Guest guest Posted December 28, 2007 Report Share Posted December 28, 2007 Anyone see this stuff? I think this, or similar, has been around in the news. I read this article in Newsweek: http://www.newsweek.com/id/73357 Here's the paper by JI Gordon (free), which I only skimmed: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed & pubmedid=1721091\ 9 It's a little confusing... how does this jive or clash with the improved mass gain per food consumed, that is seen in agricultural animals on abx. I'm guessing those animals end up far from germ free; whatever is resistant to the abx must grow out in the intestines at least somewhat. Interested in this for two reasons - 1. Is there some way I can use this to manipulate my metabolism for more motor and cognitive energy - as opposed to going along with evolution's energy-conserving plan, which is no longer helpful? Like, without catabolizing my muscles? It always seems like I eat a lot, but I am pretty lean fatwise, and also very sparsely muscled. 2. Interesting to understand how we have co-evolved with the Ancestors inhabiting the gut. They probably help us hydrolyze certain dietary molecules and may suppress certain pathogens, but obviously we lose a lot of calories to them. Are they a net good or a net bad, en masse, or however you spell that? If there are good ones and bad ones, how do mammals try to help the good ones prevail in their conflict with the bad ones (see colicins, etc), and how successful is that effort? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.