Guest guest Posted July 16, 2008 Report Share Posted July 16, 2008 Hi again, I thought I'd post this on its own as many here are veterans of chelation. I submitted this also to the frequent chelation group (based on Cutler's hair analysis and chelation recommendations books). Sorry if the formatting doesn't come out right. --------- Hi folks, My 11 year old son is being treated for Lyme disease and has had significant exposure to molds from a compromised bedroom (which has since been addressed). I originally ran a hair test for him 1.5 years ago in which he came out with the " all-low " type signature and definitely met the counting rules for showing deranged mineral xport. I did 3 rounds of chelation last fall but stopped because he developed severe ongoing GI problems that took a long time to resolve/go away. Also, since he was on abx for his Lyme treatment, I was worried about too many interactions that I could not control. Now that he is more stable, I ran another hair test as a baseline in prep to restart chelation. I was very shocked to see his results come back very differently as I have NOT been actively chelating him. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- His test now no longer meets the counting rules – normal – and shows a more normal pattern!? How is this possible? His reference ranges are still the same. Here are my questions and concerns: • Are these tests generally repeatable and consistent? • Could I have screwed up in the collection of hair to get such radically different results? • Could he have excreted the metals himself without special chelation aid? • Could his Lyme abx have stirred things up enough to change the equation? • Is he truly " normal " now, in terms of mineral transport? • If so, what does this current test now show in terms of problems or issues, as he still has significant and mysterious health problems (see below)? • Can he now take ALA on a schedule other than a " safe " one as defined in " Amalgam Illness " with impunity? Since ALA is helpful to the liver and he is on abx, this would be a support for him? • Has anyone else had experience with Lyme or mold affecting their hair test results? ---- Here is the data from the 2 tests: Male (age 11) June 2008 – newest test POTENTIALLY TOXIC ELEMENTS element result ref range color ============================================= aluminum 5.9 < 8.0 green antimony 0.032 <0.066 green arsenic 0.039 <0.080 green beryllium <0.01 <0.020 none bismuth 0.16 <2.0 green cadmium 0.040 <0.15 green lead 0.31 <1.0 green mercury 0.50 <0.40 yellow platinum <0.003 <0.005 none thallium <0.001 <0.010 none thorium <0.001 <0.005 none uranium 0.019 <0.060 green nickel 0.16 <0.40 green silver 0.05 <0.13 green tin 0.13 <0.30 green titanium 0.84 <1.0 green ESSENTIAL AND OTHER ELEMENTS element result ref range color under/over 50% ============================================================ Calcium 1230 160-500 red over Magnesium 89 12-50 yellow over Sodium 56 12-90 green over Potassium 11 10-40 green under Copper 29 9.0-30 green over Zinc 210 110-190 yellow over Manganese 0.20 0.18-0.60 green under Chromium 0.57 0.23-0.50 yellow over Vanadium 0.077 0.025-0.10 green over Molybdenum 0.023 0.040-0.089 red under Boron 1.3 0.50-3.5 white middle Iodine 1.5 0.25-1.3 yellow over Lithium 0.007 0.007-0.023 green under Phosphorus 149 160-250 yellow under Selenium 0.94 0.95-1.7 green under Strontium 2.7 0.21-2.1 yellow over Sulfur 47100 45500-53000 green under Barium 1.9 0.19-1.6 yellow over Cobalt 0.013 0.013-0.035 green under Iron 13 6.0-17 green over Germanium 0.029 0.045-0.065 yellow under Rubidium 0.011 0.008-0.080 green under Zirconium 0.10 0.0600.70 green under Counting rule #1: 11 (ordinary & average) Counting rule #2: 11 (ordinary & average) Counting rule #3: 2 (not uncommon) Counting rule #4: 13 (unusual) Counting rule #5: not met, ============================================================= Here is the older test: 2007 Hair Test Results Lab: Doctor's Data, Incorporated. Age: 9 Y Male POTENTIALLY TOXIC ELEMENTS element result ref range color ============================================= aluminum 18 <8.0 yellow antimony 0.038 <0.066 green arsenic 0.053 <0.080 green beryllium <0.01 <0.020 absent bismuth 0.044 <0.12 green cadmium 0.054 <0.15 green lead 0.24 <1.0 green mercury 0.96 <0.40 yellow platinum <0.003 <0.005 absent thallium <0.001 <0.010 absent thorium <0.001 <0.005 absent uranium 0.025 <0.060 green nickel 0.10 <0.40 green silver 0.03 <0.13 green tin 0.25 <0.30 green titanium 1.5 <1.0 yellow ESSENTIAL AND OTHER ELEMENTS element result ref range color under/over 50% ============================================================ Calcium 328 160-500 green under Magnesium 110 12-50 yellow over Sodium 17 12-90 green under Potassium 6 10-40 yellow under Copper 15 9.0-30 white exactly 50% Zinc 160 110-190 white exactly 50% Manganese 0.15 0.18-0.60 yellow under Chromium 0.33 0.23-0.50 green over Vanadium 0.035 0.025-0.10 green under Molybdenum 0.040 0.040-0.089 green under Boron 0.61 0.50-3.5 green under Iodine 0.25 0.25-1.3 green under Lithium <0.004 0.007-0.023 red under Phosphorus 169 160-250 green under Selenium 0.93 0.95-1.7 green/yellow under Strontium 1.1 0.21-2.1 green over Sulfur 48800 45500-53000 green over Barium 0.51 0.19-1.6 white exactly 50% Cobalt 0.009 0.013-0.035 yellow under Iron 24 6.0-17 yellow over Germanium 0.035 0.045-0.065 yellow under Rubidium 0.012 0.008-0.080 green under Zirconium 0.10 0.060-0.70 green under Counting rule #1: 5 (abnormal) The significant changes have been his: abx treatment for Lyme, increased mineral and vitamin supplementation, and removal from a terrible mold situation (removed from mold situation 2/14/08). I have not been giving him any other alleged chelators vetted by Andy, although I am giving reasonable doses of Vit C daily and other supplementation. Strange, yes? Deb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 16, 2008 Report Share Posted July 16, 2008 Deb, Andy Cutler's counting rules for interpreting the essential elements on a Hair Elements test only applies to establish Mercury toxicity in a person, since only Mercury affects a wide variety of mineral transport proteins in various different ways. With this said, whether the pattern of deranged mineral transport has improved or not does not provide any information on the status of the other two significantly neuro-toxic metals, Lead and Aluminum. I find this test useful for understanding Mercury status, but it is not a good gauge of the status of Lead and Aluminum. Limin pinkfeet2000 wrote: Hi again, I thought I'd post this on its own as many here are veterans of chelation. I submitted this also to the frequent chelation group (based on Cutler's hair analysis and chelation recommendations books). Sorry if the formatting doesn't come out right. --------- Hi folks, My 11 year old son is being treated for Lyme disease and has had significant exposure to molds from a compromised bedroom (which has since been addressed). I originally ran a hair test for him 1.5 years ago in which he came out with the "all-low" type signature and definitely met the counting rules for showing deranged mineral xport. I did 3 rounds of chelation last fall but stopped because he developed severe ongoing GI problems that took a long time to resolve/go away. Also, since he was on abx for his Lyme treatment, I was worried about too many interactions that I could not control. Now that he is more stable, I ran another hair test as a baseline in prep to restart chelation. I was very shocked to see his results come back very differently as I have NOT been actively chelating him. ---------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- His test now no longer meets the counting rules – normal – and shows a more normal pattern!? How is this possible? His reference ranges are still the same. Here are my questions and concerns: • Are these tests generally repeatable and consistent? • Could I have screwed up in the collection of hair to get such radically different results? • Could he have excreted the metals himself without special chelation aid? • Could his Lyme abx have stirred things up enough to change the equation? • Is he truly "normal" now, in terms of mineral transport? • If so, what does this current test now show in terms of problems or issues, as he still has significant and mysterious health problems (see below)? • Can he now take ALA on a schedule other than a "safe" one as defined in "Amalgam Illness" with impunity? Since ALA is helpful to the liver and he is on abx, this would be a support for him? • Has anyone else had experience with Lyme or mold affecting their hair test results? ---- Here is the data from the 2 tests: Male (age 11) June 2008 – newest test POTENTIALLY TOXIC ELEMENTS element result ref range color ============================================= aluminum 5.9 < 8.0 green antimony 0.032 <0.066 green arsenic 0.039 <0.080 green beryllium <0.01 <0.020 none bismuth 0.16 <2.0 green cadmium 0.040 <0.15 green lead 0.31 <1.0 green mercury 0.50 <0.40 yellow platinum <0.003 <0.005 none thallium <0.001 <0.010 none thorium <0.001 <0.005 none uranium 0.019 <0.060 green nickel 0.16 <0.40 green silver 0.05 <0.13 green tin 0.13 <0.30 green titanium 0.84 <1.0 green ESSENTIAL AND OTHER ELEMENTS element result ref range color under/over 50% ============================================================ Calcium 1230 160-500 red over Magnesium 89 12-50 yellow over Sodium 56 12-90 green over Potassium 11 10-40 green under Copper 29 9.0-30 green over Zinc 210 110-190 yellow over Manganese 0.20 0.18-0.60 green under Chromium 0.57 0.23-0.50 yellow over Vanadium 0.077 0.025-0.10 green over Molybdenum 0.023 0.040-0.089 red under Boron 1.3 0.50-3.5 white middle Iodine 1.5 0.25-1.3 yellow over Lithium 0.007 0.007-0.023 green under Phosphorus 149 160-250 yellow under Selenium 0.94 0.95-1.7 green under Strontium 2.7 0.21-2.1 yellow over Sulfur 47100 45500-53000 green under Barium 1.9 0.19-1.6 yellow over Cobalt 0.013 0.013-0.035 green under Iron 13 6.0-17 green over Germanium 0.029 0.045-0.065 yellow under Rubidium 0.011 0.008-0.080 green under Zirconium 0.10 0.0600.70 green under Counting rule #1: 11 (ordinary & average) Counting rule #2: 11 (ordinary & average) Counting rule #3: 2 (not uncommon) Counting rule #4: 13 (unusual) Counting rule #5: not met, ============================================================= Here is the older test: 2007 Hair Test Results Lab: Doctor's Data, Incorporated. Age: 9 Y Male POTENTIALLY TOXIC ELEMENTS element result ref range color ============================================= aluminum 18 <8.0 yellow antimony 0.038 <0.066 green arsenic 0.053 <0.080 green beryllium <0.01 <0.020 absent bismuth 0.044 <0.12 green cadmium 0.054 <0.15 green lead 0.24 <1.0 green mercury 0.96 <0.40 yellow platinum <0.003 <0.005 absent thallium <0.001 <0.010 absent thorium <0.001 <0.005 absent uranium 0.025 <0.060 green nickel 0.10 <0.40 green silver 0.03 <0.13 green tin 0.25 <0.30 green titanium 1.5 <1.0 yellow ESSENTIAL AND OTHER ELEMENTS element result ref range color under/over 50% ============================================================ Calcium 328 160-500 green under Magnesium 110 12-50 yellow over Sodium 17 12-90 green under Potassium 6 10-40 yellow under Copper 15 9.0-30 white exactly 50% Zinc 160 110-190 white exactly 50% Manganese 0.15 0.18-0.60 yellow under Chromium 0.33 0.23-0.50 green over Vanadium 0.035 0.025-0.10 green under Molybdenum 0.040 0.040-0.089 green under Boron 0.61 0.50-3.5 green under Iodine 0.25 0.25-1.3 green under Lithium <0.004 0.007-0.023 red under Phosphorus 169 160-250 green under Selenium 0.93 0.95-1.7 green/yellow under Strontium 1.1 0.21-2.1 green over Sulfur 48800 45500-53000 green over Barium 0.51 0.19-1.6 white exactly 50% Cobalt 0.009 0.013-0.035 yellow under Iron 24 6.0-17 yellow over Germanium 0.035 0.045-0.065 yellow under Rubidium 0.012 0.008-0.080 green under Zirconium 0.10 0.060-0.70 green under Counting rule #1: 5 (abnormal) The significant changes have been his: abx treatment for Lyme, increased mineral and vitamin supplementation, and removal from a terrible mold situation (removed from mold situation 2/14/08). I have not been giving him any other alleged chelators vetted by Andy, although I am giving reasonable doses of Vit C daily and other supplementation. Strange, yes? Deb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 16, 2008 Report Share Posted July 16, 2008 I don't know how to read hair toxin results, but I will say that I have heard of people dumping metals when treated for pathogens, such as lyme. Although, the practice is still to do some type of chelation or detoxing to keep one from relapsing. If he still has symptoms, I suspect he is still full of pathogens and toxins. Heidi N > > Hi again, > > I thought I'd post this on its own as many here are veterans of > chelation. I submitted this also to the frequent chelation group > (based on Cutler's hair analysis and chelation recommendations > books). > > Sorry if the formatting doesn't come out right. > --------- > > Hi folks, > My 11 year old son is being treated for Lyme disease and has had > significant exposure to molds from a compromised bedroom (which has > since been addressed). > I originally ran a hair test for him 1.5 years ago in which he came > out with the " all-low " type signature and definitely met the counting > rules for showing deranged mineral xport. > I did 3 rounds of chelation last fall but stopped because he > developed severe ongoing GI problems that took a long time to > resolve/go away. Also, since he was on abx for his Lyme treatment, > I was worried about too many interactions that I could not control. > Now that he is more stable, I ran another hair test as a baseline in > prep to restart chelation. I was very shocked to see his results > come back very differently as I have NOT been actively chelating him. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > ---------------------------------------------- > His test now no longer meets the counting rules – normal – and shows > a more normal pattern!? > How is this possible? His reference ranges are still the same. > Here are my questions and concerns: > • Are these tests generally repeatable and consistent? > • Could I have screwed up in the collection of hair to get such > radically different results? > • Could he have excreted the metals himself without special > chelation aid? > • Could his Lyme abx have stirred things up enough to change > the equation? > • Is he truly " normal " now, in terms of mineral transport? > • If so, what does this current test now show in terms of > problems or issues, as he still has significant and mysterious > health problems (see below)? > • Can he now take ALA on a schedule other than a " safe " one as > defined in " Amalgam Illness " with impunity? Since ALA is helpful to > the liver and he is on abx, this would be a support for him? > • Has anyone else had experience with Lyme or mold affecting > their hair test results? > ---- > Here is the data from the 2 tests: > Male (age 11) > June 2008 – newest test > POTENTIALLY TOXIC ELEMENTS > element result ref range color > ============================================= > aluminum 5.9 < 8.0 green > antimony 0.032 <0.066 green > arsenic 0.039 <0.080 green > beryllium <0.01 <0.020 none > bismuth 0.16 <2.0 green > cadmium 0.040 <0.15 green > lead 0.31 <1.0 green > mercury 0.50 <0.40 yellow > platinum <0.003 <0.005 none > thallium <0.001 <0.010 none > thorium <0.001 <0.005 none > uranium 0.019 <0.060 green > nickel 0.16 <0.40 green > silver 0.05 <0.13 green > tin 0.13 <0.30 green > titanium 0.84 <1.0 green > ESSENTIAL AND OTHER ELEMENTS > element result ref range color under/over 50% > ============================================================ > Calcium 1230 160-500 red over > Magnesium 89 12-50 yellow > over > Sodium 56 12-90 green over > Potassium 11 10-40 green > under > Copper 29 9.0-30 green over > Zinc 210 110-190 yellow over > Manganese 0.20 0.18-0.60 green > under > Chromium 0.57 0.23-0.50 yellow > over > Vanadium 0.077 0.025-0.10 green > over > Molybdenum 0.023 0.040-0.089 red > under > Boron 1.3 0.50-3.5 white > middle > Iodine 1.5 0.25-1.3 yellow over > Lithium 0.007 0.007-0.023 green > under > Phosphorus 149 160-250 yellow under > Selenium 0.94 0.95-1.7 green > under > Strontium 2.7 0.21-2.1 yellow > over > Sulfur 47100 45500-53000 green under > Barium 1.9 0.19-1.6 yellow over > Cobalt 0.013 0.013-0.035 green under > Iron 13 6.0-17 green > over > Germanium 0.029 0.045-0.065 yellow > under > Rubidium 0.011 0.008-0.080 green > under > Zirconium 0.10 0.0600.70 green > under > > Counting rule #1: 11 (ordinary & average) > Counting rule #2: 11 (ordinary & average) > Counting rule #3: 2 (not uncommon) > Counting rule #4: 13 (unusual) > Counting rule #5: not met, > > ============================================================= > Here is the older test: > 2007 Hair Test Results > > Lab: Doctor's Data, Incorporated. > Age: 9 Y Male > > POTENTIALLY TOXIC ELEMENTS > element result ref range color > ============================================= > aluminum 18 <8.0 > yellow > antimony 0.038 <0.066 green > arsenic 0.053 <0.080 green > beryllium <0.01 <0.020 absent > bismuth 0.044 <0.12 green > cadmium 0.054 <0.15 green > lead 0.24 <1.0 green > mercury 0.96 <0.40 yellow > platinum <0.003 <0.005 absent > thallium <0.001 <0.010 absent > thorium <0.001 <0.005 absent > uranium 0.025 <0.060 green > nickel 0.10 <0.40 green > silver 0.03 <0.13 green > tin 0.25 <0.30 green > titanium 1.5 <1.0 yellow > ESSENTIAL AND OTHER ELEMENTS > element result ref range color under/over 50% > ============================================================ > Calcium 328 160-500 > green under > Magnesium 110 12-50 > yellow over > Sodium 17 12-90 > green under > Potassium 6 10-40 > yellow under > Copper 15 9.0-30 > white exactly 50% > Zinc 160 110-190 > white exactly 50% > Manganese 0.15 0.18-0.60 > yellow under > Chromium 0.33 0.23-0.50 > green over > Vanadium 0.035 0.025-0.10 > green under > Molybdenum 0.040 0.040-0.089 green > under > Boron 0.61 0.50-3.5 > green under > Iodine 0.25 0.25-1.3 > green under > Lithium <0.004 0.007-0.023 > red under > Phosphorus 169 160-250 > green under > Selenium 0.93 0.95-1.7 > green/yellow under > Strontium 1.1 0.21-2.1 > green over > Sulfur 48800 45500-53000 green > over > Barium 0.51 0.19-1.6 > white exactly 50% > Cobalt 0.009 0.013-0.035 > yellow under > Iron 24 6.0-17 > yellow over > Germanium 0.035 0.045-0.065 yellow > under > Rubidium 0.012 0.008-0.080 > green under > Zirconium 0.10 0.060-0.70 > green under > > Counting rule #1: 5 (abnormal) > > The significant changes have been his: abx treatment for Lyme, > increased mineral and vitamin supplementation, and removal from a > terrible mold situation (removed from mold situation 2/14/08). > I have not been giving him any other alleged chelators vetted by > Andy, although I am giving reasonable doses of Vit C daily and other > supplementation. > > Strange, yes? > > Deb > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 17, 2008 Report Share Posted July 17, 2008 I agree Limin, therefore I used the term " better. " I think even being anemic might skew the results because heme is somewhere in the picture? I have not read up too much on the bio-chemistry of it. Then there is the aspect of diffusion, metals sitting in the brain will take time to diffuse out especially for seizure kids (I would think). It is however loads better than the hair test. My son did not even meet the counting rules for mercury back when he was mobilizing metals as evidenced by aluminum and other metals in the red, and he was *definitely* mercury toxic. Gayatri > > > > > > Hi again, > > > > > > I thought I'd post this on its own as many here are veterans of > > > chelation. I submitted this also to the frequent chelation group > > > (based on Cutler's hair analysis and chelation recommendations > > > books). > > > > > > Sorry if the formatting doesn't come out right. > > > --------- > > > > > > Hi folks, > > > My 11 year old son is being treated for Lyme disease and has had > > > significant exposure to molds from a compromised bedroom (which has > > > since been addressed). > > > I originally ran a hair test for him 1.5 years ago in which he came > > > out with the " all-low " type signature and definitely met the counting > > > rules for showing deranged mineral xport. > > > I did 3 rounds of chelation last fall but stopped because he > > > developed severe ongoing GI problems that took a long time to > > > resolve/go away. Also, since he was on abx for his Lyme treatment, > > > I was worried about too many interactions that I could not control. > > > Now that he is more stable, I ran another hair test as a baseline in > > > prep to restart chelation. I was very shocked to see his results > > > come back very differently as I have NOT been actively chelating him. > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > ---------------------------------------------- > > > His test now no longer meets the counting rules � normal � and > > shows > > > a more normal pattern!? > > > How is this possible? His reference ranges are still the same. > > > Here are my questions and concerns: > > > � Are these tests generally repeatable and consistent? > > > � Could I have screwed up in the collection of hair to get such > > > radically different results? > > > � Could he have excreted the metals himself without special > > > chelation aid? > > > � Could his Lyme abx have stirred things up enough to change > > > the equation? > > > � Is he truly " normal " now, in terms of mineral transport? > > > � If so, what does this current test now show in terms of > > > problems or issues, as he still has significant and mysterious > > > health problems (see below)? > > > � Can he now take ALA on a schedule other than a " safe " one as > > > defined in " Amalgam Illness " with impunity? Since ALA is helpful to > > > the liver and he is on abx, this would be a support for him? > > > � Has anyone else had experience with Lyme or mold affecting > > > their hair test results? > > > ---- > > > Here is the data from the 2 tests: > > > Male (age 11) > > > June 2008 � newest test > > > POTENTIALLY TOXIC ELEMENTS > > > element result ref range color > > > ============================================= > > > aluminum 5.9 < 8.0 green > > > antimony 0.032 <0.066 green > > > arsenic 0.039 <0.080 green > > > beryllium <0.01 <0.020 none > > > bismuth 0.16 <2.0 green > > > cadmium 0.040 <0.15 green > > > lead 0.31 <1.0 green > > > mercury 0.50 <0.40 yellow > > > platinum <0.003 <0.005 none > > > thallium <0.001 <0.010 none > > > thorium <0.001 <0.005 none > > > uranium 0.019 <0.060 green > > > nickel 0.16 <0.40 green > > > silver 0.05 <0.13 green > > > tin 0.13 <0.30 green > > > titanium 0.84 <1.0 green > > > ESSENTIAL AND OTHER ELEMENTS > > > element result ref range color under/over 50% > > > ============================================================ > > > Calcium 1230 160-500 red over > > > Magnesium 89 12-50 yellow > > > over > > > Sodium 56 12-90 green over > > > Potassium 11 10-40 green > > > under > > > Copper 29 9.0-30 green over > > > Zinc 210 110-190 yellow over > > > Manganese 0.20 0.18-0.60 green > > > under > > > Chromium 0.57 0.23-0.50 yellow > > > over > > > Vanadium 0.077 0.025-0.10 green > > > over > > > Molybdenum 0.023 0.040-0.089 red > > > under > > > Boron 1.3 0.50-3.5 white > > > middle > > > Iodine 1.5 0.25-1.3 yellow over > > > Lithium 0.007 0.007-0.023 green > > > under > > > Phosphorus 149 160-250 yellow under > > > Selenium 0.94 0.95-1.7 green > > > under > > > Strontium 2.7 0.21-2.1 yellow > > > over > > > Sulfur 47100 45500-53000 green under > > > Barium 1.9 0.19-1.6 yellow over > > > Cobalt 0.013 0.013-0.035 green under > > > Iron 13 6.0-17 green > > > over > > > Germanium 0.029 0.045-0.065 yellow > > > under > > > Rubidium 0.011 0.008-0.080 green > > > under > > > Zirconium 0.10 0.0600.70 green > > > under > > > > > > Counting rule #1: 11 (ordinary & average) > > > Counting rule #2: 11 (ordinary & average) > > > Counting rule #3: 2 (not uncommon) > > > Counting rule #4: 13 (unusual) > > > Counting rule #5: not met, > > > > > > ============================================================= > > > Here is the older test: > > > 2007 Hair Test Results > > > > > > Lab: Doctor's Data, Incorporated. > > > Age: 9 Y Male > > > > > > POTENTIALLY TOXIC ELEMENTS > > > element result ref range color > > > ============================================= > > > aluminum 18 <8.0 > > > yellow > > > antimony 0.038 <0.066 green > > > arsenic 0.053 <0.080 green > > > beryllium <0.01 <0.020 absent > > > bismuth 0.044 <0.12 green > > > cadmium 0.054 <0.15 green > > > lead 0.24 <1.0 green > > > mercury 0.96 <0.40 yellow > > > platinum <0.003 <0.005 absent > > > thallium <0.001 <0.010 absent > > > thorium <0.001 <0.005 absent > > > uranium 0.025 <0.060 green > > > nickel 0.10 <0.40 green > > > silver 0.03 <0.13 green > > > tin 0.25 <0.30 green > > > titanium 1.5 <1.0 yellow > > > ESSENTIAL AND OTHER ELEMENTS > > > element result ref range color under/over 50% > > > ============================================================ > > > Calcium 328 160-500 > > > green under > > > Magnesium 110 12-50 > > > yellow over > > > Sodium 17 12-90 > > > green under > > > Potassium 6 10-40 > > > yellow under > > > Copper 15 9.0-30 > > > white exactly 50% > > > Zinc 160 110-190 > > > white exactly 50% > > > Manganese 0.15 0.18-0.60 > > > yellow under > > > Chromium 0.33 0.23-0.50 > > > green over > > > Vanadium 0.035 0.025-0.10 > > > green under > > > Molybdenum 0.040 0.040-0.089 green > > > under > > > Boron 0.61 0.50-3.5 > > > green under > > > Iodine 0.25 0.25-1.3 > > > green under > > > Lithium <0.004 0.007-0.023 > > > red under > > > Phosphorus 169 160-250 > > > green under > > > Selenium 0.93 0.95-1.7 > > > green/yellow under > > > Strontium 1.1 0.21-2.1 > > > green over > > > Sulfur 48800 45500-53000 green > > > over > > > Barium 0.51 0.19-1.6 > > > white exactly 50% > > > Cobalt 0.009 0.013-0.035 > > > yellow under > > > Iron 24 6.0-17 > > > yellow over > > > Germanium 0.035 0.045-0.065 yellow > > > under > > > Rubidium 0.012 0.008-0.080 > > > green under > > > Zirconium 0.10 0.060-0.70 > > > green under > > > > > > Counting rule #1: 5 (abnormal) > > > > > > The significant changes have been his: abx treatment for Lyme, > > > increased mineral and vitamin supplementation, and removal from a > > > terrible mold situation (removed from mold situation 2/14/08). > > > I have not been giving him any other alleged chelators vetted by > > > Andy, although I am giving reasonable doses of Vit C daily and other > > > supplementation. > > > > > > Strange, yes? > > > > > > Deb > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.