Guest guest Posted February 4, 2004 Report Share Posted February 4, 2004 @@@@@@@@@@@@@@ > It could *lower* the total amount of dissolved particles due to the reduced > amount of water, but if you end up with the water replaced for any amount of > time I'd expect this to have little effect. > > Chris @@@@@@@@@@@@@@ I'm not sure we're on the same wavelength here. Your statement implies a relationship between volume of water and amount of dissolved particles, and that was precisely my point. The idea is that if water is being evaporated and replaced continually, then there would be a much larger volume of water throughout the stock- making process, hence more dissolved particles in the final stock. The counterargument is that the total volume of water is essentially constant at any given moment in time. I don't know enough chemistry to say which makes more sense. Mike SE Pennsylvania Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.