Guest guest Posted January 21, 2007 Report Share Posted January 21, 2007 a, It looks like Crist has changed his mind on the significance of the 41 kDa band, which is most strongly positive for me. He no longer thinks 41 kDa is significant, but I have a few other weak positives that he does think are significant. I forgot to mention earlier that Jemsek put me on a trial of minocycline, Biaxin and Flagyl. I didn't feel much of anything on them, neither better or anything I would call a herx. I wonder if I should do the 4-week abx challenge that Crist mentioned to see if more bands become positive? I should also mention that Jemsek said that I do not have the genetics to be susceptible to Lyme. OK Tony, I'll bite: How do I test for "pseudonomas - staph areus-VRE and a few other oppurtunists/disease causing organisms"? What does VRE stand for? And if an infection is merely opportunistic, wouldn't it make more sense to diagnose and treat the underlying disease that made the body susceptible to the opportunists? Penny, how do you know I am one of "us"? Tim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2007 Report Share Posted January 21, 2007 **********OK Tony, I'll bite: How do I test for " pseudonomas - staph areus-VRE and > a few other oppurtunists/disease causing organisms " ? What does VRE stand******** Tim I don't understand what your trying to say when you mention- I'll BITE?What normally happens for many with cfs or fibromyalgia the common place the infection shows and stages from is the sinus, 97% have been shown to have sinus disease. Now you may tell me point blanc you have no sinus disease, but on closer inspection most of us have some pretty nasty stuff going on in there.When you look carefully at the sites of most disease around the sinus you grow all the organisms mentioned- if you do CULTURE AND SENSITIVITIES.. Lab workups.. tony > > a, > > It looks like Crist has changed his mind on the significance of the 41 > kDa band, which is most strongly positive for me. He no lo OK Tony, I'll bite: How do I test for " pseudonomas - staph areus-VRE and > a few other oppurtunists/disease causing organisms " ? What does VRE stand nger thinks 41 > kDa is significant, but I have a few other weak positives that he does > think are significant. > > I forgot to mention earlier that Jemsek put me on a trial of minocycline, > Biaxin and Flagyl. I didn't feel much of anything on them, neither better > or anything I would call a herx. I wonder if I should do the 4-week abx > challenge that Crist mentioned to see if more bands become positive? > > I should also mention that Jemsek said that I do not have the genetics to > be susceptible to Lyme. > > OK Tony, I'll bite: How do I test for " pseudonomas - staph areus- VRE and > a few other oppurtunists/disease causing organisms " ? What does VRE stand > for? And if an infection is merely opportunistic, wouldn't it make more > sense to diagnose and treat the underlying disease that made the body > susceptible to the opportunists? > > Penny, how do you know I am one of " us " ? > > Tim > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2007 Report Share Posted January 21, 2007 VRE- VANCOMYCIN RESISTANT ENTEROCOCCUS --- In infections , candtcampbell@... wrote: > > a, > > It looks like Crist has changed his mind on the significance of the 41 > kDa band, which is most strongly positive for me. He no longer thinks 41 > kDa is significant, but I have a few other weak positives that he does > think are significant. > > I forgot to mention earlier that Jemsek put me on a trial of minocycline, > Biaxin and Flagyl. I didn't feel much of anything on them, neither better > or anything I would call a herx. I wonder if I should do the 4-week abx > challenge that Crist mentioned to see if more bands become positive? > > I should also mention that Jemsek said that I do not have the genetics to > be susceptible to Lyme. > > OK Tony, I'll bite: How do I test for " pseudonomas - staph areus- VRE and > a few other oppurtunists/disease causing organisms " ? What does VRE stand > for? And if an infection is merely opportunistic, wouldn't it make more > sense to diagnose and treat the underlying disease that made the body > susceptible to the opportunists? > > Penny, how do you know I am one of " us " ? > > Tim > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.