U.S. Rushes to Change Workplace Toxin Rules - again

[Guest guest]

:

Regarding your reference to:

U.S. Rushes to Change Workplace Toxin Rules

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/22/AR2008072202

838.html

Response:

Q1: Have you read the proposed " change " ?

Q2: Do you know whether it is a " change " ?

Q3: Do you know the content?

Q4: Do you understand the implications (not those hypothesis by the

media or politicians)?

If not, then it is another case of you referring to piece absent

verification - I am seeing a theme in your process (in addition to not

answering questions).

Tony

Ps I have read it. There is a BS piece in it - the lack of due process for

its implementation [not surprising for this administration]. Which in all

irony is part of what the proposed " change " will more clearly require for

future regulations. The rest is nothing very new, just formal presentation

of the history and legal decisions that drive the agency.

.......................................................................

" Tony " Havics, CHMM, CIH, PE

pH2, LLC

5250 E US 36, Suite 830

Avon, IN 46123

www.ph2llc.com

off

fax

cell

90% of Risk Management is knowing where to place the decimal point...any

consultant can give you the other 10%(SM)

This message is from pH2. This message and any attachments may contain

legally privileged or confidential information, and are intended only for

the individual or entity identified above as the addressee. If you are not

the addressee, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, you

are not authorized to read, copy, or distribute this message and any

attachments, and we ask that you please delete this message and attachments

(including all copies) and notify the sender by return e-mail or by phone at

. Delivery of this message and any attachments to any person

other than the intended recipient(s) is not intended in any way to waive

confidentiality or a privilege. All personal messages express views only of

the sender, which are not to be attributed to pH2 and may not be copied or

distributed without this statement.

[Guest guest]

Tony,I am the one who posted the reference to the Bush administration's proposed rulemaking.I was just trying to show the irony of their double standards and also show how the cards are clearly stacked against anyone who would try to improve the health situation for working people under this administration, regardless of how much relevant information became available.

But of course, they are also falling over backwards trying to prevent any new information on these issues from emerging, and intimidate those who dare to speak out against this. You know, their so called " war on science " .

:

Regarding your reference to:

U.S. Rushes to Change Workplace Toxin Rules

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/22/AR2008072202

838.html

Response:

Q1: Have you read the proposed " change " ?

Q2: Do you know whether it is a " change " ?

Q3: Do you know the content?

Q4: Do you understand the implications (not those hypothesis by the

media or politicians)?

If not, then it is another case of you referring to piece absent

verification - I am seeing a theme in your process (in addition to not

answering questions).

Tony

Ps I have read it. There is a BS piece in it - the lack of due process for

its implementation [not surprising for this administration]. Which in all

irony is part of what the proposed " change " will more clearly require for

future regulations. The rest is nothing very new, just formal presentation

of the history and legal decisions that drive the agency.

.......................................................................

" Tony " Havics, CHMM, CIH, PE

pH2, LLC

5250 E US 36, Suite 830

Avon, IN 46123

www.ph2llc.com

off

fax

cell

90% of Risk Management is knowing where to place the decimal point...any

consultant can give you the other 10%(SM)