Productive Discussions-Explosive Exercise is pointless

[Guest guest]

Tom Rankin wrote:

While HIT has been popular with athletes in the past(any type of

strength training is better than no strength training), it's primary

focus is building muscle mass not increasing athletic performance.

Most of HIT famous spokesmen were bodybuilders not athletes. Limit

yourself to just one training dogma and you will limit your results.

Everything (even superslow) has its time and its place. It's not about

what's best, but what is most appropiate at the time.

Casler writes:

Excellent points Tom.

Somehow a few have developed a paranoia based on " philosophy " rather than

results.

I don't know any coach, trainer or athlete who would want to do any more

than needed to get the best result.

To think that we somehow have a " bias " to support a methodology, to be

" anti " some other applications is without reason.

Regards,

Casler

TRI-VECTOR 3-D Force Systems

Century City, CA