Sex, love and reproduction--

[Guest guest]

wrote:

<<<<<In due respect to 's wishes and not to further antagonize, I won't

elaborate anymore than to say that normal to a biologist would be the

physiological way nature (or whoever) designed each species to achieve that end

process of reproduction. Percentages and bell curves just don't have relevance

to this stuff.>>>>>

, you are confounding love and sexuality with reproduction. Love is love;

sexuality is sexuality; reproduction is reproduction. To equate one with the

other simply defies reality, and is neither logical nor Biblical.

Chris

[Guest guest]

At 11:43 AM 2/17/04 -0500, you wrote:

> wrote:

><<<<<In due respect to 's wishes and not to further antagonize, I

won't elaborate anymore than to say that normal to a biologist would be the

physiological way nature (or whoever) designed each species to achieve that

end process of reproduction. Percentages and bell curves just don't have

relevance to this stuff.>>>>>

>

>, you are confounding love and sexuality with reproduction. Love is

love; sexuality is sexuality; reproduction is reproduction. To equate one

with the other simply defies reality, and is neither logical nor Biblical.

>

>Chris

>

I am SOOOOOOO changing my name.

MFJ

The

Queen of Amok

Defender and Wielder of All Things Flamingo

[Guest guest]

<, you are confounding love and sexuality with reproduction. Love is love;

sexuality is sexuality; reproduction is reproduction. To equate one with the

other simply defies reality, and is neither logical nor Biblical.

So is everyone else confounding - why do I have to be subject to different rules

than the rest. I think I have actually made some remarks of the need to qualify

terms such as what distinguishes the particular group in question. What is

meant when the term is used? Who is and who isn't? Until it is defined, all

the presenting arguments are going to continue to be confounding mixtures and

blends of these concepts.

Now, I am not the one who started using biology as a supporting defense of

homosexuality. And if we are talking biology, then sexuality and reproduction

are hardly confounded but go together.

Sex, love and reproduction--

wrote:

<<<<<In due respect to 's wishes and not to further antagonize, I won't

elaborate anymore than to say that normal to a biologist would be the

physiological way nature (or whoever) designed each species to achieve that end

process of reproduction. Percentages and bell curves just don't have relevance

to this stuff.>>>>>

, you are confounding love and sexuality with reproduction. Love is love;

sexuality is sexuality; reproduction is reproduction. To equate one with the

other simply defies reality, and is neither logical nor Biblical.

Chris