Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

toxic hair test results change w/o chelation during abx Lyme treatment ??

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Hi again,

I thought I'd post this on its own as many here are veterans of

chelation. I submitted this also to the frequent chelation group

(based on Cutler's hair analysis and chelation recommendations

books).

Sorry if the formatting doesn't come out right.

---------

Hi folks,

My 11 year old son is being treated for Lyme disease and has had

significant exposure to molds from a compromised bedroom (which has

since been addressed).

I originally ran a hair test for him 1.5 years ago in which he came

out with the " all-low " type signature and definitely met the counting

rules for showing deranged mineral xport.

I did 3 rounds of chelation last fall but stopped because he

developed severe ongoing GI problems that took a long time to

resolve/go away. Also, since he was on abx for his Lyme treatment,

I was worried about too many interactions that I could not control.

Now that he is more stable, I ran another hair test as a baseline in

prep to restart chelation. I was very shocked to see his results

come back very differently as I have NOT been actively chelating him.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------

His test now no longer meets the counting rules – normal – and shows

a more normal pattern!?

How is this possible? His reference ranges are still the same.

Here are my questions and concerns:

• Are these tests generally repeatable and consistent?

• Could I have screwed up in the collection of hair to get such

radically different results?

• Could he have excreted the metals himself without special

chelation aid?

• Could his Lyme abx have stirred things up enough to change

the equation?

• Is he truly " normal " now, in terms of mineral transport?

• If so, what does this current test now show in terms of

problems or issues, as he still has significant and mysterious

health problems (see below)?

• Can he now take ALA on a schedule other than a " safe " one as

defined in " Amalgam Illness " with impunity? Since ALA is helpful to

the liver and he is on abx, this would be a support for him?

• Has anyone else had experience with Lyme or mold affecting

their hair test results?

----

Here is the data from the 2 tests:

Male (age 11)

June 2008 – newest test

POTENTIALLY TOXIC ELEMENTS

element result ref range color

=============================================

aluminum 5.9 < 8.0 green

antimony 0.032 <0.066 green

arsenic 0.039 <0.080 green

beryllium <0.01 <0.020 none

bismuth 0.16 <2.0 green

cadmium 0.040 <0.15 green

lead 0.31 <1.0 green

mercury 0.50 <0.40 yellow

platinum <0.003 <0.005 none

thallium <0.001 <0.010 none

thorium <0.001 <0.005 none

uranium 0.019 <0.060 green

nickel 0.16 <0.40 green

silver 0.05 <0.13 green

tin 0.13 <0.30 green

titanium 0.84 <1.0 green

ESSENTIAL AND OTHER ELEMENTS

element result ref range color under/over 50%

============================================================

Calcium 1230 160-500 red over

Magnesium 89 12-50 yellow

over

Sodium 56 12-90 green over

Potassium 11 10-40 green

under

Copper 29 9.0-30 green over

Zinc 210 110-190 yellow over

Manganese 0.20 0.18-0.60 green

under

Chromium 0.57 0.23-0.50 yellow

over

Vanadium 0.077 0.025-0.10 green

over

Molybdenum 0.023 0.040-0.089 red

under

Boron 1.3 0.50-3.5 white

middle

Iodine 1.5 0.25-1.3 yellow over

Lithium 0.007 0.007-0.023 green

under

Phosphorus 149 160-250 yellow under

Selenium 0.94 0.95-1.7 green

under

Strontium 2.7 0.21-2.1 yellow

over

Sulfur 47100 45500-53000 green under

Barium 1.9 0.19-1.6 yellow over

Cobalt 0.013 0.013-0.035 green under

Iron 13 6.0-17 green

over

Germanium 0.029 0.045-0.065 yellow

under

Rubidium 0.011 0.008-0.080 green

under

Zirconium 0.10 0.0600.70 green

under

Counting rule #1: 11 (ordinary & average)

Counting rule #2: 11 (ordinary & average)

Counting rule #3: 2 (not uncommon)

Counting rule #4: 13 (unusual)

Counting rule #5: not met,

=============================================================

Here is the older test:

2007 Hair Test Results

Lab: Doctor's Data, Incorporated.

Age: 9 Y Male

POTENTIALLY TOXIC ELEMENTS

element result ref range color

=============================================

aluminum 18 <8.0

yellow

antimony 0.038 <0.066 green

arsenic 0.053 <0.080 green

beryllium <0.01 <0.020 absent

bismuth 0.044 <0.12 green

cadmium 0.054 <0.15 green

lead 0.24 <1.0 green

mercury 0.96 <0.40 yellow

platinum <0.003 <0.005 absent

thallium <0.001 <0.010 absent

thorium <0.001 <0.005 absent

uranium 0.025 <0.060 green

nickel 0.10 <0.40 green

silver 0.03 <0.13 green

tin 0.25 <0.30 green

titanium 1.5 <1.0 yellow

ESSENTIAL AND OTHER ELEMENTS

element result ref range color under/over 50%

============================================================

Calcium 328 160-500

green under

Magnesium 110 12-50

yellow over

Sodium 17 12-90

green under

Potassium 6 10-40

yellow under

Copper 15 9.0-30

white exactly 50%

Zinc 160 110-190

white exactly 50%

Manganese 0.15 0.18-0.60

yellow under

Chromium 0.33 0.23-0.50

green over

Vanadium 0.035 0.025-0.10

green under

Molybdenum 0.040 0.040-0.089 green

under

Boron 0.61 0.50-3.5

green under

Iodine 0.25 0.25-1.3

green under

Lithium <0.004 0.007-0.023

red under

Phosphorus 169 160-250

green under

Selenium 0.93 0.95-1.7

green/yellow under

Strontium 1.1 0.21-2.1

green over

Sulfur 48800 45500-53000 green

over

Barium 0.51 0.19-1.6

white exactly 50%

Cobalt 0.009 0.013-0.035

yellow under

Iron 24 6.0-17

yellow over

Germanium 0.035 0.045-0.065 yellow

under

Rubidium 0.012 0.008-0.080

green under

Zirconium 0.10 0.060-0.70

green under

Counting rule #1: 5 (abnormal)

The significant changes have been his: abx treatment for Lyme,

increased mineral and vitamin supplementation, and removal from a

terrible mold situation (removed from mold situation 2/14/08).

I have not been giving him any other alleged chelators vetted by

Andy, although I am giving reasonable doses of Vit C daily and other

supplementation.

Strange, yes?

Deb

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Deb,

Andy Cutler's counting rules for interpreting the essential elements on

a Hair Elements test only applies to establish Mercury toxicity in a

person, since only Mercury affects a wide variety of mineral transport

proteins in various different ways. With this said, whether the

pattern of deranged mineral transport has improved or not does not

provide any information on the status of the other two significantly

neuro-toxic metals, Lead and Aluminum. I find this test useful for

understanding Mercury status, but it is not a good gauge of the status

of Lead and Aluminum.

Limin

pinkfeet2000 wrote:

Hi again,

I thought I'd post this on its own as many here are veterans of

chelation. I submitted this also to the frequent chelation group

(based on Cutler's hair analysis and chelation recommendations

books).

Sorry if the formatting doesn't come out right.

---------

Hi folks,

My 11 year old son is being treated for Lyme disease and has had

significant exposure to molds from a compromised bedroom (which has

since been addressed).

I originally ran a hair test for him 1.5 years ago in which he came

out with the "all-low" type signature and definitely met the counting

rules for showing deranged mineral xport.

I did 3 rounds of chelation last fall but stopped because he

developed severe ongoing GI problems that took a long time to

resolve/go away. Also, since he was on abx for his Lyme treatment,

I was worried about too many interactions that I could not control.

Now that he is more stable, I ran another hair test as a baseline in

prep to restart chelation. I was very shocked to see his results

come back very differently as I have NOT been actively chelating him.

----------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------

His test now no longer meets the counting rules – normal – and shows

a more normal pattern!?

How is this possible? His reference ranges are still the same.

Here are my questions and concerns:

• Are these tests generally repeatable and consistent?

• Could I have screwed up in the collection of hair to get such

radically different results?

• Could he have excreted the metals himself without special

chelation aid?

• Could his Lyme abx have stirred things up enough to change

the equation?

• Is he truly "normal" now, in terms of mineral transport?

• If so, what does this current test now show in terms of

problems or issues, as he still has significant and mysterious

health problems (see below)?

• Can he now take ALA on a schedule other than a "safe" one as

defined in "Amalgam Illness" with impunity? Since ALA is helpful to

the liver and he is on abx, this would be a support for him?

• Has anyone else had experience with Lyme or mold affecting

their hair test results?

----

Here is the data from the 2 tests:

Male (age 11)

June 2008 – newest test

POTENTIALLY TOXIC ELEMENTS

element result ref range color

=============================================

aluminum 5.9 < 8.0 green

antimony 0.032 <0.066 green

arsenic 0.039 <0.080 green

beryllium <0.01 <0.020 none

bismuth 0.16 <2.0 green

cadmium 0.040 <0.15 green

lead 0.31 <1.0 green

mercury 0.50 <0.40 yellow

platinum <0.003 <0.005 none

thallium <0.001 <0.010 none

thorium <0.001 <0.005 none

uranium 0.019 <0.060 green

nickel 0.16 <0.40 green

silver 0.05 <0.13 green

tin 0.13 <0.30 green

titanium 0.84 <1.0 green

ESSENTIAL AND OTHER ELEMENTS

element result ref range color under/over 50%

============================================================

Calcium 1230 160-500 red over

Magnesium 89 12-50 yellow

over

Sodium 56 12-90 green over

Potassium 11 10-40 green

under

Copper 29 9.0-30 green over

Zinc 210 110-190 yellow over

Manganese 0.20 0.18-0.60 green

under

Chromium 0.57 0.23-0.50 yellow

over

Vanadium 0.077 0.025-0.10 green

over

Molybdenum 0.023 0.040-0.089 red

under

Boron 1.3 0.50-3.5 white

middle

Iodine 1.5 0.25-1.3 yellow over

Lithium 0.007 0.007-0.023 green

under

Phosphorus 149 160-250 yellow under

Selenium 0.94 0.95-1.7 green

under

Strontium 2.7 0.21-2.1 yellow

over

Sulfur 47100 45500-53000 green under

Barium 1.9 0.19-1.6 yellow over

Cobalt 0.013 0.013-0.035 green under

Iron 13 6.0-17 green

over

Germanium 0.029 0.045-0.065 yellow

under

Rubidium 0.011 0.008-0.080 green

under

Zirconium 0.10 0.0600.70 green

under

Counting rule #1: 11 (ordinary & average)

Counting rule #2: 11 (ordinary & average)

Counting rule #3: 2 (not uncommon)

Counting rule #4: 13 (unusual)

Counting rule #5: not met,

=============================================================

Here is the older test:

2007 Hair Test Results

Lab: Doctor's Data, Incorporated.

Age: 9 Y Male

POTENTIALLY TOXIC ELEMENTS

element result ref range color

=============================================

aluminum 18 <8.0

yellow

antimony 0.038 <0.066 green

arsenic 0.053 <0.080 green

beryllium <0.01 <0.020 absent

bismuth 0.044 <0.12 green

cadmium 0.054 <0.15 green

lead 0.24 <1.0 green

mercury 0.96 <0.40 yellow

platinum <0.003 <0.005 absent

thallium <0.001 <0.010 absent

thorium <0.001 <0.005 absent

uranium 0.025 <0.060 green

nickel 0.10 <0.40 green

silver 0.03 <0.13 green

tin 0.25 <0.30 green

titanium 1.5 <1.0 yellow

ESSENTIAL AND OTHER ELEMENTS

element result ref range color under/over 50%

============================================================

Calcium 328 160-500

green under

Magnesium 110 12-50

yellow over

Sodium 17 12-90

green under

Potassium 6 10-40

yellow under

Copper 15 9.0-30

white exactly 50%

Zinc 160 110-190

white exactly 50%

Manganese 0.15 0.18-0.60

yellow under

Chromium 0.33 0.23-0.50

green over

Vanadium 0.035 0.025-0.10

green under

Molybdenum 0.040 0.040-0.089 green

under

Boron 0.61 0.50-3.5

green under

Iodine 0.25 0.25-1.3

green under

Lithium <0.004 0.007-0.023

red under

Phosphorus 169 160-250

green under

Selenium 0.93 0.95-1.7

green/yellow under

Strontium 1.1 0.21-2.1

green over

Sulfur 48800 45500-53000 green

over

Barium 0.51 0.19-1.6

white exactly 50%

Cobalt 0.009 0.013-0.035

yellow under

Iron 24 6.0-17

yellow over

Germanium 0.035 0.045-0.065 yellow

under

Rubidium 0.012 0.008-0.080

green under

Zirconium 0.10 0.060-0.70

green under

Counting rule #1: 5 (abnormal)

The significant changes have been his: abx treatment for Lyme,

increased mineral and vitamin supplementation, and removal from a

terrible mold situation (removed from mold situation 2/14/08).

I have not been giving him any other alleged chelators vetted by

Andy, although I am giving reasonable doses of Vit C daily and other

supplementation.

Strange, yes?

Deb

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I don't know how to read hair toxin results, but I will say that I

have heard of people dumping metals when treated for pathogens, such

as lyme. Although, the practice is still to do some type of

chelation or detoxing to keep one from relapsing. If he still has

symptoms, I suspect he is still full of pathogens and toxins.

Heidi N

>

> Hi again,

>

> I thought I'd post this on its own as many here are veterans of

> chelation. I submitted this also to the frequent chelation group

> (based on Cutler's hair analysis and chelation

recommendations

> books).

>

> Sorry if the formatting doesn't come out right.

> ---------

>

> Hi folks,

> My 11 year old son is being treated for Lyme disease and has had

> significant exposure to molds from a compromised bedroom (which has

> since been addressed).

> I originally ran a hair test for him 1.5 years ago in which he came

> out with the " all-low " type signature and definitely met the

counting

> rules for showing deranged mineral xport.

> I did 3 rounds of chelation last fall but stopped because he

> developed severe ongoing GI problems that took a long time to

> resolve/go away. Also, since he was on abx for his Lyme

treatment,

> I was worried about too many interactions that I could not control.

> Now that he is more stable, I ran another hair test as a baseline

in

> prep to restart chelation. I was very shocked to see his results

> come back very differently as I have NOT been actively chelating

him.

> --------------------------------------------------------------------

--

> ----------------------------------------------

> His test now no longer meets the counting rules – normal – and

shows

> a more normal pattern!?

> How is this possible? His reference ranges are still the same.

> Here are my questions and concerns:

> • Are these tests generally repeatable and consistent?

> • Could I have screwed up in the collection of hair to get such

> radically different results?

> • Could he have excreted the metals himself without special

> chelation aid?

> • Could his Lyme abx have stirred things up enough to change

> the equation?

> • Is he truly " normal " now, in terms of mineral transport?

> • If so, what does this current test now show in terms of

> problems or issues, as he still has significant and mysterious

> health problems (see below)?

> • Can he now take ALA on a schedule other than a " safe " one as

> defined in " Amalgam Illness " with impunity? Since ALA is helpful

to

> the liver and he is on abx, this would be a support for him?

> • Has anyone else had experience with Lyme or mold affecting

> their hair test results?

> ----

> Here is the data from the 2 tests:

> Male (age 11)

> June 2008 – newest test

> POTENTIALLY TOXIC ELEMENTS

> element result ref range color

> =============================================

> aluminum 5.9 < 8.0 green

> antimony 0.032 <0.066 green

> arsenic 0.039 <0.080 green

> beryllium <0.01 <0.020 none

> bismuth 0.16 <2.0 green

> cadmium 0.040 <0.15 green

> lead 0.31 <1.0 green

> mercury 0.50 <0.40 yellow

> platinum <0.003 <0.005 none

> thallium <0.001 <0.010 none

> thorium <0.001 <0.005 none

> uranium 0.019 <0.060 green

> nickel 0.16 <0.40 green

> silver 0.05 <0.13 green

> tin 0.13 <0.30 green

> titanium 0.84 <1.0 green

> ESSENTIAL AND OTHER ELEMENTS

> element result ref range color under/over 50%

> ============================================================

> Calcium 1230 160-500 red over

> Magnesium 89 12-50 yellow

> over

> Sodium 56 12-90 green

over

> Potassium 11 10-40 green

> under

> Copper 29 9.0-30 green

over

> Zinc 210 110-190 yellow over

> Manganese 0.20 0.18-0.60 green

> under

> Chromium 0.57 0.23-0.50 yellow

> over

> Vanadium 0.077 0.025-0.10 green

> over

> Molybdenum 0.023 0.040-0.089 red

> under

> Boron 1.3 0.50-3.5 white

> middle

> Iodine 1.5 0.25-1.3 yellow

over

> Lithium 0.007 0.007-0.023 green

> under

> Phosphorus 149 160-250 yellow under

> Selenium 0.94 0.95-1.7 green

> under

> Strontium 2.7 0.21-2.1 yellow

> over

> Sulfur 47100 45500-53000 green

under

> Barium 1.9 0.19-1.6 yellow

over

> Cobalt 0.013 0.013-0.035 green

under

> Iron 13 6.0-17 green

> over

> Germanium 0.029 0.045-0.065 yellow

> under

> Rubidium 0.011 0.008-0.080 green

> under

> Zirconium 0.10 0.0600.70 green

> under

>

> Counting rule #1: 11 (ordinary & average)

> Counting rule #2: 11 (ordinary & average)

> Counting rule #3: 2 (not uncommon)

> Counting rule #4: 13 (unusual)

> Counting rule #5: not met,

>

> =============================================================

> Here is the older test:

> 2007 Hair Test Results

>

> Lab: Doctor's Data, Incorporated.

> Age: 9 Y Male

>

> POTENTIALLY TOXIC ELEMENTS

> element result ref range color

> =============================================

> aluminum 18 <8.0

> yellow

> antimony 0.038 <0.066 green

> arsenic 0.053 <0.080 green

> beryllium <0.01 <0.020 absent

> bismuth 0.044 <0.12 green

> cadmium 0.054 <0.15 green

> lead 0.24 <1.0

green

> mercury 0.96 <0.40 yellow

> platinum <0.003 <0.005 absent

> thallium <0.001 <0.010 absent

> thorium <0.001 <0.005 absent

> uranium 0.025 <0.060 green

> nickel 0.10 <0.40 green

> silver 0.03 <0.13 green

> tin 0.25 <0.30

green

> titanium 1.5 <1.0 yellow

> ESSENTIAL AND OTHER ELEMENTS

> element result ref range color under/over 50%

> ============================================================

> Calcium 328 160-500

> green under

> Magnesium 110 12-50

> yellow over

> Sodium 17 12-90

> green under

> Potassium 6 10-40

> yellow under

> Copper 15 9.0-30

> white exactly 50%

> Zinc 160 110-190

> white exactly 50%

> Manganese 0.15 0.18-0.60

> yellow under

> Chromium 0.33 0.23-0.50

> green over

> Vanadium 0.035 0.025-0.10

> green under

> Molybdenum 0.040 0.040-0.089 green

> under

> Boron 0.61 0.50-3.5

> green under

> Iodine 0.25 0.25-1.3

> green under

> Lithium <0.004 0.007-0.023

> red under

> Phosphorus 169 160-250

> green under

> Selenium 0.93 0.95-1.7

> green/yellow under

> Strontium 1.1 0.21-2.1

> green over

> Sulfur 48800 45500-53000

green

> over

> Barium 0.51 0.19-1.6

> white exactly 50%

> Cobalt 0.009 0.013-0.035

> yellow under

> Iron 24 6.0-17

> yellow over

> Germanium 0.035 0.045-0.065

yellow

> under

> Rubidium 0.012 0.008-0.080

> green under

> Zirconium 0.10 0.060-0.70

> green under

>

> Counting rule #1: 5 (abnormal)

>

> The significant changes have been his: abx treatment for Lyme,

> increased mineral and vitamin supplementation, and removal from a

> terrible mold situation (removed from mold situation 2/14/08).

> I have not been giving him any other alleged chelators vetted by

> Andy, although I am giving reasonable doses of Vit C daily and

other

> supplementation.

>

> Strange, yes?

>

> Deb

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I agree Limin, therefore I used the term " better. " I think even being

anemic might skew the results because heme is somewhere in the

picture? I have not read up too much on the bio-chemistry of it. Then

there is the aspect of diffusion, metals sitting in the brain will

take time to diffuse out especially for seizure kids (I would think).

It is however loads better than the hair test. My son did not even

meet the counting rules for mercury back when he was mobilizing metals

as evidenced by aluminum and other metals in the red, and he was

*definitely* mercury toxic.

Gayatri

> > >

> > > Hi again,

> > >

> > > I thought I'd post this on its own as many here are veterans of

> > > chelation. I submitted this also to the frequent chelation group

> > > (based on Cutler's hair analysis and chelation

recommendations

> > > books).

> > >

> > > Sorry if the formatting doesn't come out right.

> > > ---------

> > >

> > > Hi folks,

> > > My 11 year old son is being treated for Lyme disease and has had

> > > significant exposure to molds from a compromised bedroom (which has

> > > since been addressed).

> > > I originally ran a hair test for him 1.5 years ago in which he came

> > > out with the " all-low " type signature and definitely met the

counting

> > > rules for showing deranged mineral xport.

> > > I did 3 rounds of chelation last fall but stopped because he

> > > developed severe ongoing GI problems that took a long time to

> > > resolve/go away. Also, since he was on abx for his Lyme treatment,

> > > I was worried about too many interactions that I could not control.

> > > Now that he is more stable, I ran another hair test as a baseline in

> > > prep to restart chelation. I was very shocked to see his results

> > > come back very differently as I have NOT been actively chelating

him.

> > > ----------------------------------------------------------

> > > ----------------------------------------------

> > > His test now no longer meets the counting rules � normal � and

> > shows

> > > a more normal pattern!?

> > > How is this possible? His reference ranges are still the same.

> > > Here are my questions and concerns:

> > > � Are these tests generally repeatable and consistent?

> > > � Could I have screwed up in the collection of hair to get such

> > > radically different results?

> > > � Could he have excreted the metals himself without special

> > > chelation aid?

> > > � Could his Lyme abx have stirred things up enough to change

> > > the equation?

> > > � Is he truly " normal " now, in terms of mineral transport?

> > > � If so, what does this current test now show in terms of

> > > problems or issues, as he still has significant and mysterious

> > > health problems (see below)?

> > > � Can he now take ALA on a schedule other than a " safe " one as

> > > defined in " Amalgam Illness " with impunity? Since ALA is helpful to

> > > the liver and he is on abx, this would be a support for him?

> > > � Has anyone else had experience with Lyme or mold affecting

> > > their hair test results?

> > > ----

> > > Here is the data from the 2 tests:

> > > Male (age 11)

> > > June 2008 � newest test

> > > POTENTIALLY TOXIC ELEMENTS

> > > element result ref range color

> > > =============================================

> > > aluminum 5.9 < 8.0 green

> > > antimony 0.032 <0.066 green

> > > arsenic 0.039 <0.080 green

> > > beryllium <0.01 <0.020 none

> > > bismuth 0.16 <2.0 green

> > > cadmium 0.040 <0.15 green

> > > lead 0.31 <1.0 green

> > > mercury 0.50 <0.40 yellow

> > > platinum <0.003 <0.005 none

> > > thallium <0.001 <0.010 none

> > > thorium <0.001 <0.005 none

> > > uranium 0.019 <0.060 green

> > > nickel 0.16 <0.40 green

> > > silver 0.05 <0.13 green

> > > tin 0.13 <0.30 green

> > > titanium 0.84 <1.0 green

> > > ESSENTIAL AND OTHER ELEMENTS

> > > element result ref range color under/over 50%

> > > ============================================================

> > > Calcium 1230 160-500 red over

> > > Magnesium 89 12-50 yellow

> > > over

> > > Sodium 56 12-90 green over

> > > Potassium 11 10-40 green

> > > under

> > > Copper 29 9.0-30 green over

> > > Zinc 210 110-190 yellow over

> > > Manganese 0.20 0.18-0.60 green

> > > under

> > > Chromium 0.57 0.23-0.50 yellow

> > > over

> > > Vanadium 0.077 0.025-0.10 green

> > > over

> > > Molybdenum 0.023 0.040-0.089 red

> > > under

> > > Boron 1.3 0.50-3.5 white

> > > middle

> > > Iodine 1.5 0.25-1.3 yellow over

> > > Lithium 0.007 0.007-0.023 green

> > > under

> > > Phosphorus 149 160-250 yellow under

> > > Selenium 0.94 0.95-1.7 green

> > > under

> > > Strontium 2.7 0.21-2.1 yellow

> > > over

> > > Sulfur 47100 45500-53000 green under

> > > Barium 1.9 0.19-1.6 yellow over

> > > Cobalt 0.013 0.013-0.035 green under

> > > Iron 13 6.0-17 green

> > > over

> > > Germanium 0.029 0.045-0.065 yellow

> > > under

> > > Rubidium 0.011 0.008-0.080 green

> > > under

> > > Zirconium 0.10 0.0600.70 green

> > > under

> > >

> > > Counting rule #1: 11 (ordinary & average)

> > > Counting rule #2: 11 (ordinary & average)

> > > Counting rule #3: 2 (not uncommon)

> > > Counting rule #4: 13 (unusual)

> > > Counting rule #5: not met,

> > >

> > > =============================================================

> > > Here is the older test:

> > > 2007 Hair Test Results

> > >

> > > Lab: Doctor's Data, Incorporated.

> > > Age: 9 Y Male

> > >

> > > POTENTIALLY TOXIC ELEMENTS

> > > element result ref range color

> > > =============================================

> > > aluminum 18 <8.0

> > > yellow

> > > antimony 0.038 <0.066 green

> > > arsenic 0.053 <0.080 green

> > > beryllium <0.01 <0.020 absent

> > > bismuth 0.044 <0.12 green

> > > cadmium 0.054 <0.15 green

> > > lead 0.24 <1.0 green

> > > mercury 0.96 <0.40 yellow

> > > platinum <0.003 <0.005 absent

> > > thallium <0.001 <0.010 absent

> > > thorium <0.001 <0.005 absent

> > > uranium 0.025 <0.060 green

> > > nickel 0.10 <0.40 green

> > > silver 0.03 <0.13 green

> > > tin 0.25 <0.30 green

> > > titanium 1.5 <1.0 yellow

> > > ESSENTIAL AND OTHER ELEMENTS

> > > element result ref range color under/over 50%

> > > ============================================================

> > > Calcium 328 160-500

> > > green under

> > > Magnesium 110 12-50

> > > yellow over

> > > Sodium 17 12-90

> > > green under

> > > Potassium 6 10-40

> > > yellow under

> > > Copper 15 9.0-30

> > > white exactly 50%

> > > Zinc 160 110-190

> > > white exactly 50%

> > > Manganese 0.15 0.18-0.60

> > > yellow under

> > > Chromium 0.33 0.23-0.50

> > > green over

> > > Vanadium 0.035 0.025-0.10

> > > green under

> > > Molybdenum 0.040 0.040-0.089 green

> > > under

> > > Boron 0.61 0.50-3.5

> > > green under

> > > Iodine 0.25 0.25-1.3

> > > green under

> > > Lithium <0.004 0.007-0.023

> > > red under

> > > Phosphorus 169 160-250

> > > green under

> > > Selenium 0.93 0.95-1.7

> > > green/yellow under

> > > Strontium 1.1 0.21-2.1

> > > green over

> > > Sulfur 48800 45500-53000 green

> > > over

> > > Barium 0.51 0.19-1.6

> > > white exactly 50%

> > > Cobalt 0.009 0.013-0.035

> > > yellow under

> > > Iron 24 6.0-17

> > > yellow over

> > > Germanium 0.035 0.045-0.065 yellow

> > > under

> > > Rubidium 0.012 0.008-0.080

> > > green under

> > > Zirconium 0.10 0.060-0.70

> > > green under

> > >

> > > Counting rule #1: 5 (abnormal)

> > >

> > > The significant changes have been his: abx treatment for Lyme,

> > > increased mineral and vitamin supplementation, and removal from a

> > > terrible mold situation (removed from mold situation 2/14/08).

> > > I have not been giving him any other alleged chelators vetted by

> > > Andy, although I am giving reasonable doses of Vit C daily and other

> > > supplementation.

> > >

> > > Strange, yes?

> > >

> > > Deb

> > >

> >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...