Guest guest Posted February 19, 2002 Report Share Posted February 19, 2002 I am a little concernced about the following statement: " If you're taking cod liver oil, you can ditch the flax oil. " -- see message below. I think we should be careful when making such recommendations, unless one knows the exact composition of the cod liver oil in question. Relying only on cod liver oil for Omega 3s (EPA and DHA) might result in consuming too much vitamin D. FDA toxicity is 2000 IU daily. From K. Sullivan's article on the WAP site - she suggests testing the blood if one is supplementing with more than 1000 IU daily. Assume a 2000cal diet, of that 40% is consumed as fat, 2% of the total fat should come from Omega 3s = 1778mg. Or, assume a 2500cal diet, of that 40% is consumed as fat, 2% of the total fat should come from Omega 3s = 2222mg. 1 Teaspoon of Carlson's Cod Liver Oil (Regular Formula in the bottle) provides: A 5000 IU D 500 IU O3s 1050mg Taking 1.5 to 2 teaspoons to get 1575mg or 2100mg O3s would not be a concern. However, the Cod Liver Oil that I take (in gelcap form) daily dose provides: A 5000 IU D 500 IU O3s 500mg Taking 3 daily doses to get 1500mg O3s would not be a concern. Taking 4 or 4.5 daily doses to get 2000mg or 2250mg O3s would result in 2000IU or 2250IU vitamin D daily, a possible concern. Please correct me if I am wrong on this or am missing something. I know the question about getting Omega 3s from Cod Liver Oil v. Flax Oil came-up previously. Additionally, I think we should be careful when considering conversion rates since it is known that people whose ancestory is associated with a diet heavy on sea foods do not make the conversion well. I doubt researchers controlled for this variable. Additionally, the conversion is reduced under poor dietary conditions - again, something which I am guessing was not controlled for in the studies. Deanna ----- Original Message ----- From: " justinbond " <justin_bond@...> < > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 9:39 AM Subject: Re: mixing oils If you're taking cod liver oil, you can ditch the flax oil. There's no reason to take two omega-3 supplements, particularly considering how poor the conversion rate of LNA to EPA/DHA is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 19, 2002 Report Share Posted February 19, 2002 >Taking 4 or 4.5 daily doses to get 2000mg or 2250mg O3s would result in >2000IU or 2250IU vitamin D daily, a possible concern. My understanding is that if you were taking that much D2 (synthetic D which probably shouldn't even be called D at all) it would/could be a concern, but the RDA of real D should probably be more like 4000 IU, based on the work of Price and others. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 19, 2002 Report Share Posted February 19, 2002 , In the same article that K. Sullivan recommends testing when taking more than 1000 IU in supplements - she also states that a Dr. Vieth suggests the RDA should be 4000 IU. But, it concerned me that she (who has had clinical experience with D supplementing) suggests testing when using over 1000 IU with supplements - according to her presentation last year, she only recommended supplementing with D from Cod Liver Oil. I sent the post b/c I remember the issue of Cod Liver Oil v. Flaxseed Oil came up previously - I thought one possible reason for not getting all of one's daily supply of O-3s from Cod Liver Oil would be the potential for vitamin overdose. If I attempted this with my Cod Liver Oil, according to Sullivan, I should be blood testing. However, this might not be the case at all if the true RDA is 4000 IU. Deanna ----- Original Message ----- From: " Idol " <Idol@...> < > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 4:11 PM Subject: Re: Re: mixing oils cod v. flax >Taking 4 or 4.5 daily doses to get 2000mg or 2250mg O3s would result in >2000IU or 2250IU vitamin D daily, a possible concern. My understanding is that if you were taking that much D2 (synthetic D which probably shouldn't even be called D at all) it would/could be a concern, but the RDA of real D should probably be more like 4000 IU, based on the work of Price and others. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 19, 2002 Report Share Posted February 19, 2002 Deanna wrote: > I sent the post b/c I remember the issue of > Cod Liver Oil v. Flaxseed Oil came up previously - > I thought one possible reason for not getting all of > one's daily supply of O-3s from Cod Liver Oil would > be the potential for vitamin overdose. If I attempted > this with my Cod Liver Oil, according to Sullivan, I > should be blood testing. However, this might not be > the case at all if the true RDA is 4000 IU. This reminds me of something I've wondered before. Why doesn't fish body oil come up in these discussions of Omega 3 supplementation? Is it that there aren't any really high quality sources? That's hard for me to imagine, but it could be the case. At any rate, a high quality fish body oil supplement would seem to dispose with the problems of both flax and cod liver oil as an omega 3 source. It's already in the form of EPA and DHA and it's not a concentrated source of A or D. I have heard mention that some fish body oils may contain some of both A and D, but since neither is ever listed on the information labels, it must be very small amounts. On another note, do we know that the precursor form of Omega 3 provided by flax oil isn't useful in it's own right? I know the conversion to EPA and DHA is poor, and they may be the most critical forms of omega 3 for human health. I wonder, though, if there is a human biological need for (or at least a benefit from) Alpha-linoleic-acid or perhaps other less commonly discussed omega 3 forms. Are there perhaps prostaglandins that are readily formed from the Alpha-linoleic form that aren't readily made directly from EPA and/or DHA (perhaps requiring a reverse conversion to the Alpha-linoleic form)? If anyone knows the definitive answer to either of these, I'd be very interested... Thanks, Minneapolis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 19, 2002 Report Share Posted February 19, 2002 - >Even if there is an >optimal dosage higher than 1.25g of EPA + DHA, butter, lard, meat and >milk will provide additional omega-3's. Seems to me the limiting factor in cod liver oil consumption is more likely to be the n3 content -- we need enough, but not too much -- rather than the vitamin content. Either way, I'm highly skeptical of the usefulness of flax oil. As you say, the conversion rate is awful, so we're left with a lot of seemingly-useless oil floating through our systems. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 20, 2002 Report Share Posted February 20, 2002 wrote: " On another note, do we know that the precursor form of Omega 3 provided by flax oil isn't useful in it's own right? " My thoughts exactly. I have printed out Enig's article from the WAP site " Tripping lightly down the prostaglandin pathway " in an attempt to answer this question myself. Additionally, I have seen references that indicate that as long as one consumes enough Omega 3 (I think it was 2000mg) the issue was not so much the amount, but the important issue became the ratio of O3 to O6. - Again, leading me to agree with your hypothesis. From my personal experience of taking Evening Primrose Oil and Flaxseed Oil (for 9 months before starting Cod) - the Flax is clearly doing something for me - that is, eliminating my chicken skin (aka: eczema). Without Flax, it comes back - this happened on each of the 3 occasions that I ran out of it. As you, I have also wondered about the fish oils. I have heard similar stories - good sources are difficult to find. Deanna ----- Original Message ----- From: " Kroyer " <skroyer@...> < > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 5:37 PM Subject: RE: Re: mixing oils cod v. flax Deanna wrote: > I sent the post b/c I remember the issue of > Cod Liver Oil v. Flaxseed Oil came up previously - > I thought one possible reason for not getting all of > one's daily supply of O-3s from Cod Liver Oil would > be the potential for vitamin overdose. If I attempted > this with my Cod Liver Oil, according to Sullivan, I > should be blood testing. However, this might not be > the case at all if the true RDA is 4000 IU. This reminds me of something I've wondered before. Why doesn't fish body oil come up in these discussions of Omega 3 supplementation? Is it that there aren't any really high quality sources? That's hard for me to imagine, but it could be the case. At any rate, a high quality fish body oil supplement would seem to dispose with the problems of both flax and cod liver oil as an omega 3 source. It's already in the form of EPA and DHA and it's not a concentrated source of A or D. I have heard mention that some fish body oils may contain some of both A and D, but since neither is ever listed on the information labels, it must be very small amounts. On another note, do we know that the precursor form of Omega 3 provided by flax oil isn't useful in it's own right? I know the conversion to EPA and DHA is poor, and they may be the most critical forms of omega 3 for human health. I wonder, though, if there is a human biological need for (or at least a benefit from) Alpha-linoleic-acid or perhaps other less commonly discussed omega 3 forms. Are there perhaps prostaglandins that are readily formed from the Alpha-linoleic form that aren't readily made directly from EPA and/or DHA (perhaps requiring a reverse conversion to the Alpha-linoleic form)? If anyone knows the definitive answer to either of these, I'd be very interested... Thanks, Minneapolis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 20, 2002 Report Share Posted February 20, 2002 " Only the elongated omega-3s (EPA, DPA and DHA)and omega-6s (GLA and AA) can be formed in the body and that makes them either non-essential or conditionally essential, but they do not have the same level of " essentiality " as their precursors LA and LNA (both of which have some additional functions separate from their roles as specific precursors to GLA, AA, EPA, DPA, and DHA). " Thank you very much for posting this - it answers my questions too! ----- Original Message ----- From: " sraosha87 " <sraosha@...> < > Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 12:20 AM Subject: Re: mixing oils cod v. flax > On another note, do we know that the precursor form of Omega 3 provided by > flax oil isn't useful in it's own right? I know the conversion to EPA and > DHA is poor, and they may be the most critical forms of omega 3 for human > health. I wonder, though, if there is a human biological need for (or at > least a benefit from) Alpha-linoleic-acid or perhaps other less commonly > discussed omega 3 forms. Are there perhaps prostaglandins that are readily > formed from the Alpha-linoleic form that aren't readily made directly from > EPA and/or DHA (perhaps requiring a reverse conversion to the Alpha-linoleic > form)? >From post #3846 on coconut-info group, by Enig, PhD.: --snip-- Regarding the essential fatty acids (often referred to as EFAs): (i) The first of the omega-3 fatty acids is called alpha-linolenic acid (LNA) and it is essential because it can only be obtained from the diet. It cannot be made in any animal body. (ii) The first of the omega-6 fatty acids is called linoleic acid (LA) and it is essential because it can only be obtained from the diet. It too cannot be made in any animal body. Only the elongated omega-3s (EPA, DPA and DHA)and omega-6s (GLA and AA) can be formed in the body and that makes them either non-essential or conditionally essential, but they do not have the same level of " essentiality " as their precursors LA and LNA (both of which have some additional functions separate from their roles as specific precursors to GLA, AA, EPA, DPA, and DHA). --snip-- I am a nutritionist/nutritional biochemist. I have an MS and a PhD from the University of land's Graduate Program in Nutritional Sciences. I did my graduate degree studies in the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry. I am a researcher with real " bench " experience in food fats and oils chemistry and in lipid biochemistry. By bench chemistry and biochemistry I mean that I have actually analyzed in many different ways fats and oils from foods and lipids from tissues of both animals and humans. In addition to doing this extensive bench research in a university setting for nearly 20 years and attending technical meetings for nearly 30 years, I have made sure that I am well-read in the entire fats, oils and lipids research area, and in addition to the pertinent historical information that most people hear about, many of my files and papers on fats and oils go back to the early 1930s. Thus I presented the above information as an expert in lipids and all aspects of nutrition connected with lipids. I wrote the book Know Your Fats because I was quite concerned about all of the misinformation concerning the subject of fats, oils, and lipids that was showing up in the different literatures; eg, in books, newsletters, magazines, newspapers. I wrote the book as a " primer " because I hoped to give people an opportunity to see and understand the basics. I included some small pieces of technical information but did not expand on many areas that are best covered in a text book and that must of necessity be at a scientific research level. I also included a certain amount of the politics, but did not dwell on the whole issue as that would have required an entire book in itself. I answered many questions that had been asked of me over many years. Enig Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 20, 2002 Report Share Posted February 20, 2002 From: sraosha87 [mailto:sraosha@...] quoting from post #3846 on coconut-info group, by Enig, PhD.: > " Regarding the essential fatty acids .... > they [EPA, DPA, DHA, GLA, AA] do not have the same > level of " essentiality " as their precursors LA and LNA > (both of which have some additional functions separate > from their roles as specific precursors to GLA, AA, EPA, > DPA, and DHA) " . Beautiful! I hadn't dared to hope for such a specific and informative response. Thank you very much! I think I'll continue to look for opportunities for adding small amounts of flax to my diet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 20, 2002 Report Share Posted February 20, 2002 wrote: >That is interesting. Now I'd like to know more >(anything) about these functions, and what foods >have the precursors besides flax. , Most vegetables, nuts and seeds contain some. Walnuts, butternuts, wheat germ, and purslane are some that I know to be relatively rich sources. Most very green herbs contain a fair amount proportionately speaking, but since the total lipids in most of them are so low, they don't really yield a very concentrated source. What I'm not sure about is whether all of the vegetable (precursor) form of omega 3 gets converted in the animal to the longer forms like DHA, or whether some remains in the shorter precursor form. I'm guessing that there's at least *some* remaining in the precursor form in marine fats and grass-fed fats, but I don't know that for sure yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 21, 2002 Report Share Posted February 21, 2002 Anyone care to comment on the broadsides by Ray Peat and Bruce Fife against supplementing with flax and fish oils? On Tue, 19 Feb 2002 18:06:14 -0500 Idol <Idol@...> writes: - >Even if there is an >optimal dosage higher than 1.25g of EPA + DHA, butter, lard, meat and >milk will provide additional omega-3's. Seems to me the limiting factor in cod liver oil consumption is more likely to be the n3 content -- we need enough, but not too much -- rather than the vitamin content. Either way, I'm highly skeptical of the usefulness of flax oil. As you say, the conversion rate is awful, so we're left with a lot of seemingly-useless oil floating through our systems. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 24, 2002 Report Share Posted February 24, 2002 Bianca- >Anyone care to comment on the broadsides by Ray Peat and Bruce Fife >against supplementing with flax and fish oils? I think history's pretty clear that fish is good and helpful, but I stopped using flax oil a few years ago and I'm not going to start again. I also read elsewhere that the lignin content of flax and flax oil is hormonally active like isoflavones. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 25, 2002 Report Share Posted February 25, 2002 , I don't think either one of these men would disagree on the wholesomeness of fish. It is the fish and flax oils they have a problem with. I will post the Ray Peat article tomorrow for perusal. B On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 23:13:21 -0500 Idol <Idol@...> writes: Bianca- >Anyone care to comment on the broadsides by Ray Peat and Bruce Fife >against supplementing with flax and fish oils? I think history's pretty clear that fish is good and helpful, but I stopped using flax oil a few years ago and I'm not going to start again. I also read elsewhere that the lignin content of flax and flax oil is hormonally active like isoflavones. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.