Guest guest Posted February 26, 2004 Report Share Posted February 26, 2004 Has anyone developed an 'adjusted' food pyramid that is more accurate (according to Nourishing Traditions research) for our daily dietary needs than the current USDA food pyramid? Or, would it be more appropriate to ask if there is a 'nutrient' pyramid for daily nutrient intake? ________________________________________________________________ The best thing to hit the Internet in years - Juno SpeedBand! Surf the Web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER! Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 26, 2004 Report Share Posted February 26, 2004 Hi- >Has anyone developed an 'adjusted' food pyramid that is more accurate >(according to Nourishing Traditions research) for our daily dietary needs >than the current USDA food pyramid? Or, would it be more appropriate to >ask if there is a 'nutrient' pyramid for daily nutrient intake? The Atkins people have a new food pyramid which is flexible based on exercise, but WAPF doesn't really believe in a pyramid or in prescribed macronutrient ratios. Here's the Atkins pyramid if you're interested, though -- it's fairly consonant with WAPF principles. http://atkins.com/Archive/2004/2/10-121449.html - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 26, 2004 Report Share Posted February 26, 2004 I should have noted the areas in which the Atkins pyramid is out of line with WAPF principles, principally its acceptance of soy (represented by tofu on the pyramid) and in its restriction of dairy to the second-highest level of the pyramid. However, while their pyramid does restrict grains to the top level, it allows a surprising amount for a low-carb regimen. At any rate, the important emphasis -- eat more fat, more vegetables, more animal products -- is in line with WAPF even if some of the particulars aren't. > >Has anyone developed an 'adjusted' food pyramid that is more accurate > >(according to Nourishing Traditions research) for our daily dietary needs > >than the current USDA food pyramid? Or, would it be more appropriate to > >ask if there is a 'nutrient' pyramid for daily nutrient intake? > >The Atkins people have a new food pyramid which is flexible based on >exercise, but WAPF doesn't really believe in a pyramid or in prescribed >macronutrient ratios. Here's the Atkins pyramid if you're interested, >though -- it's fairly consonant with WAPF principles. > >http://atkins.com/Archive/2004/2/10-121449.html - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 26, 2004 Report Share Posted February 26, 2004 >Has anyone developed an 'adjusted' food pyramid that is more accurate >(according to Nourishing Traditions research) for our daily dietary needs >than the current USDA food pyramid? Or, would it be more appropriate to >ask if there is a 'nutrient' pyramid for daily nutrient intake? I think a few people have ... but even on this list, people disagree as to what should be on said pyramid (i.e. everyone has their own). Might depend on your genetics too. I use the WD " pyramid " --- eat greens first, then protein, and vegies, then starch. And let your body decide how much of each it wants. And snack on fruit and raw vegies during the day. I personally think that if you restrict yourself to high-nutrient foods that you aren't intolerant to, your body will decide how much of what it wants. Some days I crave dried whole fish, some days rare steak, some days big piles of greens. Sometimes I just want grapefruit. It keeps changing ... -- Heidi Jean Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 26, 2004 Report Share Posted February 26, 2004 > Has anyone developed an 'adjusted' food pyramid that is more accurate > (according to Nourishing Traditions research) for our daily dietary needs > than the current USDA food pyramid? Or, would it be more appropriate to > ask if there is a 'nutrient' pyramid for daily nutrient intake? @@@@@@@@@@@ I would say question and reject the conceptual presuppositions of the " food pyramid " class of theoretical objects. Why a pyramid? Why not a circle, or a square, or a tree, or a queue, or a fruitcake, or a bipedal body? While you will find a macronutrient article on the WAPF site (overall a very nice article too) that might be roughly translatable into pyramidal terms, and you could certainly point to the actual practices of SF and other dietary role models, I think the essential WAPF/NT worldview precludes any dietary prescriptions narrow enough to be distilled in such a framework. I would say the essence is " Eat minimally processed foods from good sources and be sure to include animal foods; when in doubt let human traditions be your guide " . What is that in pyramidese? (Don't forget the breadth of the word " good " !) When you look at the incredible variety of ecologies and lifestyles our species thrives in, with the corresponding variety of diets, it is senseless to prescribe any universal proportions of macronutrients, animal foods, etc. Check out the quantitative and proportional diversity of NAPD. Here's another take: " Veggies and Meat. Veggies and Meat. Veggies and Meat. Other stuff as physiologies and circumstances permit or promote. " (Don't forget that " meat " can include oysters, tortoise liver, etc.) Humans can do great with low-fat or high-fat, 2% animal foods or 99% animal foods, no grains or high grains, no dairy or hedonistic kefir- centrism, no sea foods or mostly sea foods.... We are omnivores, opportuno-vores, and adapto-vores. Okay, I don't need to belabor the point! Mike SE Pennsylvania Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 26, 2004 Report Share Posted February 26, 2004 At 10:13 PM 2/26/04 -0000, you wrote: >(Don't forget that " meat " can include oysters, tortoise liver, etc.) Hmmmmm. I wonder if I could choke down tortoise liver. >We are omnivores, opportuno-vores, and adapto-vores. Would it give me the ability to make up cool words like that? Or does that come from the nutrients in other good sources? MFJ Any moment in which you feel like dancing is a perfect moment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 26, 2004 Report Share Posted February 26, 2004 Mike asks - " Why a pyramid? Why not a circle, or a square, or a tree, or a queue, or a fruitcake, or a bipedal body? Ha ha ha! How about a bowl? I read on WAPF site about four food groups not being so bad to begin with. And I'm sorry, but the present USDA scheme is no pyramid, it's a stinking triangle! - Deanna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 26, 2004 Report Share Posted February 26, 2004 > Mike asks - " Why a pyramid? Why not a circle, or a square, or a tree, or > a queue, or a fruitcake, or a bipedal body? > > Ha ha ha! How about a bowl? I read on WAPF site about four food groups not > being so bad to begin with. And I'm sorry, but the present USDA scheme is > no pyramid, it's a stinking triangle! - Deanna @@@@@@@@@@@ OOOOOOOh! You're right! Duh, why didn't I pick up on that! Yes, nothing but a stinking triangle! Thanks! " The USDA Food Triangle " Mike SE Pennsylvania Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 26, 2004 Report Share Posted February 26, 2004 @@@@@@@@@@ --- In , " F. Jewett " > Hmmmmm. I wonder if I could choke down tortoise liver. > > > >We are omnivores, opportuno-vores, and adapto-vores. > > Would it give me the ability to make up cool words like that? Or does > that come from the nutrients in other good sources? @@@@@@@@@@@@@ I can't take any credit for the second one; it's " out there " . The third one was improvised, but not so exciting... Mike SE Pennsylvania Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 26, 2004 Report Share Posted February 26, 2004 You know, the four food groups weren't really so ideal in that they lumped fruits and vegetables into one group. Most SAD folks need to up the veggies a great deal. And nuts/seeds aren't really ideal lumped with high protein sources, are they? Hmmm. Groups may well be better than shapes though, conceptually. Deanna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 26, 2004 Report Share Posted February 26, 2004 LOL... I've been b*tching about that for years! >From: " Anton " <michaelantonparker@...> >Reply- > >Subject: Re: food pyramid according to NT? >Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 23:05:56 -0000 > > > > Mike asks - " Why a pyramid? Why not a circle, or a square, or a >tree, or > > a queue, or a fruitcake, or a bipedal body? > > > > Ha ha ha! How about a bowl? I read on WAPF site about four food >groups not > > being so bad to begin with. And I'm sorry, but the present USDA >scheme is > > no pyramid, it's a stinking triangle! - Deanna >@@@@@@@@@@@ > >OOOOOOOh! You're right! Duh, why didn't I pick up on that! >Yes, nothing but a stinking triangle! >Thanks! > > " The USDA Food Triangle " > >Mike >SE Pennsylvania > > _________________________________________________________________ Find and compare great deals on Broadband access at the MSN High-Speed Marketplace. http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200360ave/direct/01/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.