Guest guest Posted December 31, 2007 Report Share Posted December 31, 2007 Ok at this point I'd like to hear from Krieger - wasn't bicarbonate loading specifically busted with regard to powerlifting in " Pure Power " magazine some time ago? The only thing I've recently heard in the gyms is some thinking that taking a " TUMS " will help on recovery....but that has made a few people extremely SICK trying it too....which is worse, sore muscles or hurling violently lol. I'll take DOMS for 200, .... I don't know anybody who uses the bicarbonate nor have I heard anybody competing at meets I've been at proclaim the usefulness of worrying their pH. The only worry I have is staying sufficiently hydrated and energized, and yeah, that's a POWERADE TM thing with me, nothing more. (side note: even effervescent creatine with its fizzy component has been a problem for a few people I've trained with in the past, causing severe nausea/gas and a feeling like lifting after intake a very bad idea? one guy drank some on the way to a workout and felt SO bad he bought water and drank it on the way in...trying desperately to settle his stomach. regular creatine didn't induce this so perhaps the bicarbonate isn't going to work for some people at all?). The Phantom aka Schaefer, CMT, CSCS, competing powerlifter Denver, Colorado, USA ==================== -------------- Original message -------------- Dan, I gather you are disputing the efficacy of bicarbonate as an ergogenic aid. I posted the Tipton and Jeukendrup paper because they are highly respected scientists in the field of sports nutrition and metabolism. I don't have a copy of the paper in full. However, I think it is fair to say that there are three legal ergogenic supplements that most sports scientists agree do offer some advantage for some athletes, in some events. The evidence is relatively mature. They are creatine, caffeine and bicarbonate. You can see a summary of the evidence for bicarbonate (and citrate) at the following link. (More recent evidence may also be available.) http://www.ais.org.au/nutrition/documents/T16.5Bicarbonate.pdf And a fact sheet, with appropriate doses etc here: http://www.ais.org.au/nutrition/documents/SupBicarbonate07.pdf As a point of interest, and for the original poster, there is also this paper: Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2007 Apr;17(2):206-17. Does sodium- bicarbonate ingestion improve simulated judo performance? Artioli GG, Gualano B, Coelho DF, Benatti FB, Gailey AW, Lancha AH Jr. " In conclusion, sodium bicarbonate improves judo-related performance and increases blood lactate concentration but has no effect on perceived exertion. " If you dispute the utility of bicarbonate as an ergogenic aid, I would welcome a comprehensive formulated rebuttal of the evidence. Gympie, Australia > > > > > > > > > The buffer capacity is of importance during performance drawing > > energy > > > from anaerobic glycolysis. > > > > > > Typically, a correct designed training programs for developing a > > high > > > anaerobic working capacity will (with respect to the ability to > > handle > > > acidosis alone ): > > > > > > - increase the buffer capacity of the muscles through reserve > > alkali. > > > Note that the probably the main buffer used in muscles is a protein > > > based buffer. > > > > > > - adaptive protein synthesis will create isozymes able to operate > > > efficiently at reduced pH > > > > > > > > > A correct designed conditioning program will most likely have a much > > > more powerful effect on performance then indiscriminately eating > > > " bicarbonate " or other alkaline substances to keep " body alkaline " . > > > Your MMA performer was probably well payed to praise that > > supplement. > > > For most of the supplements in existence, the effect and utility > > is > > > at most speculative. > > > > > > Dan Partelly > > > Oradea, Romania Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 31, 2007 Report Share Posted December 31, 2007 , in the context of this discussion concerning Body pH, I think that it is very important to note that Bicarbonate does not alter the body pH nor does it decrease the production of Lactate. When and if it does work, it improves the buffering capacity of blood. With regards to caffeine readers should know the following: <<Caffeine use is not banned by the International Olympic Committee (IOC), but its use is regulated: an athlete with a urine caffeine concentration in excess of 12 mg/l is considered to have committed a doping offense.... An intake of 800mg of caffeine ( equivalent of 8 cups of coffee or 8 cans of Red Bull) would be needed by the average person to reach the urine level that will result in disqualification. However, the amount may vary depending on the athlete’s body mass, gender, body composition and recent fluid intake http://www.medicdirectsport.com/sportsnutrition/default.asp?step=4 & pid=83 >> Ralph Giarnella MD Southington Ct USA --- sregor99 wrote: > Dan, I gather you are disputing the efficacy of > bicarbonate as an > ergogenic aid. > > I posted the Tipton and Jeukendrup paper because > they are highly > respected scientists in the field of sports > nutrition and metabolism. > I don't have a copy of the paper in full. > > However, I think it is fair to say that there are > three legal > ergogenic supplements that most sports scientists > agree do offer some > advantage for some athletes, in some events. The > evidence is > relatively mature. > > They are creatine, caffeine and bicarbonate. > > You can see a summary of the evidence for > bicarbonate (and citrate) > at the following link. (More recent evidence may > also be available.) > > http://www.ais.org.au/nutrition/documents/T16.5Bicarbonate.pdf > > And a fact sheet, with appropriate doses etc here: > > http://www.ais.org.au/nutrition/documents/SupBicarbonate07.pdf > > As a point of interest, and for the original poster, > there is also > this paper: > > Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2007 Apr;17(2):206-17. > Does sodium- > bicarbonate ingestion improve simulated judo > performance? Artioli GG, > Gualano B, Coelho DF, Benatti FB, Gailey AW, Lancha > AH Jr. > > " In conclusion, sodium bicarbonate improves > judo-related performance > and increases blood lactate concentration but has no > effect on > perceived exertion. " > > If you dispute the utility of bicarbonate as an > ergogenic aid, I > would welcome a comprehensive formulated rebuttal of > the evidence. > > > Gympie, Australia > > > > > > > > > > > The paper in question only says: > > > > ******************* > > Beta-alanine and bicarbonate ***may be*** useful > as buffering agents > > in longer sprints. > > ******************* > > > > " May be " is far from " irrefutable " . If you can > mail me the whole > paper > > I would be delighted to read it, for the abstract > doesn't say much. > > > > Dan Partelly > > Oradea, ROmania > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 31, 2007 Report Share Posted December 31, 2007 , in the context of this discussion concerning Body pH, I think that it is very important to note that Bicarbonate does not alter the body pH nor does it decrease the production of Lactate. When and if it does work, it improves the buffering capacity of blood. With regards to caffeine readers should know the following: <<Caffeine use is not banned by the International Olympic Committee (IOC), but its use is regulated: an athlete with a urine caffeine concentration in excess of 12 mg/l is considered to have committed a doping offense.... An intake of 800mg of caffeine ( equivalent of 8 cups of coffee or 8 cans of Red Bull) would be needed by the average person to reach the urine level that will result in disqualification. However, the amount may vary depending on the athlete’s body mass, gender, body composition and recent fluid intake http://www.medicdirectsport.com/sportsnutrition/default.asp?step=4 & pid=83 >> Ralph Giarnella MD Southington Ct USA --- sregor99 wrote: > Dan, I gather you are disputing the efficacy of > bicarbonate as an > ergogenic aid. > > I posted the Tipton and Jeukendrup paper because > they are highly > respected scientists in the field of sports > nutrition and metabolism. > I don't have a copy of the paper in full. > > However, I think it is fair to say that there are > three legal > ergogenic supplements that most sports scientists > agree do offer some > advantage for some athletes, in some events. The > evidence is > relatively mature. > > They are creatine, caffeine and bicarbonate. > > You can see a summary of the evidence for > bicarbonate (and citrate) > at the following link. (More recent evidence may > also be available.) > > http://www.ais.org.au/nutrition/documents/T16.5Bicarbonate.pdf > > And a fact sheet, with appropriate doses etc here: > > http://www.ais.org.au/nutrition/documents/SupBicarbonate07.pdf > > As a point of interest, and for the original poster, > there is also > this paper: > > Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2007 Apr;17(2):206-17. > Does sodium- > bicarbonate ingestion improve simulated judo > performance? Artioli GG, > Gualano B, Coelho DF, Benatti FB, Gailey AW, Lancha > AH Jr. > > " In conclusion, sodium bicarbonate improves > judo-related performance > and increases blood lactate concentration but has no > effect on > perceived exertion. " > > If you dispute the utility of bicarbonate as an > ergogenic aid, I > would welcome a comprehensive formulated rebuttal of > the evidence. > > > Gympie, Australia > > > > > > > > > > > The paper in question only says: > > > > ******************* > > Beta-alanine and bicarbonate ***may be*** useful > as buffering agents > > in longer sprints. > > ******************* > > > > " May be " is far from " irrefutable " . If you can > mail me the whole > paper > > I would be delighted to read it, for the abstract > doesn't say much. > > > > Dan Partelly > > Oradea, ROmania > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 1, 2008 Report Share Posted January 1, 2008 > > Ok at this point I'd like to hear from Krieger - wasn't bicarbonate loading specifically busted with regard to powerlifting in " Pure Power " magazine some time ago? > > The only thing I've recently heard in the gyms is some thinking that taking a " TUMS " will help on recovery....but that has made a few people extremely SICK trying it too....which is worse, sore muscles or hurling violently lol. I'll take DOMS for 200, .... > > I don't know anybody who uses the bicarbonate nor have I heard anybody competing at meets I've been at proclaim the usefulness of worrying their pH. The only worry I have is staying sufficiently hydrated and energized, and yeah, that's a POWERADE TM thing with me, nothing more. > > (side note: even effervescent creatine with its fizzy component has been a problem for a few people I've trained with in the past, causing severe nausea/gas and a feeling like lifting after intake a very bad idea? one guy drank some on the way to a workout and felt SO bad he bought water and drank it on the way in...trying desperately to settle his stomach. regular creatine didn't induce this so perhaps the bicarbonate isn't going to work for some people at all?). > **** Some users can't tolerate it well and suffer from gastrointestinal problems - hence you may be busting for something:) Recommended usage (there is a high degree of individuality and athletes should " experiment " ) is 0.3 g per kg body mass. I'm not entirely sure why any powerlifter would use sodium bicarbonate (weight loss?). Carruthers Wakefield, UK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 1, 2008 Report Share Posted January 1, 2008 , buffer capacity has 0 influence in sports like yours. Powerlifters don't need any kind of increased buffer capacity at meets. It true that bicarbonate can have adverse reactions, but not everybody has them. Some can ingest a lot without any ill effects. Dan Partelly Oradea, Romania > > Ok at this point I'd like to hear from Krieger - wasn't bicarbonate loading specifically busted with regard to powerlifting in " Pure Power " magazine some time ago? > > The only thing I've recently heard in the gyms is some thinking that taking a " TUMS " will help on recovery....but that has made a few people extremely SICK trying it too....which is worse, sore muscles or hurling violently lol. I'll take DOMS for 200, .... > > I don't know anybody who uses the bicarbonate nor have I heard anybody competing at meets I've been at proclaim the usefulness of worrying their pH. The only worry I have is staying sufficiently hydrated and energized, and yeah, that's a POWERADE TM thing with me, nothing more. > > (side note: even effervescent creatine with its fizzy component has been a problem for a few people I've trained with in the past, causing severe nausea/gas and a feeling like lifting after intake a very bad idea? one guy drank some on the way to a workout and felt SO bad he bought water and drank it on the way in...trying desperately to settle his stomach. regular creatine didn't induce this so perhaps the bicarbonate isn't going to work for some people at all?). > > The Phantom > aka Schaefer, CMT, CSCS, competing powerlifter > Denver, Colorado, USA > > ==================== > -------------- Original message -------------- > > Dan, I gather you are disputing the efficacy of bicarbonate as an > ergogenic aid. > > I posted the Tipton and Jeukendrup paper because they are highly > respected scientists in the field of sports nutrition and metabolism. > I don't have a copy of the paper in full. > > However, I think it is fair to say that there are three legal > ergogenic supplements that most sports scientists agree do offer some > advantage for some athletes, in some events. The evidence is > relatively mature. > > They are creatine, caffeine and bicarbonate. > > You can see a summary of the evidence for bicarbonate (and citrate) > at the following link. (More recent evidence may also be available.) > > http://www.ais.org.au/nutrition/documents/T16.5Bicarbonate.pdf > > And a fact sheet, with appropriate doses etc here: > > http://www.ais.org.au/nutrition/documents/SupBicarbonate07.pdf > > As a point of interest, and for the original poster, there is also > this paper: > > Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2007 Apr;17(2):206-17. Does sodium- > bicarbonate ingestion improve simulated judo performance? Artioli GG, > Gualano B, Coelho DF, Benatti FB, Gailey AW, Lancha AH Jr. > > " In conclusion, sodium bicarbonate improves judo-related performance > and increases blood lactate concentration but has no effect on > perceived exertion. " > > If you dispute the utility of bicarbonate as an ergogenic aid, I > would welcome a comprehensive formulated rebuttal of the evidence. > > > Gympie, Australia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 1, 2008 Report Share Posted January 1, 2008 The reasoning in powerlifting is based apparently on the duration of workouts, and work capacity. Also some consideration that people might want to load for the duration of a competition. Apparently outside our sport few people realize the endurance required to do three maximal lift competitions, which span hours, and essentially require three warmups, and then maximal attempts on the platform. So the topic had come up more than once (hatfield discusses it in a book too) and as I said, Krieger might spread better light on this as I think he did the article for " Pure Power " magazine. Anyway I know he lurks around here at times and perhaps he would comment. The Phantom aka Schaefer, CMT, CSCS, competing powerlifter Denver, Colorado, USA -------------- Original message -------------- > > Ok at this point I'd like to hear from Krieger - wasn't bicarbonate loading specifically busted with regard to powerlifting in " Pure Power " magazine some time ago? > > The only thing I've recently heard in the gyms is some thinking that taking a " TUMS " will help on recovery....but that has made a few people extremely SICK trying it too....which is worse, sore muscles or hurling violently lol. I'll take DOMS for 200, .... > > I don't know anybody who uses the bicarbonate nor have I heard anybody competing at meets I've been at proclaim the usefulness of worrying their pH. The only worry I have is staying sufficiently hydrated and energized, and yeah, that's a POWERADE TM thing with me, nothing more. > > (side note: even effervescent creatine with its fizzy component has been a problem for a few people I've trained with in the past, causing severe nausea/gas and a feeling like lifting after intake a very bad idea? one guy drank some on the way to a workout and felt SO bad he bought water and drank it on the way in...trying desperately to settle his stomach. regular creatine didn't induce this so perhaps the bicarbonate isn't going to work for some people at all?). > ========================= Some users can't tolerate it well and suffer from gastrointestinal problems - hence you may be busting for something:) Recommended usage (there is a high degree of individuality and athletes should " experiment " ) is 0.3 g per kg body mass. I'm not entirely sure why any powerlifter would use sodium bicarbonate (weight loss?). ===================== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 1, 2008 Report Share Posted January 1, 2008 , My thoughts would be that even though a competition may be an exhausting process overall, the duration of any individual lift (or even warmup lifts) is very short. In this context, I can't see that bicarbonate would be useful because the time intervals between maximum efforts should be sufficient to recycle lactate and dissipate H+. Bicarbonate loading seems to be most effective for continuous anaerobic exercise from 1-7 minutes, although there is a view that shorter and longer efforts may also benefit to some extent. One can see how even a few hundredths of a second can be important in 100m sprinting for example. Gympie, Australia > > > > Ok at this point I'd like to hear from Krieger - wasn't > bicarbonate loading specifically busted with regard to powerlifting > in " Pure Power " magazine some time ago? > > > > The only thing I've recently heard in the gyms is some thinking > that taking a " TUMS " will help on recovery....but that has made a few > people extremely SICK trying it too....which is worse, sore muscles > or hurling violently lol. I'll take DOMS for 200, .... > > > > I don't know anybody who uses the bicarbonate nor have I heard > anybody competing at meets I've been at proclaim the usefulness of > worrying their pH. The only worry I have is staying sufficiently > hydrated and energized, and yeah, that's a POWERADE TM thing with me, > nothing more. > > > > (side note: even effervescent creatine with its fizzy component > has been a problem for a few people I've trained with in the past, > causing severe nausea/gas and a feeling like lifting after intake a > very bad idea? one guy drank some on the way to a workout and felt > SO bad he bought water and drank it on the way in...trying > desperately to settle his stomach. regular creatine didn't induce > this so perhaps the bicarbonate isn't going to work for some people > at all?). > > > > ========================= > Some users can't tolerate it well and suffer from gastrointestinal > problems - hence you may be busting for something:) Recommended > usage (there is a high degree of individuality and athletes > should " experiment " ) is 0.3 g per kg body mass. I'm not entirely sure why any powerlifter would use sodium bicarbonate (weight loss?). > > ===================== > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 1, 2008 Report Share Posted January 1, 2008 > > , in the context of this discussion concerning > Body pH, I think that it is very important to note > that Bicarbonate does not alter the body pH nor does > it decrease the production of Lactate. Yes, but exercise, especially anaerobic exercise, will lower blood pH (and intra- and extracellular pH). Buffering and regulatory mechanisms, including respiration, keep this under tight control close to 7.4. Normal homeostatic mechanisms will eventually control this in healthy people. However, it seems to me that the relatively large doses of supplemental bicarb recommended as an ergogenic, probably work by *accelerating* the dissipation of hydrogen ions -- and as you say this has nothing to do with preventing lactate production, which may be muscle protective in any case, or with dramatic movements in pH. > When and if it does work, it improves the buffering > capacity of blood. > > With regards to caffeine readers should know the > following: > <<Caffeine use is not banned by the International > Olympic Committee (IOC), but its use is regulated: an > athlete with a urine caffeine concentration in excess > of 12 mg/l is considered to have committed a doping > offense.... There is the case of the Australian modern pentathlete who was banned from the Seoul Olympics because he tested positive after the fencing event. This case is well known in Australia. He tested at 14 mg/L. This case caused a review of the existing WADA regulations re caffeine -- mainly because habitual coffee drinking was associated with some sporting cultures including fencing and cycling. Caffeine was taken off the banned list soon after, although it is monitored as you say. Here is the WADA policy. " The following substances included in the 2007 Monitoring Program (bupropion, caffeine, phenylephrine, phenylpropanolamine, pipradol, pseudoephedrine, synephrine) are not considered as Prohibited Substances. " Here is the WADA 2007 banned list: http://www.wada-ama.org/rtecontent/document/2007_List_En.pdf Gympie, Australia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2008 Report Share Posted January 2, 2008 Regarding training (duration & work capacity ): The adaptive processes to training is mainly mediated through adaptive protein synthesis. Yes, probably even neural effects which contributes to expression of strength are mediated through protein synthesis in neural tissue. There is a incontestable link between adaptive processes and the genetic machinery. Its very wrong to think that only hypertrophy means synthesis of new proteins, and unfortunately, this is what most ppl think. There are different signaling factors which can enhance protein synthesis, but a determinant one is the presence of metabolites resulting from the training process. They signal the enhanced protein synthesis, and the effect is amplified by hormones. In the light of this theory, during training, it is not advisable to use chemicals which remove metabolites from the site. Without the presence of elevated metabolite concentrations, some adaptations may not occur, or occur at much lower rates. So I would not remove H+ forced during training. I would let the body gain a significant buffering capacity by its own, as a result to presence of H+, and resort to this kind of tricks only in competition, should I consider it gives any edge, regardless how statistically improbable it seems. So, IMO, do not remove metabolites forcefully during training. As a side note, taking steroids is not removing the metabolites. Due to their nature, they can act as amplifiers of adaptation rates, much like endogenous hormones do. Dan Partelly Oradea, Romania > > > > Ok at this point I'd like to hear from Krieger - wasn't > bicarbonate loading specifically busted with regard to powerlifting > in " Pure Power " magazine some time ago? > > > > The only thing I've recently heard in the gyms is some thinking > that taking a " TUMS " will help on recovery....but that has made a few > people extremely SICK trying it too....which is worse, sore muscles > or hurling violently lol. I'll take DOMS for 200, .... > > > > I don't know anybody who uses the bicarbonate nor have I heard > anybody competing at meets I've been at proclaim the usefulness of > worrying their pH. The only worry I have is staying sufficiently > hydrated and energized, and yeah, that's a POWERADE TM thing with me, > nothing more. > > > > (side note: even effervescent creatine with its fizzy component > has been a problem for a few people I've trained with in the past, > causing severe nausea/gas and a feeling like lifting after intake a > very bad idea? one guy drank some on the way to a workout and felt > SO bad he bought water and drank it on the way in...trying > desperately to settle his stomach. regular creatine didn't induce > this so perhaps the bicarbonate isn't going to work for some people > at all?). > > > > ========================= > Some users can't tolerate it well and suffer from gastrointestinal > problems - hence you may be busting for something:) Recommended > usage (there is a high degree of individuality and athletes > should " experiment " ) is 0.3 g per kg body mass. I'm not entirely sure why any powerlifter would use sodium bicarbonate (weight loss?). > > ===================== > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2008 Report Share Posted January 2, 2008 In the light of this theory, during training, it is not advisable to use chemicals which remove metabolites from the site. Without the > presence of elevated metabolite concentrations, some adaptations may > not occur, or occur at much lower rates. > > So I would not remove H+ forced during training. I would let the body > gain a significant buffering capacity by its own, as a result to > presence of H+, and resort to this kind of tricks only in > competition, should I consider it gives any edge, regardless how > statistically improbable it seems. So, IMO, do not remove >metabolites forcefully during training. **** **** I would not advocate using bicarbonate in training but there is at least one study that suggests you are wrong. Edge J, Bishop D, Goodman C. Effects of chronic NaHCO3 ingestion during interval training on changes to muscle buffer capacity, metabolism, and short-term endurance performance. J Appl Physiol. 2006 Sep;101(3):918-25. " The group ingesting NaHCO3 before each training session had larger improvements in the LT and endurance performance, possibly because of a reduced metabolic acidosis during training and a greater improvement in muscle oxidative capacity. " mac (brianmac.co.uk) summarises it like this: " 16 recreationally active women underwent an 8-week program of 3- times per week training of six to 12 two-minute cycle intervals at 140-170% of their lactate threshold. Half of the group consumed bicarbonate before each session and half a placebo. Both groups showed improvements in buffer capacity (19 vs. 9%) and VO2 peak (22 vs. 17%) after the training period, with no differences between groups. Pre-training buffer capacity and percent change in buffer capacity correlated well. There were greater improvements in both the lactate threshold (26 vs. 15%) and time to fatigue (164 vs. 123%) after taking bicarbonate, compared with the placebo. " Read the full paper here: http://jap.physiology.org/cgi/content/full/101/3/918 Gympie, Australia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 3, 2008 Report Share Posted January 3, 2008 Hi I am fascinated by this conversation and once again want to bring this back to a team sport with which I am familiar, rugby. It seems that there would be an application in rugby players who are interval sprint and power and strength athletes that have a high requirement for strength and speed endurance. You made the statement that you would not suggest the use of NaHCO3 in practice, however is there not an argument that players would be able to offer improved quality of practice by delaying onset of muscular fatigue in practice sessions. Game day situations could also bennefit from carbonate consumption, but to avoid the problems of gastointestinal problems loading on Thursday (normally in season low intensity practice day) and Friday may benefit the player come Saturday games. The study on the improvements in Judo performance as well as the srpint cycling studies and this latest study you present show that perhaps one could consider continuous loading of NaHCO3. Any thoughts? Best Regards Nick Tatalias Johannesburg South Africa > > > > In the light of this theory, during training, it is not > advisable to use chemicals which remove metabolites from the site. > Without the > > presence of elevated metabolite concentrations, some adaptations may > > not occur, or occur at much lower rates. > > > > So I would not remove H+ forced during training. I would let the > body > > gain a significant buffering capacity by its own, as a result to > > presence of H+, and resort to this kind of tricks only in > > competition, should I consider it gives any edge, regardless how > > statistically improbable it seems. So, IMO, do not remove > >metabolites forcefully during training. **** > > **** > I would not advocate using bicarbonate in training but there is at > least one study that suggests you are wrong. > > Edge J, Bishop D, Goodman C. Effects of chronic NaHCO3 ingestion > during interval training on changes to muscle buffer capacity, > metabolism, and short-term endurance performance. J Appl Physiol. > 2006 Sep;101(3):918-25. > > " The group ingesting NaHCO3 before each training session had larger > improvements in the LT and endurance performance, possibly because of > a reduced metabolic acidosis during training and a greater > improvement in muscle oxidative capacity. " > > mac (brianmac.co.uk) summarises it like this: > > " 16 recreationally active women underwent an 8-week program of 3- > times per week training of six to 12 two-minute cycle intervals at > 140-170% of their lactate threshold. Half of the group consumed > bicarbonate before each session and half a placebo. Both groups > showed improvements in buffer capacity (19 vs. 9%) and VO2 peak (22 > vs. 17%) after the training period, with no differences between > groups. Pre-training buffer capacity and percent change in buffer > capacity correlated well. There were greater improvements in both the > lactate threshold (26 vs. 15%) and time to fatigue (164 vs. 123%) > after taking bicarbonate, compared with the placebo. " > > Read the full paper here: > > http://jap.physiology.org/cgi/content/full/101/3/918 > > > Gympie, Australia > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 3, 2008 Report Share Posted January 3, 2008 , I don't disagree with you " per-se " . If I were to start to gather research I will most likely find at least one research paper making a counterpoint to almost any affirmation in this field, which is not an exact science. This is very good and interesting. This is one of the way science evolves, contradiction. But when you get your hands dirty, and apply things practically, then you have to choose sides. You will position yourself on one side or another of the barricade. Its inevitable. Dan Partelly Oradea, Romania Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 4, 2008 Report Share Posted January 4, 2008 Nick (and Dan), I am not too keen on the idea of loading in training for team sports because: 1) the gastro problem and 2) getting them to actually bother to do it. But you may have a much more committed and experimental team than in my experience :-). And 3) . . . Even in the face of that study I quoted, Dan's logic is quite sound. When you supply exogenous (external) substances to the body the tendency is for it to back off with endogenous (internal) production. This is the basis of homeostasis, which is how the body keeps things in the narrow range of normal -- glucose, hormones, pH etc. People on prednisone (a synthetic cortisone) for certain illnesses are warned not to suddenly cease their dose because the body virtually stops making its own cortisol. It's also one of the reasons people get into trouble taking anabolic steroids -- testosterone production gets lazy, estrogen overload etc. In this case, it may seem logical that if you were to offer the body a constant supply of a very high alkaline supplement for buffering H+, it may, over time, just decide that it does not need to do the work internally and that this may eventually negatively affect buffer capacity and anaerobic performance. In the study I quoted, this did not happen -- to the surprise of the study team. Buffer capacity improved and, it seems, physiological performance criteria as well. Even so, this is not a large study even though it seems well thought through and carefully produced. In any case it was only three times/week, which may not be enough to disrupt homeostatic mechanisms. Your idea of doing a Thursday and Friday loading for a Saturday game could work out well, preventing game day upsets. Some will tolerate it, others won't. I have tried it and for me the slight nausea seemed more related to the unpalatable taste. A bit of fruit juice seems to help. I regularly drink potassium bicarb soda water as a rehydration drink with a bit of juice. That's quite palatable but it does not have the concentration of the dosing protocols required. All that sodium in NaHCO3 may not be good for hypertensives either. Below is further discussion from AIS re bicarb loading. You may get more ideas re dosing protocols. http://www.ais.org.au/nutrition/documents/16.5.1.4Bicarbonate.pdf Regards, Gympie, Australia > > > > In the light of this theory, during training, it is not > > advisable to use chemicals which remove metabolites from the site. > > Without the > > > presence of elevated metabolite concentrations, some adaptations may > > > not occur, or occur at much lower rates. > > > > > > So I would not remove H+ forced during training. I would let the > > body > > > gain a significant buffering capacity by its own, as a result to > > > presence of H+, and resort to this kind of tricks only in > > > competition, should I consider it gives any edge, regardless how > > > statistically improbable it seems. So, IMO, do not remove > > >metabolites forcefully during training. **** > > > > **** > > I would not advocate using bicarbonate in training but there is at > > least one study that suggests you are wrong. > > > > Edge J, Bishop D, Goodman C. Effects of chronic NaHCO3 ingestion > > during interval training on changes to muscle buffer capacity, > > metabolism, and short-term endurance performance. J Appl Physiol. > > 2006 Sep;101(3):918-25. > > > > " The group ingesting NaHCO3 before each training session had larger > > improvements in the LT and endurance performance, possibly because of > > a reduced metabolic acidosis during training and a greater > > improvement in muscle oxidative capacity. " > > > > mac (brianmac.co.uk) summarises it like this: > > > > " 16 recreationally active women underwent an 8-week program of 3- > > times per week training of six to 12 two-minute cycle intervals at > > 140-170% of their lactate threshold. Half of the group consumed > > bicarbonate before each session and half a placebo. Both groups > > showed improvements in buffer capacity (19 vs. 9%) and VO2 peak (22 > > vs. 17%) after the training period, with no differences between > > groups. Pre-training buffer capacity and percent change in buffer > > capacity correlated well. There were greater improvements in both the > > lactate threshold (26 vs. 15%) and time to fatigue (164 vs. 123%) > > after taking bicarbonate, compared with the placebo. " > > > > Read the full paper here: > > > > http://jap.physiology.org/cgi/content/full/101/3/918 > > > > > > Gympie, Australia > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 6, 2008 Report Share Posted January 6, 2008 Maybe, bicarbonate has a place in power sports. It can be renal protective from rhabdomyolysis, especially in beginners who overdo it or to those with elevated CK. But I'm not sure about that. Chrysostomos Georiou Ioannina, Greece > > , > > buffer capacity has 0 influence in sports like yours. Powerlifters > don't need any kind of increased buffer capacity at meets. > > It true that bicarbonate can have adverse reactions, but not everybody > has them. Some can ingest a lot without any ill effects. > > Dan Partelly > Oradea, Romania > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.