Guest guest Posted March 12, 2009 Report Share Posted March 12, 2009 Research just published in the March 17, 2009, issue of the Journal of the American College of Cardiology links depression to sudden cardiac death (SCD) and fatal coronary heart disease (CHD) in women with no known heart problems. Read more at http://healtnhappyness.blogspot.com/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 Speaking for myself, I'd like to see the actual numbers and drawn correlations from the study before I concluded anything at all. I went to this site, and I see it's associated with what's obviously a sort of New Age health site that's fundamentally antagonistic toward the medical establishment, on general principles, and has fans as uninformed as the one person who posted a comment praising the unfortunately sketchy article by saying things like that psychiatrists diagnose and prescribe based on mental disease standards according to something, he's not sure what, written and codified by Sigmund Freud. This is so far from reality that it's silly. For decades, and through several major revisions, The reference used to identify mental and emotional problems has been something called the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Illness, now approaching time for another update and revision in light of recent discoveries in both psychology and neurology. There's little, if anything, left in this book or in the diverse fields of contemporary psychology and psychiatry that directly hooks up with any specific belief of Freud's, not to deny at all that his work was seminal and, for years after his death, persistently, pervasively influential. But today, no, not really. It's too much to go into. Also, I'm aware of the well known Boston nurses' study, which this issue uses as its statistical basis. But the article failed to explain the study in any meaningful way, leaving me with the impression that the researchers quoted are making a worthwhile inquiry, but they're not talking about the results of a scientifically rigorous study that's double blind and randomized, but rather based on an anecdotal sampling. this approach isn't worthless for looking for correlations between things, but it's not definitive, either. I'm guessing that most of us know that there was some study that seemed to " prove " that cell phone use caused benign brain tumors of the sort that I happen to have, myself. Well, that was a study done by the Karolinska institute in Sweden which again was worth doing but had a lot of things wrong with it, and the jury is still out, like nowhere near a conclusion, about the cell phone/tumor thing. Personally, I happen to have one of these tumors, which has caused a lot of damage to me. But I never even owned a cell phone until after this thing was diagnosed, and I use it against the opposite ear anyway, so it's all moot. But this study is in that kind of very gray area. Worthy of further study, but not a warning that everyone on Prozac is about to drop dead unless they get themselves an ICD immediately. bottom line is I wouldn't get too worked up about this if I happened to be on an SSRI class antidepressant, especially if it was doing me any good emotionally, hopefully in conjunction with some sort of talk therapy. Any site on which you can run into something about the medicinal powers of papaya juice isn't a serious medical or scientific site, not in this person's world, anyway. In my humble opinion, of course. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.