Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Pain Relief for Some, With an Odd Tradeoff

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Pain Relief for Some, With an Odd Tradeoff

By Tara -Pope

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/08/health/08well.html?

ex=1357448400 & en=696dc404f58e532b & ei=5088 & partner=rssnyt & emc=rss

For people with chronic pain, relief comes with a tradeoff. Bed rest

means missing out on life. Drugs take the edge off, but they also

dull the senses and the mind.

But there's another potential option: implantable stimulators that

blunt pain with electrical impulses. In this case, the tradeoff is

living with a low-grade buzzing sensation in place of the pain.

The devices, which are implanted near the spine, are not widely

used. They are expensive, don't work for everyone and rarely offer

complete relief. Industry officials estimate that fewer than 10

percent of eligible patients opt for the treatment.

But when they do work, they can be life-changing. Carolyn ,

45, of Clifton, N.J., has lived with chronic back pain since she was

18, when she had surgery after a car accident. Then four years ago,

a procedure for a collapsed lung accidentally resulted in nerve

damage that caused excruciating pain. " I just want to sleep normally

and not have pain that wakes me up every 20 minutes, " she said.

Ms. has been using pain drugs to cope, but side effects,

including fatigue and constipation, only add to her discomfort. A

few years ago she did a " test drive " of a spinal cord stimulator and

experienced a significant drop in her pain. Insurance troubles

delayed a permanent implant, but this month she is finally

undergoing surgery to attach the device to her spinal cord. " It's

not going to be 100 percent, " she said. " But I will be happy with a

50 percent change. "

Not every patient feels that way. Ms. 's physician, Dr.

G. Kaufman, director of interventional pain management at

Overlook Hospital in Summit, N.J., described a patient who tested a

stimulator and experienced " unbelievable " pain relief, yet simply

couldn't adjust to the sensation created by the device and decided

not to keep it. " She couldn't get over the background buzzing, " Dr.

Kaufman said.

Still, most patients accept this vibrating version of white noise,

says Dr. North, a retired neurosurgery professor at s

Hopkins who developed several patents related to the technology,

although he no longer receives royalties.

" When they first feel the sensation they say, `That's weird,' " said

Dr. North, who treats patients at the LifeBridge Health Brain and

Spine Institute in Baltimore. " It quickly becomes clear that `weird'

is going to be just fine if it replaces the pain. "

Chronic pain is a particularly difficult problem to understand and

solve. Pain is normal after an injury or because of a health

problem. But sometimes the nerves misfire and continue sending

intense pain signals to the brain even after the injury heals. Dr.

Vijay B. Vad, a sports medicine specialist at the Hospital for

Special Surgery in Manhattan, compares the problem to a thermostat

in a cool room. " If it's 65 degrees in the house, but the thermostat

thinks it's 50 degrees, the heat keeps running, " Dr. Vad said.

The condition, complex regional pain syndrome, or C.R.P.S.,

typically develops after a medical procedure or an accident. But

even minor injuries, like a sprain from a fall, can cause it. The

syndrome may follow 5 percent of all injuries, according to the

Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy Association, an advocacy group for

people with chronic pain.

Spinal cord stimulation works by implanting an electrode near the

spinal cord, inserted through the same place where epidural pain

relief is injected for women in labor. Electrical pulses scramble or

block the pain signals traveling through the nervous system,

preventing them from reaching the brain.

But spinal cord stimulators offer significant relief to only about

half the patients who try them. In September, the journal Pain

published the largest-ever clinical trial of spinal cord

stimulators, comparing their use with conventional pain therapies,

including drugs, nerve blocks and physical therapy. The study, which

was financed by the implant maker Medtronic, followed 100 patients

who had undergone spinal surgery and had developed chronic pain in

one or both legs.

Every patient received conventional pain treatment, but half were

also given a spinal cord implant. Pain fell by half for 48 percent

of the implant patients but only 9 percent of the others.

The implants cost about $20,000, and the procedure, hospital care

and follow-up can bring the total bill to about $40,000. In August,

the medical journal Neurosurgery showed that spinal cord implants

were far cheaper than additional operations to treat pain.

Another concern is that patients who require high doses of

stimulation drain the battery quickly, requiring surgery to replace

the device. New rechargeable versions of the stimulators have helped

resolve that concern.

For some patients, relief is only temporary, and the pain returns.

Doctors say simple adjustments to the device may solve that problem.

" Sometimes efficacy wanes over time, but I still believe in them, "

said Dr. Kaufman, also an assistant professor of anesthesiology at

the New Jersey Medical School. " When drugs don't work, what else is

there? "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...