Guest guest Posted January 13, 2009 Report Share Posted January 13, 2009 Hi Everyone: I have a question Should a child with autism who has only olimited words and who has lot of sensory issues be sent to a normal school (if your state allows it) or send to a special school only We currently live in a place in India in place where autism is slowly coming to the forefront and hence does not have much when comes to special education especially autism. Everyone states that my child be sent to a normal school (in fact they suggest that all kids with autism should be sent to a normal school)despite the fact that my son has very limitted words and does stim a lot and have sensory issues. The reason they tell is if send to a normal school children with ASD can see many role models and this will help with the childs language and can learn many other skills from their peers. Been in the US for many years i am unable to digest the way special need kids are treated in special ed classes here in my city (as most of the teachers who handle these kids are trained only to handle kids with MR) and the regular ed teachers overlook many of these kids special needs. Personaly, i feel that first of all autism should be treated seperately as there are many surprises in it and it can be only handled by some one who is wholeheartedly dedicated in the field . I would like to know the groups opinion on this whether kids with autism should be sent to a normal school or to a special ed class and why they feel so Thanks in advance SPG Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 16, 2009 Report Share Posted February 16, 2009 Hello, With a student with severe special needs one-on-one necessitates a specialized environment dedicated to individualized instruction. I would fade into a normal rather than a special-needs setting or classroon because special needs situations have more variables to complicate things and wouldn't likely set the better example for supporting what individuals with special would be like within such a context. Of course mainstreaming, of sorts, compromises what the higher functioning students might get out of the situation (perhaps) where the needs of the situation are considered the priority, as they probably must be. But abuse is also less likely to happen in such a situation with so many witnesses and intelligent minds interacting in such a situation, is my sense of that. The more advanced students would have to be conscripted on how to behave in such a, less than normal situation, where they couldn't figure that out for themselves, guided by their social responsibility and skills to do so, (conscience?) which I feel would be a " plus, " to a more variable and unpredictable circumstance. Resources, with respect to quality of teaching staff and related resources considered " equal, " is what I'm talking to of this analysis. Where they are not equal, of course that changes everything relative to what teaching staff and supporting resources are available relative to the choices you are comparing as to the individual situation, which would indeed weigh " heavily " on the prospects and outcome of what can be accomplished, which you have not provided details to and I wouldn't assume towards. Consider that you might need as many as one specialized teaching assistant for each one, or two, moderate to severely special-needs students to offset with the normal setting without such challenges, perhaps? My experience has also taught me that normal folks (especially adults) are more tolerant and understanding of unpredicatable behavior in probably being better able to handle it, of logically being better able to handle themselves, or would at least more quickly learn to adapt to what develops, thereof. (We can hope?) You, as all of us, are subject to the resources available in that respect, and very often it is what accomodates the school (or society at large) that limits your options there, where you can't afford what might be better to optimal alternatives that might exist where you could afford them, otherwise, perhaps? Moving might be the more reasonable option where you could afford that, time also being of the essence. Things do have to start at the home and can go a " long " way there (if not all the way) where you are still undecided and have the resources for that, even taking on more yourself where you can. Look before you leap and do what you can with what you've got I would advise, where there is usually a significant transition burden associated with moving from the familiar if not more comfortable and better understood, natural environment, to the unknown or relatively unknown, that may not be what it purports to be? There " is " a tendency (if not full-blown conflict) for misrepresentation where resources are concerned, from those who provide them for profit especially, of human nature, thereof, which I'm sure everyone normal is somewhat familiar with? On the other side of that, a change is as good as a rest and a new locale can help break a cycle of abuse, especially where relatives and set-in-their-way friends and associates are concerned, if that should be your problem, as well. But I wouldn't compromise myself or my family in the process, of " true " (honest) family and friends, because that usually is what life and a more reasonable upbringing (dare I say ABA) " is " very much about.. . ABA analysts from around the world can usually provide most else that you might need where you are, usually with what you've got in a civilized world, (I believe, though I haven't been there or done that, your place) especially where there is a university or school of higher learning nearby, where you are generally happy where you are, where learning a new language wouldn't be the primary issue perhaps. A reasonably competent analyst should be able to work around most of that is my sense of it. It all very much depends what you want out of life in the bigger picture. " You " have to be happy too Best wishes in that respect, Mike Volunteer ABAJ > > Hi Everyone: > I have a question Should a child with autism who has only olimited > words and who has lot of sensory issues be sent to a normal school (if > your state allows it) or send to a special school only > We currently live in a place in India in place where autism is slowly > coming to the forefront and hence does not have much when comes to > special education especially autism. Everyone states that my child be > sent to a normal school (in fact they suggest that all kids with autism > should be sent to a normal school)despite the fact that my son has very > limitted words and does stim a lot and have sensory issues. > The reason they tell is if send to a normal school children with ASD > can see many role models and this will help with the childs language > and can learn many other skills from their peers. Been in the US for > many years i am unable to digest the way special need kids are treated > in special ed classes here in my city (as most of the teachers who > handle these kids are trained only to handle kids with MR) and the > regular ed teachers overlook many of these kids special needs. > Personaly, i feel that first of all autism should be treated seperately > as there are many surprises in it and it can be only handled by some > one who is wholeheartedly dedicated in the field . > > I would like to know the groups opinion on this whether kids with > autism should be sent to a normal school or to a special ed class and > why they feel so > > Thanks in advance > SPG > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 " Inclusion " may be the better word than mainstreaming for our intents and purposes, where mainstreaming might for some, imply something other than an individualized approach to education as within the group or mainstream, which I'm not aware it formally does, but, just to be on the safe side, the word/concept " inclusion " would perhaps better rule that possibility out and be better suited for our intents and purposes? It also seems to be more in vogue by others, I'm finding.. . Best wishes, with respect to trying to clear things up, (as best I can) as things change, where " communication " is the main part of such change " as " development, in that respect of It.. . On how to get there, perhaps, of learning " from " our changes, Thereof. Mike So, it's not really " lying " in that respect?!. It's " censorship " that denies that (me?), that I Feel I have the bigger problem with.. More on political " positivism " (abuse? Thereof?) for another time, if I may, of relative abuse, thereof? Where we all could be more meaningful in this respect of that is my sense of It. What of value have you got out of your kids/students lately? .. . Of course I want to hear about that, especially.. . > > > > Hi Everyone: > > I have a question Should a child with autism who has only olimited > > words and who has lot of sensory issues be sent to a normal school > (if > > your state allows it) or send to a special school only > > We currently live in a place in India in place where autism is > slowly > > coming to the forefront and hence does not have much when comes to > > special education especially autism. Everyone states that my child > be > > sent to a normal school (in fact they suggest that all kids with > autism > > should be sent to a normal school)despite the fact that my son has > very > > limitted words and does stim a lot and have sensory issues. > > The reason they tell is if send to a normal school children with > ASD > > can see many role models and this will help with the childs > language > > and can learn many other skills from their peers. Been in the US > for > > many years i am unable to digest the way special need kids are > treated > > in special ed classes here in my city (as most of the teachers who > > handle these kids are trained only to handle kids with MR) and the > > regular ed teachers overlook many of these kids special needs. > > Personaly, i feel that first of all autism should be treated > seperately > > as there are many surprises in it and it can be only handled by > some > > one who is wholeheartedly dedicated in the field . > > > > I would like to know the groups opinion on this whether kids with > > autism should be sent to a normal school or to a special ed class > and > > why they feel so > > > > Thanks in advance > > SPG > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.