Guest guest Posted January 21, 2008 Report Share Posted January 21, 2008 > I guess, to find a risk ratio of 16, at least one non-encephalitis subject and 16 CMV subjects had to come down with psychosis (because you cant have a fraction of a person) - so that sounds as if it would be very highly significant. Wow, I really botched that one - what I said was waaay illogical. It would have be correct only if half the population had had a history of CMV encephalitis, which is not true at all. In reality - there were just two cases of psychosis among 63 people with prior CMV encephalitis history. That gives the rate 2/63, which is 16.6 times higher than the rate of psychosis among the normals (ie those without history of CMV encephalitis). The raw p is still under 0.05, but I also forgot the Bonferroni issues, which are significant here. In total, the CMV finding is far less impressive than I thought, on its own. If it were confirmed in a separate cohort, it would be a finding with greater confidence. Still, childhood CMV encephalitis - at least, childhood CMV encephalitis requiring hospitalization, which is the criterion in this study - doesn't appear to be one of the main causes of psychosis, because it is after all so very rare: only 63 people out of 1.2 million had childhood CMV encephalitis, whereas 2,270 of those 1.2 million had psychosis. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.