Guest guest Posted September 1, 2010 Report Share Posted September 1, 2010 Unfortunately....... the new paper doesn't even approach settling the issue. It raises more issues. Tzerefore, mein Herrn in terms of clarity it is not exactly on a par with the famous tuberculosis lecture-demonstration of Herr Doktor Koch to a Berlin audience including Virchow and Ehrlich - the 'greatest lecture in medicine' and the main reason I always wish dass I a belle epoque German scholar myself waere. Actually I wish I were a belle epoque anything (other than a Freud disciple), and also my descendants forever, I snarl at this World War world, all Kali Yuga to the max for now 96 years... Uhh, anyway, it's very easy to imagine that these other MLVs all behave the same as XMRV (whatever that behavior is). And Mikovits states that she can find the MLVs Alter/Lo found and has already presented about that at a conference - so that seems to add up (pending publication). What's not easy to explain is why Alter/Lo didn't detect XMRV. Unless it is just a regionality thing, which is hard to ascertain. Where's it at?! So, this paper has greatly revitalized and expanded this little field. But it has not really clarified things at all, as far as I can tell (and I'm not a viro man of course but a student of the bacteria). And so it is time for another appalling entr'act in the waiting room of medical world history! And then another paper! Aaiiiieeeeeeeeeee, this after an entire year!!!!! Time for a relaxing hot bath or 60... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.