Guest guest Posted December 4, 2008 Report Share Posted December 4, 2008 I recently replied to a colleague about whether fire suppression water that floods part of a building should be cleaned up as a Category 1, 2 or 3 water damage. My response is: General industry consensus is that fire sprinkler water in: (1) polyethylene pipes is at least a Category 2 contamination and can become a Category 3 contamination. Facts include: stagnant water in pipes creates an increase of anaerobic organisms. (2) Galvanized and iron pipes almost always creates a Category 3 contamination. Corrosion in the pipe increases sulfur compounds and along with the absence of oxygen hydrogen sulfide conditions develop. I’ve tested several commercial systems and found high sulfur compounds in sprinkler system water. In fact, the area or room where a sprinkler system breaks you may see an orange, red or black staining that came from the sprinkler hear or broken sprinkler system pipe. The color difference depends on many factors including chemical and biological. There is an agreement among the sprinkler system industry, microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) damages pipes causing a premature breakdown of the sprinkler system. Interesting Reading: http://www.nobackflow.com/Impacts-of-Wet.htm http://www.c-ad.bnl.gov/esfd/monday/2_16_06.pdf http://www.nfpa.org/assets/files//PDF/Proceedings/Preventing_Hydrogen_Sulfide_Formation...-_R.Sheinson-B.Willi.pdf http://www.wbdg.org/ccb/ARMYCOE/COETM/tm_5_692_2.pdf http://www.cispi.org/handbook/handbook.pdf http://www.fpemag.com/_pdf/archives/FPE_WINTER_2001.pdf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 4, 2008 Report Share Posted December 4, 2008 Pat, " wet type " sprinkler system water is also Cat 3 in my opinion. I have seen some really gross examples over the years. Another case occurs in emergency eye wash/shower systems, that are not flushed on a weekly basis. The only exception may be a dry type system. For those systems, it depends on whether they are fed from the city main when they discharge. Bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 4, 2008 Report Share Posted December 4, 2008 Bob, Thank you for confirming what I believe is a Category 3 loss. Somewhere in my past life I’ve read that the union for the fire suppression industry diagnosed an eye infection common to their workers who must look up to inspect sprinkler pipes that are leaking. I don’t remember the name of the eye infection and the bacteria causing it. Maybe someone else has the reference. From: iequality [mailto:iequality ] On Behalf Of Bob s Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 11:26 AM To: iequality Subject: Re: Fire Suppression System Water Pat, " wet type " sprinkler system water is also Cat 3 in my opinion. I have seen some really gross examples over the years. Another case occurs in emergency eye wash/shower systems, that are not flushed on a weekly basis. The only exception may be a dry type system. For those systems, it depends on whether they are fed from the city main when they discharge. Bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 4, 2008 Report Share Posted December 4, 2008 Pat. It may be Pseudomonas aeruginosa, if my memory is correct. Bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.