Whoa! What's going on here? Re: Mercola says: Why I Don't Recommend

[Guest guest]

I was going to bump up Dr. Mercola's article on the Marshall Protocol but the link posted here appeared to be broken so I went back to his main site and the link to mercola.com is coming up as "broken" as well. I've tried several different mercola addresses and I'm getting nothing.

You don't suppose he's being hit with the whole libel game, do you? (I remember when our site suddenly just disappeared. ) Wow, hope not. Hope this is just a coincidence.

I had difficulty getting Mark London's site to open as well. It's no surprise that they're dissing him over on mp.com. Mostly about his MIT credentials. (A little ironic if you know the history of the MP) Londons' analysis finally came up after 2 tries.

Anyway, here's an alternative link that posted Mercola's original article.

Why I don't recommend the Marshall Protocol

http://www.care2.com/c2c/groups/disc.html?gpp=8992 & pst=1037992

And here's the link for the Washington Health Department's list of

charges against Shlifer, MD: http://tinyurl.com/d8j4t5

And here's the link for Dr. (which isn't broken...yet :-) Marshall Protocol and Other Fairy Tales: http://heartscanblog.blogspot.com/2008/03/marshall-protocol-and-other-fairy-tales.html

here's another analysis:http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/marshall-protocol

And here's Mark London's analysis of the Marshall Protocol:http://stuff.mit.edu/people/london/universe.htm

I was about to say that it looks like mp.com is finally being outnumbered and that it won't be as easy to shut down people with differing views. But with the Mercola site down now, I'm not so sure.

> > > > > From: sue_upstate rhbailey@ .>> > > Subject: [infectionAndInflam mation2] Mercola says: Why I Don’t Recommend the [Protocol That Cannot Be Named]> > > InfectionAndInflamm ation2@grou ps.com> > > Date: Sunday, March 15, 2009, 4:00 PM> > > Hi all,> > > > > > An interesting article was posted at Mercola.com yesterday:> > > > > > Clearing Up Confusion on Vitamin D -- Why I Don't> > > Recommend the [Protocol That Cannot Be Named]l> > > > > > by Dr. Mercola > > > > > > Ever since I started promoting the benefits of vitamin D> > > there has been a small but vocal minority of advocates of> > > what is referred to as the ["Protocol That Cannot Be> > > Named"]. > > > > > > As much as I would like to ignore it due to its lack of> > > validity, I can no longer do so, because so many people are> > > using this information and at the very least, they are> > > placing their health at great risk and in many cases they> > > are damaging their health... > > > ============ ========= ======> > > > > > It's a long, well-reasoned article, and the responses> > > are very interesting.> > > > > > http://articles. mercola.com/ sites/articles/ archive/2009/ 03/14/Clearing- Up-Confusion- on-Vitamin- D--Why-I- Dont-Recommend- the-Marshall- Protocol. aspx> > > > > > It will also be interesting to see how long Mercola leaves> > > it on his website.> > > > > > Sue B.> >>