Guest guest Posted January 31, 2004 Report Share Posted January 31, 2004 I thought that every one would find this of interest. http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsArticle.jhtml? type=healthNews & storyID=4243293 & section=news Arsenic Levels in Chicken Higher Than Expected Thu 29 January, 2004 20:24 By Merritt McKinney NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Young chickens may contain more than three times as much arsenic as other types of poultry and meat, researchers report. These levels are higher than previously believed and may need to be taken into account when determining what levels of overall arsenic exposure are safe, according to a report in the January issue of the journal Environmental Health Perspectives. The findings raise questions about arsenic exposure in the diet, but the results need to be confirmed, according to lead author Dr. Tamar Lasky of the National Institute of Child Health and Development in Bethesda, land. Although levels of arsenic in young chickens were higher than expected, this does not mean that people who eat chicken are at risk of consuming too much arsenic, Lasky told Reuters Health. " Most people do not eat amounts of chicken that would result in excessive arsenic exposure, " she said. Arsenic has been linked to an increased risk of several health problems, including bladder and lung cancer, heart disease, diabetes and birth defects. The chemical naturally occurs in groundwater. Arsenic is also found in some antibiotics approved for use in animals, so Lasky's team measured average arsenic concentrations in meat and poultry in the U.S. from 1994 to 2000. During that period, arsenic levels were three to four times higher in young chickens than in other poultry or animals. Even though arsenic concentrations were higher in young chickens than in other kinds of meat, the arsenic a person is exposed to by eating chicken is well below the maximum daily arsenic exposure recommended by the World Health Organization. A 154-pound person who ate 612 grams (more than 21 ounces) of chicken a day would still receive less than half of the daily arsenic limit from chicken, according to the report. Of course, chicken is not the only source of arsenic exposure. Lasky said that people's concern about arsenic in chicken may depend on how much chicken they consume, as well as on their other sources of arsenic exposure, such as in their water supply or on the job. But Lasky stressed that the study was the first attempt to estimate arsenic concentrations in poultry and meats, so the results must be validated with additional research. " If people are receiving higher levels of arsenic from chicken than previously thought, we may need to recalculate the amounts allowed in water, " she said. In the meantime, Lasky said that people who consume lots of chicken and are very concerned about their arsenic exposure may want to consider purchasing chicken that is raised without antibiotics. She noted that antibiotics are the major source of arsenic in chicken. SOURCE: Environmental Health Perspectives, January 2004. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.