Guest guest Posted August 28, 2008 Report Share Posted August 28, 2008 OMB Signs Off On OSHA's Controversial Risk Assessment Rule The White House Office of Management and Budget approved OSHA's controversial risk assessment rule Tuesday (Aug. 26) " consistent with change, " meaning certain revisions were made by the office. The rule, drafted secretly by the Labor Department, has been sharply criticized by unions and industrial hygienists who fear it could lead to less-stringent OSHA standards, spur a reopening of existing standards, and pose new hurdles in the already slow-paced regulatory process. The rule allows the agency to sidestep historical risk assessment measures in favor of industry-by-industry exposure calculations. OMB has not specified the changes it made to the rule, which the Labor Department drafted without going through the normal notice and comment rulemaking process. While stakeholders await the final rule, an industry lawyer told Inside OSHA the proposal could give OSHA the opportunity to revisit existing safety standards and rewrite them based on the new provisions. Given the difficulty of drafting regulations, however, such reassessments remain very unlikely, both industry and labor sources said. " There's a theoretical possibility, " Baruch Fellner, an attorney with Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, said. " But probably not. OSHA has so many problems moving regulations as it is, it would never happen. " But Rick Melberth, director of federal regulatory policy at OMB Watch, a nonprofit research group that advocates for transparency within OMB, says federal agencies could use a number of mechanisms to revisit risk assessments for existing standards under the new rule, including the Regulatory Flexibility Act, Data Quality Act and Small Business Administration's Office of Advocacy's Regulatory Review and Reform initiative. The RFA requires federal agencies to review existing rules every 10 years and revise those deemed overly burdensome, duplicative or longer than necessary. Like the RFA, the Office of Advocacy's r3 initiative, implemented last year, produces a list of rules nominated by small businesses for streamlining or elimination. Finally, the Data Quality Act, passed by Congress in 2000, requires federal agencies consider challenges from industry regarding the science used to develop regulations. Another possibility includes an industry lawsuit requesting a reevaluation, he said. " There are a whole series of ways in which reevaluations might be triggered, " Melberth told Inside OSHA. ....................................................................... " Tony " Havics, CHMM, CIH, PE pH2, LLC 5250 E US 36, Suite 830 Avon, IN 46123 www.ph2llc.com off fax cell 90% of Risk Management is knowing where to place the decimal point...any consultant can give you the other 10%(SM) This message is from pH2. This message and any attachments may contain legally privileged or confidential information, and are intended only for the individual or entity identified above as the addressee. If you are not the addressee, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, you are not authorized to read, copy, or distribute this message and any attachments, and we ask that you please delete this message and attachments (including all copies) and notify the sender by return e-mail or by phone at . Delivery of this message and any attachments to any person other than the intended recipient(s) is not intended in any way to waive confidentiality or a privilege. All personal messages express views only of the sender, which are not to be attributed to pH2 and may not be copied or distributed without this statement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.