Guest guest Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 I wonder if Mercola knows of Trevor's litigous history. At least Mercola has the resources to deal with it ... --Bob sue_upstate wrote: Hi all, An interesting article was posted at Mercola.com yesterday: Clearing Up Confusion on Vitamin D -- Why I Don't Recommend the [Protocol That Cannot Be Named]l by Dr. Mercola Ever since I started promoting the benefits of vitamin D there has been a small but vocal minority of advocates of what is referred to as the ["Protocol That Cannot Be Named"]. As much as I would like to ignore it due to its lack of validity, I can no longer do so, because so many people are using this information and at the very least, they are placing their health at great risk and in many cases they are damaging their health... =========================== It's a long, well-reasoned article, and the responses are very interesting. http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/03/14/Clearing-Up-Confusion-on-Vitamin-D--Why-I-Dont-Recommend-the-Marshall-Protocol.aspx It will also be interesting to see how long Mercola leaves it on his website. Sue B. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 I'll bet he does by now !!! R Re: [infections] Mercola says: Why I Don’t Recommend the [Protocol That Cannot Be Named] I wonder if Mercola knows of Trevor's litigous history. At least Mercola has the resources to deal with it ...--Bobsue_upstate wrote: Hi all,An interesting article was posted at Mercola.com yesterday:Clearing Up Confusion on Vitamin D -- Why I Don't Recommend the [Protocol That Cannot Be Named]lby Dr. Mercola Ever since I started promoting the benefits of vitamin D there has been a small but vocal minority of advocates of what is referred to as the ["Protocol That Cannot Be Named"]. As much as I would like to ignore it due to its lack of validity, I can no longer do so, because so many people are using this information and at the very least, they are placing their health at great risk and in many cases they are damaging their health... ===========================It's a long, well-reasoned article, and the responses are very interesting.http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/03/14/Clearing-Up-Confusion-on-Vitamin-D--Why-I-Dont-Recommend-the-Marshall-Protocol.aspxIt will also be interesting to see how long Mercola leaves it on his website.Sue B. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 Here's a forum run by a cardiologist, Dr. . He writes that he " was inundated with questions about this so-called protocol, which amounts to little more than the unfounded speculations of a non-physician, actually someone not even involved in health care. " He continues, " In all honesty, I blew the whole issue off after I read [the protocol founder's] rants. They smack of pure quackery, though from somebody who clearly has a command of scientific lingo. " Then Dr. commends Vitamin D researcher Dr. Cannell for " taking the time and effort to construct a rational response " in the latest issue of Cannell's newsletter, which Dr. includes here: http://heartscanblog.blogspot.com/2008/03/marshall-protocol-and-other-fairy-tale\ s.html An interesting discussion follows. One responder writes, " As you can see, most of the post MPers like myself are posting as " anonymous " and not by accident. This is because of the nature of leaving the MP is much like leaving a religious cult. " Sue B. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 Hi /all I hope you read my comment , i did say i generally agreed with the article but its not all rubbish on the MP, There’s no doubt that inflammation is a big factor in chronic infection and ARB's are so effective against that.. Anyways , I think i may have worked out why I have relapsed . I have been taking statins for slightly high lipids. I did say I would want to be tested for co.enzyme q10 as statins deplete it ..I thought testing at about three or four months would be about the time scale to show results ..but no ..well within that period I felt so bloody tired with aching muscles joints .. and the symptoms of infection …On supplementing with 300 mg of co 10 per day all symptoms have abated ..early days but maybe!! I’ve stopped taking statins BTW .. I e-mailed my GP and diabetic consultant this info on the 21 Feb the comments below i find especially relevant , Infection is associated with high cholesterol "There is also a growing understanding that an inflammatory response of the arterial intima to injury is a crucial step in the genesis of atherosclerosis. and that infections may be one type of such injury"http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/96/12/927 It all adds to my findings that essential hypertension, high cholesterol and many more conditions are caused by stealth infections ..bugs from within that hide and manipulate the immune system .. Regards .. http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/02/21/900-Studies-Show-Statin-Drugs-are-Dangerous.aspx Chlolesterol does not cause heart disease any more than firemen cause house fires! In fact that analogy (the relationship between them) is appropriate, i.e., cholesterol is the body's firemen (or Bandaid), and cholesterol levels go up in response to the damage that has already occurred to the arteries as a result of oxidation, etc. The actual cause of Heart Disease and arterial damage appears to be oxidation, caused by many factors: Trans-fatty acids, partially hydrogenated oils (vegetable), high Iron levels, and many other things, but elevated cholesterol and high dietary cholesterol intake do not cause this damage. The cholesterol is part of the "patch" that the body uses to repair the damage done by other factors! There is a lot of money at stake in the "war on cholesterol". If you think "Drug X may be right for you!", think twice. The whole class of anti-cholesterol drugs (called HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors) is dangerous to your health! Please read TheCholesterolMyths, by Ravnskov. He is a top expert on the subject. I would be happy to blog away about this! DECEMBER 19, 2008 H. pylori infection high in metabolic syndrome patients Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103: 3005–3010 · PRINT THIS ARTICLE · RSS HEADLINES MedWire News: Helicobacter pylori infection is significantly associated with presence of the metabolic syndrome, show results from a large Japanese population study published in the American Journal of Gastroenterology. “Some epidemiologic studies report a significant link between Helicobacter pylori infection and certain cardiovascular disease risk factors, suggesting that chronic inflammation caused by H. pylori promotes atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease,” explain Nobuyuki Matsuhashi, from Kanto Medical Center in Tokyo, Japan, and team The researchers investigated links between H. pylori infection and the metabolic syndrome in 7394 asymptomatic Japanese individuals undergoing medical checkups between April 2006 and March 2007. The metabolic syndrome was diagnosed according to Japanese criteria, namely, visceral obesity plus two of high blood pressure, dyslipidemia (high triglycerides and/or low high-density lipoprotein [HDL] cholesterol) or glucose intolerance. H. pylori infection was diagnosed by the presence of specific antibodies measured using an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. Matsuhashi et al report that prevalence of H. pylori infection was significantly higher in individuals with the metabolic syndrome than in those without, at 38.6% versus 28.0%, respectively. In addition, individuals who were positive for H. pylori infection were 39% more likely to have the metabolic syndrome than uninfected individuals. When analyzing individual components, the researchers found that H. pylori seropositivity was positively associated with low HDL cholesterol, high low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and high blood pressure in the study participants. “Our results add to the evidence supporting the notion that H. pylori has a role in promoting atherosclerosis,” conclude the authors. “Eradication of H. pylori might have a role in preventing the metabolic syndrome, particularly in the Japanese population with H. pylori infection,” they add. Windsor wrote: I'll bet he does by now !!! R ----- Original Message ----- From: Bob Grommes infections Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 10:15 AM Subject: Re: [infections] Mercola says: Why I Don’t Recommend the [Protocol That Cannot Be Named] I wonder if Mercola knows of Trevor's litigous history. At least Mercola has the resources to deal with it ... --Bob sue_upstate wrote: Hi all, An interesting article was posted at Mercola.com yesterday: Clearing Up Confusion on Vitamin D -- Why I Don't Recommend the [Protocol That Cannot Be Named]l by Dr. Mercola Ever since I started promoting the benefits of vitamin D there has been a small but vocal minority of advocates of what is referred to as the ["Protocol That Cannot Be Named"]. As much as I would like to ignore it due to its lack of validity, I can no longer do so, because so many people are using this information and at the very least, they are placing their health at great risk and in many cases they are damaging their health... =========================== It's a long, well-reasoned article, and the responses are very interesting. http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/03/14/Clearing-Up-Confusion-on-Vitamin-D--Why-I-Dont-Recommend-the-Marshall-Protocol.aspx It will also be interesting to see how long Mercola leaves it on his website. Sue B. No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.15/2003 - Release Date: 03/15/09 14:07:00 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 I consantly observe the bullshit thrown up by arb's..Most doctors visits in my opinion are because of the rediculous side effects these drugs throw up..I recently had a friend who's father was given an arb and was suffering crippling joint issues,(frozen shoulders) which resolved 3 days after stopping the arb. This line of drug(arb's) are complete and utter bullshit drugs IMO..I have seen time and time again people being made invalids from taking these so called wonder drugs..Personally they dampened inflammation for a couple of weeks then the benefits were all gone.. Why you'd want to introduce constant lung infections and crippling joint pains in the hope you reduce blood pressure is beyond me.Higher Blood pressure in a three minute doctor visit isn't a marker that your BP is high for the rest of the week.It's basically an oppurtunity to push something on behalf of the drug companies for something that may not even be a real health issue. > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> An interesting article was posted at Mercola.com yesterday: > >> > >> Clearing Up Confusion on Vitamin D -- Why I Don't Recommend the > >> [Protocol That Cannot Be Named]l > >> > >> by Dr. Mercola > >> > >> Ever since I started promoting the benefits of vitamin D there has > >> been a small but vocal minority of advocates of what is referred to > >> as the [ " Protocol That Cannot Be Named " ]. > >> > >> As much as I would like to ignore it due to its lack of validity, I > >> can no longer do so, because so many people are using this > >> information and at the very least, they are placing their health at > >> great risk and in many cases they are damaging their health... > >> =========================== > >> > >> It's a long, well-reasoned article, and the responses are very > >> interesting. > >> > >> http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/03/14/Clearing-Up-Confus\ ion-on-Vitamin-D--Why-I-Dont-Recommend-the-Marshall-Protocol.aspx > >> <http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/03/14/Clearing-Up-Confu\ sion-on-Vitamin-D--Why-I-Dont-Recommend-the-Marshall-Protocol.aspx> > >> > >> It will also be interesting to see how long Mercola leaves it on his > >> website. > >> > >> Sue B. > >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > > Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.15/2003 - Release Date: 03/15/09 14:07:00 > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 17, 2009 Report Share Posted March 17, 2009 Tony , amazing , you always manage to meet my expectations of you dumbaussie2000 wrote: I consantly observe the bullshit thrown up by arb's..Most doctors visits in my opinion are because of the rediculous side effects these drugs throw up..I recently had a friend who's father was given an arb and was suffering crippling joint issues,(frozen shoulders) which resolved 3 days after stopping the arb. This line of drug(arb's) are complete and utter bullshit drugs IMO..I have seen time and time again people being made invalids from taking these so called wonder drugs..Personally they dampened inflammation for a couple of weeks then the benefits were all gone.. Why you'd want to introduce constant lung infections and crippling joint pains in the hope you reduce blood pressure is beyond me.Higher Blood pressure in a three minute doctor visit isn't a marker that your BP is high for the rest of the week.It's basically an oppurtunity to push something on behalf of the drug companies for something that may not even be a real health issue. > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> An interesting article was posted at Mercola.com yesterday: > >> > >> Clearing Up Confusion on Vitamin D -- Why I Don't Recommend the > >> [Protocol That Cannot Be Named]l > >> > >> by Dr. Mercola > >> > >> Ever since I started promoting the benefits of vitamin D there has > >> been a small but vocal minority of advocates of what is referred to > >> as the ["Protocol That Cannot Be Named"]. > >> > >> As much as I would like to ignore it due to its lack of validity, I > >> can no longer do so, because so many people are using this > >> information and at the very least, they are placing their health at > >> great risk and in many cases they are damaging their health... > >> =========================== > >> > >> It's a long, well-reasoned article, and the responses are very > >> interesting. > >> > >> http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/03/14/Clearing-Up-Confusion-on-Vitamin-D--Why-I-Dont-Recommend-the-Marshall-Protocol.aspx > >> <http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/03/14/Clearing-Up-Confusion-on-Vitamin-D--Why-I-Dont-Recommend-the-Marshall-Protocol.aspx> > >> > >> It will also be interesting to see how long Mercola leaves it on his > >> website. > >> > >> Sue B. > >> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > > Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.15/2003 - Release Date: 03/15/09 14:07:00 > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.15/2004 - Release Date: 03/16/09 07:04:00 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.