Guest guest Posted January 12, 2008 Report Share Posted January 12, 2008 I don't know what this proves. I don't know of anyone who has recommended using 3 second isos at 70% of max. In fact, I remember Muller had already tested that duration way back in the 1950s and concluded that 7 seconds was pretty much needed for any training effect. A better study would have been 7-10 seconds at Max vs the longer durations. Then we would have a more valid comparison of longer vs shorter. Moreover, I am not sure the left leg vs right leg approach is correct. One could argue that one leg learns more effectively than another, ie right handed folks etc. Interesting though. The role of metabolites in strength training. II. Short versus long isometric contractions. Schott J, McCully K, Rutherford OM. Department of Physiology, St. 's Hospital Medical School, London, UK. The role of intramuscular metabolite changes in the adaptations following isometric strength training was examined by comparing the effect of short, intermittent contractions (IC) and longer, continuous (CC) contractions. In a parallel study, the changes in phosphate metabolites and pH were examined during the two protocols using whole-body nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMRS). Seven subjects trained three time per week for 14 weeks. The right leg was trained using four sets of ten contractions, each lasting 3 s with a 2-s rest period between each contraction and 2 min between each set. The left leg was trained using four 30-s contractions with a 1-min rest period between each. Both protocols involved isometric contractions at 70% of a maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVC). The MVC, length:tension and force:velocity relationships and cross-sectional area (CSA) of each leg were measured before and after training. The increase in isometric strength was significantly greater (P = 0.041) for the CC leg (median 54.7%; P = 0.022) than for IC (31.5%; P = 0.022). There were no significant differences between the two protocols for changes in the length:tension or force:velocity relationships. There were significant increases in muscle CSA for the CC leg only. NMRS demonstrated that the changes in phosphate metabolites and pH were greater for the CC protocol. These findings suggest that factors related to the greater metabolite changes during CC training results in greater increases in isometric strength and muscle CSA. > > 7. Schott, J., McCully, K., & Rutherford, O.M. (1995). The role of metabolites in strength training II: Short versus long isometric contractions. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 71, 337–341 > > In a related study, long fatiguing isometric muscle actions (four isometric muscle actions lasting 30 seconds each) were compared to shorter and less fatiguing isometric muscle action (four sets of 10 contractions, each lasting three seconds) [7]. > Although the muscle was under tension for the same amount of time (120 seconds), gains in muscle strength were greater with the longer isometric muscle actions, which caused a greater amount of muscle fatigue. > > > > --------------------------------- > Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.