Guest guest Posted February 5, 2004 Report Share Posted February 5, 2004 Suze- >i would be interested in any comments on his >products to " manufacture " healthy soil. btw - he uses Mycorrhizal Fungi, >which someone else mentioned is a " living " soil enhancer. OK, let me clarify. I'm talking about manufacturing fertile, healthy soil from scratch, not aiding natural processes in the soil. We already know to add manure, certain kinds of clay, and various other amendments, all provided conditions are appropriate, but compared to manufacturing something from scratch all on our own, or even anything remotely close to it, that's doing practically nothing. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 5, 2004 Report Share Posted February 5, 2004 Idol wrote: > OK, let me clarify. I'm talking about manufacturing fertile, healthy > soil from scratch, not aiding natural processes in the soil. We > already know to add manure, certain kinds of clay, and various other > amendments, all provided conditions are appropriate, but compared to > manufacturing something from scratch all on our own, or even anything > remotely close to it, that's doing practically nothing. Why does it matter? We can't manufacture wood from scratch, but we can still get enough wood to mass-produce furniture by aiding natural processes in the soil, which is every bit as good. If we can culture vast quantities of microorganisms that increase soil fertility, who cares whether we can duplicate it in a test tube? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 5, 2004 Report Share Posted February 5, 2004 >> OK, let me clarify. I'm talking about manufacturing fertile, healthy >> soil from scratch, not aiding natural processes in the soil. We >> already know to add manure, certain kinds of clay, and various other >> amendments, all provided conditions are appropriate, but compared to >> manufacturing something from scratch all on our own, or even anything >> remotely close to it, that's doing practically nothing Actually a lot of the current " mass manufacturing " processes now are done with micro-organisms ... I think they are using bacteria to produce insulin now, for instance. And silkworms mass-manufacture silk, and have done so for a long time. Bio-manufacture is pretty easy and cheap ... no minimum wage on buggies and they reproduce readily ... -- Heidi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 5, 2004 Report Share Posted February 5, 2004 - >Why does it matter? Simply because it's what we were talking about. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 5, 2004 Report Share Posted February 5, 2004 Heidi- >Actually a lot of the current " mass manufacturing " processes now >are done with micro-organisms ... OK, fair point, but we're now able to make some organisms produce some single compounds. Fertile soil is an entire ecosystem unto itself -- it's a very, very complex compound substance. Assuming technology proceeds apace it'll eventually be in our power to produce, but not within the next couple generations. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 5, 2004 Report Share Posted February 5, 2004 Idol wrote: > - >> Why does it matter? > > Simply because it's what we were talking about. As far as I can tell, you're the only one who was talking about it. The original question, IIRC, was whether we could mass-produce fertile soil. Then, under your guidance, it morphed into a question of whether we could manufacture it, with you narrowing down the definition (I see a pattern here) of " manufacture " to exclude anything involving the use of certain naturally-occurring processes. Supposing that you're on the same page as everyone else, though, I'm still curious as to why you would be talking about it. I don't see why this question is at all meaningful. What matters is whether we can produce good soil efficiently and in large quantities using all available tools, not whether we can produce it with some arbitrary limit on the type of tools we can use. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 5, 2004 Report Share Posted February 5, 2004 ---Just when I thot things were getting boring(not purky like yesterday) a good topic comes around. We been making soil out here the last seven seasons and next year we're going to add fungi and other beneficials to the crop residue to produce it even faster. Don't know how fast though. Need more testing. Dennis In , Idol <Idol@c...> wrote: > - > > >Why does it matter? > > Simply because it's what we were talking about. > > > > > - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 6, 2004 Report Share Posted February 6, 2004 >---Just when I thot things were getting boring(not purky like >yesterday) a good topic comes around. We been making soil out here >the last seven seasons and next year we're going to add fungi and >other beneficials to the crop residue to produce it even faster. >Don't know how fast though. Need more testing. Dennis So how fast can you produce it? What are the raw materials? Can it be done on a mass scale? -- Heidi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2004 Report Share Posted February 9, 2004 --- Heidi those are good questions. Just using livestock, crop residue and the little critters already in healthy soil. Can mass produce in a sense but not in a bldg. It's happening in the field with crop residue and moisture as raw material when soil temperature is favorable. Essentially composting in the field. Course the nutrients taken out with the harvest would need consideration. Not sure what the net gain or loss of nutrients is. Dennis In , Heidi Schuppenhauer <heidis@t...> wrote: > > >---Just when I thot things were getting boring(not purky like > >yesterday) a good topic comes around. We been making soil out here > >the last seven seasons and next year we're going to add fungi and > >other beneficials to the crop residue to produce it even faster. > >Don't know how fast though. Need more testing. Dennis > > So how fast can you produce it? What are the raw materials? > Can it be done on a mass scale? > > -- Heidi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 10, 2004 Report Share Posted February 10, 2004 >Heidi those are good questions. Just using livestock, crop residue >and the little critters already in healthy soil. Can mass produce in >a sense but not in a bldg. It's happening in the field with crop >residue and moisture as raw material when soil temperature is >favorable. Essentially composting in the field. Course the nutrients >taken out with the harvest would need consideration. Not sure what >the net gain or loss of nutrients is. Dennis Thanks! That sounds like what I heard they are doing in India. They are gaining topsoil at a nice rate, and growing good crops, using composting techniques. In one book I read, a person digs a trench between the rows of plants and buries garbage there as one goes -- a combination of garbage disposal and soil renewal in one. Sounds awfully efficient on both counts. -- Heidi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.