Guest guest Posted February 8, 2004 Report Share Posted February 8, 2004 slethnobotanist@... wrote: > On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 00:45:55 -0500 > Idol <Idol@...> wrote: >> Were pirates " government " ? Are muggers " government " ? Are churches >> " government " ? If you define government as " anything that uses >> compulsion " , then you're right. Otherwise, you're wrong. > > What I have said is that the problem with civil gov't mean is that it > has a _legal_ monopoly on the initiation of force, and such a > characteristic means it is unique among every other institution in > our society. To say otherwise is to only deny the obvious. Also, no one here is arguing that we should give more power to (freelance) pirates and muggers. Government is unique in that its use of compulsion is generally regarded as legitimate. Furthermore, I would argue that churches could be considered governmental entities to the extent that they used compulsion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2004 Report Share Posted February 9, 2004 > >slethnobotanist@... wrote: >> On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 00:45:55 -0500 >> Idol <Idol@...> wrote: >>> Were pirates " government " ? Are muggers " government " ? Are churches >>> " government " ? If you define government as " anything that uses >>> compulsion " , then you're right. Otherwise, you're wrong. >> >> What I have said is that the problem with civil gov't mean is that it >> has a _legal_ monopoly on the initiation of force, and such a >> characteristic means it is unique among every other institution in >> our society. To say otherwise is to only deny the obvious. > >Also, no one here is arguing that we should give more power to >(freelance) pirates and muggers. Government is unique in that its use of >compulsion is generally regarded as legitimate. > >Furthermore, I would argue that churches could be considered >governmental entities to the extent that they used compulsion. how does a church use compulsion? and isn't church membership strictly voluntary? Suze Fisher Lapdog Design, Inc. Web Design & Development http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze3shjg Weston A. Price Foundation Chapter Leader, Mid Coast Maine http://www.westonaprice.org ---------------------------- “The diet-heart idea (the idea that saturated fats and cholesterol cause heart disease) is the greatest scientific deception of our times.” -- Mann, MD, former Professor of Medicine and Biochemistry at Vanderbilt University, Tennessee; heart disease researcher. The International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics <http://www.thincs.org> ---------------------------- > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2004 Report Share Posted February 9, 2004 Suze Fisher wrote: >>> On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 00:45:55 -0500 >>> Idol <Idol@...> wrote: >>>> Were pirates " government " ? Are muggers " government " ? Are churches >>>> " government " ? If you define government as " anything that uses >>>> compulsion " , then you're right. Otherwise, you're wrong. >> Also, no one here is arguing that we should give more power to >> (freelance) pirates and muggers. Government is unique in that its >> use of compulsion is generally regarded as legitimate. >> >> Furthermore, I would argue that churches could be considered >> governmental entities to the extent that they used compulsion. > > how does a church use compulsion? and isn't church membership strictly > voluntary? Now, yes. It has not always been the case, though. For example, take the Spanish Inquisition (please!). At least, I assume that that's the sort of thing had in mind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.