Guest guest Posted February 2, 2004 Report Share Posted February 2, 2004 In a message dated 2/2/04 5:07:40 PM Eastern Standard Time, s.fisher22@... writes: > this concept fascinates me and i've not yet decided what to believe. anyone > else have an opinon on this? Yes-- it's bogus. If that were true, why can we replicate diseases by injecting said viruses or their toxins into an animal? Moreover, why can we isolate the *toxins* developed by these organisms and cause disease/physiological malfunction? Sure, being in a bad state of health and having bad tissue will attract organisms to eat that crappy tissue-- say, as in tooth decay-- but these organisms are well established as harmful and capable of reaping havoc on the body-- hardly the body's " tool. " Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2004 Report Share Posted February 2, 2004 In a message dated 2/2/04 8:42:40 PM Eastern Standard Time, karenr@... writes: > I don't think he can prove this, but Aajonus says the toxins produced > by infections are easily eliminated and not damaging when the proper > amount of raw fat is in the diet. Not sure how long it would take to > get to that status since most of us haven't been eating the fats we > require until relatively recently. But is there any reason at all to believe what he says has any grounding in reality? Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2004 Report Share Posted February 2, 2004 At 05:07 PM 2/2/04 -0500, you wrote: > > >>There's a school of thought that colds and viruses aren't a matter of >> " " , but that the toxic condition requires the use of >>viruses to aid in the detox process. Jim West who has written an >>article on >>SARS on the WAPF site, is a major proponent of this theory. Aajonus >>Vonderplanitz similarly says that viruses have solvent-like properties and >>aid in the detox process. > > this concept fascinates me and i've not yet decided what to believe. anyone > else have an opinon on this? No opinion of my own, but I'm very interested in that of others - having picked up two " bugs " in the last six weeks, the first in three years. >so, you believe that colds/viruses are a result of a " healthier " body >detoxing? If it truly is somewhat attributable to a detox process, that makes sense for my own recent experience (and a bit of a relief). I thought the whole thing was odd anyway, a detox connection would put a whole new light on it, if true. I mean, REALLY ... eat crap and do all sorts of other unhealthy things for 2-1/2 years, " see the light " and make appropriate changes over six months and THEN start getting sick all the time? Ick. Yuck. Say it ain't so, Joe. MFJ Some days the bear will eat you, some days you'll eat the bear. ~Joan Armatrading Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2004 Report Share Posted February 2, 2004 > >If it truly is somewhat attributable to a detox process, that makes sense >for my own recent experience (and a bit of a relief). I thought the >whole thing was odd anyway, a detox connection would put a whole new light >on it, if true. I mean, REALLY ... eat crap and do all sorts of other >unhealthy things for 2-1/2 years, " see the light " and make appropriate >changes over six months and THEN start getting sick all the time? Ick. >Yuck. Say it ain't so, Joe. >MFJ mfj - what is your name? or do you prefer " mfj? " ? in the past six months since you've improved your diet, have you added anything that you weren't eating before, such as dairy? or increased your consumption of anything? >Some days the bear will eat you, some days you'll eat the bear. ~Joan >Armatrading what a blast from the past - i used to love joan armatrading :-) Suze Fisher Lapdog Design, Inc. Web Design & Development http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze3shjg Weston A. Price Foundation Chapter Leader, Mid Coast Maine http://www.westonaprice.org ---------------------------- " The diet-heart idea (the idea that saturated fats and cholesterol cause heart disease) is the greatest scientific deception of our times. " -- Mann, MD, former Professor of Medicine and Biochemistry at Vanderbilt University, Tennessee; heart disease researcher. The International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics <http://www.thincs.org> ---------------------------- > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2004 Report Share Posted February 2, 2004 Hi Suze, > so, you believe that colds/viruses are a result of a " healthier " >body detoxing? It's a tenet of homeopathic philosophy that if the body has a crisis to deal with, it will defer dealing with more chronic issues. I've noticed this in my own experience, when I'd be in some crisis and suddenly not getting my usual migraines during that time. The body seems to prioritize things, and there may be times when it sees fit not to appropriate the resources to deal with ongoing toxic exposures. Maybe with a lot of us being in chronic states of adrenal stress, the body is more or less in fight-or-flight and not interested in doing its regular housecleaning. Aajonus Vonderplanitz says that viruses are solvents produced when dying/decaying tissue is too toxic for bacteria or parasites to consume them. Viruses dilute the waste and spread them out throughout the bloodstream. That's why viral detoxification is usually more debilitating and produces more uncomfortable symptoms. He says that people generally lack the nutrients necessary to regularly enter into major detoxification like colds and flu. Especially in toxic environments, bodies need major detox regularly. I've got more notes on the toxic model of infectious disease, next installment :-) - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2004 Report Share Posted February 2, 2004 At 06:02 PM 2/2/04 -0500, you wrote: >mfj - what is your name? or do you prefer " mfj? " ? Ah, sorry, been meaning to do something about that. My name would be Jewett, I'm just so used to using my initial in sigs and sech that I forget that it might confuse people that don't already know me. I answer to , Felicia, Yard Chick, Butch Girl, Paint Girl, Hey Goombah, Cooking Lady, and occasionally You Over There. > >in the past six months since you've improved your diet, have you added >anything that you weren't eating before, such as dairy? or increased your >consumption of anything? Let's see. I guess you can say I switched over from SAD - SAD including quite a good bit of alcohol and nicotine (major failing - Sam Cherry Wheat!). It started with the hypothyroid thing - I started eating a bit more meat, fish, eggs, cheese, salads ... was really pissed off about all my favorite veggies being " off-limits " , namely brassicas. I also made a serious effort to get my food from better sources - got lots of grass-fed meats, etc., and did a de-cluttering in my refrigideezer and pantry, removing anything remotely resembling a processed food and substituting better stuff (i.e. let's toss the Van de Kamps fish fillets and make a nice variety of dumplings with shrimp and my own-grown veggies and grass-fed meats - and use those as " fast food " instead). Got seriously into sprouting at that point too, for vegetable intake. At that point, I also started avoiding the usual things that people should avoid - processed/refined grains, bread, pasta, etc. About two months ago, started working with a naturopath, who pretty much told me that diet-wise, I was already going down the right path, just do a little more of this, a little less of that. He added a whole bunch of supplements based on some blood work - I think I'm taking everything under the sun right now, but most of it has to do with some " temporary " things that the blood work pinpointed - like liver/gallbladder stress, toxin load, and things of that nature. I'm really looking forward to getting that whole detox/stress thing under control, would be nice to not have to pop 35 capsules a day, not to mention the iodine and CLO. It was actually kinda funny ... after the bloodwork came back, and he added all sorts of detox's and antioxidants and sech ... oh, trust me, I KNEW it was working. Broke out like crazy, all sorts of other things going on .... man, that stuff was gonna get out of me any way it COULD! Was amusing for a while - 40 and Zitted! But, so, yeah, that's why I perked up at a detox/immune connection. So far none of my experience nor any of the tests done indicate any sort of major immune system malfunction on my part ... but yep, was pissed at that cold and the one flu I got. >>Some days the bear will eat you, some days you'll eat the bear. ~Joan >>Armatrading > >what a blast from the past - i used to love joan armatrading :-) Whaddaya mean USED to, Little Missy? MFJ Some days the bear will eat you, some days you'll eat the bear. ~Joan Armatrading Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2004 Report Share Posted February 2, 2004 Suze - I forgot to note that I started eating *all* raw dairy just before Christmas. Had already switched to raw milk cheese, but just prior to Christmas is when I got the source for raw milk and pastured poultry/eggs, etc. I went absolutely nuts drinking the raw milk at first (remember that constipation topic? LOL), I've since cut back a bit on the consumption, but what I DO drink is all raw. So I'd say that I've increased the milk consumption, but the rest is pretty much just a case of getting better stuff than what I was before (i.e. pastured v. Perdue). MFJ Some days the bear will eat you, some days you'll eat the bear. ~Joan Armatrading Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2004 Report Share Posted February 2, 2004 When I ate junk I was sick ALL THE TIME. I have to emphasize this. After I switched to a healthier diet, I didn't get sick at all, until I went back to eating some less than ideal foods, so I guess I'm backwards according to the detox theory. I did get a few bumps the first week, and lost a lot of weight, but that was a positive! take care, Michele >From: " F. Jewett " <mfjewett@...> >Reply- > >Subject: Re: Detox and Immune Suppression >Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 17:36:58 -0500 > >At 05:07 PM 2/2/04 -0500, you wrote: > > > > >>There's a school of thought that colds and viruses aren't a matter of > >> " " , but that the toxic condition requires the use of > >>viruses to aid in the detox process. Jim West who has written an > >>article on > >>SARS on the WAPF site, is a major proponent of this theory. Aajonus > >>Vonderplanitz similarly says that viruses have solvent-like properties >and > >>aid in the detox process. > > > > this concept fascinates me and i've not yet decided what to believe. >anyone > > else have an opinon on this? > >No opinion of my own, but I'm very interested in that of others - having >picked up two " bugs " in the last six weeks, the first in three years. > > >so, you believe that colds/viruses are a result of a " healthier " body > >detoxing? > >If it truly is somewhat attributable to a detox process, that makes sense >for my own recent experience (and a bit of a relief). I thought the >whole thing was odd anyway, a detox connection would put a whole new light >on it, if true. I mean, REALLY ... eat crap and do all sorts of other >unhealthy things for 2-1/2 years, " see the light " and make appropriate >changes over six months and THEN start getting sick all the time? Ick. >Yuck. Say it ain't so, Joe. > > > > >MFJ >Some days the bear will eat you, some days you'll eat the bear. ~Joan >Armatrading _________________________________________________________________ Let the new MSN Premium Internet Software make the most of your high-speed experience. http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-us & page=byoa/prem & ST=1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2004 Report Share Posted February 2, 2004 Suze- >this concept fascinates me and i've not yet decided what to believe. anyone >else have an opinon on this? It's an interesting theory, but though specific research into it hasn't really been done, it has several serious show-stopping problems. Infections further weaken previously-healthy tissues and organs, particularly when the infectious organism produces toxins designed specifically to harm its host. (Anthrax is a good example.) If you think of this as a Hegelian dialectic, the simplistic original theory of disease is the synthesis, the simplistic all-organisms-are-beneficial theory is the antithesis, and a melding of the best parts of each is (or more properly will be) the synthesis. Obviously the health and quality of the " terrain " as it's often called is very important. A healthy person is going to resist an awful lot more than an unhealthy person, so the idea that exposure is the only real factor in transmission is absurd. But even though there are obviously many different beneficial organisms (an idea which is only just beginning to make real headway in medical circles) various organisms are infectious, resilient and harmful to different degrees; the idea that they're all our happy little helpers is just as ludicrous as its opposite. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2004 Report Share Posted February 2, 2004 So then here's another theory, tell me if it's completely ludicrous or not ... .... in my specific example, is it possible that any additional stress caused by the detox process increased my susceptibility at the time to other cooties? ( " cooties " being another wonderful word) At 07:25 PM 2/2/04 -0500, you wrote: >It's an interesting theory, but though specific research into it hasn't >really been done, it has several serious show-stopping >problems. Infections further weaken previously-healthy tissues and organs, >particularly when the infectious organism produces toxins designed >specifically to harm its host. (Anthrax is a good example.) If you think >of this as a Hegelian dialectic, the simplistic original theory of disease >is the synthesis, the simplistic all-organisms-are-beneficial theory is the >antithesis, and a melding of the best parts of each is (or more properly >will be) the synthesis. Obviously the health and quality of the " terrain " >as it's often called is very important. A healthy person is going to >resist an awful lot more than an unhealthy person, so the idea that >exposure is the only real factor in transmission is absurd. But even >though there are obviously many different beneficial organisms (an idea >which is only just beginning to make real headway in medical circles) >various organisms are infectious, resilient and harmful to different >degrees; the idea that they're all our happy little helpers is just as >ludicrous as its opposite. > > MFJ Some days the bear will eat you, some days you'll eat the bear. ~Joan Armatrading Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2004 Report Share Posted February 2, 2004 - >... in my specific example, is it possible that any additional stress >caused by the detox process increased my susceptibility at the time to >other cooties? Sure... theoretically. A lot of toxins get stored away in the body, and it can be risky to mobilize them, even if the ultimate result is their elimination. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2004 Report Share Posted February 2, 2004 Hi , >>Infections further weaken previously-healthy tissues and organs, particularly when the infectious organism produces toxins designed specifically to harm its host. (Anthrax is a good example.) I don't think he can prove this, but Aajonus says the toxins produced by infections are easily eliminated and not damaging when the proper amount of raw fat is in the diet. Not sure how long it would take to get to that status since most of us haven't been eating the fats we require until relatively recently. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2004 Report Share Posted February 2, 2004 @@@@@@@@@@@ I don't think he can prove this, but Aajonus says the toxins produced > by infections are easily eliminated and not damaging when the proper > amount of raw fat is in the diet. Not sure how long it would take to > get to that status since most of us haven't been eating the fats we > require until relatively recently. > > - @@@@@@@@@@@@@@ ah, the good 'ol " Aajonus says... " ! gotta love it!!! ROFL!! (this is not meant as an insult to you ; it just cracks me up everytime I see this phrase... my translation is " In one of Aajonus' daydreams the thought arose... " ) Mike SE Pennsylvania Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 3, 2004 Report Share Posted February 3, 2004 (i.e. let's toss the Van de Kamps fish fillets and make a nice > variety of dumplings with shrimp and my own-grown veggies and grass- fed > meats - and use those as " fast food " instead). Oooh! This caught my eye. One of the problems I have is that I just get the munchies and don't want to spend the time preparing something. I just have to munch right away. Some of the things I currently munch on are crispy nuts or cheese with butter, but I would love to find something a little more meat focused. I'm doing a low carb diet and cheese and nuts both have carbs so if I could make something up ahead of time to snack on with less carbs, I'd be happy. Would you be willing to point me towards some recipes. Dumplings are just not something my family ever made so I'm not very familiar with them. Ghislaine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 3, 2004 Report Share Posted February 3, 2004 <<<<Would you be willing to point me towards some recipes. Dumplings are just not something my family ever made so I'm not very familiar with them. Ghislaine >>>> WHen I was cutting back on the carbs, I used to take leftover cooked chicken, or some lunch meat, and wrap it up in a piece of lettuce. Sometimes I put mustard or mayo inside, but plain was just fine too. _________________________________________________________________ Check out the coupons and bargains on MSN Offers! http://shopping.msn.com/softcontent/softcontent.aspx?scmId=1418 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 3, 2004 Report Share Posted February 3, 2004 Well, I'm not sure that the wrapper (essentially pasta) is terribly apropos for a purist, but I never claimed to be one. I've collected a few different recipes from here and there over the years and tend to stick with just a few favorites. I'll send you some off-list in the next couple of days (as soon as I get a block of time to type 'em out). Else you could simply rifle through any decent Asian cookbook. Or try foodtv.com, there are probably a bunch of them there too. I tend to be partial to Shui Mai (sp?) and a ginger-chicken one I grabbed out of the Washington Post a few years ago. Another thing I did was make a whole bunch of mini-crustless quiches, different flavors, using raw milk cheese and sech - I had some of those really weenie little muffin pans from when I catered a friend's wedding lo those many years ago - baked 'em up and popped them in the freezer, look! More " fast food " !. I'm sure it would work just as well using a regular-size muffin pan, too, I just like the little ones 'cause they're cute. That's about as far as I've gotten in my " snack " freezer stocking - although I plan to do some mini-eggrolls or something too, as soon as I get time. Basically I just looked at the insta-food I had in the freezer, tossed the gross stuff and replaced it with better versions. Again, some of it isn't exactly purist, but it's still better than what I had before. At 04:12 PM 2/3/04 -0000, you wrote: >(i.e. let's toss the Van de Kamps fish fillets and make a nice >> variety of dumplings with shrimp and my own-grown veggies and grass- >fed >> meats - and use those as " fast food " instead). > >Oooh! This caught my eye. One of the problems I have is that I just >get the munchies and don't want to spend the time preparing >something. I just have to munch right away. Some of the things I >currently munch on are crispy nuts or cheese with butter, but I would >love to find something a little more meat focused. I'm doing a low >carb diet and cheese and nuts both have carbs so if I could make >something up ahead of time to snack on with less carbs, I'd be happy. > >Would you be willing to point me towards some recipes. Dumplings are >just not something my family ever made so I'm not very familiar with >them. > >Ghislaine MFJ Some days the bear will eat you, some days you'll eat the bear. ~Joan Armatrading Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 3, 2004 Report Share Posted February 3, 2004 At 09:18 AM 2/3/04 -0700, you wrote: ><<<<Would you be willing to point me towards some recipes. Dumplings are >just not something my family ever made so I'm not very familiar with >them. > >Ghislaine >>>> > > >WHen I was cutting back on the carbs, I used to take leftover cooked >chicken, or some lunch meat, and wrap it up in a piece of lettuce. >Sometimes I put mustard or mayo inside, but plain was just fine too. > > I've done similar things - was always a big fan of Italian-type subs. Now I just take the meat and cheese and onions and roll it up and eat it that way, instead of in the bun. Did that last night, as a matter of fact. One thing I can pretty much guarantee I will blow as far as pasta etc. goes is pierogi. I just refuse to give that up. I'm the only person in my family that still makes it, and well ... I suppose I should probably avoid making a bunch of the potato ones, but .... mmmmmmm .... cabbage and bacon. Mmmmmmmmm. Eeesh, now I'm making myself hungry again! MFJ Some days the bear will eat you, some days you'll eat the bear. ~Joan Armatrading Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 3, 2004 Report Share Posted February 3, 2004 > Well, I'm not sure that the wrapper (essentially pasta) is terribly apropos > for a purist, but I never claimed to be one. Ahhh, okay. I was assuming you were making them without a wrapper. Sort of like a quenelle which is something else on my " try to make someday " list. I do have a recipe for sausage cheese bites that are low carb. I found them to be a bit messy due mainly to grease from the cheese. I'd love to see your recipes though I'd have to think hard about the wrappers. From a purely low-carb point of view I could use tofu skin, but the soy makes me nervous from an NT standpoint. Sometimes it's really hard to merge the two and still feel satisfied. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 3, 2004 Report Share Posted February 3, 2004 >>ah, the good 'ol " Aajonus says... " ! gotta love it!!! ROFL!! (this is not meant as an insult to you ; it just cracks me up everytime I see this phrase... my translation is " In one of Aajonus' daydreams the thought arose... " ) Hehe. yeah, it seems that " Aajonus says " more times than anyone else " says " , for some odd reason. I think his " sayings " are worthy of consideration, as some of them have worked for me. Not to swallow them whole or bolt them like raw meat ;-) - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 3, 2004 Report Share Posted February 3, 2004 At 05:12 PM 2/3/04 -0000, you wrote: >Ahhh, okay. I was assuming you were making them without a wrapper. >Sort of like a quenelle which is something else on my " try to make >someday " list. I do have a recipe for sausage cheese bites that are >low carb. I found them to be a bit messy due mainly to grease from >the cheese. I'd love to see your recipes though I'd have to think >hard about the wrappers. From a purely low-carb point of view I >could use tofu skin, but the soy makes me nervous from an NT >standpoint. Sometimes it's really hard to merge the two and still >feel satisfied. Actually, now that I think about it (thanks for spurring that little lightbulb), I'm sure you (and therefore also I) could just make little meatball-y things out of the filling and just steam or pan-fry those, sans wrapper. Good idea! (Won't work for the pierogi though - lol) MFJ Some days the bear will eat you, some days you'll eat the bear. ~Joan Armatrading Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 3, 2004 Report Share Posted February 3, 2004 Since we were discussing fast food.....one thing I have made in the past which was VERY convenient for breakfasts......was to take eggs, sausage, cheese, onions, and anything else you find yummy........poured the mixture in a greased muffin tin, and cooked up little egg muffins. I heated them up real quick in the morning....tossed on a bit of salsa....mmmm...they were good! I found the recipe on a low carb site, but don't remember which one. E _________________________________________________________________ There are now three new levels of MSN Hotmail Extra Storage! Learn more. http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-us & page=hotmail/es2 & ST=1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 3, 2004 Report Share Posted February 3, 2004 use the fourth stomach of a cow, very tender and thin, yet won't fall apart like pasta wrappers. also easily obtained for free. Mike SE Pennsylvania > > Well, I'm not sure that the wrapper (essentially pasta) is terribly > apropos > > for a purist, but I never claimed to be one. > > > Ahhh, okay. I was assuming you were making them without a wrapper. > Sort of like a quenelle which is something else on my " try to make > someday " list. I do have a recipe for sausage cheese bites that are > low carb. I found them to be a bit messy due mainly to grease from > the cheese. I'd love to see your recipes though I'd have to think > hard about the wrappers. From a purely low-carb point of view I > could use tofu skin, but the soy makes me nervous from an NT > standpoint. Sometimes it's really hard to merge the two and still > feel satisfied. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 3, 2004 Report Share Posted February 3, 2004 In a message dated 2/3/04 8:38:59 PM Eastern Standard Time, s.fisher22@... writes: > can you expand on that a little? i'm not sure how that counters the concept > as karen explained it. as i understand her explanation, the healthier you > are the better able you are to deal with viruses/toxins. and the way the > body deals with these is fever, etc. I fully agree with that, but so does pretty much everyone on the planet, except the people who oppose the germ theory of disease, among whom is counted Aajounus, by the way you've described his theory to me. so if someone is getting healthier and > they are getting fevers more often, it may be that their body is more > efficiently responding to the invading virus/toxins. I doubt that, but perhaps. > that doesn't seem to indicate that replicating viruses and causing illness > by injecting them is not possible or even probable. No, it doesn't. But *that* in turn, has nothing to do with the theory that infections are not actually infections, but mechanisms of the body to deal with poor tissues. > aajonus stating ( " aajonus says! " ) something to the effect that parasites > make us healthier by cleaning out diseased tissue. perhaps it's " dose > dependent " ? keep in mind that some " parasites " are now being used to treat > IBD - not because they consume diseased tissue, but rather that they > stimulate the immune system, and the body repairs itself. either way, the > role of " parasites " is not as clear as it once was. Sure, but that isn't the theory that oppose the germ theory of disease. If Aajounus doesn't oppose the germ theory, then fine, his position might be reasonable. But if his position is that infectious are not causes of disease and do not cause harm, but only fulfill good functions, he is out of his mind. Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 3, 2004 Report Share Posted February 3, 2004 At 10:46 AM 2/3/04 -0700, you wrote: >Since we were discussing fast food.....one thing I have made in the past >which was VERY convenient for breakfasts......was to take eggs, sausage, >cheese, onions, and anything else you find yummy........poured the mixture >in a greased muffin tin, and cooked up little egg muffins. I heated them up >real quick in the morning....tossed on a bit of salsa....mmmm...they were >good! I found the recipe on a low carb site, but don't remember which one. Yep, that's pretty much what I did with those little mini-quiches. Although I'll admit I haven't really eaten many of them since I'm back on an omelette kick LOL ... get enough eggs that way. Salsa on top. Huh. I used to make a lot of salsa for Ex-Boy (probably 75% of all garden space was devoted to those ingredients to keep up with his consumption!), but stopped. I think I'll put that on the list of things to do again this year, even if it DOES make my sissy laugh at me for planting tomatillos again. You get used to doing certain things, for reasons that made sense at the time (or even sometimes for no real reason at all) ... then something pops up to make you think about it again, and realize that the old reasons no longer exist, so gee, maybe you oughtta expand your horizons a bit more again. Just a month or so here has given me all sorts of new ideas ... :) (see? stellar company!) MFJ Some days the bear will eat you, some days you'll eat the bear. ~Joan Armatrading Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 3, 2004 Report Share Posted February 3, 2004 At 08:12 AM 2/3/2004, you wrote: >This caught my eye. One of the problems I have is that I just >get the munchies and don't want to spend the time preparing >something. I just have to munch right away. You might try making Jerky (recipe in the Files section). Great travel snack! -- Heidi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.