Guest guest Posted October 24, 2007 Report Share Posted October 24, 2007 Hi Folks, I just returned from giving a workshop in Buenos Aires and speaking at an Autism Congress in Santa Fe, Argentina. Man what a beautiful country! The trip back to Germany is extremely long but it gave me the chance to finally sit down and read ’s book " The Verbal Behavior Approach. " To be honest, I was secretly hoping I would hate it, so that I could say that my book Educate Toward Recovery is a much better option for people interested in starting, updating, or looking to evaluate a VB program. However, after reading her description I have to say that I was very surprised. Not that the book is well organized, written and helpful (I have met at ABA int. and through email contact find her to be very knowledgeable, conscientious and of similar focus to myself). However, what I was surprised about was how complimentary our two books end up being to each other. Even though we are covering the same overall topic (the VB approach to ABA) it was interesting to me how two different practitioners can organize and offer very different sets of valuable tips and guidance and perspective. Where ’s book lays out a very simple to understand explanation of the teaching aspects of VB and discusses basic functional behavior planning, my book delves further into how to address and overcome the barriers and trouble spots that parents can encounter with earning instructional control in a VB program as well as talking clearly about the ethical use of extinction and punishment procedures. Even among the many base topics that we share in common, I found many useful nuggets in each section of her book that I did not highlight in my book, while seeing several places that ETR is able to offer many valuable insights and tips that were not mentioned in ’s book. Overall, I was extremely pleased to see that both books together make a very nice compliment to each other and offer the same target audience (parents, teachers, and therapists of children with autism and/or language delays) a well-rounded, and easy to understand look at modern ABA/VB. I am definitely going to recommend ’s book to my readers, consulting team and English speaking families. In fact, I have added her book to both the text and references section of the latest version of ETR recommending it as a valuable read for families looking for further ideas and perspective on VB. I still feel comfortable recommending ETR as the best available one-stop shop for understanding the how and why of ABA/VB for people who might only have the funds or time for one resource. However, for families interested and capable of reading both books, I think ’s book might even be a better book to read first. With ETR valuable as a way to address the myriad problems and inconsistencies that might appear as a family begins implementing their new ABA/VB program. Again, this is just one person’s opinion and hardly objective, but I was just wondering if others have had the chance to read both books and also see them as being complimentary takes on a very valuable approach to teaching. PS. I am absolutely NOT fishing for any comparisons or interested in participating in any discussions over why one book might be better than the other (I suspect that answer would be different for different reasons for different people). I just wanted to give her props for writing a good book and see if others who have read both also feel as I do that The VB Approach and Educate Toward Recovery are very complimentary to each other and together (with the Sundberg and Partington books and a few others) help complete a must-have set of reading resources for people supporting the education of children with autism. _________________________________ Schramm, MA, BCBA Author of Educate Toward Recovery: Turning the Tables on Autism www.lulu.com/knospe-aba www.knospe-aba.com _________________________________ [VerbalBehavior] Research on Cold Probe Data Hi all, There was a request from re: research on cold probe data and other techniques used within a VB approach. With some help from Regina F., we were able to track down a recent dissertation on this topic by Dr. Cummings (a former doctoral student of Dr. Jack ). I also recommended that read Dr. Greer's book called Verbal Behavior Analysis and to check out all the other references available on Regina's web site. Also, a 2005 article I published in AVB used only cold probe data to teach tacts. Barbera, M. L., & Kubina, R. M. (2005). Using transfer procedures to teach tacts to a child with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 21, 155-161. You can download this article by going to my web site: _www.vbapproach. com_ (http://www.vbapproa ch.com) (author page--under publications) Below is the info about the work of Dr. Cummings. I wanted to pass this info to the VB list serve for anyone else who is interested. Have a great weekend, ____________ ______ Lynch Barbera, RN, MSN, BCBA _www.vbapproach. com_ (http://www.vbapproa ch.com) Cummings, A. R., & Carr, J. E. Evaluating progress in behavioral programs for children with pervasive developmental disorders: A comparison of continuous and intermittent data collection. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. (In press). ------------ --------- --------- --------- ------ Abstract from UWM Candidate: Anne Rena Cummings Degree of: Doctor of Philosophy Department: Psychology Title: Evaluating Progress in Behavioral Programs for Children with Pervasive Developmental Disorders: Continuous versus Intermittent Data Collection Committee: Dr. E. Carr, Chair Dr. Jack Dr. LeBlanc Dr. Gaynor Dr. Nickola Date: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 9:00 a.m. -11.00 a.m. 3715 Wood Hall Abstract: It is well documented that intensive behavioral treatment of early childhood autism can result in significant improvements in adaptive behavior. The typical teaching format in such programs is based on the restricted operant (aka, discrete trial) in which the performance of an exemplar skill follows a clear instruction and precedes programmed reinforcement or error correction. Because of the often intensive nature of behavioral treatment, it is not unusual for thousands of learning opportunities to be presented each week. There currently exists a professional debate regarding the frequency of data collection necessary in autism treatment programs. One side of the argument favors collecting data on every learning opportunity for a complete assessment of child performance. The other side favors intermittent data collection to facilitate more efficient instruction. Unfortunately, little published empirical evidence exists to inform the debate. Thus, current study was designed to evaluate continuous (i.e., trial by trial) versus intermittent (i.e., first-trial only) data collection systems across a number of curriculum areas in behavioral treatment programs for children with pervasive developmental disabilities. In our study, 6 children were taught numerous exemplars in 2-4 curricular areas using established behavioral procedures. The exemplars within each curricular area were randomly assigned to one of the data collection conditions. Each condition was evaluated based on the number of sessions to reach a mastery criterion for an exemplar and the percentage correct score for that exemplar at a 3 week follow-up assessment. Our results indicate that type of data collection generally failed to substantially impact acquisition rates or maintenance performance. Although the experimental preparation employed in this study is not representative of all teaching circumstances, our data suggest that collecting data on only the first trial of a session might be a reasonable tactic. ************ ********* ********* ******** See what's new at http://www.aol. com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.