Guest guest Posted November 9, 2009 Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 DRO - differential reinforcement of OTHER behavior. If any other behavior occurs, other than the problem behavior, in the alloted time, then the individual is reinforced. Example: A child is given praise and a piece of candy after 15 minutes of engaging in appropriate play, and no problem behavior. DRA - differential reinforcement of ALTERNATIVE behavior. Reinforce behavior that may COMPETE with the problem behavior. Example: A child gets a piece of candy after tapping you and saying " may I have a piece of candy? " , rather than screaming and/or hitting to get the candy DRI - differential reinforcement of INCOMPATIBLE behavior. Reinforce behavior that is physically incompatible with problem behavior. Example: A child is reinforced for clapping his/her hands together, rather than hitting (child cannot hit while hands are engaged). I hope this helps! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 ,That is an interesting point. It is so hard to explain the concept during parent training as well. I think of the general definition of differential reinforcement as: when one member of a response class is reinforced and other members are not. So this would apply to DRL, DRH, DRO, DRI, DRA. I think of Differential Reinforcement as a behavioral term/procedure. Then there is the process of differentially reinforcing behavior. I think of differentially reinforcing a behavior as a way of providing reinforcement and explaining to people to be more excited and provide more reinforcement when the child does the best response and being less excited and providing less reinforcement when the child does not do his best response. So differential reinforcement is a procedure used to reinforce one member of a response class and not others and reinforcement can be provided differentially based on responding. I don't know if that is a good explanation but that is how I think about it. Also, I just wanted to tell you , I love your website! It is very helpful and informative. DeLeon, M.S., BCBANavigation Behavioral Consulting " Navigating the world of behavior, changing the course of people's lives. " www.navigationbehavioralconsulting.comblog.navigationbehavioralconsulting\ ..com From: Schramm <knospeaba_robert@...> Subject: Re: [ ] Re:differential reinforcement Date: Thursday, November 12, 2009, 7:36 AM  This brings up an interesting question for me. I would be curious what the other BCBA's on this list think. Differential Reinforcement is often looked at as being the schedule of reinforcement for Other, Alternative or Incompatable Behaviors. But as Reg stated here, Isn't it also an appropriate terminology for applying different levels of reinforcement for different levels or qualities of response? To me, we are talking about two different things here. One is DRO, DRI, or DRA but the other is still Differential Reinforcement, isn't it? What are your thoughts on this. Is the term Differential reinforcement appropriate for both situations or is one a misuse of the term Differential reinforcement. Just curious what you folks thinks. ____________ _________ _________ ___ Schramm, MA, BCBA Author of Educate Toward Recovery: Turning the Tables on Autism www.lulu.com/ knospe-aba www.knospe-aba. com ____________ _________ _________ ___ " There is no greater testament to character than the selfless act designed to go unnoticed " ____________ _________ _________ __ From: Reg Reynolds <rmreynoldscogeco (DOT) ca> @groups .com Sent: Mon, November 9, 2009 4:15:24 PM Subject: [ ] Re:differential reinforcement Reg Reynolds Some consequences are likely to be more desirable, from the perspective of the person receiving them, and hence likely to be more reinforcing, than other consequences. Differential reinforcement refers to providing more desirable consequences for more desirable behaviours, e.g., for closer approximations to, or better performance of, the behaviour that you want the person to learn. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 This came up in one of my courses to become a behavior analyst with Mark Dixon. He corrected me on something I was calling differential reinforcement that was technically two schedules of reinforcement with one rich and one lean. True differential reinforcement he said was when reinforcement no longer followed behavior A, but did follow behavior B. Tamara S. Kasper MS/CCC-SLP, BCBA Speech-Language Pathologist Board Certified Behavior Analyst From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of Schramm Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 6:36 AM Subject: Re: [ ] Re:differential reinforcement This brings up an interesting question for me. I would be curious what the other BCBA's on this list think. Differential Reinforcement is often looked at as being the schedule of reinforcement for Other, Alternative or Incompatable Behaviors. But as Reg stated here, Isn't it also an appropriate terminology for applying different levels of reinforcement for different levels or qualities of response? To me, we are talking about two different things here. One is DRO, DRI, or DRA but the other is still Differential Reinforcement, isn't it? What are your thoughts on this. Is the term Differential reinforcement appropriate for both situations or is one a misuse of the term Differential reinforcement. Just curious what you folks thinks. _________________________________ Schramm, MA, BCBA Author of Educate Toward Recovery: Turning the Tables on Autism www.lulu.com/knospe-aba www.knospe-aba.com _________________________________ " There is no greater testament to character than the selfless act designed to go unnoticed " ________________________________ From: Reg Reynolds <rmreynolds@... <mailto:rmreynolds%40cogeco.ca> > <mailto: %40> Sent: Mon, November 9, 2009 4:15:24 PM Subject: [ ] Re:differential reinforcement Reg Reynolds Some consequences are likely to be more desirable, from the perspective of the person receiving them, and hence likely to be more reinforcing, than other consequences. Differential reinforcement refers to providing more desirable consequences for more desirable behaviours, e.g., for closer approximations to, or better performance of, the behaviour that you want the person to learn. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 I'd go along with generalizing the concept to make it more useful with respect to it meaning using reinforcement reasonably for the results we aspire to in that regard, of applied reinforcement, perhaps. From my observations, that's the way it seems to be utilized more and more, wouldn't you say? Best wishes, Mike Glavic > > This brings up an interesting question for me. I would be curious what the other BCBA's on this list think. > > Differential Reinforcement is often looked at as being the schedule of reinforcement for Other, Alternative or Incompatable Behaviors. But as Reg stated here, Isn't it also an appropriate terminology for applying different levels of reinforcement for different levels or qualities of response? > > To me, we are talking about two different things here. One is DRO, DRI, or DRA but the other is still Differential Reinforcement, isn't it? > > What are your thoughts on this. Is the term Differential reinforcement appropriate for both situations or is one a misuse of the term Differential reinforcement. > > Just curious what you folks thinks. > > > _________________________________ > Schramm, MA, BCBA > Author of Educate Toward Recovery: > Turning the Tables on Autism > www.lulu.com/knospe-aba > www.knospe-aba.com > _________________________________ > > " There is no greater testament to character than > the selfless act designed to go unnoticed " > > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Reg Reynolds <rmreynolds@...> > > Sent: Mon, November 9, 2009 4:15:24 PM > Subject: [ ] Re:differential reinforcement > > > Reg Reynolds > > Some consequences are likely to be more desirable, from the perspective of the person receiving them, and hence likely to be more reinforcing, than other consequences. Differential reinforcement refers to providing more desirable consequences for more desirable behaviours, e.g., for closer approximations to, or better performance of, the behaviour that you want the person to learn. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 I am not a BCBA just a mere parent. Still, it seems to me that the term " differential reinforcement " when applied to DRO, DRI, or DRA is misuse. The term " differential equations, " in part, refers to finding solution approximations. So, by extension, " differential reinforcement " should refer to reinforcing performance approximations. On the other hand, many professions have unique acronyms, terms and definitions that don't make perfect sense. This particular case of acronyms could be a source of confusion among professionals. It still seems to me to be a misuse of the term . The source of the misuse, in my view, lies in teaching the " Universe of Examples " as described by Engelmann et. al. (Rubric for Identifying Authentic Direct Instruction Programs). By this I mean, the child is unable to " differentiate " between examples and non-examples, unable to " differentiate " between when using a loud voice is appropriate behavior (playground) or inappropriate behavior (in church). The term " differential " as used here refers to the behaver differentiating the conditions/environment/circumstances under which the behavior should/shouldn't occur. Merriam-Webster says that, as an adjective, " differential " could mean either " distinguish - perceive a difference " or " functioning differently or at a different rate. " Just my crude 2 cents. Aimee Schramm wrote: > > > This brings up an interesting question for me. I would be curious what > the other BCBA's on this list think. > > Differential Reinforcement is often looked at as being the schedule of > reinforcement for Other, Alternative or Incompatable Behaviors. But as > Reg stated here, Isn't it also an appropriate terminology for applying > different levels of reinforcement for different levels or qualities of > response? > > To me, we are talking about two different things here. One is DRO, > DRI, or DRA but the other is still Differential Reinforcement, isn't it? > > What are your thoughts on this. Is the term Differential reinforcement > appropriate for both situations or is one a misuse of the term > Differential reinforcement. > > Just curious what you folks thinks. > > > _________________________________ > Schramm, MA, BCBA > Author of Educate Toward Recovery: > Turning the Tables on Autism > www.lulu.com/knospe-aba > www.knospe-aba.com > _________________________________ > > " There is no greater testament to character than > the selfless act designed to go unnoticed " > > ________________________________ > From: Reg Reynolds <rmreynolds@... <mailto:rmreynolds%40cogeco.ca>> > <mailto: %40> > Sent: Mon, November 9, 2009 4:15:24 PM > Subject: [ ] Re:differential reinforcement > > Reg Reynolds > > Some consequences are likely to be more desirable, from the > perspective of the person receiving them, and hence likely to be more > reinforcing, than other consequences. Differential reinforcement > refers to providing more desirable consequences for more desirable > behaviours, e.g., for closer approximations to, or better performance > of, the behaviour that you want the person to learn. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.