Guest guest Posted October 17, 2008 Report Share Posted October 17, 2008 I did a few quick tests this evening with my cell phone: Signal: Stainless mesh strainer, single. Upright and inverted. Phone rings Stainless mesh strainers, doubled with edges touching (like a clam shell). Phone still rings. Stainless perforated cheese grater (long rectangle with open top and bottom, phone held inside, grater held sideways). Phone still rings. Stainless perforated strainer, single. Upright and inverted. Phone still rings. No Signal: Stainless sheet metal perforated strainers, doubled (clam shell). No signal! Solid Stainless pot with lid off upright. No signal. Solid Stainless pot inverted on wood pull out chopping block (free standing). No signal. So - I wasn't able to get stainless steel mesh to block the signal. Perhaps the fabric is different than my kitchen strainers? The perforated sheet stainless was better, it had to be totally enclosed top, bottom and all sides to work though. The pot with no lid was a surprise. Total blockage of signal, so it must be the 2 inch high sides. No enclosure necessary with thicker and perforated 18/8 stainless. Coverage on only three sides is all that was needed to prevent the signal from getting through. So I'm still reserving my opinion on the mesh fabric till someone gets some and does simple signal strength tests like this. > > If you put a stainless steel metal pot at the bottom, then it should work. > All we need for shielding is an Enclosed surface with low resistance. > > > > Jean > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.