Guest guest Posted February 7, 2004 Report Share Posted February 7, 2004 This shouldn't be news to anyone, but it's nice to see it getting more coverage ..,. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A20147-2004Feb6.html?referer=email Business, Science Clash at Medical Journal By Shankar Vedantam Washington Post Staff Writer Saturday, February 7, 2004; Page A02 An analysis critical of the growing use of an expensive medicine used for dialysis patients was turned down by the most widely circulated medical journal in the field after its marketing department objected, according to an e-mail from the journal's editor to the article's author. Three senior scientists had reviewed the analysis and approved it for publication, ph Herman, executive editor of Dialysis & Transplantation, wrote to author Dennis Cotter, president of a nonprofit health research group in Bethesda. " Unfortunately, I have been overruled by our marketing department with regard to publishing the editorial, " Herman added. " As you accurately surmised, the publication of your editorial would, in fact, not be accepted in some quarters . .. . and apparently went beyond what our marketing department is willing to accommodate. " Cotter questioned whether patients benefited from increased doses of Epogen, which increases levels of red blood cells in patients with kidney problems. The federal government is considering whether to provide Medicare patients with higher doses of such treatments, which could cost hundreds of millions of additional tax dollars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.