Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Productive Discussions (HIT)

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

I would say that bias reflects some scientific credibility. HIT has some

use as a discrete training protocol and for training muscular endurance.

But to rely only on HIT for strength training for most applications

completely ignore the principle of specific adaptation.

Drew Baye wrote:

> W.G. writes:

>

> " Even a perfunctory read of the latest issue of the NSCA Journal will

> provide you with considerable evidence. You'll find no research

> supporting HIT training... "

>

> The only thing this provides " considerable evidence " of is the NSCA's

> anti-HIT bias.

>

> Drew Baye

> Orlando, FL

> www.baye.com

>

>

>

--

Hobman

Saskatoon, CANADA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...