Guest guest Posted February 7, 2004 Report Share Posted February 7, 2004 @@@@@@@@@@ Gene: > I'd bet that eating a Big Mac once a week is more harmful than > smoking a joint every day. @@@@@@@@@@ No way!!! If you eat three meals a day, then your one Big Mac meal is about 5% of your diet. When you think about the nutrient distribution in traditional diets with starches and things, you could get all your nutrition from maybe about only about 70% or so of a high-quality diet. As long as the other 30% doesn't screw you up, then you break even. Now, if 30% of your diet was Big Macs, about one per day, then the glycemic load of the bun, the sodium, and the concentration of chemical nasties in all the ingredients might be enough to set you back a little, but smoking a joint every day would probably set you back a fair bit too from densensitization to neurological effects, carcinogens, etc. I would imagine the joint would be much worse and the Big Mac would be in the neighborhood of daily coffee, depending on individual physiology. Now throw in some fries as part of the 30% and the trans fats and extra glycemic load might push things a bit closer to the joint. But I can't see any measurable negative effect from a weekly Big Mac if the other 95% was a decent NT diet, while a dialy joint's got to be bad news. I wouldn't be surprised if a weekly joint was harmless though, but I don't know enough about it. Can't say I've ever tried either one... Mike SE Pennsylvania Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.