Re: Off topic: Goodbye cancer! Hello again Laetrile

[Guest guest]

Here's a 1980 paper.. anyone remember Laetrile?

Laetrile was touted as a cancer cure.. interestingly enough it was

Vitamin 15 (pangamic acid)

Maybe Bradford was right... you know - he's the whole blood

microscopist now (but in the 1970's was trying to sell

peachpit/Laetrile as a cancer cure. and had to move to Mexico)

Maybe he was on to something.

Barb

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat

of dichloroacetate. or of preparations. of pangamic. acid.

www.ajcn.org/cgi/reprint/33/6/1179.pdf

> >

> > Hi, all.

> >

> > I want to let you know about what appears to me to be a major

> > breakthrough in research on cancer treatment. I'm not selling

> > anything, and I was not involved with the research, but I think

> it's

> > very exciting! I hope you won't think I've parted company with

my

> > sanity when I tell you this.

> >

> > I'm referring to work recently published by researchers at the

> > University of Alberta in Canada. The full paper can be found at

> the

> > following site:

> >

> > http://www.depmed.ualberta.ca/dca/cancer_cell.pdf

> >

> > I'm not exaggerating when I call this a major breakthrough.

> >

> > Briefly, these researchers have found that a relatively simple,

non-

> > patentable substance, namely dichloroacetate, which has been used

> in

> > the past to control lactic acidosis in children with

mitochondrial

> > disease, is able to knock out a variety of types of cancer cells

> > without causing systemic problems. They have demonstrated this

by

> > experiments in three types of human cancer cell cultures and in

> mice.

> >

> > This substance works by blocking the enzyme pyruvate

dehydrogenase

> > kinase, causing pyruvate to be converted to acetyl Co-A and be

fed

> > into the Krebs cycle, instead of being reduced to lactic acid as

> > normally occurs in cancer cells, and thus forcing the cancer

cells

> to

> > change their metabolism from glycolysis to oxidative

> phosphorylation,

> > like normal cells. As a result of this change, they are able to

> > cause these cells to undergo apoptosis and die, rather than being

> > immortal as cancer cells are. In the mice, they put this

substance

> > in their driinkinig water, and they began to see effects on their

> > cancer within one week!

> >

> > Because it operates on a feature that is common to all cancer

cells

> > (as shown by Otto Warburg in 1930, for which he won the Nobel

> prize),

> > this substance promises to be a universal treatment for all types

> of

> > cancers.

> >

> > Because it is nonpatentable, it should be relatively

inexpensive.

> > This also means that non-pharma money will have to be found for

the

> > phase II and III clinical trials, and they've started a fund for

> > that. Because there is already a history of using this substance

> in

> > humans to treat lactic acidosis in mitochondrial disease, it is

> > already known that the side effects are mnimal.

> >

> > I am fairly familiar with the biochemistry of the intermediary

> > metabolism, and I can tell you that the paper looks good to me.

I

> > would invite comments from others on this. If this is what it

> looks

> > like to me, the ramifications are huge to society, the economy,

the

> > cancer industry, and to all of us as individuals. I think this

> will

> > make it even more imperative that we figure out what to do for

> > Alzheimer's, because the average life expectancy is going to

jump.

> > When futurists used to talk about the possibility of " a cure for

> > cancer " being found, I always thought they were nuts! I don't

> think

> > so anymore.

> >

> > Rich

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Bradford still lives here in the San Diego area (unless he's died in the last couple of years), and while he is smart and did have some good ideas and was on the right track in some ways, he's a walking health disaster himself. He has a bad teeth/jaw situation and lives with a permanent i.v. implanted in his chest for his own bleach therapy and antibiotics. I've also been to the clinic that he started in Mexico and last time I was there, the current owners still buy some product from him (bleach, which they mark up ridiculously), and also still use his dark field microscopy in diagnosing, but for the most part have shifted their focus to stem cell injections at $10k a pop. By the way, they demonstrated the microscope on myself and 2 of my friends and the results were hilariously inconsistent. Especially since one of my friends was a doctor who also owned a

darkfield microscope at the time. The funniest thing was that by accident they had 2 of their doctors analyze the slides, neither of them aware that the other was also doing it, and they reported entirely different findings. I couldn't get out of that place fast enough. penny Barb Peck <egroups1bp@...> wrote: Here's a 1980 paper.. anyone remember Laetrile? Laetrile was touted as a cancer cure.. interestingly enough it was Vitamin

15 (pangamic acid)Maybe Bradford was right... you know - he's the whole blood microscopist now (but in the 1970's was trying to sell peachpit/Laetrile as a cancer cure. and had to move to Mexico)Maybe he was on to something.Barb File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobatof dichloroacetate. or of preparations. of pangamic. acid. www.ajcn.org/cgi/reprint/33/6/1179.pdf >

>> > Hi, all.> > > > I want to let you know about what appears to me to be a major > > breakthrough in research on cancer treatment. I'm not selling > > anything, and I was not involved with the research, but I think > it's > > very exciting! I hope you won't think I've parted company with my > > sanity when I tell you this.> > > > I'm referring to work recently published by researchers at the > > University of Alberta in Canada. The full paper can be found at > the > > following site:> > > > http://www.depmed.ualberta.ca/dca/cancer_cell.pdf> > > > I'm not exaggerating when I call this a major breakthrough. > > > > Briefly, these researchers have found that a relatively simple, non-> >

patentable substance, namely dichloroacetate, which has been used > in > > the past to control lactic acidosis in children with mitochondrial > > disease, is able to knock out a variety of types of cancer cells > > without causing systemic problems. They have demonstrated this by > > experiments in three types of human cancer cell cultures and in > mice.> > > > This substance works by blocking the enzyme pyruvate dehydrogenase > > kinase, causing pyruvate to be converted to acetyl Co-A and be fed > > into the Krebs cycle, instead of being reduced to lactic acid as > > normally occurs in cancer cells, and thus forcing the cancer cells > to > > change their metabolism from glycolysis to oxidative > phosphorylation, > > like normal cells. As a result of this change, they are able to > > cause these cells to

undergo apoptosis and die, rather than being > > immortal as cancer cells are. In the mice, they put this substance > > in their driinkinig water, and they began to see effects on their > > cancer within one week! > > > > Because it operates on a feature that is common to all cancer cells > > (as shown by Otto Warburg in 1930, for which he won the Nobel > prize), > > this substance promises to be a universal treatment for all types > of > > cancers.> > > > Because it is nonpatentable, it should be relatively inexpensive. > > This also means that non-pharma money will have to be found for the > > phase II and III clinical trials, and they've started a fund for > > that. Because there is already a history of using this substance > in > > humans to treat lactic acidosis in mitochondrial disease, it is

> > already known that the side effects are mnimal.> > > > I am fairly familiar with the biochemistry of the intermediary > > metabolism, and I can tell you that the paper looks good to me. I > > would invite comments from others on this. If this is what it > looks > > like to me, the ramifications are huge to society, the economy, the > > cancer industry, and to all of us as individuals. I think this > will > > make it even more imperative that we figure out what to do for > > Alzheimer's, because the average life expectancy is going to jump. > > When futurists used to talk about the possibility of "a cure for > > cancer" being found, I always thought they were nuts! I don't > think > > so anymore.> > > > Rich> >>

[Guest guest]

I had the same experience- although not in Mexico and not by Bradford

himself- but by someone (who called themselves a Dr.) who 'graduated'

from his facility in CA.

Bottom line is- they didn't have a clue what they were looking at

under the scope ( They called a Howell-jowel body - which I have

becuase I am spleen-less- a Babesia infected cell..) I couldn't wait

to get out of thhere either.

Barb

> > >

> > > Hi, all.

> > >

> > > I want to let you know about what appears to me to be a major

> > > breakthrough in research on cancer treatment. I'm not selling

> > > anything, and I was not involved with the research, but I think

> > it's

> > > very exciting! I hope you won't think I've parted company with

> my

> > > sanity when I tell you this.

> > >

> > > I'm referring to work recently published by researchers at the

> > > University of Alberta in Canada. The full paper can be found at

> > the

> > > following site:

> > >

> > > http://www.depmed.ualberta.ca/dca/cancer_cell.pdf

> > >

> > > I'm not exaggerating when I call this a major breakthrough.

> > >

> > > Briefly, these researchers have found that a relatively simple,

> non-

> > > patentable substance, namely dichloroacetate, which has been

used

> > in

> > > the past to control lactic acidosis in children with

> mitochondrial

> > > disease, is able to knock out a variety of types of cancer

cells

> > > without causing systemic problems. They have demonstrated this

> by

> > > experiments in three types of human cancer cell cultures and in

> > mice.

> > >

> > > This substance works by blocking the enzyme pyruvate

> dehydrogenase

> > > kinase, causing pyruvate to be converted to acetyl Co-A and be

> fed

> > > into the Krebs cycle, instead of being reduced to lactic acid

as

> > > normally occurs in cancer cells, and thus forcing the cancer

> cells

> > to

> > > change their metabolism from glycolysis to oxidative

> > phosphorylation,

> > > like normal cells. As a result of this change, they are able to

> > > cause these cells to undergo apoptosis and die, rather than

being

> > > immortal as cancer cells are. In the mice, they put this

> substance

> > > in their driinkinig water, and they began to see effects on

their

> > > cancer within one week!

> > >

> > > Because it operates on a feature that is common to all cancer

> cells

> > > (as shown by Otto Warburg in 1930, for which he won the Nobel

> > prize),

> > > this substance promises to be a universal treatment for all

types

> > of

> > > cancers.

> > >

> > > Because it is nonpatentable, it should be relatively

> inexpensive.

> > > This also means that non-pharma money will have to be found for

> the

> > > phase II and III clinical trials, and they've started a fund

for

> > > that. Because there is already a history of using this

substance

> > in

> > > humans to treat lactic acidosis in mitochondrial disease, it is

> > > already known that the side effects are mnimal.

> > >

> > > I am fairly familiar with the biochemistry of the intermediary

> > > metabolism, and I can tell you that the paper looks good to me.

> I

> > > would invite comments from others on this. If this is what it

> > looks

> > > like to me, the ramifications are huge to society, the economy,

> the

> > > cancer industry, and to all of us as individuals. I think this

> > will

> > > make it even more imperative that we figure out what to do for

> > > Alzheimer's, because the average life expectancy is going to

> jump.

> > > When futurists used to talk about the possibility of " a cure

for

> > > cancer " being found, I always thought they were nuts! I don't

> > think

> > > so anymore.

> > >

> > > Rich

> > >

> >

>