Guest guest Posted September 21, 2008 Report Share Posted September 21, 2008 Dr. Dyck discusses CMT (and hope) The following article is excerpted from the keynote address Dr. Dyck gave at the Second International Conference on Charcot- Marie-Tooth disorders in June, 1987. The conference was sponsored by the NFPMA and Columbia University. (See The NFPMA Report, Vol. 1, #3.) My interest in inherited neuropathy began in 1962. I began to see patients in a valley of the Mississippi River, the Zumbro River, which flows into Lake Pepin. This kindred lived in the small villages and farms of that area and it turned out that investigators from the University of Minnesota had done genetic studies in this region some fifty years earlier. I pursued Ed Lambert's discovery of low nerve conduction in inherited neuropathy. We now know much more about inherited neuropathy than we did twenty-five years ago. Unfortunately much more remains to be discovered about inherited neuropathy. When we began our studies the question was why are conduction velocities low in inherited neuropathy? Lambert had made the observation that they sometimes were low, and secondly that they might serve as a marker of Charcot-Marie- Tooth syndrome. We asked a series of questions. Why was nerve conduction low? Did all kindreds with peroneal muscular atrophy have such low nerve conductions? Are the nerves enlarged in peroneal muscular atrophy? Why? Since nerve has fibers of different functional and size classes, which classes were especially vulnerable to disease? Was the neuron, or the axon, or the Schwann cell, or the myelin selectively involved? What were the three dimensional alterations along the nerve fiber? We also asked what was the metabolic abnormality in these diseases? Were the syndromes with peroneal muscular atrophy distinctly different? Were they from different mutant genes? What was the role of environmental factors? What were the gene loci (chromosome locations)? Are there specific treatments in these disorders? The reason for listing these questions is to show that progress has been made in the last twenty-five years. We have answers for many of these questions. Since I began my studies in inherited neuropathy we have learned a lot. We know that peroneal muscular atrophy is not one disease but several diseases. We have learned a considerable amount about how the disorders can be detected and characterized. The disorders known as Charcot-Marie-Tooth syndrome may also be referred to as forms of Hereditary Motor and Sensory Neuropathy, or HMSN. Some are directly inherited from an affected parent to one-half of the children (dominantly inherited). Others are recessively inherited (25% of the children from unaffected parents) and still others are inherited (sons) from an unaffected mother (sex-linked). There are different disorders even within these different inheritance patterns. Low nerve onductions are a useful marker for some disorders but not for others. The approximate chromosome and gene localization is known for two varieties of HMSN, HMSN-lb and sex linked HMSN. We now have some understanding of the structural changes in nerve which account for the clinical symptoms and abnormality of nerve conduction. In HMSN-1 all classes of nerve fibers are affected. There is an abnormality of redistribution of enzymes and other macromolecules along the length of the fiber. The nerve fiber appears to develop normally, then prematurely begins to atrophy. This atrophic condition appears to begin in the feet and legs. With atrophy there is myelin remodeling. Repeated de- and remyelination is involved in developing a microscopic abnormality called the onion- bulb formation and enlargement of the nerve. Disturbed electrical phenomena are associated with fiber atrophy and myelin re-modeling. Low nerve conductions, in general, relate to the severity of the clinical deficits. The evidence for myelin remodeling and for the occurrence of secondary demyelination also came from studies of uremic neuropathy, Friedreich's Ataxia (a recessively inherited disorder also associated with peroneal muscular atrophy) and an experimental study of the nerves above the site of the amputation of the legs in cat and man. Several lines of evidence convinced us that demyelination (breakdown of the fat and protein insulation of a nerve fiber) could, in some cases, be due to axonal atrophy. The reasons were: (1) demyelination was clustered on certain fibers-presumably those with atrophic axons, (2) demyelination was more frequent in more proximal aspects of nerve- distally fibers had undergone degeneration, and (3) in transverse sections of nerve the caliber of axons relative to myelin thickness was decreased as compared to normal. To prove our hypothesis we amputated legs of cats and evaluated nerve fibers above the amputations at various times after injury. Even by four months the frequency distribution peaks of myelin fiber diameters had shifted to smaller diameter categories. By one year this atrophic trend was clear. By two years the findings were very striking; an atrophic process had occurred. We could reproduce all of the changes that we had seen in uremic nerves. After injury the following sequential changes had taken place: axonal atrophy, myelin wrinkling, paranodal or internodal demyelination, remyelination, and with further atrophy axonal degeneration. Our model had proven what we had suspected from the human observations. Axonal atrophy may cause myelin remodeling. A new insight which has come from our recent studies is the important role of environmental factors in the clinical manifestations of HMSN. This should not have been a surprise since it was already clear from both experimental study and human neuropathy that environmental factors do play a role in the expression of mutant genes. For example, in porphyria the clinical disorder is not expressed until you give the patient a barbiturate. In the case of Refsum's disease, a peroneal muscular atrophy with excessive storage of phytanic acid, deleting phytanic acid from the diet can improve nerve function. So in those two genetic diseases, there is clear evidence that the environment does make a difference. It may also make a difference to the symptoms of HMSN neuropathy. We have not talked about this yet, but physicians should make very careful distinctions between the symptoms which a patient has, the deficits which he has and the accompanying neurophysiological abnormalities. The physician should further make a distinction between conduction velocity on one hand and abnormalities of amplitude and distal latency on the other hand. They do tell you different things. Even though there is an association among them, they do represent different pathophysiological mechanisms, obviously related. Let's deal with the issue of burning feet. When I first began to see patients with burning feet, it often occurred to me that perhaps they were neurotic patients, old age patients who had hurting feet and were complainers. But as I began to see these patients, I recognized that sometimes their symptoms were inherited. When I studied some of the older members of such a family, there was unequivocal evidence of neuropathy. That was an important insight for me because here the deficit was not the problem, but the symptom was a major problem. A secretary from Phoenix, AZ came to see me because of burning feet without evidence of neuropathy. We did extensive autonomic and other tests and even nerve biopsy, all of which were normal. Her father, however, who had had burning feet, clearly had some signs of the electrophysiological abnormality of neuropathy, as did an uncle. The issue which was of such great interest to me was that environmental factors related to that symptom. For example, if the girl was in Minnesota, where it's cool and wonderful and placid, she did not have burning feet. In Arizona, where it's hot and they have only asphalt, she had a lot of pain. In other words, the thermal condition which her feet were exposed to affected her symptoms. Her uncle who plowed the fields found that he could get relief for his symptoms by taking off his shoes and walking in the cold furrow. In the winter time he would put his feet up against the wall to get relief. So think carefully when you see a patient with these symptoms, because you might be able to ameliorate them. I have had patients coming from San Francisco who ran twenty miles a day. By reducing that to five miles a day they can live with their feet with their mild inherited neuropathy. So mechano-sensitivity is something you can modulate...it's an important issue, I think, that we should be thinking very carefully about modulation of neurophysiological activity which may give symptoms. Sabin and Swift had a patient with leprosy, lepromatous leprosy. That is sensory loss in both hands. The man developed a stroke, so one arm was paralyzed. It was the other arm that developed the mutilating acropathy. So here was an example of a patient who had the same degree of sensory loss bilaterally, but it was the use and abuse that led to the complications. So quite a different idea came to me about how people develop the mutilation. ... Not only is it the sensory loss, which may be trivial, but it's how you use your limbs, what precautions you take, whether you are indifferent to your injuries and whether you neglect trivial injuries. So you have an accumulation of trivial injuries which lead to these terrible complications. That is where all of us come in, because these are preventable troubles. Some of the major complications, the plantar ulcers, the Charcot joints are preventable. The patients who have inherited neuropathy should know that this is a failure of taking proper precautions. In the Quebec and Virginia kinships that we studied, we found that it was the males that had the problem. The women looked after their feet, they did not walk in the frozen nights of Virginia and the crates of chickens did not fall on their feet. The outcome was strikingly different due to different environmental factors, but the sensory loss was the same. So a very important message to patients and to us: prevent these kinds of complications. The environment does influence the expression of these genetic abnormalities by what we do and what we advise. We wrote an article on the factors that may be involved. I want to end up with what one tells the patient with inherited neuropathy. First of all, tell the truth. When I first began as a neurologist at Mayo Clinic I asked Millikin, " What do I do? " He said, " Tell the truth. " That is not bad advice. I find that many physicians are kind of playing games with patients and there is no reason why you cannot tell the truth. The truth is generally better than the anticipation of an anxious patient. Second point: tell the patient about the disorder. Tell them what you know. When you do not know, say, " I don't know what you have. " If you think the patient has inherited neuropathy, tell the patient what you need to do to be sure. A little candor can go a long way. Tell them about the outlook. Some physicians follow the practice of sending the child out of the room while the disease is discussed with the parents. Don't do this! This practice sends the child a message that he must have something terrible that can't be talked about with him present. You can always talk about the outlook of a disease if you do it honestly. Many physicians paint much too gloomy a picture. They have been brainwashed by the textbooks. The textbooks tell the worst story. The truth is usually better than the textbooks by a long shot. You may have noticed that our slides, our textbook pictures showed only the worst cases, but 95% of cases have less abnormality than demonstrated in lectures and chapters. Tell them about the outlook. The outlook is excellent in most cases. They can go to school, they can marry, they can have children. Why not? Why should they not have children? Some of the best people I have known have Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Tell them about what they should do. In my experience, they all want to be geologists or foresters. Well, try to persuade them to pursue other jobs. They should go to school and learn something else which also would be worthwhile, besides it might be fun. Tell them about how their disease is inherited. Do not go simply by the phenotype; base it on the examination of the relatives. You may need to examine the parents, the children, the uncles, and the aunts. Get them to come in. Do not get someone in San Francisco to do it, do it yourself. If you do not adequately advise about inheritance, a legal problem may ensue. I have known of cases where doctors have told patients that they had an inherited neuromuscular disease but have failed to provide enough information about the implications for the descendants. The physician could be perceived as having been negligent if insufficient information was provided. To be the genetic advisor the neurologist should be able to explain Mendelian inheritance and the probability of involvement among offspring. Remember that in dominantly inherited HMSN-la and -b and also in HMSN- 11, although the probability is that 50% of offspring of a person with the disorder will be affected, a lesser percentage will have the severity of involvement that the parent has. On average the affected children are going to be less affected than the affected parent. That's good news. Physical fitness. Although we are all going to do the definitive study and Wally Bradley has just told me about an excellent design, we know that physical fitness is good for patients, have had HMSN patients who were the tennis champ of Indiana or the winning bicyclist of Iowa. They seem to have clearly helped themselves with exercise. Physical fitness also helps control weight. Diet. There is no evidence that diet has anything to do with this disease. So, except for the amount of calories, there is no information. Vitamins. Don't waste your money; it's been tried for fifty years. It never did any good. Unless you are B-1 2 deficient, are a lactating mother or were a prisoner of war, you do not need exogenous vitamins. Excessive B-6 vitamin can cause neuropathy! Ultimately, the point I want to make is to provide hope. That is what being a physician is about. When you talk to patients with this disorder, tell them that for most patients with HMSN the life expectancy is normal. Some of the life insurance companies do not seem to be aware of this fact! The fact is that life expectancy for most of these patients is normal. There are many worthwhile things to do. " Ask not what the country can do for you, but what you can do for the country. " Most patients with HMSN should hold jobs. Many patients with HMSN are too concerned about their disease. There are some mighty good things they can do for others, and it also minimizes their concern about themselves. Tell them you don't want to see them for ten years, no, twenty years. You see, what that tells them is that they are not on a precipice, they are not about to fall off. Yes, you will see them in a year, but get across the idea that there is nothing to be alarmed about. There is hope in that the people here are going to tell us where the CMT genes are, and are going to find the specific proteins, and are going to find the specific treatment for the disease. So there is considerable hope that the causes of HMSN will be delineated in the next few decades and good prevention and treatment will become available. Already there is a great deal that can be done symptomatically! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.