A sib theory

[Guest guest]

Ok e,I was ufo watching and all I could see were air hugs and

kisses,lol. Of course I couldn't refuse a chance to

contemplate,speculate and spin ideas,lol.

Heres what I think is going on with pain,self injury type. There is

lots of research into the brain and pain. Much of how pain is felt

equates to an increase in the working ability of neural paths,axons

ect. to the brain that evoke pain. Motor function and body

presentation becomes altered as pain persists. Then a reverse signal

from the motor function,body presentation gets disrupted info

returning to the brain wich results in less pain to the area of the

original signal. As the brain begins to process the info it must

learn a new function,seperate from the body part involved. The body

part may in effect become numb to the nerve info via

damage,callous,axon signals ect. and be oblivious to the pain. The

brain how ever would be actively involved in the lesson and releasing

chemical loops. It may provide stimulation of the brain to provide

chemical release such as endorphines{feel goods}fueling receptors

that cause us to repeat the experience. When the receptors and

chemical reactions fade down the self injury would stop. The process

would start over agin,in sequence once the receptors and chemical

reactions replenish enough to trigger a que or be available to the

que. I would suspect the behaviors would persist for receptor life or

duration and change to new sib as the receptor response changes or

numbs to the chemical flow in the course of time,years perhaps. If no

replacement sib is found I think the sib may stop as the endorphines

would lose there potency of desired outcome of repeat sib pattern. To

stop a sib a replacement action or behavior to release the same or

equal chemical response must happen,in the brain. Then the body part

involved would not be needed for the sib,or the behavior itself.

This is my theory,opinion based on my own experiences with the brain

and pain, I have found it to apply. In observances of human nature,

behavior and research I believe it would hold merit.

The facts I found in research of the seperate parts all contribute to

the whole and connect. Basically what we percieve as painful in

another person may be in fact not pain to them as an outcome or

reaction. In our visual persumption or in our own trial of

duplication,such as biting ourselves to feel what its like, it would

be pain for us. If that same person experienced a threshold of pain

outside of their {chemical} comfort zone they would respond in

similar fashion with crying,ouch ect. Pain within their zone would

equate to releasing endorphines or odd reactions in contrast to our

own imagined response of painful events,like biting ourself or

banging our head.

Lol,lol,I just keep going,and going,and going!

Hugs,high fives

Tishanne