you can almost never undo the damage they become legend's and everyone claims to have seen one, or have some type of psychic power. You can't take personal testimony at face value EVER. > > That's why I advised on Sickbuildings that people perform some simple testing to find out for themselves. -MW " Subject: [sickbuildings] Joe Kleins Website www.stachy5u.com Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 15:59:20 -0000 To: sickbuildings " It's absolutely awesome to hear someone else describe the ability of hair to maintain and transport the mold. I found that wool garments are no different. I noticed that some contaminated places give me a huge " hit " but that I could walk away and recover without decontamination. Other places might hit me less, but I would carry the " reaction " with me. This led me to believe that the neurotoxic reaction was to aerosolized mycotoxins and not necessarily inhalation of spores. I tested this by placing a contaminated article in HEPA filters and taking it to my " clean " place. I put it under six layers of blankets and slept on it. I got the usual reaction and removed the article but went back to sleep on the same blankets. The reaction was gone. This convinced me that that spores had not penetrated the filter or blankets and that the toxic gas was truly my primary irritant. This was confirmed by Dr Marinkovich who told me that a housing project in Sweden had recently been identified with sick inhabitants but no spores could be found. Only when the walls were opened up were the colonies found, but they were so tightly sealed in the walls that only the toxic gas could escape. Many places that give me mold hits are strictly VOC hits and not spores. When I leave these areas I do not have to bother with decontamination. - " =================================================== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.