Guest guest Posted January 7, 2008 Report Share Posted January 7, 2008 Hello Everyone!! I just finished my last cycle for pre season lifting and now it is time for me to taper down kind of because in three weeks it will be time for me to start competing. I am very please with where I am at and I think that this is the strongest I've been over all. Now I have the task of putting together an inseason program in which I find difficult because of peaking purposes..Thank God for Supertraining... So I wanted to get the input on in season training from you guys. I start competing January 25th. My first peak needs to be the weekend of Feb. 29-Mar. 1. It is our indoor conference meet,so I figure I need to taper before that. I will be running the 600meters that meet. Between March 1st and March 27th I don't have a meet, so I would like to do some good liftinng in between that time to get my strength levels back up and then begin to taper off for outdoor. My first outdoor meet is March 28th. The main outdoor conference meet is May 3-4 and I know I have to taper for that.. So that is the outline of my season. I would just like to have a basic outline of how many days a week I should lift, how many lifts and when to stop lifting. I was thinking maybe a Tabata session once a week would be good or it could be my last workout before the meet that week and maybe two heavy lifting sessions early in the week. Just an idea. Something else to think about,our running workouts are close to threshold so I know fatigue will be an issue, and I should be care to monitor how I feel and how much work Im getting in. I appreciate all the info. Thank You, Archield Tampa,Florida USA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2008 Report Share Posted January 11, 2008 I would drop the volume by reducing set lengths considerably. A typical workout would look like this - pretty much like a warm up for a power lifting meet if you squat 200kgs IRM then I would do 2 X 20kg bar x 5 reps then 1set of 5reps on 60, 80 then 3 reps on 100 and one single each of 120, 140 and 160. Next exercise or go home. The idea is to do just enough to maintain strength gains that you have made or improve slightly over the season with low volume. we aim at about 80% of 1RM and depending on the athlete may occasionally go to 90%. Train 3 days a week something like Squat Monday, Deadlift/overhead squat Tues, Clean Thurs. We use protocols similar to this for our in season rugby players they play games every Saturday, we include exercises like benching, rowing and front squats for them, but not sure you need this for 800m races. The Rugby season starts in late February and goes on until October (if you win tournaments). The player do quite big volumes of sprint endurance (practice) and strength endurance in scrums and rucking practice, so we try to keep the volume down, but keep % of 1RM max up to maintain strength. These are my thoughts, and I'm giving a principal. What else do you do except running, do you do plyometrics or weight vest running, or do feel that you get enough of that in you speed work and other training. Not sure how to taper for your races, others might have an idea. How you taper training for an MMA fighter or boxer might be similar, I will try to think this through more. WIll talk to the 10k runners about their tappering stratergies. Nick Tatalias Joahhnesburg South Africa > > Hello Everyone!! > I just finished my last cycle for pre season lifting and now it is > time for me to taper down kind of because in three weeks it will be > time for me to start competing. I am very please with where I am at > and I think that this is the strongest I've been over all. > > Now I have the task of putting together an inseason program in which > I find difficult because of peaking purposes..Thank God for > Supertraining... > > So I wanted to get the input on in season training from you guys. > > I start competing January 25th. > My first peak needs to be the weekend of Feb. 29-Mar. 1. It is our > indoor conference meet,so I figure I need to taper before that. I > will be running the 600meters that meet. > > Between March 1st and March 27th I don't have a meet, so I would like > to do some good liftinng in between that time to get my strength > levels back up and then begin to taper off for outdoor. > > My first outdoor meet is March 28th. > > The main outdoor conference meet is May 3-4 and I know I have to > taper for that.. > > So that is the outline of my season. > > I would just like to have a basic outline of how many days a week I > should lift, how many lifts and when to stop lifting. > > I was thinking maybe a Tabata session once a week would be good or it > could be my last workout before the meet that week and maybe two > heavy lifting sessions early in the week. Just an idea. > > Something else to think about,our running workouts are close to > threshold so I know fatigue will be an issue, and I should be care to > monitor how I feel and how much work Im getting in. > > I appreciate all the info. > > Thank You, > Archield > Tampa,Florida USA > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2008 Report Share Posted January 11, 2008 I would have them lift two days a week. Doing squats, power cleans, maybe front squats, lateral squats, and some upper body exercises. Use 80-90% of 1Rm, and 3-5 sets of 3-5 reps. Keep it intense power/strength based and short. Garrison,CSCS*D Mesa,AZ Mesa Community College ================================== To: Supertraining@...: nick.tatalias@...: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:47:02 +0200Subject: Re: Strength Training for a 800m runner(In Season) I would drop the volume by reducing set lengths considerably.A typical workout would look like this - pretty much like a warm up for apower lifting meetif you squat 200kgs IRM then I would do 2 X 20kg bar x 5 reps then 1set of5reps on 60, 80 then 3 reps on 100 and one single each of 120, 140 and 160.Next exercise or go home. The idea is to do just enough to maintainstrength gains that you have made or improve slightly over the season withlow volume. we aim at about 80% of 1RM and depending on the athlete mayoccasionally go to 90%. Train 3 days a week something like Squat Monday,Deadlift/overhead squat Tues, Clean Thurs.We use protocols similar to this for our in season rugby players they playgames every Saturday, we include exercises like benching, rowing and frontsquats for them, but not sure you need this for 800m races. The Rugbyseason starts in late February and goes on until October (if you wintournaments). The player do quite big volumes of sprint endurance(practice) and strength endurance in scrums and rucking practice, so we tryto keep the volume down, but keep % of 1RM max up to maintain strength.These are my thoughts, and I'm giving a principal. What else do you doexcept running, do you do plyometrics or weight vest running, or do feelthat you get enough of that in you speed work and other training. Not surehow to taper for your races, others might have an idea. How you tapertraining for an MMA fighter or boxer might be similar, I will try to thinkthis through more. WIll talk to the 10k runners about their tapperingstratergies.Nick TataliasJoahhnesburgSouth AfricaOn 07/01/2008, itsmeyoungb wrote:>> Hello Everyone!!> I just finished my last cycle for pre season lifting and now it is> time for me to taper down kind of because in three weeks it will be> time for me to start competing. I am very please with where I am at> and I think that this is the strongest I've been over all.>> Now I have the task of putting together an inseason program in which> I find difficult because of peaking purposes..Thank God for> Supertraining...>> So I wanted to get the input on in season training from you guys.>> I start competing January 25th.> My first peak needs to be the weekend of Feb. 29-Mar. 1. It is our> indoor conference meet,so I figure I need to taper before that. I> will be running the 600meters that meet.>> Between March 1st and March 27th I don't have a meet, so I would like> to do some good liftinng in between that time to get my strength> levels back up and then begin to taper off for outdoor.>> My first outdoor meet is March 28th.>> The main outdoor conference meet is May 3-4 and I know I have to> taper for that..>> So that is the outline of my season.>> I would just like to have a basic outline of how many days a week I> should lift, how many lifts and when to stop lifting.>> I was thinking maybe a Tabata session once a week would be good or it> could be my last workout before the meet that week and maybe two> heavy lifting sessions early in the week. Just an idea.>> Something else to think about,our running workouts are close to> threshold so I know fatigue will be an issue, and I should be care to> monitor how I feel and how much work Im getting in.>> I appreciate all the info.>> Thank You,> Archield> Tampa,Florida USA>> =================================== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 12, 2008 Report Share Posted January 12, 2008 > I just finished my last cycle for pre season lifting and now it is > time for me to taper down kind of because in three weeks it will be > time for me to start competing. I am very please with where I am at > and I think that this is the strongest I've been over all. > > I was thinking maybe a Tabata session once a week would be good or it > could be my last workout before the meet that week and maybe two > heavy lifting sessions early in the week. Just an idea. > > Thank You, > Archield > Tampa,Florida USA , with all due respect, why on earth would you consider doing 'Tabata protocol' training when you're an 800 metre runner? For goodness sake, get outside on the track or do some hills. Get a decent 800 metre track training program and forget about the trivia. And don't lift heavy in-season. You're a middle distance runner not a freakin' powerlifter! Do heavy stuff pre-season if you want to, and power train in-season if you want to do weights. 60%1RM max explosive, plyos, and no more. Gympie, Australia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 14, 2008 Report Share Posted January 14, 2008 Hi If you recall is a converted 400m hurdle runner. In sprint events weight training seems quite appropriate. In my view the 800m is almost the same a sprint event if not the same. Here is my logic as to why should lift weights. Given the recent posts on the energy system demands of sport I think it may be useful to analyse this for an 800m run. The event can be run at quite a pace, or tactically (which favours a runner like who has speed and sprint endurance). In previous discussions it was apparent that after the P-Cr system was exhausted (at around 30 seconds) the glycolytic system was the major contributor to the energy system. Fast twitch (type II A) with mitochondria for metabolising glucose, re-using lactates and pyruvates would be the muscle of choice to provide the athlete running the 800m as the event is usually over before the Type II A muscles are used up and Type I muscles must be used. Usually the Type II A fibres last for about 3 minutes if I recall the posts. The reason I conclude that Type II A muscles fibre are preferable to Type I is that the force generated by these muscles is significantly higher and the rate of force development is greater also making athletic endevour faster and more explosive. Further more in post from about a year ago around the Weyand 2001 study it was proposed as part of that study that the bodies ability to maintain (with out fatigue) strength to rebound the landing forces was what made athletes running at top speed run at that speed. Stronger athletes were able to maintain top speed running for longer and had longer stride lengths thus covering the ground faster. Thus to be able to run faster for longer, the athlete should build strength but not at the expense of increased body mass (relative strength). Low volume higher intensity (defined as % of 1RM in this instance) would be beneficial in maintaining off season strength gains without stimulating inappropriate mass building hypertrophy. This was why I suggested the low volume high % of 1RM (80% to 85% perhaps 90% in some cases) programme. 's second question about Tabata protocols adapted to strength training or running for that matter, was not that silly a question. Given the " anaerobic " demands on the glycolitic system during the 800m run training the body in a style that challenges the body to adapt to high lactate build up (which repeat high intensity (this case defined as a % of sprint speed or a 15RM) training may help the body adapt to endocrine system to deal with the onset of acidosis (thus improve lactate formation, H+ ions from the cells to mitochondria(intracellular) or carbonate transfer of H+ to the extra cellular fluid and blood. Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning states " Accordingly, the contribution of conditioning to optimal performance can be realised only if intensity is maximal " High intensity training (through Tabata style protocols) may be beneficial. Sure hill sprints and weight vest running (as I alluded to in my previous post) may add intensity to the training and are useful, however are they optimal on their own. A system of lifting a 15RM for 8 to 12 reps in a front squat (or similar full body training) for a 20 seconds followed by 10 seconds rest for eight sets (4 minutes total time) was popularised by coach Dan and nick-named Tabata style lifting. This type of training seems to stimulate strength and glycolytic adaption in a very short training period (short to maintain intensity). It may also improve capiliarization of the muscle tissue which may improve extra cellular transfer of H+ to the blood. " This indicates that resistance training results in alterations to lactate response similar to those from Aerobic training (42, 60, 110) " from Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning which also states " The high intensity and low volume seen in power lifting is associate with no change or a decrease in capillary density due to the dilution effects eiifecs of muscular fibre hypertophy conversely, training of low intensity with high volume such as that used by body builders, may actually increase capilliarization. " This " Tabata " type weight training may well be effective for capiliarization and a good counter point to the low volume strength training I offered. s 800m running and speed drills (e.g. 600m sprints) may contribute to improved capiliarization and adaption to lactate metabolism, but adding a strength component that does this with light loads may be beneficial. One would have to make sure that this does not stimulate hypertrophy or this protocol may be counter productive. The question in all of this is how to get the results by combining running training and gym work. I think finding a strategy that helps not over reach too close to the competition is helpful. In my opinion maintain strength with low volume high % of 1RM (80 to 85) in the build up I have shown. its probably a workout that is over in 20 minute and either a second movement can be performed or can leave the gym (probably feeling like more is possible). I would not use Tabata type protocols in the week before a race, even if they only last 4 minutes they exhaust one (my personal experience) for days, if Tabata style is to be included then in the weeks preceding the competition, to allow this training to improve capilliarization and facilitate lactate & energy system endocrine changes. Tapering into the competition I would do the last session e.g the squat session to 85% (90% if easy) of 1RM on the Tuesday and no more gym the rest of the week. Technical runs and stride through etc for running and at low volumes also. I'd appreciate some feed back on my suggestion and my logic for training in the weight room for . I would like to understand your reasoning with regards to your recomendation to , as you seem to have significant experience in training runners. This way I can learn more. Best Regards Nick Tatalias Johannesburg South Africa > > > > > I just finished my last cycle for pre season lifting and now it is > > time for me to taper down kind of because in three weeks it will be > > time for me to start competing. I am very please with where I am at > > and I think that this is the strongest I've been over all. > > > > I was thinking maybe a Tabata session once a week would be good or it > > could be my last workout before the meet that week and maybe two > > heavy lifting sessions early in the week. Just an idea. > > > > Thank You, > > Archield > > Tampa,Florida USA > > , with all due respect, why on earth would you consider > doing 'Tabata protocol' training when you're an 800 metre runner? For > goodness sake, get outside on the track or do some hills. Get a decent > 800 metre track training program and forget about the trivia. > > And don't lift heavy in-season. You're a middle distance runner not a > freakin' powerlifter! Do heavy stuff pre-season if you want to, and > power train in-season if you want to do weights. 60%1RM max explosive, > plyos, and no more. > > > Gympie, Australia > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 15, 2008 Report Share Posted January 15, 2008 Nick, thanks for the response. I recall most of our earlier discussion on this subject. Here is my general approach based on many years of track and road racing -- albeit at an amateur level -- and I can't claim to have coached any elite athletes. 1. The 800m is still mostly an aerobic race (<>60%). It looks like a sprint sometimes and there clearly is a high anaerobic requirement. However, I'm not convinced many 400 metre runners make successful adaptations to 800m. The reasons may be physiological and psychological. 2. We don't really know if weight training improves performance in 800m racers even though, as discussed previously, some studies suggest improvement in running economy and perhaps speed in middle distance runners. 3. If you read the professional 800 metre forums, which I do from time to time, you can see that the main point of disagreement is to do with the balance between intensity and volume (hey, where have I heard that before?). Strength weight training is mentioned from time to time, and at least some of them seem to do some gym work, but it does not seem to rate highly in discussion, which is not necessarily a good guide. 4. As most of these guys seem to agree, there is not one single training model that works for everyone. Naturally, this may have to do with percentage fibre type etc. You have the guys coming down from 1500 and 5000 and the guys and gals coming up from 400. And they document some people moving up from 400 metres who are just not able to perform at 800 no matter how they train. 5. Even though my response to may have seemed a little harsh (sorry ), I was concerned that he seemed too keen to concentrate on gym work. I may be mistaken. I hope he is doing at least 80 kms/wk on the road plus the necessary sprint and track intervals. Steve Ovett by the way (and others), did up to 200 kms/week. Yet he still managed to run 11.8s from 1300-1400 metres in a 1500m race that he won. 6. I am not against some weight training for middle distance and up. My cautionary approach is that heavy strength training, eg, 2-4RM low volume etc might best be done pre-season because we don't really know how this might affect other elements of 800m capacity if done in- season. I am not so concerned about bulking up because the track and road work will knock this down for sure. 7. Also, if training can be done with specificity for an event, then that's pretty much where most training should concentrate. I question whether weight strength training in-season would provide advantages over similar time spent running hills, which would build the type of specific strength required, and which seems to be successfully utilised by most middle distance runners. I understand that one could do both -- as long as it does not down-regulate other important adaptations, eg, aerobic capacity, capillary and mitochondrial development. 8. As I stated, some explosive type training in-season would be my preference. I would also monitor vertical jump performance, which might go some way toward establishing that no elastic component has been compromised with low-volume strength training. I note one study that suggests this could occur. (I recall Carl saying that the worst season he had was the one he spent in the gym.) 9. I understand that Tabata training could supplement other high- intensity training. However, my objection relates to my point above. Why would one do Tabata training in a gym when you can do much more specific, high-intensity running training on a track or hills with superior specificity. Lactate is lactate and capillaries are capillaries. You won't do better for either than track intervals or road running respectively in my view. 10. Having said that, I understand the Tabata weights idea, eg Dan , although I had not heard of it previously. I do something similar in training for masters sprints. Here's my main strength program in-season: a. Barbell hang clean press (explosive) 3x8 (about 40% 1RM) b. Romanian deadlifts (3x10) (about 60%) c. Hang jump squats with barbell (small bar) or dumbbells, or box marches with plenty of height. d. I precede all this (after mild warmup) with two 5 minutes sessions on bike or treadmill, each one building to the last two minutes at 90- 95% max heart rate with last 30 seconds flat out -- with two minutes break in between. Or, a full ten minute treadmill or bike session building to 90-100% over last three minutes. I'm well warm by the time I reach the weights room :-). I do a few other isolation exercises that I enjoy at about 8-12RM. Soon, I'll back off and do mostly track work while racing. But back to 800m. Because of the aerobic component in the 800m, what I might experiment with for sprints could be much more of a risk for because of the potential conflict of adaptations. There may indeed be several routes to success with the 800 metres, so in retrospect, probably should experiment but take note of what the minimum requirements are for high performance in this race. Kind regards, Gympie, Australia > > > > > I just finished my last cycle for pre season lifting and now it is > > > time for me to taper down kind of because in three weeks it will be > > > time for me to start competing. I am very please with where I am at > > > and I think that this is the strongest I've been over all. > > > > > > I was thinking maybe a Tabata session once a week would be good or it > > > could be my last workout before the meet that week and maybe two > > > heavy lifting sessions early in the week. Just an idea. > > > > > > Thank You, > > > Archield > > > Tampa,Florida USA > > > > , with all due respect, why on earth would you consider > > doing 'Tabata protocol' training when you're an 800 metre runner? For > > goodness sake, get outside on the track or do some hills. Get a decent > > 800 metre track training program and forget about the trivia. > > > > And don't lift heavy in-season. You're a middle distance runner not a > > freakin' powerlifter! Do heavy stuff pre-season if you want to, and > > power train in-season if you want to do weights. 60%1RM max explosive, > > plyos, and no more. > > > > > > Gympie, Australia > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 Hi Thanks for this post, I guess be specific is the lesson here, I take your point. Being some one who only ever sprinted about 60m to score on an interception, I don't always get the middle and long distance stuff. Rugby players are very different to this despite needing to sustain high intensity sprints for about 90 seconds (probability of scoring peaks at about 90 seconds of possession). My coach used to train a top level (South African champion standard) boxer also and again we adapted from the traditional road training for him to short sprints (50 m) timed for 3 minute round with and gym work as the mainstay - of course they went to the boxing coaches for technical training. The problem with a sample of one is that the athlete may just be a dam good fighter irrespective of what we did, yet when he went to one off to one of the top fight trainers and back to traditional road work training he seemed to lack the thrust and power and his career tapered off. I was trying to use that experience (learning from other) and apply this to 's situation. The problem is always making sure that the athlete is progressing optimally and would have to judge that for himself. Best Regards Nick Tatalias Johannesburg South Africa > > Nick, thanks for the response. I recall most of our earlier > discussion on this subject. Here is my general approach based on many > years of track and road racing -- albeit at an amateur level -- and I > can't claim to have coached any elite athletes. > > 1. The 800m is still mostly an aerobic race (<>60%). It looks like a > sprint sometimes and there clearly is a high anaerobic requirement. > However, I'm not convinced many 400 metre runners make successful > adaptations to 800m. The reasons may be physiological and > psychological. > > 2. We don't really know if weight training improves performance in > 800m racers even though, as discussed previously, some studies > suggest improvement in running economy and perhaps speed in middle > distance runners. > > 3. If you read the professional 800 metre forums, which I do from > time to time, you can see that the main point of disagreement is to > do with the balance between intensity and volume (hey, where have I > heard that before?). Strength weight training is mentioned from time > to time, and at least some of them seem to do some gym work, but it > does not seem to rate highly in discussion, which is not necessarily > a good guide. > > 4. As most of these guys seem to agree, there is not one single > training model that works for everyone. Naturally, this may have to > do with percentage fibre type etc. You have the guys coming down from > 1500 and 5000 and the guys and gals coming up from 400. And they > document some people moving up from 400 metres who are just not able > to perform at 800 no matter how they train. > > 5. Even though my response to may have seemed a little harsh > (sorry ), I was concerned that he seemed too keen to concentrate > on gym work. I may be mistaken. I hope he is doing at least 80 kms/wk > on the road plus the necessary sprint and track intervals. Steve > Ovett by the way (and others), did up to 200 kms/week. Yet he still > managed to run 11.8s from 1300-1400 metres in a 1500m race that he > won. > > 6. I am not against some weight training for middle distance and up. > My cautionary approach is that heavy strength training, eg, 2-4RM low > volume etc might best be done pre-season because we don't really know > how this might affect other elements of 800m capacity if done in- > season. I am not so concerned about bulking up because the track and > road work will knock this down for sure. > > 7. Also, if training can be done with specificity for an event, then > that's pretty much where most training should concentrate. I question > whether weight strength training in-season would provide advantages > over similar time spent running hills, which would build the type of > specific strength required, and which seems to be successfully > utilised by most middle distance runners. I understand that one could > do both -- as long as it does not down-regulate other important > adaptations, eg, aerobic capacity, capillary and mitochondrial > development. > > 8. As I stated, some explosive type training in-season would be my > preference. I would also monitor vertical jump performance, which > might go some way toward establishing that no elastic component has > been compromised with low-volume strength training. I note one study > that suggests this could occur. (I recall Carl saying that the > worst season he had was the one he spent in the gym.) > > 9. I understand that Tabata training could supplement other high- > intensity training. However, my objection relates to my point above. > Why would one do Tabata training in a gym when you can do much more > specific, high-intensity running training on a track or hills with > superior specificity. Lactate is lactate and capillaries are > capillaries. You won't do better for either than track intervals or > road running respectively in my view. > > 10. Having said that, I understand the Tabata weights idea, eg Dan > , although I had not heard of it previously. I do something > similar in training for masters sprints. Here's my main strength > program in-season: > > a. Barbell hang clean press (explosive) 3x8 (about 40% 1RM) > b. Romanian deadlifts (3x10) (about 60%) > c. Hang jump squats with barbell (small bar) or dumbbells, or box > marches with plenty of height. > d. I precede all this (after mild warmup) with two 5 minutes sessions > on bike or treadmill, each one building to the last two minutes at 90- > 95% max heart rate with last 30 seconds flat out -- with two minutes > break in between. Or, a full ten minute treadmill or bike session > building to 90-100% over last three minutes. > > I'm well warm by the time I reach the weights room :-). I do a few > other isolation exercises that I enjoy at about 8-12RM. Soon, I'll > back off and do mostly track work while racing. > > But back to 800m. Because of the aerobic component in the 800m, what > I might experiment with for sprints could be much more of a risk for > because of the potential conflict of adaptations. > > There may indeed be several routes to success with the 800 metres, so > in retrospect, probably should experiment but take note of what > the minimum requirements are for high performance in this race. > > Kind regards, > > > Gympie, Australia > > > > > > > > > I just finished my last cycle for pre season lifting and now it > is > > > > time for me to taper down kind of because in three weeks it > will be > > > > time for me to start competing. I am very please with where I > am at > > > > and I think that this is the strongest I've been over all. > > > > > > > > I was thinking maybe a Tabata session once a week would be good > or it > > > > could be my last workout before the meet that week and maybe two > > > > heavy lifting sessions early in the week. Just an idea. > > > > > > > > Thank You, > > > > Archield > > > > Tampa,Florida USA > > > > > > , with all due respect, why on earth would you consider > > > doing 'Tabata protocol' training when you're an 800 metre runner? > For > > > goodness sake, get outside on the track or do some hills. Get a > decent > > > 800 metre track training program and forget about the trivia. > > > > > > And don't lift heavy in-season. You're a middle distance runner > not a > > > freakin' powerlifter! Do heavy stuff pre-season if you want to, > and > > > power train in-season if you want to do weights. 60%1RM max > explosive, > > > plyos, and no more. > > > > > > > > > Gympie, Australia > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 Hi ! One of the easiest self-assessments you can do relative to your current progress in the 800 is: 1) determine your seasonal goal--what you want to run at the most important races in your training cycle 2) run the 800 in practice as fast as you are currently capable 3) start your watch or have a teammate time you 4) stop or have your teammate whistle or signal you to stop when the goal time on the watch is reached 5) see how far from the finish line you actually are when the watch reaches your goal time It is always good for an athlete to get a 'perspective' in distance as well as time in order to help them direct their training plan. It's amazing what this simple test does in terms of getting you to think 'meters from your goal' rather than just 'fewer seconds to achieve that goal.' Ken Jakalski Lisle High School Lisle, Illinois USA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 Ok..Let me try to throw my two cents in... I am a 400/800 type guy. Although it is true that I need a certain amount of mileage, too much will kill me results.This summer, I did 25 miles a week on the road,and it absolulely was somewhat of a detriment to my progress.Although I had better aerobic capacity, I had lost a great bit of speed. This was evident as I am a 48 sec 400m runner and I could only mustard 53 seconds at the beginning of october.I am just now getting my speed back. Something else to remember is I am still mainly a 400 hurdler. I am running the 800 indoors to help the last 200 meters of my race for the 400 hurdles. I think understood it as I only run the 800 and I am sorry if I was unclear about that. You post is not at all harsh as I am learning just as you are. This situation is difficult for me because my college doesnt not have a coach conditioned in this area of running and lifting and most of the athletes have to come up with their own strength and conditioning programs. In my case is could be hit or miss because I never know if Im doing the right thing. But In my humble opinion I believe the strength I have built up needs to be maintained as last year, I had a training partner who lifting like he ran the 100 meters and he was about to run 1:52 for the 800 meters. My genetics and body type may be different but what is the point of building great deals of strength and power and not using it if can beneficial. The power lies in my situation is to balance the two without much weight gain as I am very very prone to weight gain. Those are just my two cents. Here is my program form the week it will allow everyone to see what I am doing. Heated debate is the only way to get to the truth of close to it, so keep everything coming. Monday January 14th Hang Clean and Jerk at 140lbs 3 reps and 5 sets Back squats x 5 at 275lbs,4 at 280lbs,3 at 285lbs,3 at 290lbs,2 at 295lbs. Dumbell Bench Press 5 reps x 3 sets with 80lbs dumbells Dumbell Lat Row 6 reps x 3 sets with 65lbs dumbells. Wednesday January 16th Power snatch + overhead squat 3reps x 5 sets at 115lbs Barbell Bench Press 3reps x 5 sets a 190 lbs Good Mornings 5reps x5sets at 150 lbs Lat Pull Down 6x4 I know I lift a little heavier than must 800 runners but is just a natural things for me. I havent really stopped making progress and I am not really gaining weight. So you guys can pick that apart. I appreciate the criticism. .Archield Tampa,Florida USA > > Hi > > Thanks for this post, I guess be specific is the lesson here, I take your > point. Being some one who only ever sprinted about 60m to score on an > interception, I don't always get the middle and long distance stuff. Rugby > players are very different to this despite needing to sustain high intensity > sprints for about 90 seconds (probability of scoring peaks at about 90 > seconds of possession). My coach used to train a top level (South African > champion standard) boxer also and again we adapted from the traditional road > training for him to short sprints (50 m) timed for 3 minute round with and > gym work as the mainstay - of course they went to the boxing coaches for > technical training. The problem with a sample of one is that the athlete may > just be a dam good fighter irrespective of what we did, yet when he went to > one off to one of the top fight trainers and back to traditional road work > training he seemed to lack the thrust and power and his career tapered > off. I was trying to use that experience (learning from other) and apply > this to 's situation. The problem is always making sure that the > athlete is progressing optimally and would have to judge that for > himself. > > Best Regards > Nick Tatalias > Johannesburg > South Africa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 --- itsmeyoungb wrote: > Ok..Let me try to throw my two cents in... , I would also like to add two cents of my own to this interesting dialogue. I do agree with 's assessment and his suggestions. I have no experience in coaching runners however I do have extensive experience in coaching cyclists. I have never been one to accept on blind faith a training regimen of any kind without asking the question " why " should this work better than some other regimen. One of the biggest problems I came across frequently, while coaching cyclists, was athletes who did a lot of hard training but very little " smart " training. Many of the cyclists put in a lot of miles every week with little benefit because they were not riding the miles with a purpose. They putting in a lot of miles because that was what the professional riders were doing but there was no rhyme or reason to their program. The same can be said for weight training and running. lots of running and lots of lifting does not guarantee faster times unless there is specific goals within the training. You have done a lot of work over the past months building your strength through weight lifting. Now you have to convert that lifting strength into running strength. I have always found it best to break down an activity into its components and try to analyze how to best improve the various components and have them work well together. I would like to first analyze your strength regimen. When you did your lifting or squatting you probably used relatively heavy weights with which you were able to perform 3-4 sets of 8-12 reps each. Each set took about 1 minute or less and you rested about 2-3 minutes between sets. That makes for a total of 36-48 reps of a particular activity over 10-12 minutes per session. Now lets take a look at how you plan on using this strength. You are going to run 800 meters as fast as you can. I have no idea how long an average stride is when running a 800 meter race so I will, for the sake of this discussion, estimate that you will have to take 350-500 strides from start to finish. That is 350-500 reps in about 2 minutes. Nothing you did in the gym can replicate this activity. Now lets take a peek into the muscles you have produced with all that work. Your resistance training helped you develop a lot of large Type IIB fibers which contain very few mitochondria. Great for short powerful efforts but easily fatigued. What do you need in order to perform 350-500 reps in two minutes. Lots of Type IIA fibers loaded with glucose burning mitochondria. To accommodate these mitochondria the cell needs to sacrifice some intracellular fibrils (thus sacrificing some strength). These are the type of fibers that Nick was referring to in his discussion. This 800 m effort will also produce a great deal of H ions which need to be buffered and a large amount of lactate which needs to be cleared as well as require an increased Oxygen delivery capacity. This in part gets back to the discussion we have had in the past two weeks concerning buffering capacity and lactate. The conversion of IIB fibers to IIA fibers takes time and the proper training stimulus. This is were the proper interval training on the track as well as the hill running that alluded to comes into play. The intervals and hill climbing, if done properly are very taxing on your system as well as requiring a great deal of energy. Six weeks may not be enough time to allow all your newly acquired IIB fibers to adapt and transform themselves into IIA fibers. Besides transforming you muscle fibers you also have to increase your hearts capacity to pump more blood to your muscles. You also have to upgrade your vascular system to handle the increase cardiac output as well as the capillary system to deliver the increase blood volume to these muscles. You have to increase the buffering capacity both inside the muscle fibers as well as in the blood stream. Only the proper training regime will do this. Resistance training with its short work intervals (1 min or less for a set of 8- 10 reps) and long rest intervals (2-3) minutes does not require a large buffering capacity nor does it require and large cardiac output and the IIB fibers have relatively fewer capillaries. You mention the Tabata protocol in the gym. If I understand the protocol correctly from my reading, it is designed to improve aerobic capacity and probably should best be incorporated on the track and not the gym. After a very good warm up (10+ minutes- or until you have worked up a good sweat), you run for 20 seconds (150 + meters) recover for 10 and repeat this x 8 for a total of 4 minutes then cool down for 10 minutes. If you are unable to complete 8 sets, this indicates that you started out to fast. Your last rep should be just as fast if not faster than your first rep. This type of work will produce a tremendous amount of lactate, put tremendous strain on you cardiovascular as well as pulmonary system, as well as tax you buffering capacity. This should be done at the end of you daily training and preferably before a rest day. Initially this should be done once a week. This is just one of many different types of interval training that can be used to transform you IIB fibers to IIA fibers. Your coach probably has many other types of intervals in his arsenal. While working out in the gym may seem to make sense it is important to remember that any energy expended in the gym is energy not available for track work. Any muscle fibers (IIB) built through resistance training is useless to an 800 meter runner unless the majority are converted to IIA fibers. As a college student you must have many other things to do besides train and recover. During your pre-race period and during your racing season you have to train smart and learn to allocate your precious energy and time to your primary goal, in this case improving your 800 meter time and not your lifting strength. You state that you do not have the benefit of a coach who both trains runners and knows how to train you in resistance training. You have the benefit of 's advice who obviously has been training as a runner for years and has experience in the gym. As alluded, there is no consensus in the running field concerning the role of strength training. The same can be said for swimming, cycling and rowing. Individuals whose primary focus is resistance training will argue that this type of training can benefit any sport and some will say the heavier the lifting the greater the benefit. Ask them why they don't take up running to improve their lifting. The reason is they are afraid that they will convert their powerful IIB fibers to IIA fibers and in the process of gaining endurance lose some strength. So much for my two cents. Two cents doesn't buy much these days. Ralph Giarnella MD Southington Ct USA .. > I am a 400/800 type guy. Although it is true that I > need a certain > amount of mileage, too much will kill me > results.This summer, I did > 25 miles a week on the road,and it absolulely was > somewhat of a > detriment to my progress.Although I had better > aerobic capacity, I > had lost a great bit of speed. This was evident as I > am a 48 sec 400m > runner and I could only mustard 53 seconds at the > beginning of > october.I am just now getting my speed back. > > Something else to remember is I am still mainly a > 400 hurdler. I am > running the 800 indoors to help the last 200 meters > of my race for > the 400 hurdles. I think understood it as I > only run the 800 and > I am sorry if I was unclear about that. You post is > not at all harsh > as I am learning just as you are. > This situation is difficult for me because my > college doesnt not have > a coach conditioned in this area of running and > lifting and most of > the athletes have to come up with their own strength > and conditioning > programs. In my case is could be hit or miss because > I never know if > Im doing the right thing. But In my humble opinion I > believe the > strength I have built up needs to be maintained as > last year, I had a > training partner who lifting like he ran the 100 > meters and he was > about to run 1:52 for the 800 meters. My genetics > and body type may > be different but what is the point of building great > deals of > strength and power and not using it if can > beneficial. The power lies > in my situation is to balance the two without much > weight gain as I > am very very prone to weight gain. > > Those are just my two cents. Here is my program form > the week it will > allow everyone to see what I am doing. Heated debate > is the only way > to get to the truth of close to it, so keep > everything coming. > > Monday January 14th > > Hang Clean and Jerk at 140lbs 3 reps and 5 sets > Back squats x 5 at 275lbs,4 at 280lbs,3 at 285lbs,3 > at 290lbs,2 at > 295lbs. > Dumbell Bench Press 5 reps x 3 sets with 80lbs > dumbells > Dumbell Lat Row 6 reps x 3 sets with 65lbs dumbells. > > Wednesday January 16th > Power snatch + overhead squat 3reps x 5 sets at > 115lbs > Barbell Bench Press 3reps x 5 sets a 190 lbs > Good Mornings 5reps x5sets at 150 lbs > Lat Pull Down 6x4 > > I know I lift a little heavier than must 800 runners > but is just a > natural things for me. I havent really stopped > making progress and I > am not really gaining weight. So you guys can pick > that apart. I > appreciate the criticism. > > .Archield > Tampa,Florida USA > > > > > > > Hi > > > > Thanks for this post, I guess be specific is the > lesson here, I > take your > > point. Being some one who only ever sprinted > about 60m to score on > an > > interception, I don't always get the middle and > long distance > stuff. Rugby > > players are very different to this despite needing > to sustain high > intensity > > sprints for about 90 seconds (probability of > scoring peaks at about > 90 > > seconds of possession). My coach used to train a > top level (South > African > > champion standard) boxer also and again we adapted > from the > traditional road > > training for him to short sprints (50 m) timed for > 3 minute round > with and > > gym work as the mainstay - of course they went to > the boxing > coaches for > > technical training. The problem with a sample of > one is that the > athlete may > > just be a dam good fighter irrespective of what we > did, yet when he > went to > > one off to one of the top fight trainers and back > to traditional > road work > > training he seemed to lack the thrust and power > and his career > tapered > > off. I was trying to use that experience > (learning from other) and > apply > > this to 's situation. The problem is always > making sure that > the > > athlete is progressing optimally and would > have to judge that > for > > himself. > > > > Best Regards > > Nick Tatalias > > Johannesburg > > South Africa > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 17, 2008 Report Share Posted January 17, 2008 Hey , I probably misunderstood your program. I see that you're mainly a 400 hurdler. (Too much info, too little time to absorb everything.) And by the look of those numbers in your workout schedule . . . man, you'll never run a good 800. You need to lose some muscle! <g> Keep up the experimentation. Regards, Gympie, Australia > > > > Hi > > > > Thanks for this post, I guess be specific is the lesson here, I > take your > > point. Being some one who only ever sprinted about 60m to score on > an > > interception, I don't always get the middle and long distance > stuff. Rugby > > players are very different to this despite needing to sustain high > intensity > > sprints for about 90 seconds (probability of scoring peaks at about > 90 > > seconds of possession). My coach used to train a top level (South > African > > champion standard) boxer also and again we adapted from the > traditional road > > training for him to short sprints (50 m) timed for 3 minute round > with and > > gym work as the mainstay - of course they went to the boxing > coaches for > > technical training. The problem with a sample of one is that the > athlete may > > just be a dam good fighter irrespective of what we did, yet when he > went to > > one off to one of the top fight trainers and back to traditional > road work > > training he seemed to lack the thrust and power and his career > tapered > > off. I was trying to use that experience (learning from other) and > apply > > this to 's situation. The problem is always making sure that > the > > athlete is progressing optimally and would have to judge that > for > > himself. > > > > Best Regards > > Nick Tatalias > > Johannesburg > > South Africa > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 17, 2008 Report Share Posted January 17, 2008 Hi Or gain equivalent strength endurance so that the power to weight ratio is the same as losing muscle. Easier to get power or lose weight? Regards Nick Tatalias Johanesburg > > Hey , > > I probably misunderstood your program. I see that you're mainly a 400 > hurdler. (Too much info, too little time to absorb everything.) > > And by the look of those numbers in your workout schedule . . . man, > you'll never run a good 800. You need to lose some muscle! <g> > > Keep up the experimentation. > > Regards, > > > Gympie, Australia > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > Thanks for this post, I guess be specific is the lesson here, I > > take your > > > point. Being some one who only ever sprinted about 60m to score > on > > an > > > interception, I don't always get the middle and long distance > > stuff. Rugby > > > players are very different to this despite needing to sustain high > > intensity > > > sprints for about 90 seconds (probability of scoring peaks at > about > > 90 > > > seconds of possession). My coach used to train a top level (South > > African > > > champion standard) boxer also and again we adapted from the > > traditional road > > > training for him to short sprints (50 m) timed for 3 minute round > > with and > > > gym work as the mainstay - of course they went to the boxing > > coaches for > > > technical training. The problem with a sample of one is that the > > athlete may > > > just be a dam good fighter irrespective of what we did, yet when > he > > went to > > > one off to one of the top fight trainers and back to traditional > > road work > > > training he seemed to lack the thrust and power and his career > > tapered > > > off. I was trying to use that experience (learning from other) > and > > apply > > > this to 's situation. The problem is always making sure that > > the > > > athlete is progressing optimally and would have to judge > that > > for > > > himself. > > > > > > Best Regards > > > Nick Tatalias > > > Johannesburg > > > South Africa > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 17, 2008 Report Share Posted January 17, 2008 Hi Ralph Can I be in on this money racket you have what with the exchange rate 2c might come in handy :-) Came across this sentence in the Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning. " The increase in aerobic capacity of skeletal muscle that occurs after aerobic endurance training is experienced by both fast and slow twitch muscle fibres. Slow twitch fibres have an inherently higher aerobic capacity than fast twitch fibres and are preferentially recruited during aerobic activity. However, if the intensity is sufficient, as in repeat 800-m intervals, fast twitch fibres (especially type IIb fibres) also make a significant contribution to the effort. Under such conditions, their aerobic capacity also increases with training. " This has me thinking about the following, 1. Type IIb muscle is used in 800m high intensity activities, if they are trained their contribution can be the difference maker. 2. Although aerobic type training interferes with strength development compared to strength development on its own, both can be developed overtime and if ultimate strength is not your goal then it is worth trying. If type IIb muscle improve their endurance function, then instead of reducing the amount of myosin as you suggest, perhaps appropriate training may increase mitochondrial function or intracellular removal of H+ through lactate, and carbonate systems may be achieved which leaves the thicker myosin to execute highly forceful and strong exhibits of strength that may be required for later 400m hurdles. 3. If running 800m intervals improves this functioning then , by by running the 800m indoor season, may have intuitively chosen the correct training for his 400m hurdles which requires fast twitch muscle to endure to the end of the race to come off the hurdles and accelerate. It seems that this is the area of concern for . 4. Some Rugby players may be running 800m intervals soon :-) I agree that appropriate training intervals may be better than lifting, but I am still struck by the Weyand Study and the demonstration that strength improves top speed running. However to increase explosive endurance if such a concept exists, I have used in the past is to do an 80% of 1RM max clean every 30 seconds for 15 to 20 minutes (time is set before I start) that is 31 or 41 reps. This does not give the muscles time to recover properly but the weight is significantly challenging to clean or explode that you must use type IIb muscles also. This type of workout though should be kept to off season or pre-season as it can compromise your running. Well it will compromise mine but then I'm not in the kind of shape that allows for that kind of concurrent training. In a completely separate discussion with one of the trainees in our gym, who has accompanied expeditions to Everest and to some high Andean mountains as the medical doctor, as well as many trips to Kilimanjaro (the highest mountain in Africa). His comment was that it seems that marathon trained runners seemed to struggle more with altitude than other people (no studies anecdotal). I speculate it is because of the lack of oxygen the slow twitch muscles are not able to deal with anaerobic conditions and suffer. People trained for high intensity have bodies better able to deal with the anaerobic environment at altitude. Why do I mention this, I am speculating that high intensity intervals may develop not only type IIa muscle fibres but type IIb also. The Tabata (weight training) protocols not only develop aerobic capacity but anaerobic capacity and power, and whether its on track, with hills, with weight vest or in the gym, may be worth including in the training. I would suggest that in 's case running lots of miles may not be useful. Comments? Best Regards Nick Tatalias Johannesburg South Africa > > > --- itsmeyoungb <howmanyukno@... <howmanyukno%40aol.com>> wrote: > > > Ok..Let me try to throw my two cents in... > > , I would also like to add two cents of my own to > this interesting dialogue. > > I do agree with 's assessment and his suggestions. > I have no experience in coaching runners however I do > have extensive experience in coaching cyclists. > > I have never been one to accept on blind faith a > training regimen of any kind without asking the > question " why " should this work better than some other > regimen. > > One of the biggest problems I came across frequently, > while coaching cyclists, was athletes who did a lot of > hard training but very little " smart " training. > > Many of the cyclists put in a lot of miles every week > with little benefit because they were not riding the > miles with a purpose. They putting in a lot of miles > because that was what the professional riders were > doing but there was no rhyme or reason to their > program. > > The same can be said for weight training and running. > lots of running and lots of lifting does not guarantee > faster times unless there is specific goals within the > training. > > You have done a lot of work over the past months > building your strength through weight lifting. Now > you have to convert that lifting strength into running > strength. > > I have always found it best to break down an activity > into its components and try to analyze how to best > improve the various components and have them work well > together. > > I would like to first analyze your strength regimen. > When you did your lifting or squatting you probably > used relatively heavy weights with which you were able > to perform 3-4 sets of 8-12 reps each. > > Each set took about 1 minute or less and you rested > about 2-3 minutes between sets. That makes for a > total of 36-48 reps of a particular activity over > 10-12 minutes per session. > > Now lets take a look at how you plan on using this > strength. You are going to run 800 meters as fast as > you can. > > I have no idea how long an average stride is when > running a 800 meter race so I will, for the sake of > this discussion, estimate that you will have to take > 350-500 strides from start to finish. That is 350-500 > reps in about 2 minutes. > > Nothing you did in the gym can replicate this > activity. > > Now lets take a peek into the muscles you have > produced with all that work. Your resistance training > helped you develop a lot of large Type IIB fibers > which contain very few mitochondria. Great for short > powerful efforts but easily fatigued. > > What do you need in order to perform 350-500 reps in > two minutes. Lots of Type IIA fibers loaded with > glucose burning mitochondria. To accommodate these > mitochondria the cell needs to sacrifice some > intracellular fibrils (thus sacrificing some > strength). > > These are the type of fibers that Nick was referring > to in his discussion. > > This 800 m effort will also produce a great deal of H > ions which need to be buffered and a large amount of > lactate which needs to be cleared as well as require > an increased Oxygen delivery capacity. This in part > gets back to the discussion we have had in the past > two weeks concerning buffering capacity and lactate. > > The conversion of IIB fibers to IIA fibers takes time > and the proper training stimulus. This is were the > proper interval training on the track as well as the > hill running that alluded to comes into play. > > The intervals and hill climbing, if done properly are > very taxing on your system as well as requiring a > great deal of energy. Six weeks may not be enough > time to allow all your newly acquired IIB fibers to > adapt and transform themselves into IIA fibers. > > Besides transforming you muscle fibers you also have > to increase your hearts capacity to pump more blood to > your muscles. You also have to upgrade your vascular > system to handle the increase cardiac output as well > as the capillary system to deliver the increase blood > volume to these muscles. > > You have to increase the buffering capacity both > inside the muscle fibers as well as in the blood > stream. Only the proper training regime will do this. > > Resistance training with its short work intervals (1 > min or less for a set of 8- 10 reps) and long rest > intervals (2-3) minutes does not require a large > buffering capacity nor does it require and large > cardiac output and the IIB fibers have relatively > fewer capillaries. > > You mention the Tabata protocol in the gym. If I > understand the protocol correctly from my reading, it > is designed to improve aerobic capacity and probably > should best be incorporated on the track and not the > gym. > > After a very good warm up (10+ minutes- or until you > have worked up a good sweat), you run for 20 seconds > (150 + meters) recover for 10 and repeat this x 8 for > a total of 4 minutes then cool down for 10 minutes. > > If you are unable to complete 8 sets, this indicates > that you started out to fast. Your last rep should > be just as fast if not faster than your first rep. > > This type of work will produce a tremendous amount of > lactate, put tremendous strain on you cardiovascular > as well as pulmonary system, as well as tax you > buffering capacity. > > This should be done at the end of you daily training > and preferably before a rest day. Initially this > should be done once a week. > > This is just one of many different types of interval > training that can be used to transform you IIB fibers > to IIA fibers. Your coach probably has many other > types of intervals in his arsenal. > > While working out in the gym may seem to make sense it > is important to remember that any energy expended in > the gym is energy not available for track work. Any > muscle fibers (IIB) built through resistance training > is useless to an 800 meter runner unless the majority > are converted to IIA fibers. > > As a college student you must have many other things > to do besides train and recover. During your pre-race > period and during your racing season you have to train > smart and learn to allocate your precious energy and > time to your primary goal, in this case improving your > 800 meter time and not your lifting strength. > > You state that you do not have the benefit of a coach > who both trains runners and knows how to train you in > resistance training. You have the benefit of 's > advice who obviously has been training as a runner for > years and has experience in the gym. > > As alluded, there is no consensus in the running > field concerning the role of strength training. The > same can be said for swimming, cycling and rowing. > > Individuals whose primary focus is resistance training > will argue that this type of training can benefit any > sport and some will say the heavier the lifting the > greater the benefit. > > Ask them why they don't take up running to improve > their lifting. The reason is they are afraid that > they will convert their powerful IIB fibers to IIA > fibers and in the process of gaining endurance lose > some strength. > > So much for my two cents. Two cents doesn't buy much > these days. > > Ralph Giarnella MD > Southington Ct USA > . > > > I am a 400/800 type guy. Although it is true that I > > need a certain > > amount of mileage, too much will kill me > > results.This summer, I did > > 25 miles a week on the road,and it absolulely was > > somewhat of a > > detriment to my progress.Although I had better > > aerobic capacity, I > > had lost a great bit of speed. This was evident as I > > am a 48 sec 400m > > runner and I could only mustard 53 seconds at the > > beginning of > > october.I am just now getting my speed back. > > > > Something else to remember is I am still mainly a > > 400 hurdler. I am > > running the 800 indoors to help the last 200 meters > > of my race for > > the 400 hurdles. I think understood it as I > > only run the 800 and > > I am sorry if I was unclear about that. You post is > > not at all harsh > > as I am learning just as you are. > > > This situation is difficult for me because my > > college doesnt not have > > a coach conditioned in this area of running and > > lifting and most of > > the athletes have to come up with their own strength > > and conditioning > > programs. In my case is could be hit or miss because > > I never know if > > Im doing the right thing. But In my humble opinion I > > believe the > > strength I have built up needs to be maintained as > > last year, I had a > > training partner who lifting like he ran the 100 > > meters and he was > > about to run 1:52 for the 800 meters. My genetics > > and body type may > > be different but what is the point of building great > > deals of > > strength and power and not using it if can > > beneficial. The power lies > > in my situation is to balance the two without much > > weight gain as I > > am very very prone to weight gain. > > > > Those are just my two cents. Here is my program form > > the week it will > > allow everyone to see what I am doing. Heated debate > > is the only way > > to get to the truth of close to it, so keep > > everything coming. > > > > Monday January 14th > > > > Hang Clean and Jerk at 140lbs 3 reps and 5 sets > > Back squats x 5 at 275lbs,4 at 280lbs,3 at 285lbs,3 > > at 290lbs,2 at > > 295lbs. > > Dumbell Bench Press 5 reps x 3 sets with 80lbs > > dumbells > > Dumbell Lat Row 6 reps x 3 sets with 65lbs dumbells. > > > > Wednesday January 16th > > Power snatch + overhead squat 3reps x 5 sets at > > 115lbs > > Barbell Bench Press 3reps x 5 sets a 190 lbs > > Good Mornings 5reps x5sets at 150 lbs > > Lat Pull Down 6x4 > > > > I know I lift a little heavier than must 800 runners > > but is just a > > natural things for me. I havent really stopped > > making progress and I > > am not really gaining weight. So you guys can pick > > that apart. I > > appreciate the criticism. > > > > .Archield > > Tampa,Florida USA > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > Thanks for this post, I guess be specific is the > > lesson here, I > > take your > > > point. Being some one who only ever sprinted > > about 60m to score on > > an > > > interception, I don't always get the middle and > > long distance > > stuff. Rugby > > > players are very different to this despite needing > > to sustain high > > intensity > > > sprints for about 90 seconds (probability of > > scoring peaks at about > > 90 > > > seconds of possession). My coach used to train a > > top level (South > > African > > > champion standard) boxer also and again we adapted > > from the > > traditional road > > > training for him to short sprints (50 m) timed for > > 3 minute round > > with and > > > gym work as the mainstay - of course they went to > > the boxing > > coaches for > > > technical training. The problem with a sample of > > one is that the > > athlete may > > > just be a dam good fighter irrespective of what we > > did, yet when he > > went to > > > one off to one of the top fight trainers and back > > to traditional > > road work > > > training he seemed to lack the thrust and power > > and his career > > tapered > > > off. I was trying to use that experience > > (learning from other) and > > apply > > > this to 's situation. The problem is always > > making sure that > > the > > > athlete is progressing optimally and would > > have to judge that > > for > > > himself. > > > > > > Best Regards > > > Nick Tatalias > > > Johannesburg > > > South Africa > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 17, 2008 Report Share Posted January 17, 2008 Hi Ralph Can I be in on this money racket you have what with the exchange rate 2c might come in handy :-) Came across this sentence in the Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning. " The increase in aerobic capacity of skeletal muscle that occurs after aerobic endurance training is experienced by both fast and slow twitch muscle fibres. Slow twitch fibres have an inherently higher aerobic capacity than fast twitch fibres and are preferentially recruited during aerobic activity. However, if the intensity is sufficient, as in repeat 800-m intervals, fast twitch fibres (especially type IIb fibres) also make a significant contribution to the effort. Under such conditions, their aerobic capacity also increases with training. " This has me thinking about the following, 1. Type IIb muscle is used in 800m high intensity activities, if they are trained their contribution can be the difference maker. 2. Although aerobic type training interferes with strength development compared to strength development on its own, both can be developed overtime and if ultimate strength is not your goal then it is worth trying. If type IIb muscle improve their endurance function, then instead of reducing the amount of myosin as you suggest, perhaps appropriate training may increase mitochondrial function or intracellular removal of H+ through lactate, and carbonate systems may be achieved which leaves the thicker myosin to execute highly forceful and strong exhibits of strength that may be required for later 400m hurdles. 3. If running 800m intervals improves this functioning then , by by running the 800m indoor season, may have intuitively chosen the correct training for his 400m hurdles which requires fast twitch muscle to endure to the end of the race to come off the hurdles and accelerate. It seems that this is the area of concern for . 4. Some Rugby players may be running 800m intervals soon :-) I agree that appropriate training intervals may be better than lifting, but I am still struck by the Weyand Study and the demonstration that strength improves top speed running. However to increase explosive endurance if such a concept exists, I have used in the past is to do an 80% of 1RM max clean every 30 seconds for 15 to 20 minutes (time is set before I start) that is 31 or 41 reps. This does not give the muscles time to recover properly but the weight is significantly challenging to clean or explode that you must use type IIb muscles also. This type of workout though should be kept to off season or pre-season as it can compromise your running. Well it will compromise mine but then I'm not in the kind of shape that allows for that kind of concurrent training. In a completely separate discussion with one of the trainees in our gym, who has accompanied expeditions to Everest and to some high Andean mountains as the medical doctor, as well as many trips to Kilimanjaro (the highest mountain in Africa). His comment was that it seems that marathon trained runners seemed to struggle more with altitude than other people (no studies anecdotal). I speculate it is because of the lack of oxygen the slow twitch muscles are not able to deal with anaerobic conditions and suffer. People trained for high intensity have bodies better able to deal with the anaerobic environment at altitude. Why do I mention this, I am speculating that high intensity intervals may develop not only type IIa muscle fibres but type IIb also. The Tabata (weight training) protocols not only develop aerobic capacity but anaerobic capacity and power, and whether its on track, with hills, with weight vest or in the gym, may be worth including in the training. I would suggest that in 's case running lots of miles may not be useful. Comments? Best Regards Nick Tatalias Johannesburg South Africa > > > --- itsmeyoungb <howmanyukno@... <howmanyukno%40aol.com>> wrote: > > > Ok..Let me try to throw my two cents in... > > , I would also like to add two cents of my own to > this interesting dialogue. > > I do agree with 's assessment and his suggestions. > I have no experience in coaching runners however I do > have extensive experience in coaching cyclists. > > I have never been one to accept on blind faith a > training regimen of any kind without asking the > question " why " should this work better than some other > regimen. > > One of the biggest problems I came across frequently, > while coaching cyclists, was athletes who did a lot of > hard training but very little " smart " training. > > Many of the cyclists put in a lot of miles every week > with little benefit because they were not riding the > miles with a purpose. They putting in a lot of miles > because that was what the professional riders were > doing but there was no rhyme or reason to their > program. > > The same can be said for weight training and running. > lots of running and lots of lifting does not guarantee > faster times unless there is specific goals within the > training. > > You have done a lot of work over the past months > building your strength through weight lifting. Now > you have to convert that lifting strength into running > strength. > > I have always found it best to break down an activity > into its components and try to analyze how to best > improve the various components and have them work well > together. > > I would like to first analyze your strength regimen. > When you did your lifting or squatting you probably > used relatively heavy weights with which you were able > to perform 3-4 sets of 8-12 reps each. > > Each set took about 1 minute or less and you rested > about 2-3 minutes between sets. That makes for a > total of 36-48 reps of a particular activity over > 10-12 minutes per session. > > Now lets take a look at how you plan on using this > strength. You are going to run 800 meters as fast as > you can. > > I have no idea how long an average stride is when > running a 800 meter race so I will, for the sake of > this discussion, estimate that you will have to take > 350-500 strides from start to finish. That is 350-500 > reps in about 2 minutes. > > Nothing you did in the gym can replicate this > activity. > > Now lets take a peek into the muscles you have > produced with all that work. Your resistance training > helped you develop a lot of large Type IIB fibers > which contain very few mitochondria. Great for short > powerful efforts but easily fatigued. > > What do you need in order to perform 350-500 reps in > two minutes. Lots of Type IIA fibers loaded with > glucose burning mitochondria. To accommodate these > mitochondria the cell needs to sacrifice some > intracellular fibrils (thus sacrificing some > strength). > > These are the type of fibers that Nick was referring > to in his discussion. > > This 800 m effort will also produce a great deal of H > ions which need to be buffered and a large amount of > lactate which needs to be cleared as well as require > an increased Oxygen delivery capacity. This in part > gets back to the discussion we have had in the past > two weeks concerning buffering capacity and lactate. > > The conversion of IIB fibers to IIA fibers takes time > and the proper training stimulus. This is were the > proper interval training on the track as well as the > hill running that alluded to comes into play. > > The intervals and hill climbing, if done properly are > very taxing on your system as well as requiring a > great deal of energy. Six weeks may not be enough > time to allow all your newly acquired IIB fibers to > adapt and transform themselves into IIA fibers. > > Besides transforming you muscle fibers you also have > to increase your hearts capacity to pump more blood to > your muscles. You also have to upgrade your vascular > system to handle the increase cardiac output as well > as the capillary system to deliver the increase blood > volume to these muscles. > > You have to increase the buffering capacity both > inside the muscle fibers as well as in the blood > stream. Only the proper training regime will do this. > > Resistance training with its short work intervals (1 > min or less for a set of 8- 10 reps) and long rest > intervals (2-3) minutes does not require a large > buffering capacity nor does it require and large > cardiac output and the IIB fibers have relatively > fewer capillaries. > > You mention the Tabata protocol in the gym. If I > understand the protocol correctly from my reading, it > is designed to improve aerobic capacity and probably > should best be incorporated on the track and not the > gym. > > After a very good warm up (10+ minutes- or until you > have worked up a good sweat), you run for 20 seconds > (150 + meters) recover for 10 and repeat this x 8 for > a total of 4 minutes then cool down for 10 minutes. > > If you are unable to complete 8 sets, this indicates > that you started out to fast. Your last rep should > be just as fast if not faster than your first rep. > > This type of work will produce a tremendous amount of > lactate, put tremendous strain on you cardiovascular > as well as pulmonary system, as well as tax you > buffering capacity. > > This should be done at the end of you daily training > and preferably before a rest day. Initially this > should be done once a week. > > This is just one of many different types of interval > training that can be used to transform you IIB fibers > to IIA fibers. Your coach probably has many other > types of intervals in his arsenal. > > While working out in the gym may seem to make sense it > is important to remember that any energy expended in > the gym is energy not available for track work. Any > muscle fibers (IIB) built through resistance training > is useless to an 800 meter runner unless the majority > are converted to IIA fibers. > > As a college student you must have many other things > to do besides train and recover. During your pre-race > period and during your racing season you have to train > smart and learn to allocate your precious energy and > time to your primary goal, in this case improving your > 800 meter time and not your lifting strength. > > You state that you do not have the benefit of a coach > who both trains runners and knows how to train you in > resistance training. You have the benefit of 's > advice who obviously has been training as a runner for > years and has experience in the gym. > > As alluded, there is no consensus in the running > field concerning the role of strength training. The > same can be said for swimming, cycling and rowing. > > Individuals whose primary focus is resistance training > will argue that this type of training can benefit any > sport and some will say the heavier the lifting the > greater the benefit. > > Ask them why they don't take up running to improve > their lifting. The reason is they are afraid that > they will convert their powerful IIB fibers to IIA > fibers and in the process of gaining endurance lose > some strength. > > So much for my two cents. Two cents doesn't buy much > these days. > > Ralph Giarnella MD > Southington Ct USA > . > > > I am a 400/800 type guy. Although it is true that I > > need a certain > > amount of mileage, too much will kill me > > results.This summer, I did > > 25 miles a week on the road,and it absolulely was > > somewhat of a > > detriment to my progress.Although I had better > > aerobic capacity, I > > had lost a great bit of speed. This was evident as I > > am a 48 sec 400m > > runner and I could only mustard 53 seconds at the > > beginning of > > october.I am just now getting my speed back. > > > > Something else to remember is I am still mainly a > > 400 hurdler. I am > > running the 800 indoors to help the last 200 meters > > of my race for > > the 400 hurdles. I think understood it as I > > only run the 800 and > > I am sorry if I was unclear about that. You post is > > not at all harsh > > as I am learning just as you are. > > > This situation is difficult for me because my > > college doesnt not have > > a coach conditioned in this area of running and > > lifting and most of > > the athletes have to come up with their own strength > > and conditioning > > programs. In my case is could be hit or miss because > > I never know if > > Im doing the right thing. But In my humble opinion I > > believe the > > strength I have built up needs to be maintained as > > last year, I had a > > training partner who lifting like he ran the 100 > > meters and he was > > about to run 1:52 for the 800 meters. My genetics > > and body type may > > be different but what is the point of building great > > deals of > > strength and power and not using it if can > > beneficial. The power lies > > in my situation is to balance the two without much > > weight gain as I > > am very very prone to weight gain. > > > > Those are just my two cents. Here is my program form > > the week it will > > allow everyone to see what I am doing. Heated debate > > is the only way > > to get to the truth of close to it, so keep > > everything coming. > > > > Monday January 14th > > > > Hang Clean and Jerk at 140lbs 3 reps and 5 sets > > Back squats x 5 at 275lbs,4 at 280lbs,3 at 285lbs,3 > > at 290lbs,2 at > > 295lbs. > > Dumbell Bench Press 5 reps x 3 sets with 80lbs > > dumbells > > Dumbell Lat Row 6 reps x 3 sets with 65lbs dumbells. > > > > Wednesday January 16th > > Power snatch + overhead squat 3reps x 5 sets at > > 115lbs > > Barbell Bench Press 3reps x 5 sets a 190 lbs > > Good Mornings 5reps x5sets at 150 lbs > > Lat Pull Down 6x4 > > > > I know I lift a little heavier than must 800 runners > > but is just a > > natural things for me. I havent really stopped > > making progress and I > > am not really gaining weight. So you guys can pick > > that apart. I > > appreciate the criticism. > > > > .Archield > > Tampa,Florida USA > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > Thanks for this post, I guess be specific is the > > lesson here, I > > take your > > > point. Being some one who only ever sprinted > > about 60m to score on > > an > > > interception, I don't always get the middle and > > long distance > > stuff. Rugby > > > players are very different to this despite needing > > to sustain high > > intensity > > > sprints for about 90 seconds (probability of > > scoring peaks at about > > 90 > > > seconds of possession). My coach used to train a > > top level (South > > African > > > champion standard) boxer also and again we adapted > > from the > > traditional road > > > training for him to short sprints (50 m) timed for > > 3 minute round > > with and > > > gym work as the mainstay - of course they went to > > the boxing > > coaches for > > > technical training. The problem with a sample of > > one is that the > > athlete may > > > just be a dam good fighter irrespective of what we > > did, yet when he > > went to > > > one off to one of the top fight trainers and back > > to traditional > > road work > > > training he seemed to lack the thrust and power > > and his career > > tapered > > > off. I was trying to use that experience > > (learning from other) and > > apply > > > this to 's situation. The problem is always > > making sure that > > the > > > athlete is progressing optimally and would > > have to judge that > > for > > > himself. > > > > > > Best Regards > > > Nick Tatalias > > > Johannesburg > > > South Africa > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 17, 2008 Report Share Posted January 17, 2008 Ralph, Thanks for your latest post on the subject- the explanation of fiber typing and conversion was very interesting and relevent to this discussion. Here's a question- would strength training by rowing on a rowing ergometer such as the Concept II promote a better fiber typing profile. Back in my racing days I used the rower successfully( I think) in place of some of the weightlifting. It most certainly promotes strength in the glutes, hamstrings, low back, upper back and arms. I also used it to train through achilles injuries with minimally slower racing times- taking 2-3 races to get back to form. This would eliminate some of the risks of weightlifting as the racing season moves forward, and training with a Tabata protocol on a rower would be a nice way to produce some serious lactate! I would still back off on the lifting/strength training as the season progresses and use that time for recovery for the maximal racing efforts at the big meets. Mark , MS, ATC, CSCS Camillus, NY Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 17, 2008 Report Share Posted January 17, 2008 Ralph, Thanks for your latest post on the subject- the explanation of fiber typing and conversion was very interesting and relevent to this discussion. Here's a question- would strength training by rowing on a rowing ergometer such as the Concept II promote a better fiber typing profile. Back in my racing days I used the rower successfully( I think) in place of some of the weightlifting. It most certainly promotes strength in the glutes, hamstrings, low back, upper back and arms. I also used it to train through achilles injuries with minimally slower racing times- taking 2-3 races to get back to form. This would eliminate some of the risks of weightlifting as the racing season moves forward, and training with a Tabata protocol on a rower would be a nice way to produce some serious lactate! I would still back off on the lifting/strength training as the season progresses and use that time for recovery for the maximal racing efforts at the big meets. Mark , MS, ATC, CSCS Camillus, NY Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 17, 2008 Report Share Posted January 17, 2008 Nick, yes that sounds like an applicable theory. There have been a few champion " big " 800 metre runners in my memory -- mostly 400 specialists doing both, eg, torena (Cuba) in the men and Kratochvilova (Czechoslavakia). I also note that they were part of, or had access to, methods used by the Soviet block in that era (enough said). So I guess that might work out if it were possible to do. My feeling is that the intervals and distance work required for aerobic and anaerobic capacity would make it just about impossible for a clean athlete to run " heavy " and be a champion 800 metre runner. That's not to say that or anyone else running for fun or training can't have a great deal of fun. Mind you, might be exceptionally strong without much bulk. I did not notice his weight. Borzakovskiy, the current Russian Olympic champ is a big man, but not overly muscled, and he has huge sprinting anaerobic strength. (BTW, not suggesting any impropriety on his part.) Watch for him in Beijing. If you like track and field, there's nothing better than watching his finishing kick. Here is what Horwill, a well-known 800 metre coach has to say about body weight: " The best weight for two-lappers ------------------------------- Another important factor that affects the acquisition of greater endurance is body weight relative to height. Coe was 5ft 9in tall and weighed 119lbs (1.753m/53.978kg). That is about 40 pounds lighter than the average non-active man of the same height - or 35 per cent less! While this may be too extreme, a figure of 10 per cent less (in this case, 144lbs) must be considered the maximum allowable weight for the height. Thus, the average man of six feet (1.829m) in height may weigh 176lbs (84.368kg) but for two-lap purposes he should not exceed 159lbs (72.121kg). Weight is lost by the avoidance of high-fat foods and a gradually increasing volume of work. " See the complete article here: http://www.pponline.co.uk/encyc/0059.htm Cheers, Gympie, Australia > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > Thanks for this post, I guess be specific is the lesson here, I > > > take your > > > > point. Being some one who only ever sprinted about 60m to score > > on > > > an > > > > interception, I don't always get the middle and long distance > > > stuff. Rugby > > > > players are very different to this despite needing to sustain high > > > intensity > > > > sprints for about 90 seconds (probability of scoring peaks at > > about > > > 90 > > > > seconds of possession). My coach used to train a top level (South > > > African > > > > champion standard) boxer also and again we adapted from the > > > traditional road > > > > training for him to short sprints (50 m) timed for 3 minute round > > > with and > > > > gym work as the mainstay - of course they went to the boxing > > > coaches for > > > > technical training. The problem with a sample of one is that the > > > athlete may > > > > just be a dam good fighter irrespective of what we did, yet when > > he > > > went to > > > > one off to one of the top fight trainers and back to traditional > > > road work > > > > training he seemed to lack the thrust and power and his career > > > tapered > > > > off. I was trying to use that experience (learning from other) > > and > > > apply > > > > this to 's situation. The problem is always making sure that > > > the > > > > athlete is progressing optimally and would have to judge > > that > > > for > > > > himself. > > > > > > > > Best Regards > > > > Nick Tatalias > > > > Johannesburg > > > > South Africa > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 18, 2008 Report Share Posted January 18, 2008 --- wrote: > Nick, yes that sounds like an applicable theory. > There have been a > few champion " big " 800 metre runners in my memory -- > mostly 400 > specialists doing both, eg, torena (Cuba) in the > men and > Kratochvilova (Czechoslavakia). I also note that > they were part of, > or had access to, methods used by the Soviet block > in that era > (enough said). > > So I guess that might work out if it were possible > to do. My feeling > is that the intervals and distance work required for > aerobic and > anaerobic capacity would make it just about > impossible for a clean > athlete to run " heavy " and be a champion 800 metre > runner. That's not > to say that or anyone else running for fun or > training can't > have a great deal of fun. Mind you, might be > exceptionally > strong without much bulk. I did not notice his > weight. > > Borzakovskiy, the current Russian Olympic champ is a > big man, but not > overly muscled, and he has huge sprinting anaerobic > strength. (BTW, > not suggesting any impropriety on his part.) Watch > for him in > Beijing. If you like track and field, there's > nothing better than > watching his finishing kick. > > Here is what Horwill, a well-known 800 metre > coach has to say > about body weight: , that article you cited is excellent. http://www.pponline.co.uk/encyc/0059.htm Any one interested in training runners should read and digest the contents of the article. It very clearly addresses the issue of the importance of the quality of the mileage run weekly vs the volume of miles and the proper mix of aerobic work and anaerobic work. My impression in reading posts written by individuals with a primary weight lifting back ground, is that they do not realize that anaerobic work can and should be done on the track. The article gets to the heart of the discussion of specificity of training. The best way to be come a faster runner is to train at running faster by including a lot of fast intervals. In my experience in coaching cyclists I found too many cyclists try to ride a lot of miles but do not include high intensity interval training (on the bicycle) in their program. Ralph Giarnella MD Southington Ct USA > " The best weight for two-lappers > ------------------------------- > Another important factor that affects the > acquisition of greater > endurance is body weight relative to height. Coe was > 5ft 9in tall and > weighed 119lbs (1.753m/53.978kg). That is about 40 > pounds lighter > than the average non-active man of the same height - > or 35 per cent > less! While this may be too extreme, a figure of 10 > per cent less (in > this case, 144lbs) must be considered the maximum > allowable weight > for the height. Thus, the average man of six feet > (1.829m) in height > may weigh 176lbs (84.368kg) but for two-lap purposes > he should not > exceed 159lbs (72.121kg). Weight is lost by the > avoidance of high-fat > foods and a gradually increasing volume of work. " > > See the complete article here: > http://www.pponline.co.uk/encyc/0059.htm > > Cheers, > > > Gympie, Australia > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 19, 2008 Report Share Posted January 19, 2008 This is a reference to my earlier statement re 800 metres racing energy systems. J Sports Sci. 2005 Mar;23(3):299-307. Energy system contribution to 400-metre and 800-metre track running. Duffield R, Dawson B, Goodman C. http://tinyurl.com/34sub7 Gympie, Australia > > , that article you cited is excellent. > http://www.pponline.co.uk/encyc/0059.htm > > Any one interested in training runners should read and > digest the contents of the article. > > It very clearly addresses the issue of the importance > of the quality of the mileage run weekly vs the volume > of miles and the proper mix of aerobic work and > anaerobic work. > > My impression in reading posts written by individuals > with a primary weight lifting back ground, is that > they do not realize that anaerobic work can and should > be done on the track. > > The article gets to the heart of the discussion of > specificity of training. The best way to be come a > faster runner is to train at running faster by > including a lot of fast intervals. > > In my experience in coaching cyclists I found too many > cyclists try to ride a lot of miles but do not include > high intensity interval training (on the bicycle) in > their program. > > Ralph Giarnella MD > Southington Ct USA > > > > > > > " The best weight for two-lappers > > ------------------------------- > > Another important factor that affects the > > acquisition of greater > > endurance is body weight relative to height. Coe was > > 5ft 9in tall and > > weighed 119lbs (1.753m/53.978kg). That is about 40 > > pounds lighter > > than the average non-active man of the same height - > > or 35 per cent > > less! While this may be too extreme, a figure of 10 > > per cent less (in > > this case, 144lbs) must be considered the maximum > > allowable weight > > for the height. Thus, the average man of six feet > > (1.829m) in height > > may weigh 176lbs (84.368kg) but for two-lap purposes > > he should not > > exceed 159lbs (72.121kg). Weight is lost by the > > avoidance of high-fat > > foods and a gradually increasing volume of work. " > > > > See the complete article here: > > http://www.pponline.co.uk/encyc/0059.htm > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Gympie, Australia > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 19, 2008 Report Share Posted January 19, 2008 --- wrote: > This is a reference to my earlier statement re 800 > metres racing > energy systems. > > J Sports Sci. 2005 Mar;23(3):299-307. Energy system > contribution to > 400-metre and 800-metre track running. Duffield R, > Dawson B, Goodman > C. > > http://tinyurl.com/34sub7 > > > Gympie, Australia Another great article http://tinyurl.com/34sub7 . What is surprising to me is the % of aerobic work in the 400 m race. Along with that article there are 4 others by the same group looking at races from 100-3000 m. I have summarized below the aerobic/anaerobic contributions in each of the races according to those articles. What is also surprising is the fact that they found that the races became predominately aerobic after only 20-30 seconds. I was under the impression that anaerobic would be predominate for the first 40-50 seconds. This data, in my opinion, supports your contention that needs to spend more time on the track doing high intensity track intervals and less time in the gym. Distance Men Women aerobic anaerobic aerobic anaerobic 100 m 21%- 79% 25% 75% 200 m 28% 72% 33% 67% 400 m 41% 59% 45% 55% 800 m 60% 40% 70% 30% 1500 m 77% 23% 86% 14% 3000 m 86% 14% 94% 6% On this theme I think that anyone interest in this topic should also visit Seilers Website and in particular the section " Time Course of Training Adaptations " http://home.hia.no/~stephens/timecors.htm What is interesting in his discussions is an individual reaches their VO2 max relatively easily (1 yr) whereas it takes about 3-4 years (of appropriate training) to reach an individual's maximum Lactate Threshold. The Lactate Threshold, in my opinion is the holy grail of most endurance sports (including 400 and 800 m events). Ralph Giarnella MD Southington Ct USA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 19, 2008 Report Share Posted January 19, 2008 Ralph I'm not sure that I made myself clear in the posts, no-one is asking not to do time on the track and I'm certain that his coach would be doing intervals, however I'm fairly certain that since has worked hard developing strength in the off season that has contributed well to improved running, and that he should maintain that strength in manner that best relates to the use of type II muscle fibre. My in season programme last somewhere between 20 and 45 minutes. Twice or three times per week depending on how close to the race day. With regards to anaerobic vrs aerobic usage, these are interesting, however I often wonder how many of the aerobic markers relate to the body trying to catch up the anaerobic expenditure of energy. In the 100m sprint for instance in a 10 second burst, who would imagine that aerobic systems are challenged at all, but 20 odd percent of bio markers indicate aerobic work - perhaps due to the body catching up with the anaerobic muscle performance, I would have thought the same for the 400, except that because the race goes on longer there is longer for the aerobic systems to get involved in processing the anaerobic work of the muscles. The reason I believe this is that in order to move the body body powerfully and fast the work must involve significant contributions from type II a & b muscles. Type IIb have very little aerobic contribution, but would load the systems with products from anaerobic energy systems. Type IIa muscle are much more capable of converting anaerobic products and using glycogen for restoring the ATP resulting in markers of apparent aerobic respiration. Any comments? I agree that intervals are good, some good studies on that topic were just recently posted. I'm still convinced that appropriate time in the gym is important. If is going to run the 400m hurdle later this year, I'm not sure that he should drop to much explosion from his work out and continue with speed work. If the 800m indoor season is part of development for that race, then the whole season needs to be kept in balance. Best Regards Nick Tatalias Johannesburg > > --- <paulr99@... <paulr99%40gmail.com>> wrote: > > > This is a reference to my earlier statement re 800 > > metres racing > > energy systems. > > > > J Sports Sci. 2005 Mar;23(3):299-307. Energy system > > contribution to > > 400-metre and 800-metre track running. Duffield R, > > Dawson B, Goodman > > C. > > > > http://tinyurl.com/34sub7 > > > > > > Gympie, Australia > > Another great article http://tinyurl.com/34sub7 . > What is surprising to me is the % of aerobic work in > the 400 m race. Along with that article there are 4 > others by the same group looking at races from > 100-3000 m. I have summarized below the > aerobic/anaerobic contributions in each of the races > according to those articles. > > What is also surprising is the fact that they found > that the races became predominately aerobic after only > 20-30 seconds. I was under the impression that > anaerobic would be predominate for the first 40-50 > seconds. > > This data, in my opinion, supports your contention > that needs to spend more time on the track > doing high intensity track intervals and less time in > the gym. > > Distance Men Women > aerobic anaerobic aerobic anaerobic > > 100 m 21%- 79% 25% 75% > > 200 m 28% 72% 33% 67% > > 400 m 41% 59% 45% 55% > > 800 m 60% 40% 70% 30% > > 1500 m 77% 23% 86% 14% > > 3000 m 86% 14% 94% 6% > > On this theme I think that anyone interest in this > topic should also visit Seilers Website and in > particular the section " Time Course of Training > Adaptations " > http://home.hia.no/~stephens/timecors.htm > > What is interesting in his discussions is an > individual reaches their VO2 max relatively easily > (1 yr) whereas it takes about 3-4 years (of > appropriate training) to reach an individual's > maximum Lactate Threshold. > > The Lactate Threshold, in my opinion is the holy grail > of most endurance sports (including 400 and 800 m > events). > > Ralph Giarnella MD > Southington Ct USA > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2008 Report Share Posted January 20, 2008 --- Nick Tatalias wrote: > Ralph > > I'm not sure that I made myself clear in the posts, > no-one is asking > not to do time on the track and I'm certain that his > coach would be doing > intervals, however I'm fairly certain that since > has worked hard > developing strength in the off season that has > contributed well to improved > running, and that he should maintain that strength > in manner that best > relates to the use of type II muscle fibre. I did understand that you were advocating that supplement his track work with weight lifting. The point I was trying to make was that instead of spending time in the gym lifting weights 1 or 2 sessions a week, that time should be spent on the track or running hills. The energy used for weight lifting should be used to run the hills, as suggested, or running up stadium stairs as I have seen other athletes doing. In this way any strength gained through running hills or stairs will be more sports specific. If has enough energy to lift weights after a track training session or on his recovery day then, in my opinion, he is not training hard enough when he is on the track or running the hills. Many years ago (mid 1980s) there was an excellent article in Bicycling magazine which stated that " Too many athletes do not train hard enough on their hard days and train too hard on their easy days " . I guess it comes down to a matter of coaching philosophy as much as anything else. In my opinion, the most important aspect of training is adequate recovery between training sessions. This point has also been emphasized in other posts,recently, concerning training load and how much is too much. Anything that interferes with recovery detracts from the benefit of the previous training session and diminishes the training intensity for the next training session. Professional athletes and elite amateurs (with the luxury of sponsorship and therefore no need to do anything other than train), have plenty of time to rest, recover etc. Most amateur athletes, such as , have other responsibilities, such as class, work, etc which adds to the stress of their lives and compromises full recovery. These other activities also limit the time to train as well using precious energy resources. The stress of these activities has to be added to the overall stress of training and need to be taken into account when designing a training program. In the off season resistance training is a good alternative and a good change of pace. During the pre-season training period the intensity of training at an individuals chosen specialty has to be significantly higher than it will be during the competitive season. If your goal is to be the fastest man or woman on the track then every effort, in my opinion, should be spent on the track developing speed by running short high intensity intervals or building running strength by running hills or stairs. > My in season programme last somewhere between 20 and > 45 minutes. Twice or > three times per week depending on how close to the > race day. I, believe that stated that his first race is March 25 if I am not mistaken. So we are still discussing the pre-season training sessions. Once the training season is over and the competitive season starts it is even more important that all energy should be geared towards the race and non running days should be dedicated to recovery. Resistance training on these days would, in my opinion, hinder full recovery. > With regards to anaerobic vrs aerobic usage, these > are interesting, however > I often wonder how many of the aerobic markers > relate to the body trying to > catch up the anaerobic expenditure of energy. In > the 100m sprint for > instance in a 10 second burst, who would imagine > that aerobic systems are > challenged at all, but 20 odd percent of bio markers > indicate aerobic work - > perhaps due to the body catching up with the > anaerobic muscle performance, I > would have thought the same for the 400, except that > because the race goes > on longer there is longer for the aerobic systems to > get involved in > processing the anaerobic work of the muscles. The > reason I believe this is > that in order to move the body body powerfully and > fast the work must > involve significant contributions from type II a & b > muscles. Type IIb have > very little aerobic contribution, but would load the > systems with products > from anaerobic energy systems. Type IIa muscle are > much more capable of > converting anaerobic products and using glycogen for > restoring the ATP > resulting in markers of apparent aerobic > respiration. Any comments? I think that their is a major flaw in the above statements. I think it is important here to review some points about energy production in muscle fibers, as I understand it. And please excuse me if I am being redundant but I think that it is important that I do this to make my point. All muscle fibers, (I,IIA,IIB,) produce some energy anaerobically. - The first step in energy production is called alactic anaerobic energy production. This involves PCR and ATP which are present at the initiation of an activity. There is ATP in small amounts available in the muscle fiber and this allows the initiation of muscle contraction. As this is depleted the PCR regenerates the ATP. This occurs in all muscle fibers (I,IIA,IIB,) . There is no Pyruvic acid produced nor is there lactate production. There is generally enough to PCR to last about 5-7 seconds. All muscle fibers (I,IIA,IIB) go through this step. - The next step in energy production is the use of glucose to maintain the supply of ATP. This is, as you know, the glycolytic pathway. This also begins at the initiation of activity but it takes a little longer than the alactic energy production. (one reason for warming up before an activity). During this phase, as was discussed in an earlier post, the end result is ATP plus either pyruvic acid or lactate. All muscle fibers (I,IIA,IIB) also go through this step. -The next step is where we apparently we differ in our understanding of the energy producing process. This is known as the fork in the road. In the presence of adequate O2 pyruvate is produced and this enters the Krebs cycle located in the mitochondria. In the absence of adequate O2 lactate is produced. Lactate cannot be utilized in any muscle cell unless it is re-converted to Pyruvate and becomes part of the Krebs cycle. In order to further metabolize Lactate it must either be re formulated into glucose via the Cori cycle or it must be re-formulated into Pyruvate and enter the Krebs cycle. Muscle cells do not have the necessary mechanism to run the Cori cycle. There are other tissues that can do this and the primary organ is the liver. It is important to note at this point that even in " anaerobic conditions " the muscle cells do have a small amount of stored Oxygen attached to myoglobin. This allows for some aerobic chemical reactions even in the face of relative " anaerobic conditions " . As stated previously IIB fibers only have enough mitochondria to maintain the fiber at rest. For this reason IIB fibers are for practical reason incapable of utilizing lactate for energy. The lactate in these fibers must exit the fiber and enter the blood steam (how else would you account or the rising blood lactate levels during high intensity work?). With appropriate training stimulus IIB fibers become IIA fibers. What distinguishes the two fiber types is mitochondrial density. IIA fibers have many mitochondria and IIB have minimal mitochondria. IIA fibers are in fact aerobic fibers. They have the same ability to produce energy aerobically as do Type I fibers. What then distinguishes Type I fiber from IIA is their innervation (slow twitch vs fast twitch) and mitochondrial density. Type I have considerably more mitochondria than do IIA. So both I and IIA fibers can utilize lactate in the mitochondria for energy production. The best way, in my opinion, to increase the IIA fiber's mitochondrial density is through high intensity interval training on the track. As pointed out by 's post in OL and Power lifters have a preponderance of type II fibers are IIA with very few IIB. I suspect this occurs with many years of long intense workouts. (see Seiler's Time Course of Training adaptations http://home.hia.no/~stephens/timecors.htm ). However I believe that specificity of training is extremely important. That was why I stated that needs to turn his lifting strength into running strength. > I agree that intervals are good, some good studies > on that > topic were just recently posted. I'm still convinced > that appropriate time in the gym is > important. If is going to run the 400m hurdle > later this year, I'm > not sure that he should drop to much explosion from > his work out and > continue with speed work. If the 800m indoor season > is part of development > for that race, then the whole season needs to be > kept in balance. In my opinion the best way for to maintain his explosiveness would be to do a lot of 30 meter starting intervals from the blocks. Specificity in training is extremely important. I would also imagine that if 's main goal is to win the 400 m events he would also include training for the 400 m event while running the indoor season. If I understood 's reason for running the 800 m was to increase his endurance (more mitochondria) so that he would have a better kick at the end of his 400 m event. If I am correct, then needs to improve his lactate training and not necessarily his strength. > Best Regards > Nick Tatalias > Johannesburg Nick I enjoy this dialogue and am looking forward to your comments. Ralph Giarnella MD Southington Ct USA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2008 Report Share Posted January 20, 2008 I would like to address some of the comments of this reply to make some things clear because I am enjoying this as well. Addressing my training.In my colliegiate training systems, most schools lift after there track sessions.Even on the pro level from 100m to 1500 meters. We did the hill sessions the first 3 months of the season on mondays and fridays when we were establishing base work. Our track work consist of intervals and short speed days,yet less short speed for me since I am running the 800m this indoor. I am always fatigued after practice.Very fatigued. But after years of running and then lifting, my body has adapted so I'm used to it.Recovery days are just that. Recovery. I do a light jog,and some flexibility work over hurdles.Even on scholarship we have a lot more to worry about than recovery. We also do not have the access to supplementation and the facilities as we want because of football basketball and other sports that are looked on as more " important " . It is a lot hard to for us than most people think. There is also the fact of that at certain programs, you don't have control of how fast you are able to run. For instance, it most colliegiate systems, both conferences meets are the only thing that matters so these are the meets we need to peak for. So in essence we are training through the season eexcept for confernece time. This is a lot of how our training system everything is based of progress. So in essence, the preseason and racing seasons are quite similiar. Our first meet is January 25th, with our conference meet being the end of february. And then out door season follows the same pattern. I agree my lifting strength does need to be turned into running strength and that is what I am ultimately seeking. Especially at 5'11 158 pounds, it helps me a lot to be that strong. I am trying to develop a program that will allow me to maintain my strength and maybe even increase it a little while, not effecting my workouts. Now that my competition season is upon me,my hard running days will be monday and tuesday, with recovery day on wednesday,pre race day on thursday and race days friday and saturday. I want to maximize what I have built up. It is in essence two seasons. My lifting days in season will Monday and wednesday,and they're will be fridays meet in which we will lift immediately after the meet sometimes. My goal is to stay fresh. Keep the comments coming.I am truly learning a lot! Archield Tampa,Florida USA ===================================== > > > Ralph > > > > I'm not sure that I made myself clear in the posts, > > no-one is asking > > not to do time on the track and I'm certain that his > > coach would be doing > > intervals, however I'm fairly certain that since > > has worked hard > > developing strength in the off season that has > > contributed well to improved > > running, and that he should maintain that strength > > in manner that best > > relates to the use of type II muscle fibre. > > I did understand that you were advocating that > supplement his track work with weight lifting. > > The point I was trying to make was that instead of > spending time in the gym lifting weights 1 or 2 > sessions a week, that time should be spent on the > track or running hills. The energy used for weight > lifting should be used to run the hills, as > suggested, or running up stadium stairs as I have seen > other athletes doing. In this way any strength gained > through running hills or stairs will be more sports > specific. > > If has enough energy to lift weights after a > track training session or on his recovery day then, in > my opinion, he is not training hard enough when he is > on the track or running the hills. > > Many years ago (mid 1980s) there was an excellent > article in Bicycling magazine which stated that " Too > many athletes do not train hard enough on their hard > days and train too hard on their easy days " . > > I guess it comes down to a matter of coaching > philosophy as much as anything else. > > In my opinion, the most important aspect of training > is adequate recovery between training sessions. This > point has also been emphasized in other > posts,recently, concerning training load and how much > is too much. Anything that interferes with recovery > detracts from the benefit of the previous training > session and diminishes the training intensity for the > next training session. > > Professional athletes and elite amateurs (with the > luxury of sponsorship and therefore no need to do > anything other than train), have plenty of time to > rest, recover etc. > > Most amateur athletes, such as , have other > responsibilities, such as class, work, etc which adds > to the stress of their lives and compromises full > recovery. These other activities also limit the time > to train as well using precious energy resources. The > stress of these activities has to be added to the > overall stress of training and need to be taken into > account when designing a training program. > > In the off season resistance training is a good > alternative and a good change of pace. During the > pre-season training period the intensity of training > at an individuals chosen specialty has to be > significantly higher than it will be during the > competitive season. > > If your goal is to be the fastest man or woman on the > track then every effort, in my opinion, should be > spent on the track developing speed by running short > high intensity intervals or building running strength > by running hills or stairs. > > > > My in season programme last somewhere between 20 and > > 45 minutes. Twice or > > three times per week depending on how close to the > > race day. > > I, believe that stated that his first race is > March 25 if I am not mistaken. So we are still > discussing the pre-season training sessions. > > Once the training season is over and the competitive > season starts it is even more important that all > energy should be geared towards the race and non > running days should be dedicated to recovery. > Resistance training on these days would, in my > opinion, hinder full recovery. > > > With regards to anaerobic vrs aerobic usage, these > > are interesting, however > > I often wonder how many of the aerobic markers > > relate to the body trying to > > catch up the anaerobic expenditure of energy. In > > the 100m sprint for > > instance in a 10 second burst, who would imagine > > that aerobic systems are > > challenged at all, but 20 odd percent of bio markers > > indicate aerobic work - > > perhaps due to the body catching up with the > > anaerobic muscle performance, I > > would have thought the same for the 400, except that > > because the race goes > > on longer there is longer for the aerobic systems to > > get involved in > > processing the anaerobic work of the muscles. The > > reason I believe this is > > that in order to move the body body powerfully and > > fast the work must > > involve significant contributions from type II a & b > > muscles. Type IIb have > > very little aerobic contribution, but would load the > > systems with products > > from anaerobic energy systems. Type IIa muscle are > > much more capable of > > converting anaerobic products and using glycogen for > > restoring the ATP > > resulting in markers of apparent aerobic > > respiration. Any comments? > > I think that their is a major flaw in the above > statements. > > I think it is important here to review some points > about energy production in muscle fibers, as I > understand it. And please excuse me if I am being > redundant but I think that it is important that I do > this to make my point. > > All muscle fibers, (I,IIA,IIB,) produce some energy > anaerobically. > > - The first step in energy production is called > alactic anaerobic energy production. > > This involves PCR and ATP which are present at the > initiation of an activity. There is ATP in small > amounts available in the muscle fiber and this allows > the initiation of muscle contraction. As this is > depleted the PCR regenerates the ATP. This occurs in > all muscle fibers (I,IIA,IIB,) . There is no Pyruvic > acid produced nor is there lactate production. > > There is generally enough to PCR to last about 5-7 > seconds. > All muscle fibers (I,IIA,IIB) go through this step. > > - The next step in energy production is the use of > glucose to maintain the supply of ATP. This is, as > you know, the glycolytic pathway. > > This also begins at the initiation of activity but it > takes a little longer than the alactic energy > production. (one reason for warming up before an > activity). > > During this phase, as was discussed in an earlier > post, the end result is ATP plus either pyruvic acid > or lactate. > > All muscle fibers (I,IIA,IIB) also go through this > step. > > -The next step is where we apparently we differ in our > understanding of the energy producing process. > > This is known as the fork in the road. In the presence > of adequate O2 pyruvate is produced and this enters > the Krebs cycle located in the mitochondria. > In the absence of adequate O2 lactate is produced. > > Lactate cannot be utilized in any muscle cell unless > it is re-converted to Pyruvate and becomes part of the > Krebs cycle. > > In order to further metabolize Lactate it must either > be re formulated into glucose via the Cori cycle or it > must be re-formulated into Pyruvate and enter the > Krebs cycle. > > Muscle cells do not have the necessary mechanism to > run the Cori cycle. There are other tissues that can > do this and the primary organ is the liver. > > It is important to note at this point that even in > " anaerobic conditions " the muscle cells do have a > small amount of stored Oxygen attached to myoglobin. > This allows for some aerobic chemical reactions even > in the face of relative " anaerobic conditions " . > > As stated previously IIB fibers only have enough > mitochondria to maintain the fiber at rest. For this > reason IIB fibers are for practical reason incapable > of utilizing lactate for energy. The lactate in these > fibers must exit the fiber and enter the blood steam > (how else would you account or the rising blood > lactate levels during high intensity work?). > > With appropriate training stimulus IIB fibers become > IIA fibers. What distinguishes the two fiber types is > mitochondrial density. IIA fibers have many > mitochondria and IIB have minimal mitochondria. > > IIA fibers are in fact aerobic fibers. They have the > same ability to produce energy aerobically as do Type > I fibers. > > What then distinguishes Type I fiber from IIA is their > innervation (slow twitch vs fast twitch) and > mitochondrial density. Type I have considerably more > mitochondria than do IIA. > > So both I and IIA fibers can utilize lactate in the > mitochondria for energy production. > > The best way, in my opinion, to increase the IIA > fiber's mitochondrial density is through high > intensity interval training on the track. > > As pointed out by 's post in OL and Power lifters > have a preponderance of type II fibers are IIA with very > few IIB. I suspect this occurs with many years of > long intense workouts. (see Seiler's Time Course of > Training adaptations > http://home.hia.no/~stephens/timecors.htm ). > > However I believe that specificity of training is > extremely important. That was why I stated that > needs to turn his lifting strength into running > strength. > > > I agree that intervals are good, some good studies > > on that > > topic were just recently posted. I'm still convinced > > that appropriate time in the gym is > > important. If is going to run the 400m hurdle > > later this year, I'm > > not sure that he should drop to much explosion from > > his work out and > > continue with speed work. If the 800m indoor season > > is part of development > > for that race, then the whole season needs to be > > kept in balance. > > In my opinion the best way for to maintain his > explosiveness would be to do a lot of 30 meter > starting intervals from the blocks. Specificity in > training is extremely important. > > I would also imagine that if 's main goal is to > win the 400 m events he would also include training > for the 400 m event while running the indoor season. > > If I understood 's reason for running the 800 m > was to increase his endurance (more mitochondria) so > that he would have a better kick at the end of his 400 > m event. If I am correct, then needs to improve > his lactate training and not necessarily his strength. > > > Best Regards > > Nick Tatalias > > Johannesburg > > Nick I enjoy this dialogue and am looking forward to > your comments. > > Ralph Giarnella MD > Southington Ct USA > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2008 Report Share Posted January 20, 2008 Dr. Ralph.... For an example of how to integrate track & speed & conditioning with strehgth training, you should check out Terry Francins World Class Program at Azusa Pacific University( NAIA).. I worked with him and assisted in the strength training of his track atlhletes in the weight room, and participated in the program on the track. We never had a problem with doing both, and as a result he continues to produce the strongest fastest men and women in small school competition in the country. You don't have to choose between strength and conditioning and speed/track work. Both can be done with excellence without sacrificing the qualitative or quantitative aspects of either program. Unless he's moved in the past few months, Terry can be reached at the general email at Azusa Pacific University in Azusa CA.! Ramsey Los Angeles, CA ============================= Re: Strength Training for a 800m runner(In Season) --- Nick Tatalias <nick.tatalias@ gmail.com> wrote: > Ralph > > I'm not sure that I made myself clear in the posts, > no-one is asking > not to do time on the track and I'm certain that his > coach would be doing > intervals, however I'm fairly certain that since > has worked hard > developing strength in the off season that has > contributed well to improved > running, and that he should maintain that strength > in manner that best > relates to the use of type II muscle fibre. I did understand that you were advocating that supplement his track work with weight lifting. The point I was trying to make was that instead of spending time in the gym lifting weights 1 or 2 sessions a week, that time should be spent on the track or running hills. The energy used for weight lifting should be used to run the hills, as suggested, or running up stadium stairs as I have seen other athletes doing. In this way any strength gained through running hills or stairs will be more sports specific. If has enough energy to lift weights after a track training session or on his recovery day then, in my opinion, he is not training hard enough when he is on the track or running the hills. Many years ago (mid 1980s) there was an excellent article in Bicycling magazine which stated that " Too many athletes do not train hard enough on their hard days and train too hard on their easy days " . I guess it comes down to a matter of coaching philosophy as much as anything else. In my opinion, the most important aspect of training is adequate recovery between training sessions. This point has also been emphasized in other posts,recently, concerning training load and how much is too much. Anything that interferes with recovery detracts from the benefit of the previous training session and diminishes the training intensity for the next training session. Professional athletes and elite amateurs (with the luxury of sponsorship and therefore no need to do anything other than train), have plenty of time to rest, recover etc. Most amateur athletes, such as , have other responsibilities, such as class, work, etc which adds to the stress of their lives and compromises full recovery. These other activities also limit the time to train as well using precious energy resources. The stress of these activities has to be added to the overall stress of training and need to be taken into account when designing a training program. In the off season resistance training is a good alternative and a good change of pace. During the pre-season training period the intensity of training at an individuals chosen specialty has to be significantly higher than it will be during the competitive season. If your goal is to be the fastest man or woman on the track then every effort, in my opinion, should be spent on the track developing speed by running short high intensity intervals or building running strength by running hills or stairs. > My in season programme last somewhere between 20 and > 45 minutes. Twice or > three times per week depending on how close to the > race day. I, believe that stated that his first race is March 25 if I am not mistaken. So we are still discussing the pre-season training sessions. Once the training season is over and the competitive season starts it is even more important that all energy should be geared towards the race and non running days should be dedicated to recovery. Resistance training on these days would, in my opinion, hinder full recovery. > With regards to anaerobic vrs aerobic usage, these > are interesting, however > I often wonder how many of the aerobic markers > relate to the body trying to > catch up the anaerobic expenditure of energy. In > the 100m sprint for > instance in a 10 second burst, who would imagine > that aerobic systems are > challenged at all, but 20 odd percent of bio markers > indicate aerobic work - > perhaps due to the body catching up with the > anaerobic muscle performance, I > would have thought the same for the 400, except that > because the race goes > on longer there is longer for the aerobic systems to > get involved in > processing the anaerobic work of the muscles. The > reason I believe this is > that in order to move the body body powerfully and > fast the work must > involve significant contributions from type II a & b > muscles. Type IIb have > very little aerobic contribution, but would load the > systems with products > from anaerobic energy systems. Type IIa muscle are > much more capable of > converting anaerobic products and using glycogen for > restoring the ATP > resulting in markers of apparent aerobic > respiration. Any comments? I think that their is a major flaw in the above statements. I think it is important here to review some points about energy production in muscle fibers, as I understand it. And please excuse me if I am being redundant but I think that it is important that I do this to make my point. All muscle fibers, (I,IIA,IIB,) produce some energy anaerobically. - The first step in energy production is called alactic anaerobic energy production. This involves PCR and ATP which are present at the initiation of an activity. There is ATP in small amounts available in the muscle fiber and this allows the initiation of muscle contraction. As this is depleted the PCR regenerates the ATP. This occurs in all muscle fibers (I,IIA,IIB,) . There is no Pyruvic acid produced nor is there lactate production. There is generally enough to PCR to last about 5-7 seconds. All muscle fibers (I,IIA,IIB) go through this step. - The next step in energy production is the use of glucose to maintain the supply of ATP. This is, as you know, the glycolytic pathway. This also begins at the initiation of activity but it takes a little longer than the alactic energy production. (one reason for warming up before an activity). During this phase, as was discussed in an earlier post, the end result is ATP plus either pyruvic acid or lactate. All muscle fibers (I,IIA,IIB) also go through this step. -The next step is where we apparently we differ in our understanding of the energy producing process. This is known as the fork in the road. In the presence of adequate O2 pyruvate is produced and this enters the Krebs cycle located in the mitochondria. In the absence of adequate O2 lactate is produced. Lactate cannot be utilized in any muscle cell unless it is re-converted to Pyruvate and becomes part of the Krebs cycle. In order to further metabolize Lactate it must either be re formulated into glucose via the Cori cycle or it must be re-formulated into Pyruvate and enter the Krebs cycle. Muscle cells do not have the necessary mechanism to run the Cori cycle. There are other tissues that can do this and the primary organ is the liver. It is important to note at this point that even in " anaerobic conditions " the muscle cells do have a small amount of stored Oxygen attached to myoglobin. This allows for some aerobic chemical reactions even in the face of relative " anaerobic conditions " . As stated previously IIB fibers only have enough mitochondria to maintain the fiber at rest. For this reason IIB fibers are for practical reason incapable of utilizing lactate for energy. The lactate in these fibers must exit the fiber and enter the blood steam (how else would you account or the rising blood lactate levels during high intensity work?). With appropriate training stimulus IIB fibers become IIA fibers. What distinguishes the two fiber types is mitochondrial density. IIA fibers have many mitochondria and IIB have minimal mitochondria. IIA fibers are in fact aerobic fibers. They have the same ability to produce energy aerobically as do Type I fibers. What then distinguishes Type I fiber from IIA is their innervation (slow twitch vs fast twitch) and mitochondrial density. Type I have considerably more mitochondria than do IIA. So both I and IIA fibers can utilize lactate in the mitochondria for energy production. The best way, in my opinion, to increase the IIA fiber's mitochondrial density is through high intensity interval training on the track. As pointed out by 's post in OL and Power lifters have a preponderance of type II fibers are IIA with very few IIB. I suspect this occurs with many years of long intense workouts. (see Seiler's Time Course of Training adaptations http://home. hia.no/~stephens /timecors. htm ). However I believe that specificity of training is extremely important. That was why I stated that needs to turn his lifting strength into running strength. > I agree that intervals are good, some good studies > on that > topic were just recently posted. I'm still convinced > that appropriate time in the gym is > important. If is going to run the 400m hurdle > later this year, I'm > not sure that he should drop to much explosion from > his work out and > continue with speed work. If the 800m indoor season > is part of development > for that race, then the whole season needs to be > kept in balance. In my opinion the best way for to maintain his explosiveness would be to do a lot of 30 meter starting intervals from the blocks. Specificity in training is extremely important. I would also imagine that if 's main goal is to win the 400 m events he would also include training for the 400 m event while running the indoor season. If I understood 's reason for running the 800 m was to increase his endurance (more mitochondria) so that he would have a better kick at the end of his 400 m event. If I am correct, then needs to improve his lactate training and not necessarily his strength. > Best Regards > Nick Tatalias > Johannesburg Nick I enjoy this dialogue and am looking forward to your comments. ====================================== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 22, 2008 Report Share Posted January 22, 2008 Hi Ralph The post by about muscle types in power lifters and weightlifters being predominantly type IIa and not much type IIb work against your argument that adaption to type IIa would need to take place on the track. By training for extended periods using these weight training techniques the muscle fibres were adapting to type IIa in any event. In other words the Type IIb muscles developed where developing mitochondrial growth to respond to the increased metabolic demand of training. Because as you sate the type IIb muscles have basically enough energy to support themselves at rest they were growing mitochondria to deal with the intensity of training. This adaption will happen with continued weight training. With regards to my question about energy systems I was getting into little circles, however I thought that on the slide show that Dan posted the Lactate to Pyruvate cycle was shown intramuscular as well as extramuscular (namely the Cori cycle in the liver). I may have got the wrong end of the stick of course, but I thought that it showed this happening in the mitochondria. Back to text books it a long ago that I read that stuff. I understand from the article reference you posted the point they make about efficiency and the transfer of lactate threshold from bike to running and swimming did not happen at the same level, although in my opinion lactate threshold in the trained athlete would have been much higher in the new sport than an untrained athlete and the adaptions would proceed faster (both from a body point of view and the likely hood that a trained athlete would apply the high intensity training to the new form). " From Seiler's Time Course of Training adaptations http://home.hia.no/~stephens/timecors.htm ). " " When the cyclists were divided into a " low " and " high " LT groups (66% vs 81% of maximal oxygen consumption), it was found that the two groups differed considerable in the years of *cycling training* (2.7 compared to 5.1 years on average). However, they did not differ in years of *endurance training* (7-8 years of running, rowing etc.) When the low cycling LT and high cycling LT groups were asked to perform a lactate threshold test while running on a treadmill, the two groups were no longer different. Measured while running, the lactate threshold in both groups averaged over 80% of VO2max. Similarly, if you are a runner and decide to add swimming and cycling to your training and compete in triathlons, you will immediately recognize that your running fitness does not immediately transfer to the bike, and of course not to the water! " Your argument from this appears to be that if adaption in one event happens that this does not transfer to another, thus improved efficiency in the gym may not transfer to the track, yet I continue to contend that would benefit from both types of training, so long as the intensity of weight training did not interfere with the track work. You could then taper the work load into the week of the competition, a bit like you would taper for a power lifting meeting with very little training in the week of the key races. In my opinion the track work is allowing the development of efficiency on the track to be enhanced by increased strength developed in the gym and by training this for a long enough period the adaption to type IIa will be enhanced. Having spent the time to develop the strength to let the strength go away (I remember reading studies after a 6 month training period pointing to a 4 week drop of of strength to levels way below gain and similar to base line levels). You also suggest running stairs as an alternate strength gaining technique. Are gains accumulated by running stadium stairs similar enough to running on a flat track to gain the efficiency you seek, will they transfer better than weight training gains or are stairs different enough to track running to have the same level of transfer as gym work? If 's race is this week I would probably not lift this week after Tuesday. Regards Nick Tatalias Johannesburg South Africa > > --- Nick Tatalias <nick.tatalias@... <nick.tatalias%40gmail.com>> > wrote: > > > Ralph > > > > I'm not sure that I made myself clear in the posts, > > no-one is asking > > not to do time on the track and I'm certain that his > > coach would be doing > > intervals, however I'm fairly certain that since > > has worked hard > > developing strength in the off season that has > > contributed well to improved > > running, and that he should maintain that strength > > in manner that best > > relates to the use of type II muscle fibre. > > I did understand that you were advocating that > supplement his track work with weight lifting. > > The point I was trying to make was that instead of > spending time in the gym lifting weights 1 or 2 > sessions a week, that time should be spent on the > track or running hills. The energy used for weight > lifting should be used to run the hills, as > suggested, or running up stadium stairs as I have seen > other athletes doing. In this way any strength gained > through running hills or stairs will be more sports > specific. > > If has enough energy to lift weights after a > track training session or on his recovery day then, in > my opinion, he is not training hard enough when he is > on the track or running the hills. > > Many years ago (mid 1980s) there was an excellent > article in Bicycling magazine which stated that " Too > many athletes do not train hard enough on their hard > days and train too hard on their easy days " . > > I guess it comes down to a matter of coaching > philosophy as much as anything else. > > In my opinion, the most important aspect of training > is adequate recovery between training sessions. This > point has also been emphasized in other > posts,recently, concerning training load and how much > is too much. Anything that interferes with recovery > detracts from the benefit of the previous training > session and diminishes the training intensity for the > next training session. > > Professional athletes and elite amateurs (with the > luxury of sponsorship and therefore no need to do > anything other than train), have plenty of time to > rest, recover etc. > > Most amateur athletes, such as , have other > responsibilities, such as class, work, etc which adds > to the stress of their lives and compromises full > recovery. These other activities also limit the time > to train as well using precious energy resources. The > stress of these activities has to be added to the > overall stress of training and need to be taken into > account when designing a training program. > > In the off season resistance training is a good > alternative and a good change of pace. During the > pre-season training period the intensity of training > at an individuals chosen specialty has to be > significantly higher than it will be during the > competitive season. > > If your goal is to be the fastest man or woman on the > track then every effort, in my opinion, should be > spent on the track developing speed by running short > high intensity intervals or building running strength > by running hills or stairs. > > > My in season programme last somewhere between 20 and > > 45 minutes. Twice or > > three times per week depending on how close to the > > race day. > > I, believe that stated that his first race is > March 25 if I am not mistaken. So we are still > discussing the pre-season training sessions. > > Once the training season is over and the competitive > season starts it is even more important that all > energy should be geared towards the race and non > running days should be dedicated to recovery. > Resistance training on these days would, in my > opinion, hinder full recovery. > > > With regards to anaerobic vrs aerobic usage, these > > are interesting, however > > I often wonder how many of the aerobic markers > > relate to the body trying to > > catch up the anaerobic expenditure of energy. In > > the 100m sprint for > > instance in a 10 second burst, who would imagine > > that aerobic systems are > > challenged at all, but 20 odd percent of bio markers > > indicate aerobic work - > > perhaps due to the body catching up with the > > anaerobic muscle performance, I > > would have thought the same for the 400, except that > > because the race goes > > on longer there is longer for the aerobic systems to > > get involved in > > processing the anaerobic work of the muscles. The > > reason I believe this is > > that in order to move the body body powerfully and > > fast the work must > > involve significant contributions from type II a & b > > muscles. Type IIb have > > very little aerobic contribution, but would load the > > systems with products > > from anaerobic energy systems. Type IIa muscle are > > much more capable of > > converting anaerobic products and using glycogen for > > restoring the ATP > > resulting in markers of apparent aerobic > > respiration. Any comments? > > I think that their is a major flaw in the above > statements. > > I think it is important here to review some points > about energy production in muscle fibers, as I > understand it. And please excuse me if I am being > redundant but I think that it is important that I do > this to make my point. > > All muscle fibers, (I,IIA,IIB,) produce some energy > anaerobically. > > - The first step in energy production is called > alactic anaerobic energy production. > > This involves PCR and ATP which are present at the > initiation of an activity. There is ATP in small > amounts available in the muscle fiber and this allows > the initiation of muscle contraction. As this is > depleted the PCR regenerates the ATP. This occurs in > all muscle fibers (I,IIA,IIB,) . There is no Pyruvic > acid produced nor is there lactate production. > > There is generally enough to PCR to last about 5-7 > seconds. > All muscle fibers (I,IIA,IIB) go through this step. > > - The next step in energy production is the use of > glucose to maintain the supply of ATP. This is, as > you know, the glycolytic pathway. > > This also begins at the initiation of activity but it > takes a little longer than the alactic energy > production. (one reason for warming up before an > activity). > > During this phase, as was discussed in an earlier > post, the end result is ATP plus either pyruvic acid > or lactate. > > All muscle fibers (I,IIA,IIB) also go through this > step. > > -The next step is where we apparently we differ in our > understanding of the energy producing process. > > This is known as the fork in the road. In the presence > of adequate O2 pyruvate is produced and this enters > the Krebs cycle located in the mitochondria. > In the absence of adequate O2 lactate is produced. > > Lactate cannot be utilized in any muscle cell unless > it is re-converted to Pyruvate and becomes part of the > Krebs cycle. > > In order to further metabolize Lactate it must either > be re formulated into glucose via the Cori cycle or it > must be re-formulated into Pyruvate and enter the > Krebs cycle. > > Muscle cells do not have the necessary mechanism to > run the Cori cycle. There are other tissues that can > do this and the primary organ is the liver. > > It is important to note at this point that even in > " anaerobic conditions " the muscle cells do have a > small amount of stored Oxygen attached to myoglobin. > This allows for some aerobic chemical reactions even > in the face of relative " anaerobic conditions " . > > As stated previously IIB fibers only have enough > mitochondria to maintain the fiber at rest. For this > reason IIB fibers are for practical reason incapable > of utilizing lactate for energy. The lactate in these > fibers must exit the fiber and enter the blood steam > (how else would you account or the rising blood > lactate levels during high intensity work?). > > With appropriate training stimulus IIB fibers become > IIA fibers. What distinguishes the two fiber types is > mitochondrial density. IIA fibers have many > mitochondria and IIB have minimal mitochondria. > > IIA fibers are in fact aerobic fibers. They have the > same ability to produce energy aerobically as do Type > I fibers. > > What then distinguishes Type I fiber from IIA is their > innervation (slow twitch vs fast twitch) and > mitochondrial density. Type I have considerably more > mitochondria than do IIA. > > So both I and IIA fibers can utilize lactate in the > mitochondria for energy production. > > The best way, in my opinion, to increase the IIA > fiber's mitochondrial density is through high > intensity interval training on the track. > > As pointed out by 's post in OL and Power lifters > have a preponderance of type II fibers are IIA with very > few IIB. I suspect this occurs with many years of > long intense workouts. (see Seiler's Time Course of > Training adaptations > http://home.hia.no/~stephens/timecors.htm ). > > However I believe that specificity of training is > extremely important. That was why I stated that > needs to turn his lifting strength into running > strength. > > > I agree that intervals are good, some good studies > > on that > > topic were just recently posted. I'm still convinced > > that appropriate time in the gym is > > important. If is going to run the 400m hurdle > > later this year, I'm > > not sure that he should drop to much explosion from > > his work out and > > continue with speed work. If the 800m indoor season > > is part of development > > for that race, then the whole season needs to be > > kept in balance. > > In my opinion the best way for to maintain his > explosiveness would be to do a lot of 30 meter > starting intervals from the blocks. Specificity in > training is extremely important. > > I would also imagine that if 's main goal is to > win the 400 m events he would also include training > for the 400 m event while running the indoor season. > > If I understood 's reason for running the 800 m > was to increase his endurance (more mitochondria) so > that he would have a better kick at the end of his 400 > m event. If I am correct, then needs to improve > his lactate training and not necessarily his strength. > > > Best Regards > > Nick Tatalias > > Johannesburg > > Nick I enjoy this dialogue and am looking forward to > your comments. > > Ralph Giarnella MD > Southington Ct USA > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.