Guest guest Posted February 3, 2004 Report Share Posted February 3, 2004 In a message dated 2/2/04 11:58:12 PM Eastern Standard Time, bberg@... writes: > In fact, I've just > thought of another reason why the soil fertility argument is bogus. If > you just extract the refined oil and compost the rest, there's no loss > of fertility. Everything except the oil, which is just carbon, hydrogen, > oxygen, and solar energy, goes right back into the soil. That's exactly what I said several posts ago, but unfortunately, when responded that the oil was the most " energy-dense, " it escaped me that none of the energy actually comes from the soil. > By the way, does anyone here actually know what it is that makes soil > fertile? It's rather complex, and it depends on your goals. If you want high yield, nitrogen will usually do the trick, and sometimes P and K, so in general NPK fertilizers are used. However, Albrecht has an enormous body of work showing that if your goal is healthy and nutritious plants, it's much more complex. The correct soil pH is important (usually slightly acidic), the breed of plant, the organic matter content of the soil, and organisms are all important (that convert elements into usable forms). That said, I think is wrong that you can't " manufacture " healthy soil. We perhaps haven't worked it out yet, but there's no reason that I see that you can't breed certain organisms like you breed worms in a worm bin. Also, even if you do it in closed doors, I'm sure the insects will find their way. Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 3, 2004 Report Share Posted February 3, 2004 Chris- >That said, I think is wrong that you can't " manufacture " healthy soil. >We perhaps haven't worked it out yet, but there's no reason that I see that >you can't breed certain organisms like you breed worms in a worm bin. Also, >even if you do it in closed doors, I'm sure the insects will find their way. I didn't say it's physically impossible, just that it's not possible with present technology and that science and technology would have to advance enormously to do it. (Of course, it partly depends on what you mean by " manufacture " , since you're talking about insects.) - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 3, 2004 Report Share Posted February 3, 2004 The horticulture industry has been breeding and packaging for sell to the landscape industry mycorrhiza for inoculating the roots of plants. It seems these naturally occuring fungi are in the soils (or should be) and populate roots in a symbiotic relationship with the plants that aid them in the uptake of nutrients. In my experience transplanted trees were more likely to survive (especially weak trees/or in adverse conditions) when properly inoculated. I wonder if there is any natural way to encourage mycorrhizal action in the soil? Amy Waters Re: Fuel oil from crops vs. sustainable agriculture (was ... Chris- >That said, I think is wrong that you can't " manufacture " healthy soil. >We perhaps haven't worked it out yet, but there's no reason that I see that >you can't breed certain organisms like you breed worms in a worm bin. Also, >even if you do it in closed doors, I'm sure the insects will find their way. I didn't say it's physically impossible, just that it's not possible with present technology and that science and technology would have to advance enormously to do it. (Of course, it partly depends on what you mean by " manufacture " , since you're talking about insects.) - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.