Guest guest Posted January 30, 2007 Report Share Posted January 30, 2007 > I take both together. I see no point at all in alternating them. It's worth bearing in mind that bacteriostatics have been considered antagonistic with cidals like penicillin, in classical fast-growing, fast-curing infections. I haven't studied this issue very much. The kinetics of killing of bacteria in vitro by at least some B-lactams has been found to be a linear function of growth rate. I don't think this applies to every single B-lactam though. They all target the PBPs of the bacterial envelope, but in most (all?) bacteria, there are a few different PBPs... I think one of them or some of them, eg, are involved primarily/only in septation, the formation of the cell wall between the two daughter cells when the cell divides. I'm not sure all this matters as much in the case of a " quagmire " infection that responds only to multi-month or multi-year treatment... but I don't have a formal theory about that. Point being that there could be at least one efficacy-related argument for not doing pen and fluc simultaneously, but I think that argument is kinda murky. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.