RE: Mercola says: Why I Don't Recommend the [Protocol That Cannot Be Named]

[Guest guest]

Hello,

I’d like to post this on two other lists if I may?

Rosie (who lurks!)

I wonder if Mercola knows

of Trevor's litigous history. At least Mercola has the resources to deal

with it ...

--Bob

sue_upstate wrote:

Hi all,

An interesting article was posted at Mercola.com yesterday:

Clearing Up Confusion on Vitamin D -- Why I Don't Recommend the [Protocol That

Cannot Be Named]l

by Dr. Mercola

Ever since I started promoting the benefits of vitamin D there has been a small

but vocal minority of advocates of what is referred to as the [ " Protocol

That Cannot Be Named " ].

As much as I would like to ignore it due to its lack of validity, I can no

longer do so, because so many people are using this information and at the very

least, they are placing their health at great risk and in many cases they are

damaging their health...

===========================

It's a long, well-reasoned article, and the responses are very interesting.

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/03/14/Clearing-Up-Confusion-on-Vitamin-D--Why-I-Dont-Recommend-the-Marshall-Protocol.aspx

It will also be interesting to see how long Mercola leaves it on his website.

Sue B.

[Guest guest]

> Hello,

> I'd like to post this on two other lists if I may?

> Rosie (who lurks!)

==================

Hi Rosie,

Sure. Here are the correct URLs.

One discussion is listed on the blog of , MD, and it is titled " The

Marshall Protocol and other fairy tales. " It centers on a letter by

Cannell, MD, reprinted from his Vitamin D Newsletter. Dr. Cannell's letter is

followed by 48 comments.

http://heartscanblog.blogspot.com/2008/03/marshall-protocol-and-other-fairy-tale\

s.html

=======================================================

The other discussion is on the website of ph Mercola, DO. It is called

" Clearing Up Confusion on Vitamin D -- Why I Don't Recommend the Marshall

Protocol. " Dr. Mercola's article is followed by comments from 98 people.

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/03/14/Clearing-Up-Confus\

ion-on-Vitamin-D--Why-I-Dont-Recommend-the-Marshall-Protocol.aspx

=======================================================

[Guest guest]

I don't know if anyone has checked lately, but I was surprised to see how many

former volunteers had posted comments, using their names too, about what went on

behind the scenes working with you know who.

A doctor in our state who pushed the MP big time is currently under

investigation after 10 patients filed a complaint with the state's medical

board. Every case involves components of the MP:

https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/providercredentialsearch/CaseLaserFicheDocVi

ew.aspx?DocId=113591

I don't know the latest on the case, but hopefully will hear updates in the next

couple of months.

Dan (back from the semi-dead)

>

> > From: sue_upstate <rhbailey@...>

> > Subject: [infections] Mercola says: Why I Don’t Recommend

the [Protocol That Cannot Be Named]

> > infections

> > Date: Sunday, March 15, 2009, 4:00 PM

> > Hi all,

> >

> > An interesting article was posted at Mercola.com yesterday:

> >

> > Clearing Up Confusion on Vitamin D -- Why I Don't

> > Recommend the [Protocol That Cannot Be Named]l

> >

> > by Dr. Mercola

> >

> > Ever since I started promoting the benefits of vitamin D

> > there has been a small but vocal minority of advocates of

> > what is referred to as the [ " Protocol That Cannot Be

> > Named " ].

> >

> > As much as I would like to ignore it due to its lack of

> > validity, I can no longer do so, because so many people are

> > using this information and at the very least, they are

> > placing their health at great risk and in many cases they

> > are damaging their health...

> > ===========================

> >

> > It's a long, well-reasoned article, and the responses

> > are very interesting.

> >

> >

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/03/14/Clearing-Up-Confus\

ion-on-Vitamin-D--Why-I-Dont-Recommend-the-Marshall-Protocol.aspx

> >

> > It will also be interesting to see how long Mercola leaves

> > it on his website.

> >

> > Sue B.

>

[Guest guest]

--- In infections , " kdrbrill " <kdrbrill@...>

wrote:

>

> A doctor in our state who pushed the MP big time is currently under

investigation after 10 >patients filed a complaint with the state's medical

board.

Hi Dan,

I counted 12! They must have been really hurt by the treatments, really angry.

Sue B.

[Guest guest]

I'm not positive, but I might know one of the patients who may be involved in

the complaint. At least there was one in our support group who almost lost

kidney function, even while the doc insisted she stay with the treatment. She's

bedridden, but her husband would come to the meetings...haven't seen him in 6-7

months.

It certainly sounds at the very least like she was somewhat careless or sloppy

at least according to the allegations.

Another friend in the support group went to her a few years ago (of course I had

totally forgotten about this) and he said when he came into her office, the

place was pitch black...all the curtains closed, etc.

So he turned on the lights. The doctor came running out of the back room,

wearing a trench coat and of course those goggles, and insisted the lights must

remain off.

He only went back once more, and that was that.

d.

--- In infections , " sue_upstate " <rhbailey@...>

wrote:

>

> --- In infections , " kdrbrill " <kdrbrill@>

wrote:

> >

> > A doctor in our state who pushed the MP big time is currently under

investigation after 10 >patients filed a complaint with the state's medical

board.

>

> Hi Dan,

>

> I counted 12! They must have been really hurt by the treatments, really

angry.

>

> Sue B.

>