Guest guest Posted January 10, 2008 Report Share Posted January 10, 2008 Ed White wrote: Interesting results, but... 2) Numerous studies have shown that for beginners one set is as productive as multiple sets in terms of strength and muslce gains. Casler writes: The confusion relating to these results stems from the " concept " of SuperCompensation as opposed to Corresponding or Direct Compensation. In a training application used for a beginner, the inital results are predicated on an untrained capacity and level of stimulus, that will quickly produce the largest training results (relatively) for most people. So implementing a High Intensity model should produce a high percentage result at that level. Once the trainee reaches a higher strength level, it becomes virtually impossible to maintain the " single set " model. For example if you reach the level where you can squat 400# x 10, it would be very risky to select that load as a single set, and expect not only to not injure yourself, but to be systemically prepared to take that load to a stimulus that would produce a result. Ed White wrote: 3) Performing three sessions per week of multi-sets to failure and beyond seems like a sure recipe for overtraining. Forced reps and other extended set techniques are not appropriate for use every training session. Casler writes: Your training to recovery capacity is individual, and predicated on many elements. I have not seen anyone here suggesting multisets to failure 3 x a week of the same exercise actions, so this is a rather clear strawman. Regards, Casler TRI-VECTOR 3-D Force Systems Century City, CA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.